Compare moats
Up to three covered companies, band by band. Every call is a curated editorial judgment, never a disclosed figure — and every band carries its cited basis.
| Cisco Systems | Cloudflare | nVent Electric | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moat rating | narrow The FY2025 10-K shows a moat that still pays but no longer compounds: total gross margin of 64.9% and remaining performance obligations of $43,533 million (up 6%) against a Networking product category that fell from $34,570 million in fiscal 2023 to $29,229 million in fiscal 2024 to $28,304 million in fiscal 2025, and a product gross-margin bridge in which 'Product pricing' subtracted 1.6 percentage points. All of the reported category growth came from Splunk-carrying lines - Security +59% and Observability +26%. Real and durable, but bounded: narrow, not wide. | wide The band is earned by a measured share gap on a hard-to-rebuild asset, not asserted. W3Techs' 17 September 2026 survey (w3techs.com/technologies/overview/proxy) puts Cloudflare in front of 25.8% of all websites, an 85.0% share of the reverse-proxy market, against Amazon CloudFront at 5.5%, Fastly at 3.0% and Akamai at 2.1% - roughly fifteen times the nearest rival. The FY2025 10-K filed 2026-02-26 describes what a challenger would have to reproduce to contest that: a network that 'spans more than 330 cities in over 125 countries worldwide and interconnects with over 13,000 networks globally', architected to 'run every service on every server in every city' - capacity and peering accumulated city by city over a decade, not bought in a quarter. The position has been monetised without margin decay: SEC XBRL fundamentals on this site show GAAP gross margin inside a 74.5-78.7% band in every fiscal year from FY2017 to FY2025 while revenue grew from $134.9M to $2,167.9M, and Cloudflare's Q4/FY2025 results release of 2026-02-10 (cloudflare.com/press/press-releases/2026/cloudflare-announces-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2025-financial-results/) reports remaining performance obligations up 48% and new annual contract value up nearly 50% year over year. What stops this being a certainty rather than a judgement: the dominant share sits in application services, while SASE and developer compute are contested by vendors the 10-K itself concedes hold 'substantially greater financial, technical, and other resources.' | narrow nVent's FY2025 Form 10-K (filed 2026-02-17) supports a real but limited edge. On the advantage side it describes "premier, industry-leading brands, some of which have a history spanning over 100 years" (nVent CADDY, ERICO, HOFFMAN, ILSCO, SCHROFF and TRACHTE), says the company is "recognized globally for quality, reliability and innovation", and lists "technical expertise, reputation for quality and reliability, timeliness of delivery, new product innovation, previous installation history, contractual terms and price" as what success depends on. Stored fundamentals from the same 10-K show gross profit of $1,075.2 million on $2,668.9 million of revenue in 2023, $1,209.1 million on $3,006.1 million in 2024 and $1,469.1 million on $3,893.1 million in 2025. An independent tracker places nVent in liquid cooling but not first: Dell'Oro Group (2026-01-08) wrote of "Vertiv leading the liquid cooling market and established players such as CoolIT, nVent, and Boyd maintaining strong market share positions". The limits are in Item 1A: "We compete in attractive markets with a high level of competition, which may result in pressure on our profit margins and limit our ability to maintain or increase the market share of our products"; "We compete with thousands of smaller regional and local companies that may be positioned to offer products produced at lower cost than ours"; and its intellectual property "may not provide us a significant competitive advantage". Branded, specified products with steady margins, in markets the company itself calls highly competitive, make a narrow moat. |
| Moat type | switching costs The durable piece is the contracted annuity attached to installed equipment: total remaining performance obligations of $43,533 million, of which $21,961 million is services and $21,810 million is long-term (recognised beyond twelve months), carried at a services gross margin of 68.5% that has risen for three consecutive years from 66.4% and 68.1%. Customers keep paying for support on gear they already run. | cost scale The FY2025 10-K states the mechanism outright, and it is a unit-cost curve rather than a user-to-user network: 'We have chosen to utilize this idle capacity to create a free tier of service which has generated substantial global scale for us. In turn, this scale makes us attractive partners for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) globally, which reduces our co-location and bandwidth costs. As our network grows, these dynamics become even more powerful.' The same section explains why the curve applies to every line rather than one: the architecture lets Cloudflare 'deploy standard, commodity hardware' and run 'every service on every server in every city', so a new product reaches 330+ cities at near-zero incremental capital. That is what lets the filing claim Workers is offered 'at prices that are highly competitive with public cloud vendors' while FY2025 GAAP gross margin still printed 74.5%. Switching costs (traffic routed through Cloudflare, DNS delegated to it) and threat-intelligence feedback from aggregate traffic sit on top, but the filing-stated primary source is cost falling as the network grows. | intangibles ip The source the 10-K points to is reputation and brand rather than lock-in or scale. Its success factors are "technical expertise, reputation for quality and reliability, timeliness of delivery, new product innovation, previous installation history, contractual terms and price", and it presents a portfolio of "premier, industry-leading brands, some of which have a history spanning over 100 years". It says "Patents, non-compete agreements, proprietary technologies, customer relationships, trademarks, trade names and brand names are important to our business", but also that "we do not regard our business as being materially dependent upon any single patent, non-compete agreement, proprietary technology, customer relationship, trademark, trade name or brand name", and Item 1A warns that intellectual property protection "may not preclude competitors from developing products similar to ours". Switching costs are not described in the filing beyond "previous installation history", and scale is not claimed as an advantage; the intangible is real but diffuse, which is part of why the rating is narrow. |
| Leadership | co leader The 10-K names no competitor and discloses no market share anywhere in Management's Discussion and Analysis. The positional facts it does give are scale and direction: Networking product revenue of $28,304 million in fiscal 2025 - by far the largest of its four categories - but down $6.3 billion from fiscal 2023, with channel partner financing volume falling from $32.1 billion to $27.1 billion to $24.9 billion across fiscal 2023-2025. | clear leader Leadership is measured, not inferred. W3Techs on 2026-09-17 records an 85.0% reverse-proxy market share against 5.5% for Amazon CloudFront and 2.1% for Akamai, and makes Cloudflare the largest authoritative-DNS provider at 18.5% of all websites versus 9.9% for the next-placed GoDaddy Group. The FY2025 10-K reports the enterprise side moving the same way - 4,298 large customers at 2025 year-end against 3,497 a year earlier and 2,756 in 2023 - and the Q4/FY2025 results release (cloudflare.com/press/press-releases/2026/cloudflare-announces-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2025-financial-results/) cites the largest annual contract value deal in company history at about $42.5M per year. The band is for the application-services core the share data covers; in SASE and in serverless compute Cloudflare is a challenger to larger incumbents, and no independent placement naming Cloudflare in those markets was obtained for this profile. | fast follower In liquid cooling the only independent ranking found puts another company first: Dell'Oro Group (2026-01-08, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/data-center-liquid-cooling-market-to-approach-7-billion-by-2029-as-ai-deployments-accelerate-according-to-delloro-group-302655848.html) wrote that "The competitive landscape is evolving rapidly, with Vertiv leading the liquid cooling market and established players such as CoolIT, nVent, and Boyd maintaining strong market share positions." In enclosures, the 10-K's statement that "We are an enclosures and liquid cooling leader in the U.S. and globally" is the company's own, and the same filing says "We compete against large and well-established national and global companies, as well as regional and local companies and lower-cost manufacturers." With Vertiv ahead in the one tracked category and no independent enclosure ranking, the band is fast follower rather than co-leader or leader. |
| Pricing power | moderate The product gross-margin bridge attributes fiscal 2025's 0.2-point improvement to productivity (+2.0 points) and mix (+1.1 points) while 'Product pricing' subtracted 1.6 points; a legal dispute with a supplier cost a further 0.8 points. Total gross margin of 64.9% (product 63.7%, services 68.5%) is held by cost and mix, not by price. | moderate Evidence cuts both ways, which is why this is not the top band. For it: GAAP gross margin has never left a 74.5-78.7% band across FY2017-FY2025 (SEC XBRL fundamentals on this site) even as revenue compounded 16x, and the Q4/FY2025 results release (cloudflare.com/press/press-releases/2026/cloudflare-announces-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2025-financial-results/) shows customers committing more rather than less - RPO +48% year over year and new ACV up nearly 50%. Against it: FY2025's 74.5% is the lowest reading in that nine-year series, a large permanent free tier anchors the entry price, the 10-K positions Workers 'at prices that are highly competitive with public cloud vendors', and the competition risk factor warns that larger rivals can 'sell products and services with which we compete at zero or negative margins, offer fee waivers and reductions or other economic and non-economic concessions', with competitive pressure that 'may result in price reductions, fewer subscriptions, reduced revenue and gross margin'. | moderate nVent has offset inflation with price, but gross margin has narrowed. Item 1A says "We strive for productivity improvements and implement increases in selling prices to help mitigate cost increases in raw materials, freight, energy, wage and other costs", and on the Q2 2026 call (https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-transcripts/2026/08/04/nvent-electric-nvt-q2-2026-earnings-call-transcript/) the CFO said "Price plus productivity offset inflation of more than $50 million including more than $30 million in tariff impact" and "Pricing is expected to offset the impact of inflation, including tariffs." Stored fundamentals from the FY2025 10-K show gross profit of $1,075.2 million on $2,668.9 million (2023), $1,209.1 million on $3,006.1 million (2024) and $1,469.1 million on $3,893.1 million (2025); the Q2 2026 release (https://s22.q4cdn.com/268397047/files/content_files/Q2-2026-NVT-Press-Release.pdf) shows gross profit at 37.9% of net sales against 38.6% a year earlier. The 10-K also warns that "economic downturns could adversely affect pricing as market participants compete more aggressively on price" and that some competitors "attempt to compete based primarily on price, localized expertise and local relationships." |
| Summary | The installed base still switches slowly - but the filing does not claim it is winning the AI datacenter on the strength of that base. The fiscal 2025 Networking decline is attributed to 'product shipments returning to normalized levels during the first half of fiscal 2025 from the elevated levels ... in the first half of fiscal 2024', to servers, and to 'a decline in campus switching' - normalisation, not disclosed share loss, so the whitebox/Arista thesis is not something this 10-K either confirms or denies. What the filing does disclose is the shape of the AI dollar Cisco is actually winning: Americas service provider and cloud growth 'driven by AI infrastructure revenue from webscale customers', funded by additional purchase commitments 'related to manufacturing Cisco Silicon One and other products to meet demand from webscale and other customers', which 'significantly increased our supply chain exposure, which has resulted in negative impacts to our product gross margin in recent periods and may result in further negative impacts in future periods'. Enterprise switching earns 63.7% product gross margin; webscale silicon costs margin to serve. The moat is intact where the annuity is and thin where the growth is. | Cloudflare sells security, performance and connectivity as services delivered from one global anycast network rather than from boxes at a customer's edge. The FY2025 10-K frames the market as a consolidation away from enterprises that 'string together a diverse set of on-premises hardware boxes from different vendors' and away from 'stringing together multiple point-cloud solutions that only address specific network needs', toward one integrated provider it calls the Connectivity Cloud, and places Cloudflare as 'a leader in this Connectivity Cloud category'. The economics are unusual: idle capacity funds a free tier, the free tier buys global traffic scale, that scale makes Cloudflare a peering partner ISPs want, and peering cuts colocation and bandwidth cost - a loop the filing says 'become[s] even more powerful' as the network grows. Independent measurement confirms where that loop has already settled the market: W3Techs on 2026-09-17 shows an 85.0% reverse-proxy share and the largest authoritative-DNS footprint at 18.5% of all websites. Commercially the company ended 2025 with roughly 332,000 paying customers in more than 190 countries and 4,298 large customers, up from 2,756 two years earlier, with no customer above 10% of revenue. The contested half of the story is the growth half: the SASE platform competes with established cloud-security, email-security and SD-WAN vendors, and the developer platform competes for storage and compute against hyperscalers, markets where the 10-K's own risk factors concede rivals have greater name recognition, larger customer bases and 'more mature products and services developed for large customers'. The core is defended; the adjacencies are being fought for, and FY2025 gross margin at a nine-year low of 74.5% is the first visible cost of building GPU capacity for that fight. | nVent makes electrical enclosures, liquid and air cooling, control buildings, switchgear, bus systems and electrical connection products, reported in two segments, Systems Protection and Electrical Connections (both renamed in 2025). The portfolio has been reshaped toward infrastructure: per the FY2025 10-K it bought ECM Industries (about $1.1 billion, 2023), Trachte (about $0.7 billion, 2024) and the Electrical Products Group of Avail Infrastructure Solutions (about $1.0 billion, 2025), and sold its Thermal Management business to a Brookfield affiliate for $1.6 billion in net cash proceeds. The 10-K says "We are an enclosures and liquid cooling leader in the U.S. and globally" and that Systems Protection products are "primarily used by hyperscalers, utilities, original equipment manufacturers, panel builders and contractors"; backlog rose to $2,349.9 million at 31 December 2025 from $749.3 million, "primarily the result of the acquisition of the Electrical Products Group and the growth of our data centers business". Independent support for the liquid-cooling position comes from Dell'Oro Group (2026-01-08), which named nVent among "established players" that are "maintaining strong market share positions" behind Vertiv, while noting that Aaon showed how hyperscaler partnerships "can quickly translate into market share gains". In the Q2 2026 release (2026-07-31) sales were $1,471 million, up 53% (47% organic), Systems Protection sales rose 70%, and the CEO said "new products contributed more than 30 points to sales growth". The limits are written into the 10-K: highly competitive markets, "thousands of smaller regional and local companies" that may produce at lower cost, large greenfield contracts "frequently subject to competitive bidding processes", a largest customer at about 11% of 2025 net sales, and intellectual property that "may not provide us a significant competitive advantage". Brands, specification history and a recognised liquid-cooling position give nVent a narrow moat. |
| Chain position | Supplies networking into AI datacenters: the 10-K ties Americas service provider and cloud growth to 'AI infrastructure revenue from webscale customers' and to Cisco Silicon One manufacturing commitments. | Cloudflare sits between end users and whatever hosts the application - origin data centre, public cloud or SaaS - so it is a control layer in front of infrastructure rather than infrastructure a workload runs on, which the 10-K argues is the point: customers 'concerned about being locked in to any one public cloud provider' want policy enforced by 'an independent and integrated services provider'. Two AI-era roles follow from that position. As a supplier, the filing describes 'ongoing deployment of graphics processing units (GPUs) across our global network of servers' behind Workers AI, Vectorize and AI Gateway, putting inference next to the user instead of in a region. As a gatekeeper, the application-services suite now exists in part to 'easily identify, block and control access from AI crawlers and AI agents and operators' and underpins announced efforts to let content creators monetise how those crawlers reach their work - which makes Cloudflare a toll point between AI model builders and the open web. | nVent supplies the electrical and thermal enclosure layer of AI data centres: the 10-K says its Systems Protection solutions protect mission-critical applications "including data centers" and are used by hyperscalers, and the Q2 2026 release says it "announced another manufacturing expansion for liquid cooling to meet continued data center demand." |
| Products (share / barrier) |
|
|
|
| Long-horizon vote | +0.13 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral Editorial prior, not backtested. | +0.38 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral Editorial prior, not backtested. | +0.06 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral Editorial prior, not backtested. |