Compare moats
Up to three covered companies, band by band. Every call is a curated editorial judgment, never a disclosed figure — and every band carries its cited basis.
| GitLab | Lattice Semiconductor | DigitalOcean | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moat rating | narrow The FY2026 10-K (year ended 2026-01-31) shows real expansion inside the installed base: 118% Dollar-Based Net Retention, Base Customers up to 10,682 from 9,893, customers above $100,000 of ARR up to 1,456 from 1,229, and $1.0 million ARR customers "to 155 from 123, an increase of 26%". But the filing concedes "limited barriers to entry" and names "Microsoft Corporation, which owns GitHub" as principal competitor. Retention decelerates (130% FY2024, 123% FY2025, 118% FY2026), and since DBNR is reported "on a threshold basis of 130%," the FY2024 figure is a cap and the slide is steeper than it looks. Narrow, not wide: expansion must be re-won against a bundled hyperscaler. | narrow Lattice holds long-lived, low-power sockets that an outside analyst calls sticky, and it kept its gross profit high through a sharp revenue fall. But each new customer product is competed for again, and the 10-K concedes larger rivals. William Blair's research initiation (2026-10-06, https://www.williamblair.com/News/Lattice-Semiconductor-Corporation-Research-Initiation) says 'Lattice has built a leadership position in the high-volume, sticky sockets where power efficiency is critical'. The FY2025 10-K's financial data (as carried in TradingPilot fundamentals) report gross profit of $340,400 thousand on revenue of $509,401 thousand in fiscal 2024, when revenue fell from $737,154 thousand in fiscal 2023. Against that, the same 10-K says 'The selection process for our products to be included in our customers' new products is highly competitive' and 'There are no guarantees that our products will be included in the next generation'. It also says many competitors 'have substantially greater financial, technological, manufacturing, marketing, and sales resources than us'. Operating income was $11,232 thousand in fiscal 2025. Narrow rather than wide, because the sockets are re-won each product generation against larger competitors, and no independent share figure was found. | none Customers can leave easily, and the FY2025 10-K (filed 2026-02-24) says so: 'The majority of our contracts with our customers are based on our terms of service, which do not require our customers to commit to a specific contractual period, and which permit the customer to terminate their contracts or decrease usage of our products and services without advance notice.' The 10-K also reports that net dollar retention, the measure of revenue kept and grown from existing customers, 'increased from 98% in 2024 to 100% in 2025'. It says larger competitors 'have substantial competitive advantages as compared to us', among them 'the ability to bundle products together' and 'larger and more mature intellectual property portfolios'. DigitalOcean itself owned six issued patents at December 31, 2025. The developer community, free support and simple pricing described in the 10-K attract customers but do not lock them in, so the rating is none. Longer AI contracts are new. The Q2 2026 results release (2026-08-04, https://investors.digitalocean.com/news/news-details/2026/DigitalOcean-Announces-Second-Quarter-2026-Financial-Results/default.aspx) reports the 'first nine-figure annual customer commitments with leading AI-Natives, extending weighted average contract life from 1.6 years to over 3 years'. These are too recent to change the call. No independent market-share figure was found. |
| Moat type | switching costs Stickiness comes from platform embedding, not IP. The 10-K rests differentiation on "our single platform with a unified data model," on "Consolidation of multiple tools into a single platform," and on deployment inside the customer's own perimeter for regulated buyers. Replacement means re-integrating a toolchain and re-certifying compliance. IP is the wrong label: only "16 issued patents and 25 pending patent applications," plus open-source licenses granting "broad permissions to use, copy, modify, and redistribute." The no-lock-in claim is the filing's own characterisation, footnoted to a Forrester study "commissioned by GitLab." | switching costs The lock is the design socket and the product's long life. The FY2025 10-K cites 'a commitment to product longevity, with a large number of Lattice devices having been supported in the market for over 20 years'. It says the sales team works to 'drive multi-generational design wins', and that Lattice still supports FPGA families 'that have been in market for more than a decade and still garner strong customer demand today'. William Blair (2026-10-06) calls the same sockets 'sticky'. The 10-K limits the lock to products already designed in: selection for customers' new products 'is highly competitive'. | none The 10-K shows no durable source of advantage. Contracts give low switching costs, since customers can end or cut usage 'without advance notice'. Scale favours rivals: 'We compete primarily with large, diversified technology companies that focus on large enterprise customers', which the 10-K names as AWS, Azure, GCP, IBM Cloud, Alibaba Cloud and Oracle Cloud. In AI it competes with the same large companies and 'smaller more infrastructure-focused companies such as Coreweave and Lambda Labs'. It also faces 'competition with larger cloud computing companies and other consumers with respect to high demand equipment, such as GPUs'. Its intellectual property is thin: six issued patents, and 'We use open source software in our services.' The nearest thing to an intangible asset is the developer community. Hacktoberfest drew 'over 56,000 developers completing over 87,000 contributions in 2025', and the 10-K presents the community as a way to win customers rather than a barrier that keeps them. |
| Leadership | fast follower The 10-K positions GitLab against a leader rather than as one: "Our principal competitor is Microsoft Corporation, which owns GitHub." Competition reads from the challenger side, differentiating "from GitHub through flexible deployment options that work within enterprise security and compliance requirements, LLM neutrality with self-hosted gateway support" and an open core model. On AI it follows: Duo Agent Platform went "Generally available in January 2026," the last month of the fiscal year. What keeps it a follower rather than behind is cadence, "a new version of our software every month for 172 months in a row," plus a regulated-deployment franchise a SaaS-first rival does not cover. | co leader William Blair (2026-10-06) calls Lattice 'a leader in low-power programmable silicon' with 'a leadership position in the high-volume, sticky sockets where power efficiency is critical'. It gives no share figure, and it notes that 'larger FPGA competitors' focus on compute-intensive work. The 10-K's 'Lattice is the low power programmable leader' is the company's own claim. Without a tracker's share number, and with larger rivals in the wider FPGA market, the band is co-leader rather than clear leader. | at parity By its own account DigitalOcean is not a leader. The 10-K names AWS, Azure, GCP, IBM Cloud, Alibaba Cloud and Oracle Cloud as its primary competitors. It says larger competitors have 'greater name recognition and longer operating histories, larger sales and marketing and customer support budgets and resources'. Among 'smaller and/or niche cloud service providers' it names 'OVHcloud, Akamai (Linode), Hetzner, Vultr, and Contabo'. Its products cover the same categories as the larger clouds (virtual machines, managed Kubernetes and databases, serverless functions, GPUs and inference), packaged for smaller customers: 'Our goal is to address the core needs of our customer base instead of offering thousands of complex products and services that are more suited to large enterprise companies.' Growth is speeding up: the 2026-08-04 presentation says Q2 2026 revenue grew 29%, 'more than double a year ago'. No third-party share figure was found, and nothing cited places DigitalOcean ahead of the smaller providers or close behind the large ones, so the band is at parity rather than fast follower. |
| Pricing power | moderate FY2026 gross margin was 87% against 89%, with cost of revenue up $35.6 million "primarily due to an increase of $18.4 million in third party hosting costs for SaaS and cloud usage," and management expects SaaS and Duo mix to bring costs that "may adversely impact our gross margins." Strain is explicit: GitLab "may be required to reduce our prices," competitors "may offer their products and services at a lower price or for free," and it "implemented user limits on our free SaaS product." Power retained: Premium lists at $29 per user/month billed annually, and seats bundle $12 and $24 of GitLab Credits. But "A majority of our subscriptions are on a one-year period." | moderate Gross profit has stayed high through the cycle. The FY2025 10-K's financial data (as carried in TradingPilot fundamentals) show gross profit of $514,670 thousand on revenue of $737,154 thousand in fiscal 2023, $340,400 thousand on $509,401 thousand in fiscal 2024, and $356,943 thousand on $523,262 thousand in fiscal 2025. The 10-Q filed 2026-08-04 shows $141,332 thousand on $201,079 thousand for the quarter ended 2026-07-04. William Blair (2026-10-06) says Lattice is 'replacing legacy small footprint FPGAs with higher-price Nexus 2 devices'. The 10-K's risk factors still warn that downturns 'can result, and in the past has resulted, in ... erosion of average selling prices'. | moderate Gross profit kept pace with revenue from 2023 to 2025 but fell behind in Q2 2026; the 10-Q says 'The decline in gross margin resulted from incurrence of costs for data center expansions in advance of the ramp in revenue from new data centers.' SEC XBRL data carried in TradingPilot fundamentals show gross profit of $397,497 thousand on revenue of $692,884 thousand in 2023, $465,943 thousand on $780,615 thousand in 2024, and $539,592 thousand on $901,427 thousand in 2025. The 10-Q filed 2026-08-04 shows $154,662 thousand on $281,184 thousand for Q2 2026, against $130,945 thousand on $218,700 thousand in Q2 2025. The 10-K warns that 'certain customers may demand substantial price concessions', that 'in the future we may be required to reduce our prices or develop new pricing models', and that customers 'may reduce their usage to lower-cost pricing tiers'. |
| Summary | GitLab sells a single-platform DevSecOps toolchain defended by workflow lock-in rather than intellectual property: a unified data model plus deployment flexibility, including single-tenant "Dedicated for Government with FedRAMP compliance," makes it hard to remove where data residency is contractual. The installed base expands: 118% Dollar-Based Net Retention, 10,682 Base Customers, 1,456 above $100,000 of ARR, 155 above $1.0 million (up 26%), over 70% of ARR from public sector and enterprise. The filing supplies the counterweight: "limited barriers to entry," Microsoft/GitHub as principal competitor, 16 issued patents. Retention (130 to 123 to 118, the 130 a cap), gross margin (89% to 87%) and a January 2026 AI launch point to compression at the commodity end. No source measures market share, so every share band is "unknown". | Lattice makes small and mid-range FPGAs that work as companion chips to a system's processors, or as primary processors, handling control, bridging, security and sensor connectivity in servers, communications gear, factories, cars and consumer devices. It competes on power and size rather than compute. William Blair says it 'specializes in low-power, small and midrange programmable silicon', while 'larger FPGA competitors focus on the compute-intensive market'. Distributors took approximately 84% of fiscal 2025 revenue, per the 10-K. In 2026 Lattice bought AMI for $1.65 billion, which William Blair says 'extends the company into platform firmware, security, and infrastructure manageability'. This profile rates the FPGA franchise described in the 10-K, not the newly acquired firmware business. | DigitalOcean rents cloud computing to developers, smaller technology companies and, increasingly, AI-native companies. Its products are Droplet virtual machines, storage and networking; managed Kubernetes, databases and hosting (the Cloudways business); GPU Droplets and bare-metal GPUs; and an inference and AI-agent platform. The FY2025 10-K says it aims at 'the portion of the cloud market whose needs are not fully met by larger cloud providers'. It sells through a self-service model, with free 24/7 support and 'highly predictable pricing that is the same across regions and usage volumes'. Annual run-rate revenue (ARR) grew from $723 million in 2023 to $820 million in 2024 and $970 million in 2025. About 21,000 Digital Native Enterprise customers, those spending more than $500 a month, supplied 60% of 2025 revenue, and the top 25 customers made up 10%. By mid-2026 the business was turning toward AI. The Q2 2026 earnings presentation (2026-08-04) shows revenue up 29% and AI Customer ARR of $234M, up 212% and equal to 21% of total company ARR. This profile rates no moat: customers can leave without notice, the main rivals are far larger, and the AI growth is too new to show staying power. |
| Chain position | GitLab sits at the software-tooling layer, not compute or models. It consumes third-party LLM capacity — marketing "LLM neutrality and support for self-hosted AI gateways, including air-gapped environments" — so it captures no model-layer economics and bears inference as COGS, visible in the $18.4 million rise in hosting costs. Its distinctive position is the regulated perimeter. | Layer-4 companion silicon: low-power FPGAs for control, security and connectivity beside processors in servers and communications gear, and in industrial, automotive and consumer systems, mostly sold through distributors. | Downstream cloud provider: rents CPU and NVIDIA and AMD GPU capacity (H100, H200, HGX B300; MI300X, MI350X, MI355X per the Q2 2026 presentation) from leased data centers to developers, smaller technology companies and AI-native companies. |
| Products (share / barrier) |
|
|
|
| Long-horizon vote | +0.06 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral Editorial prior, not backtested. | +0.13 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral Editorial prior, not backtested. | +0.01 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral Editorial prior, not backtested. |