Compare moats
Up to three covered companies, band by band. Every call is a curated editorial judgment, never a disclosed figure — and every band carries its cited basis.
| GitLab | MiTAC Holdings | Core Scientific | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moat rating | narrow The FY2026 10-K (year ended 2026-01-31) shows real expansion inside the installed base: 118% Dollar-Based Net Retention, Base Customers up to 10,682 from 9,893, customers above $100,000 of ARR up to 1,456 from 1,229, and $1.0 million ARR customers "to 155 from 123, an increase of 26%". But the filing concedes "limited barriers to entry" and names "Microsoft Corporation, which owns GitHub" as principal competitor. Retention decelerates (130% FY2024, 123% FY2025, 118% FY2026), and since DBNR is reported "on a threshold basis of 130%," the FY2024 figure is a cap and the slide is steeper than it looks. Narrow, not wide: expansion must be re-won against a bundled hyperscaler. | none The 2025 annual report (English version filed with TWSE on 2026-05-08) shows fast growth without a protected position. Revenue rose about 72% to NT$105.577 billion while gross profit rose 63%. One customer, Customer A, took 67% of 2025 net sales, up from 56% in 2024, and one supplier, Supplier C, provided 41% of purchases. The report says standard rack-mount server technology "has been relatively mature and there are a large number of ODM firms", and its risk section says "The supply of key components remains dependent on overseas suppliers, and experience in hardware–software integration is still developing". The May 2026 investor deck shows gross margin at 9% in 1Q26, down from 12% in 1Q25. Global Market Insights' AI server ranking (published September 2026) does not name MiTAC among the five largest vendors. No durable advantage is evidenced. | narrow Core Scientific's position rests on long-dated, take-or-pay leases of energized capacity, not on a protected market. Its 2025 Form 10-K (filed 2026-03-02) says wholesale colocation "typically involves large, long-term agreements with a limited number of customers, often with initial terms of 10 years or more". It adds that such leases are frequently paired with take-or-pay commitments "under which the customer is obligated to pay for leased customer power capacity regardless of utilization, providing operators with revenue visibility over the contract term." On the Q2 2026 call (2026-07-28, https://d1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net/_fda3a1f2f1890adaa7ac6c4d9d310971/corescientific/db/1085/11280/prepared_remarks/2Q26+Prepared+Remarks+Transcript+PDF.pdf) management said the company "now has approximately 1.1 gigawatts of total contracted billable capacity, representing more than $24 billion of base contracted revenue". That total combines CoreWeave's 590 MW, on what the CFO called "the 12-year lease terms", with AMD agreements for 530 MW that carry "more than $14 billion of base contracted revenue across the 15-year agreements with 2.5% annual escalators". Management also said it was "currently billing for 437 megawatts of capacity". The limits are just as clear. The 10-K says "Competitors compete on price, facility location, reputation and perceived skill with respect to performance" and that many rivals "are more established, have better brand recognition, are well capitalized". It also says "One customer, CoreWeave, currently accounts for 100% of our Colocation segment revenue." The Q2 2026 10-Q says a material weakness tied to converting mining facilities to HPC "has not been remediated". Long take-or-pay terms are the norm in wholesale colocation, so the contracts alone are contracted revenue, not an edge over rivals. What supports narrow is capacity already billing and a tenant that has expanded in place, and even that is bound to those contracts and to one customer today, so the band is narrow, not wide. |
| Moat type | switching costs Stickiness comes from platform embedding, not IP. The 10-K rests differentiation on "our single platform with a unified data model," on "Consolidation of multiple tools into a single platform," and on deployment inside the customer's own perimeter for regulated buyers. Replacement means re-integrating a toolchain and re-certifying compliance. IP is the wrong label: only "16 issued patents and 25 pending patent applications," plus open-source licenses granting "broad permissions to use, copy, modify, and redistribute." The no-lock-in claim is the filing's own characterisation, footnoted to a Forrester study "commissioned by GitLab." | none No single moat source is evidenced. The report describes a business that follows others' platforms: it aligns "with product specifications led by leading technology players", and says that, with mature technology and many ODM firms, "differentiation strategy emerged as the vital issue for all R&D designers". R&D was NT$3.597 billion, about 3% of revenue, and the report counts 200 patents in Taiwan, 197 in mainland China and 222 in Europe, the US and Japan, excluding MiTAC Digital; a patent count alone does not show a barrier. The nearest thing to a switching cost is the depth of its main customer relationship, with Customer A at 67% of sales, and the report says a global cloud platform customer gave MiTAC Computing a 2025 Outstanding Supplier Award. A concentration that large is as much a dependency as a lock-in. | switching costs The lock-in is contractual and physical. The 10-K's description of colocation is that "Customers deploy and manage their own hardware, while the operator designs, builds and operates the underlying infrastructure", under take-or-pay leases "often with initial terms of 10 years or more". On the Q2 2026 call the COO described the AMD program as "an integrated colocation platform engineered to support AMD's Helios Rack-Scale systems" with a "close-coupled AMD design framework". Leaving would mean rebuilding that power, cooling and fit-out elsewhere. The relationship with CoreWeave shows the stickiness: it "began with a 16-megawatt lease at our Austin campus in 2024 and has since expanded to 590 megawatts of total contracted capacity". Intellectual property is not the source. The 10-K says the company has "filed over 130 patent applications" but that these laws and procedures "provide only limited protection". Scale is not the source either: the 10-K says rivals are "well capitalized" and some are organized to lower "their external cost of capital". |
| Leadership | fast follower The 10-K positions GitLab against a leader rather than as one: "Our principal competitor is Microsoft Corporation, which owns GitHub." Competition reads from the challenger side, differentiating "from GitHub through flexible deployment options that work within enterprise security and compliance requirements, LLM neutrality with self-hosted gateway support" and an open core model. On AI it follows: Duo Agent Platform went "Generally available in January 2026," the last month of the fiscal year. What keeps it a follower rather than behind is cadence, "a new version of our software every month for 172 months in a row," plus a regulated-deployment franchise a SaaS-first rival does not cover. | behind No independent tracker ranks MiTAC, and the sources that rank the market leave it out. Global Market Insights' AI server page (published September 2026) names Supermicro, Dell Technologies, Wiwynn, HPE and Inspur as the top five, "which collectively held a market share of 56% in 2025", and names QCT, Lenovo, Foxconn and Wistron among other ODM and OEM participants; it does not mention MiTAC. A US brokerage channel check reported by TechNews (2026-05-12) covers Foxconn, Quanta and Wistron as the three major GB200/GB300 rack assemblers. The annual report's own market-share section gives no share or rank, only "over 20 years of experience in server R&D, design and manufacturing", and its long-term plan is to "solidify our position as a major ODM/OEM for server systems". It also concedes that its hardware–software integration experience "is still developing". Outside the leading group. | fast follower No independent share or rank was found. The 10-K lists Aligned Data Centers, Compass Datacenters, Equinix, Digital Realty Trust, NTT, QTS, Switch, Vantage Data Centers and CyrusOne as HDC competitors and says "Many of these competitors are more established, have better brand recognition, are well capitalized". It separately names Applied Digital, Cipher Mining, Galaxy Digital, Hut 8, IREN and TeraWulf as miners converting facilities for AI and HPC customers. Against that field Core Scientific is scaling quickly from a small base: 437 MW billing and about 1.1 GW contracted at the Q2 2026 call. That makes it a fast follower behind larger incumbents. Its press releases describe the company as "a leader in designing, building and operating large scale, purpose-built data centers", but that is the company's own claim and is not counted. |
| Pricing power | moderate FY2026 gross margin was 87% against 89%, with cost of revenue up $35.6 million "primarily due to an increase of $18.4 million in third party hosting costs for SaaS and cloud usage," and management expects SaaS and Duo mix to bring costs that "may adversely impact our gross margins." Strain is explicit: GitLab "may be required to reduce our prices," competitors "may offer their products and services at a lower price or for free," and it "implemented user limits on our free SaaS product." Power retained: Premium lists at $29 per user/month billed annually, and seats bundle $12 and $24 of GitLab Credits. But "A majority of our subscriptions are on a one-year period." | weak The May 2026 investor deck gives gross profit margins of 12% in 2024, 11% in 2025, 12% in 1Q25 and 9% in 1Q26, with 1Q26 gross profit up 6% on revenue up 35%. The annual report shows 2025 gross profit up 63% on revenue up 72%. The Taipei Times (2026-05-29) reports that MiTAC Computing's president named shortages and rising prices of DRAM chips, solid-state drives and CPUs as this year's pressure. He said whether the company can secure enough key components and ship on schedule "would directly affect gross margins and operating performance". Margins falling as volume grows, with one customer taking 67% of sales. | moderate Price is set competitively at signing and then locked in. The 10-K says "Competitors compete on price" and warns that "If we fail to accurately estimate the factors upon which we base our contract pricing, we may generate less profit than expected or incur losses on those contracts". Once signed, the AMD agreements carry "2.5% annual escalators" (Q2 2026 call), and the Q2 2026 10-Q says "power costs are passed through to our customer without markup". To win AMD, the company also gave AMD "market-priced warrants to purchase Core Scientific's common stock, subject to certain commercial conditions" (AMD release, 2026-07-28, https://investors.corescientific.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/138/core-scientific-and-amd-announce-infrastructure-partnership). In Q2 2026, colocation revenue was $136,669 thousand and the cost of colocation services was $56,686 thousand, including $35,073 thousand of power fees passed through to the customer (10-Q). Contracted escalators protect price over a 12- to 15-year term, but nothing shows a premium over rivals, so pricing power is moderate. |
| Summary | GitLab sells a single-platform DevSecOps toolchain defended by workflow lock-in rather than intellectual property: a unified data model plus deployment flexibility, including single-tenant "Dedicated for Government with FedRAMP compliance," makes it hard to remove where data residency is contractual. The installed base expands: 118% Dollar-Based Net Retention, 10,682 Base Customers, 1,456 above $100,000 of ARR, 155 above $1.0 million (up 26%), over 70% of ARR from public sector and enterprise. The filing supplies the counterweight: "limited barriers to entry," Microsoft/GitHub as principal competitor, 16 issued patents. Retention (130 to 123 to 118, the 130 a cap), gross margin (89% to 87%) and a January 2026 AI launch point to compression at the commodity end. No source measures market share, so every share band is "unknown". | MiTAC Holdings is a Taiwanese holding company. Its server arm, MiTAC Computing Technology, made 90.1% of 1Q26 revenue of NT$31.86 billion, with MiTAC Digital Technology (dashcams, fleet management and edge AI devices) at 7.8% and MiTAC International at 2.1% (Taipei Times, 2026-05-29). 2025 revenue rose about 72% to NT$105.577 billion on demand from hyperscale data centers and cloud service providers, and the annual report shows a single customer, Customer A, taking 67% of net sales. MiTAC Computing sells under its own brand, which since October 2024 combines the TYAN, former Intel DSG and MiTAC OCP server lines, and as an ODM. It is moving into liquid-cooled AI racks, with a Hanoi factory in mass production and two US factories due to start operating in the third quarter of 2026. The report itself calls standard server technology relatively mature, with a large number of ODM firms. The weak point is pricing power: gross margin was 12% in 2024, 11% in 2025 and 9% in 1Q26 (May 2026 investor deck), and MiTAC Computing's president said securing key components amid shortages would directly affect gross margins. A fast-growing supplier that depends on one customer and has no protected position. | Core Scientific began as a bitcoin miner and is turning its sites into high-density colocation (HDC) data centres for AI and HPC tenants. At 31 December 2025 it owned or leased ten data centres across seven U.S. states, with "approximately 1.4 gigawatts ("GW") of gross utility power capacity, or approximately 920 megawatts ("MW") of total leasable customer power capacity", and it intends "to convert every megawatt in our portfolio to high-density colocation infrastructure over the next three years" (2025 10-K). The transition is now visible in the numbers: colocation revenue "represented 77% of total revenue" in the first half of 2026, against 12% a year earlier (Q2 2026 10-Q). By July 2026 the company was billing for 437 MW. It had about 1.1 GW contracted with two anchor customers, CoreWeave at 590 MW and AMD at 530 MW (about 380 MW leased directly to AMD and about 150 MW for a neocloud that AMD backs), and AMD holds an exclusive right, under specified conditions, to lease as much as 2 additional gigawatts (Q2 2026 call). Those long take-or-pay contracts, plus energized power at a time when the 10-K says utilities demand "significant collateral postings at contract execution" and large builds take "18 to 24 months, or longer", are the source of a narrow advantage. They do not make a protected franchise. The 10-K names nine established colocation providers and six converted miners as competitors, says competitors "compete on price", and reports that CoreWeave was 100 percent of colocation revenue. The Q2 2026 10-Q says colocation revenue "is concentrated with a single customer" and that the conversion-related material weakness is still unremediated. Build costs are "approximately $11 million to $12 million per megawatt" (Q2 2026 call), and the company expects to finance the AMD build-out through project-level bonds. Core Scientific is rated as having a narrow moat: contract-bound switching costs, with no evidence of a price premium or a scale advantage. |
| Chain position | GitLab sits at the software-tooling layer, not compute or models. It consumes third-party LLM capacity — marketing "LLM neutrality and support for self-hosted AI gateways, including air-gapped environments" — so it captures no model-layer economics and bears inference as COGS, visible in the $18.4 million rise in hosting costs. Its distinctive position is the regulated perimeter. | Server designer and manufacturer selling under its own MiTAC Computing brand and as an ODM. The annual report places it downstream of IC and component makers and lists CPU/chipset, HDD, DRAM, PCB, IC and PSU as key components. The US took NT$74.138 billion of 2025 sales of NT$105.577 billion. | Core Scientific leases powered, liquid-cooled data-centre capacity to AI compute providers: CoreWeave (590 MW) and AMD, including a neocloud that AMD backs (about 530 MW), per the Q2 2026 call. It sits between utilities and GPU cloud operators while it winds down bitcoin self-mining. |
| Products (share / barrier) |
|
|
|
| Long-horizon vote | +0.06 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral Editorial prior, not backtested. | -0.20 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral Editorial prior, not backtested. | +0.06 at weight 0.20 · swarm bullish Editorial prior, not backtested. |