Skip to content

Compare moats

Up to three covered companies, band by band. Every call is a curated editorial judgment, never a disclosed figure — and every band carries its cited basis.

comparing GitLab×MiTAC Holdings×Sanmina× maximum of 3 — remove one to swap
GitLab GTLB ai moat: latest change 2026-08-05 MiTAC Holdings 3706.TW ai moat: latest change 2026-05-08 Sanmina SANM ai moat: latest change 2024-11-27
Moat rating narrow

The FY2026 10-K (year ended 2026-01-31) shows real expansion inside the installed base: 118% Dollar-Based Net Retention, Base Customers up to 10,682 from 9,893, customers above $100,000 of ARR up to 1,456 from 1,229, and $1.0 million ARR customers "to 155 from 123, an increase of 26%". But the filing concedes "limited barriers to entry" and names "Microsoft Corporation, which owns GitHub" as principal competitor. Retention decelerates (130% FY2024, 123% FY2025, 118% FY2026), and since DBNR is reported "on a threshold basis of 130%," the FY2024 figure is a cap and the slide is steeper than it looks. Narrow, not wide: expansion must be re-won against a bundled hyperscaler.

source: sec.gov

none

The 2025 annual report (English version filed with TWSE on 2026-05-08) shows fast growth without a protected position. Revenue rose about 72% to NT$105.577 billion while gross profit rose 63%. One customer, Customer A, took 67% of 2025 net sales, up from 56% in 2024, and one supplier, Supplier C, provided 41% of purchases. The report says standard rack-mount server technology "has been relatively mature and there are a large number of ODM firms", and its risk section says "The supply of key components remains dependent on overseas suppliers, and experience in hardware–software integration is still developing". The May 2026 investor deck shows gross margin at 9% in 1Q26, down from 12% in 1Q25. Global Market Insights' AI server ranking (published September 2026) does not name MiTAC among the five largest vendors. No durable advantage is evidenced.

source: doc.twse.com.tw

none

Sanmina's FY2024 10-K (fiscal year ended September 28, 2024) says "The EMS industry is highly competitive and the industry has experienced a surplus of manufacturing capacity", that "We may not be able to offer prices as low as some of our competitors", and that "due to the extremely price sensitive nature of our industry, business that we do win or maintain may have lower margins than our historical or target margins". It names Benchmark Electronics, Celestica, Flex, Foxconn, Jabil and Plexus as competitors and adds that OEM customers "may elect to manufacture their own products internally rather than outsource to EMS providers". Stored fundamentals (SEC XBRL) show gross profit of $743,211 thousand on $8,935,048 thousand of net sales in fiscal 2023, $640,429 thousand on $7,568,328 thousand in fiscal 2024 and $716,357 thousand on $8,128,382 thousand in fiscal 2025. The ZT Systems acquisition (completed 2025-10-27) added scale in cloud and AI rack manufacturing, but its release describes capacity and a preferred-partner arrangement with AMD, not a protected position. No moat is claimable.

source: sec.gov

Moat type switching costs

Stickiness comes from platform embedding, not IP. The 10-K rests differentiation on "our single platform with a unified data model," on "Consolidation of multiple tools into a single platform," and on deployment inside the customer's own perimeter for regulated buyers. Replacement means re-integrating a toolchain and re-certifying compliance. IP is the wrong label: only "16 issued patents and 25 pending patent applications," plus open-source licenses granting "broad permissions to use, copy, modify, and redistribute." The no-lock-in claim is the filing's own characterisation, footnoted to a Forrester study "commissioned by GitLab."

source: sec.gov

none

No single moat source is evidenced. The report describes a business that follows others' platforms: it aligns "with product specifications led by leading technology players", and says that, with mature technology and many ODM firms, "differentiation strategy emerged as the vital issue for all R&D designers". R&D was NT$3.597 billion, about 3% of revenue, and the report counts 200 patents in Taiwan, 197 in mainland China and 222 in Europe, the US and Japan, excluding MiTAC Digital; a patent count alone does not show a barrier. The nearest thing to a switching cost is the depth of its main customer relationship, with Customer A at 67% of sales, and the report says a global cloud platform customer gave MiTAC Computing a 2025 Outstanding Supplier Award. A concentration that large is as much a dependency as a lock-in.

source: doc.twse.com.tw

none

The FY2024 10-K's claimed strengths are breadth and vertical integration: end-to-end solutions it believes "are among the most comprehensive in the industry", design and engineering resources, and in-house components such as high-technology printed circuit boards, backplanes and cable assemblies. None is a durable barrier on the filing's own terms: "A number of our patents have expired or will expire in the near term", "Our supply agreements generally do not obligate the customer to purchase minimum quantities of products", and customers "usually do not make firm orders for product delivery more than thirty to ninety days in advance".

source: sec.gov

Leadership fast follower

The 10-K positions GitLab against a leader rather than as one: "Our principal competitor is Microsoft Corporation, which owns GitHub." Competition reads from the challenger side, differentiating "from GitHub through flexible deployment options that work within enterprise security and compliance requirements, LLM neutrality with self-hosted gateway support" and an open core model. On AI it follows: Duo Agent Platform went "Generally available in January 2026," the last month of the fiscal year. What keeps it a follower rather than behind is cadence, "a new version of our software every month for 172 months in a row," plus a regulated-deployment franchise a SaaS-first rival does not cover.

source: sec.gov

behind

No independent tracker ranks MiTAC, and the sources that rank the market leave it out. Global Market Insights' AI server page (published September 2026) names Supermicro, Dell Technologies, Wiwynn, HPE and Inspur as the top five, "which collectively held a market share of 56% in 2025", and names QCT, Lenovo, Foxconn and Wistron among other ODM and OEM participants; it does not mention MiTAC. A US brokerage channel check reported by TechNews (2026-05-12) covers Foxconn, Quanta and Wistron as the three major GB200/GB300 rack assemblers. The annual report's own market-share section gives no share or rank, only "over 20 years of experience in server R&D, design and manufacturing", and its long-term plan is to "solidify our position as a major ODM/OEM for server systems". It also concedes that its hardware–software integration experience "is still developing". Outside the leading group.

source: doc.twse.com.tw

at parity

EMSNOW/in4ma's "EMS&ODM Global 100" (2026-03-06, https://www.emsnow.com/?p=53535) groups Sanmina with Jabil, Flex and Celestica as the US "big four", "representing about 85% of the revenue base among ~20 US headquartered EMS/ODM", while Wistron, Quanta and Wiwynn "plus Foxconn together account for nearly 57% of global EMS/ODM production". Within that peer group Sanmina is smaller than its largest rivals: its updated fiscal 2026 revenue outlook is $14.0 billion to $14.3 billion (Q3 FY2026 release), against fiscal 2026 net revenue of $36.0 billion at Jabil (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/898293/000162828026063890/jbl-20260930ex991.htm). The ZT Systems release's claim that the combination "positions Sanmina as a leader in the Cloud and AI end-market" is the company's own. A peer of the large Western contract manufacturers, not a leader: at parity.

source: sec.gov

Pricing power moderate

FY2026 gross margin was 87% against 89%, with cost of revenue up $35.6 million "primarily due to an increase of $18.4 million in third party hosting costs for SaaS and cloud usage," and management expects SaaS and Duo mix to bring costs that "may adversely impact our gross margins." Strain is explicit: GitLab "may be required to reduce our prices," competitors "may offer their products and services at a lower price or for free," and it "implemented user limits on our free SaaS product." Power retained: Premium lists at $29 per user/month billed annually, and seats bundle $12 and $24 of GitLab Credits. But "A majority of our subscriptions are on a one-year period."

source: sec.gov

weak

The May 2026 investor deck gives gross profit margins of 12% in 2024, 11% in 2025, 12% in 1Q25 and 9% in 1Q26, with 1Q26 gross profit up 6% on revenue up 35%. The annual report shows 2025 gross profit up 63% on revenue up 72%. The Taipei Times (2026-05-29) reports that MiTAC Computing's president named shortages and rising prices of DRAM chips, solid-state drives and CPUs as this year's pressure. He said whether the company can secure enough key components and ship on schedule "would directly affect gross margins and operating performance". Margins falling as volume grows, with one customer taking 67% of sales.

source: doc.twse.com.tw

weak

The FY2024 10-K says "We may not be able to offer prices as low as some of our competitors for any number of reasons, including the willingness of competitors to provide EMS services at prices we are unable or unwilling to offer", and that supply agreements sometimes "include provisions for cost reduction objectives during the term of the agreement, which can have the effect of reducing revenue and profitability". Margins have improved with mix: on the Q3 FY2026 call (https://earningswhispers.com/transcript/SANM/Q32026) management said "Our non-GAAP gross profit was $370 million, or 10.7% of revenue. This was up 160 basis points versus the same period a year ago, driven by both favorable mix and non-recurring engineering services."

source: sec.gov

Summary

GitLab sells a single-platform DevSecOps toolchain defended by workflow lock-in rather than intellectual property: a unified data model plus deployment flexibility, including single-tenant "Dedicated for Government with FedRAMP compliance," makes it hard to remove where data residency is contractual. The installed base expands: 118% Dollar-Based Net Retention, 10,682 Base Customers, 1,456 above $100,000 of ARR, 155 above $1.0 million (up 26%), over 70% of ARR from public sector and enterprise. The filing supplies the counterweight: "limited barriers to entry," Microsoft/GitHub as principal competitor, 16 issued patents. Retention (130 to 123 to 118, the 130 a cap), gross margin (89% to 87%) and a January 2026 AI launch point to compression at the commodity end. No source measures market share, so every share band is "unknown".

MiTAC Holdings is a Taiwanese holding company. Its server arm, MiTAC Computing Technology, made 90.1% of 1Q26 revenue of NT$31.86 billion, with MiTAC Digital Technology (dashcams, fleet management and edge AI devices) at 7.8% and MiTAC International at 2.1% (Taipei Times, 2026-05-29). 2025 revenue rose about 72% to NT$105.577 billion on demand from hyperscale data centers and cloud service providers, and the annual report shows a single customer, Customer A, taking 67% of net sales. MiTAC Computing sells under its own brand, which since October 2024 combines the TYAN, former Intel DSG and MiTAC OCP server lines, and as an ODM. It is moving into liquid-cooled AI racks, with a Hanoi factory in mass production and two US factories due to start operating in the third quarter of 2026. The report itself calls standard server technology relatively mature, with a large number of ODM firms. The weak point is pricing power: gross margin was 12% in 2024, 11% in 2025 and 9% in 1Q26 (May 2026 investor deck), and MiTAC Computing's president said securing key components amid shortages would directly affect gross margins. A fast-growing supplier that depends on one customer and has no protected position.

Sanmina is an integrated manufacturing-solutions provider. Its FY2024 10-K describes an Integrated Manufacturing Solutions business (printed circuit board assembly and test, high-level assembly and test, direct-order fulfillment; approximately 80% of 2024 revenue) and a Components, Products and Services business (approximately 20%) that makes printed circuit boards, backplanes, cable assemblies, fabricated metal and machined parts, plus Viking storage and memory products and SCI defense and aerospace products. On October 27, 2025 it completed the acquisition of ZT Systems' data center infrastructure manufacturing business from AMD, under which Sanmina is "a U.S.-based, preferred new product introduction (NPI) manufacturing partner" for AMD cloud rack and cluster-scale AI solutions. The deal reshaped the mix: net sales for the quarter ended June 27, 2026 were $3,464,016 thousand against $2,041,562 thousand a year earlier (Q3 FY2026 release: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/897723/000089772326000036/sanmina_exx991xjune272026.htm), and on the call management put ZT Systems revenue at $1.1 billion and said "Communication networks, cloud, and AI infrastructure was 62% of our revenue" and that it is "very confident in shipping 16 plus billion dollars in fiscal year 27". The economics remain those of contract manufacturing in an industry its own 10-K calls "extremely price sensitive": ten customers have historically been "approximately half of our net sales", supply agreements generally carry no minimum purchase obligations, and Foxconn, Jabil, Flex and Celestica are named competitors. An independent tally (EMSNOW/in4ma, 2026-03-06) places Sanmina in the US "big four" EMS group, behind Foxconn, Wistron, Quanta and Wiwynn, which together account for "nearly 57% of global EMS/ODM production". More scale in AI infrastructure, but no moat.

Chain position

GitLab sits at the software-tooling layer, not compute or models. It consumes third-party LLM capacity — marketing "LLM neutrality and support for self-hosted AI gateways, including air-gapped environments" — so it captures no model-layer economics and bears inference as COGS, visible in the $18.4 million rise in hosting costs. Its distinctive position is the regulated perimeter.

Server designer and manufacturer selling under its own MiTAC Computing brand and as an ODM. The annual report places it downstream of IC and component makers and lists CPU/chipset, HDD, DRAM, PCB, IC and PSU as key components. The US took NT$74.138 billion of 2025 sales of NT$105.577 billion.

Contract manufacturer whose components arm feeds its own assembly lines; since the ZT Systems acquisition it is a U.S.-based preferred NPI manufacturing partner for AMD cloud rack and cluster-scale AI solutions, and on the Q3 FY2026 call cited "strong growth in our metal fabrication business for AI system racks".

Products (share / barrier)
  • Enterprise Agile Planning add-on Unknown · Low source: sec.gov
  • GitLab Dedicated (including Dedicated for Government) Unknown · Deep source: sec.gov
  • GitLab DevSecOps Platform (Free, Premium, and Ultimate tiers) Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov
  • GitLab Duo Agent Platform (with GitLab Credits) Unknown · Low source: about.gitlab.com
  • Self-Managed GitLab (on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment) Unknown · Deep source: sec.gov
  • Components (printed circuit boards, backplanes, cable assemblies, metal fabrication) Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov
  • Integrated Manufacturing Solutions (PCB assembly, high-level assembly and test) Unknown · Low source: sec.gov
  • ZT Systems cloud and AI rack-scale manufacturing Unknown · Moderate source: s201.q4cdn.com
Long-horizon vote +0.06 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →

-0.20 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →

-0.06 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →