Compare moats
Up to three covered companies, band by band. Every call is a curated editorial judgment, never a disclosed figure — and every band carries its cited basis.
| Schneider Electric | CrowdStrike | GitLab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moat rating | wide In its 2025 Universal Registration Document the Group states a #1 market position in electrical distribution in each of its four end markets, plus #1 in grid and #1 in industrial data and safety, reached through a channel it sizes at more than 1.4 million contractors and electricians alongside panel builders, integrators and distributors; FY2025 closed with a record-high backlog of EUR 25,362 million and, per the CFO section, a fifth consecutive year of profitability expansion, with adjusted EBITA margin at 18.7% (+50bps organic). | narrow Narrow rather than wide because the FY2026 10-K argues both ways and its own risk factors are the harder side: it describes a self-reinforcing data advantage and says "we do not believe any of our competitors currently have a true platform offering equivalent to the Falcon platform", but the same filing calls the market for security and IT operations solutions "intensely competitive, fragmented", warns that "Competitive pricing pressure may reduce our gross profits", and still carries the July 19 Incident as having "had, and is expected to continue to have, an adverse effect on our business, sales, customer and partner relations, reputation" more than two years after it occurred. | narrow The FY2026 10-K (year ended 2026-01-31) shows real expansion inside the installed base: 118% Dollar-Based Net Retention, Base Customers up to 10,682 from 9,893, customers above $100,000 of ARR up to 1,456 from 1,229, and $1.0 million ARR customers "to 155 from 123, an increase of 26%". But the filing concedes "limited barriers to entry" and names "Microsoft Corporation, which owns GitHub" as principal competitor. Retention decelerates (130% FY2024, 123% FY2025, 118% FY2026), and since DBNR is reported "on a threshold basis of 130%," the FY2024 figure is a cap and the slide is steeper than it looks. Narrow, not wide: expansion must be re-won against a bundled hyperscaler. |
| Moat type | switching costs The URD's own durability table assigns a Reference Service Life of 20 years to low-voltage equipment and 15 years to medium-voltage products, and the Group monetizes that installed stock repeatedly: it attributes Field Services growth to an increasing installed base, notably from Data Center, and reports recurring revenue at 79% of its agnostic-software revenues (AVEVA, ETAP, RIB), up 2 points year on year, with AVEVA ARR up +12% as of December 31, 2025. | network effects The 10-K states the mechanism directly: "The more data that is fed into our Falcon platform, the more intelligent the AI Security Cloud becomes, the stronger our ability to anticipate and counter evolving adversary tradecraft, and the more our customers benefit, creating a powerful network effect that increases the overall value we provide." | switching costs Stickiness comes from platform embedding, not IP. The 10-K rests differentiation on "our single platform with a unified data model," on "Consolidation of multiple tools into a single platform," and on deployment inside the customer's own perimeter for regulated buyers. Replacement means re-integrating a toolchain and re-certifying compliance. IP is the wrong label: only "16 issued patents and 25 pending patent applications," plus open-source licenses granting "broad permissions to use, copy, modify, and redistribute." The no-lock-in claim is the filing's own characterisation, footnoted to a Forrester study "commissioned by GitLab." |
| Leadership | clear leader The URD's end-market pages report #1 positions in electrical distribution across all four end markets, #1 in grid, #1 in industrial data and safety, and the most complete data-center portfolio including liquid cooling. These are the Group's own stated positions rather than a third-party ranking, and the same document names ABB, Legrand, Siemens, Eaton, Emerson, Honeywell, Johnson Controls, Rockwell Automation, Fuji Electric, Mitsubishi Electric and Yokogawa as the peer panel it is benchmarked against for TSR, a panel its compensation policy characterizes as business competitors. | co leader Co-leader rather than clear leader because the only claim of platform primacy available is the company's own ("we do not believe any of our competitors currently have a true platform offering equivalent"), while the same 10-K describes a fragmented market and lists seven distinct categories of competitor, from legacy antivirus to network security, cloud security, identity and legacy SIEM vendors. | fast follower The 10-K positions GitLab against a leader rather than as one: "Our principal competitor is Microsoft Corporation, which owns GitHub." Competition reads from the challenger side, differentiating "from GitHub through flexible deployment options that work within enterprise security and compliance requirements, LLM neutrality with self-hosted gateway support" and an open core model. On AI it follows: Duo Agent Platform went "Generally available in January 2026," the last month of the fiscal year. What keeps it a follower rather than behind is cadence, "a new version of our software every month for 172 months in a row," plus a regulated-deployment franchise a SaaS-first rival does not cover. |
| Pricing power | moderate Price is real but has not been covering input costs. FY2025 gross margin fell to 42.1%, down 40bps organic, with the URD stating that accelerating Q4 product pricing was insufficient to fully offset mix and raw-material cost inflation inclusive of tariffs; in the July 30, 2026 half-year release, gross pricing on products of +EUR 280 million was outweighed by a raw-material impact of -EUR 330 million and net tariffs of -EUR 104 million for a net price impact of -EUR 154 million, and the Group says it expects to be net-price positive only in H2 2026. | moderate The 10-K's risk factors state that "Competitive pricing pressure may reduce our gross profits" and that competing successfully may require "aggressive pricing", which is the company's own case against strong pricing power; the offsetting factor it cites is module consolidation on one sensor. | moderate FY2026 gross margin was 87% against 89%, with cost of revenue up $35.6 million "primarily due to an increase of $18.4 million in third party hosting costs for SaaS and cloud usage," and management expects SaaS and Duo mix to bring costs that "may adversely impact our gross margins." Strain is explicit: GitLab "may be required to reduce our prices," competitors "may offer their products and services at a lower price or for free," and it "implemented user limits on our free SaaS product." Power retained: Premium lists at $29 per user/month billed annually, and seats bundle $12 and $24 of GitLab Credits. But "A majority of our subscriptions are on a one-year period." |
| Summary | Schneider sells electrification, automation and digitalization into four end markets — Data Center & Networks (30% of 2025 orders), Buildings (29%), Industry (27%) and Infrastructure (14%) — and its 2025 URD claims a #1 position in electrical distribution in every one of them, sold through an ecosystem of panel builders, integrators, distributors and more than 1.4 million contractors and electricians. Energy Management is the larger and higher-margin half: EUR 33,130 million of FY2025 revenue, 83% of the Group, up +10.3% organic at a 21.8% adjusted EBITA margin, against EUR 7,022 million and 14.2% at Industrial Automation. In the July 30, 2026 half-year release the Data Center end-market continues to lead growth: Systems, 35% of Q2 revenues, grew +28% organic with prefabricated solutions, cooling technologies and 3-phase UPS all seeing significant growth. | A single lightweight sensor collects enterprise data once and reuses it across 33 cloud modules, and the pooled telemetry trains the models every customer is then defended by — the 10-K calls this crowdsourced, high-fidelity data "cloud-scale AI" and treats it as the fundamental differentiator from competitors. | GitLab sells a single-platform DevSecOps toolchain defended by workflow lock-in rather than intellectual property: a unified data model plus deployment flexibility, including single-tenant "Dedicated for Government with FedRAMP compliance," makes it hard to remove where data residency is contractual. The installed base expands: 118% Dollar-Based Net Retention, 10,682 Base Customers, 1,456 above $100,000 of ARR, 155 above $1.0 million (up 26%), over 70% of ARR from public sector and enterprise. The filing supplies the counterweight: "limited barriers to entry," Microsoft/GitHub as principal competitor, 16 issued patents. Retention (130 to 123 to 118, the 130 a cap), gross margin (89% to 87%) and a January 2026 AI launch point to compression at the commodity end. No source measures market share, so every share band is "unknown". |
| Chain position | Supplies the power and cooling layer beneath AI compute: Data Center & Networks was 30% of 2025 orders, a market the URD places on a market CAGR above 10% from 2025 to 2030. | AI-native security platform — an adopter and reseller of AI rather than a supplier of AI infrastructure. | GitLab sits at the software-tooling layer, not compute or models. It consumes third-party LLM capacity — marketing "LLM neutrality and support for self-hosted AI gateways, including air-gapped environments" — so it captures no model-layer economics and bears inference as COGS, visible in the $18.4 million rise in hosting costs. Its distinctive position is the regulated perimeter. |
| Products (share / barrier) |
|
|
|
| Long-horizon vote | +0.38 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral Editorial prior, not backtested. | +0.13 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral Editorial prior, not backtested. | +0.06 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral Editorial prior, not backtested. |