Compare moats

The FY2025 20-F Competition section cuts both ways: UMC calls itself "one of the world's largest independent semiconductor foundries" with production capacity "currently among the largest of all semiconductor foundries in the world" and says it believes it competes favorably with competitors on each principal element of foundry competition, yet in the same section concedes that "[s]ome of our competitors have substantially greater production, financial, research and development and marketing resources than we have" and that "several new dedicated foundries have commenced operations and compete directly with us," whose entry is "likely to initiate a trend of competitive pricing and create potential overcapacity in legacy technology" that "may erode our profit margins." A real but bounded advantage, not a durable wide one.

source: sec.gov

Qualcomm's advantage is real but concentrated in one segment. The FY2025 10-K (filed 2025-11-05) describes its portfolio as "the most widely and extensively licensed in the industry" and says the industry "generally recognizes that any company seeking to develop, manufacture and/or sell certain cellular products requires a license or other rights to use our patents". That licensing leg produced $5,582M of FY2025 revenue against $38,367M at QCT, where Apple, Samsung and Xiaomi are all named in the vertical-integration risk factor and Apple already "utilizes its own modem... in certain of its smartphones". The filing frames the QCT loss as expected rather than realised.

source: sec.gov

Corning's FY2025 Form 10-K (filed 12 February 2026) documents real protection in two places and hedges everywhere else. In Display it states flatly that 'We are the largest worldwide producer of glass substrates for flat panel displays' and credits a 'proprietary fusion manufacturing process, which we invented and is the cornerstone of our technology leadership in the display glass industry'; in Optical Communications it says 'We maintain a leadership position in the segment's principal product groups, which include carrier and enterprise networks'. But the Competition section opens on a company-wide concession - 'Some of these competitors are larger than we are, and some have broader product lines' - and closes that opening paragraph with 'There is no assurance that we will be able to maintain or improve our market position or competitive advantage', a hedge set over the five per-segment paragraphs that follow, the last of which has Life Sciences facing 'competition from large distributors that have pursued backward integration or introduced private label products'. In optical it expects 'industry consolidation, pricing pressure and competition for the innovation of new products' to persist. The risk factors add that Optical Communications and Display 'generate a significant amount of the Company's profits and cash flow' and are 'subject to pricing pressure', while the customer base is concentrated enough that customers 'may possess substantial leverage in negotiating contractual obligations' - the filing's own table puts two combined end customers at 28% of 2025 Optical Communications segment net sales, three at 59% of Display, two at 43% of Specialty Materials and three at 61% of Automotive. Protection that is genuine but confined to part of the portfolio, held against named larger rivals and customers with that much leverage, is narrow rather than wide.

source: sec.gov

The 20-F states plainly that "Our success depends on our ability to obtain patents, licenses and other intellectual property (IP) rights covering our production processes and activities," and reports more than 16,700 patents worldwide as of December 31, 2025, of which more than 7,490 are in the U.S., 623 domestic and foreign patents granted in 2025 alone, NT$17,725 million of R&D (7.5% of operating revenues) and 1,591 R&D professionals. The Competition section names where UMC believes it wins: it competes favorably "particularly [on] our technical competence and research and development capabilities." The proprietary specialty-process library, not scale or a network, is the cited source of the advantage.

source: sec.gov

The durable asset is intellectual property accumulated since Qualcomm's founding "in 1985". The patents have "broad coverage in many countries, including Brazil, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the United States and countries in Europe" and are licensed "to hundreds of companies on industry-accepted terms", with royalties set as "a percentage of the wholesale (i.e., licensee's) selling price... subject to per unit minimums and/or per unit caps". R&D of $9,042M equalled 20% of revenues. Manufacturing is fabless "other than for certain of our RFFE modules and RF filter products", for which Qualcomm owns fabs in Germany and Singapore.

source: sec.gov

What the filing keeps pointing at is invented process technology and the patent estate fencing it, not a network and not raw size. The FY2025 10-K repeats 'Patent protection is important to the segment's operations' word for word in four of its five reportable segments - Optical Communications, Specialty Materials, Automotive and Life Sciences - and gives Display a stronger variant, 'Patent protection and proprietary trade secrets are important to the Display segment's operations'. It reports about 11,375 unexpired patents owned worldwide at the end of 2025 (about 4,015 of them U.S.), about 370 U.S. and over 970 non-U.S. grants during 2025 and about 5,650 applications in process, and states 'We have historically enforced, and will continue to enforce, our intellectual property rights.' The single clearest asset is a process rather than a product - the fusion draw Corning says it invented and calls the cornerstone of its display-glass technology leadership, guarded in Display by 'proprietary trade secrets'. Even the cost advantage the filing claims in optical is sourced back to the same place: 'Our large-scale manufacturing experience, fiber process, technology leadership and intellectual property provide cost advantages relative to several of our competitors' - scale is described there as a consequence of the process, not the origin of the advantage, which is why this is an IP-and-know-how moat rather than a cost-scale one. The estate is broad rather than cliff-edged: 'no one patent is considered material to any segment', and about 740 worldwide patents, 6.5% of the portfolio, expire between 2026 and 2028.

source: sec.gov

UMC describes a deliberate follow strategy in the 20-F: it intends "to avoid investments in technologies that do not present commercial potential for volume production" and believes "it is beneficial to defer investment in premature equipment needed to claim the earliest advanced technology and instead to purchase more advanced and less expensive versions of such equipment from vendors who design this equipment based on pre-production lessons learned from the earliest technology." The node ladder bears this out: the most advanced process in production in 2025 is Fab 12A's 0.014 micron, wafers at 14 nanometers and under rounded to 0.0% of wafer sales in each of 2023, 2024 and 2025, and the next rung — UMC's own 12nm FinFET process, which Intel replicated in 2025 "based on our electrical design rules and UMC-verified process" for manufacture at its Arizona fab — is only "expected to begin in 2027."

source: sec.gov

Leadership is clear in licensing and contested in silicon. The 10-K names no rival licensing programme and asserts the portfolio is "the most widely and extensively licensed in the industry", while calling QCT's industries "intensely competitive" and naming eleven competitors (Broadcom, HiSilicon, MediaTek, Mobileye, Nvidia, NXP, Qorvo, Samsung, Skyworks, TI, UNISOC); "continue to be a leader in mobile" appears in a list of things future success depends on, so it reads as aspiration, not share. The band therefore rests on the licensing leg, roughly 13% of revenue. FY2025 10%-plus customers were 21%, 20% and 13%; in 9M FY2026 only two cleared 10%.

source: sec.gov

The FY2025 10-K makes exactly one unqualified rank claim and it is Display: 'We are the largest worldwide producer of glass substrates for flat panel displays', with only AGC Inc. and Nippon Electric Glass Co., Ltd. named as principal competitors. The second-strongest claim is Optical Communications' - 'We maintain a leadership position in the segment's principal product groups, which include carrier and enterprise networks' - asserted against Amphenol, Fujikura and its subsidiary America Fujikura Ltd., Sumitomo and Prysmian Group S.p.A. Those two lines carry the company: Optical Communications was 38% of total segment net sales in 2025 and Display 23%, and the segment table credits them with $1,048 million and $993 million respectively of the $2,747 million of reportable-segment net income. The band is a company-level judgment weighted to them, and it does not extend across the portfolio - Automotive claims only 'a strong market position', and Life Sciences describes itself as 'a leading developer, manufacturer and global supplier of laboratory products for over 110 years' while competing against the much larger Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. and Danaher Corporation on $972 million of 2025 sales.

source: sec.gov

The 20-F claims no premium — "our current level of pricing is comparable to that of other leading foundries in each respective geometry" — and reports that 2025 average selling price declined 5.4%, driving gross margin down from 32.6% in 2024 to 29.0% in 2025 even as 12-inch-equivalent wafer shipments rose from 3,446 thousand to 3,870 thousand and average capacity utilization improved from 68.7% to 75.2%. It also notes that "[p]rices for wafers of a given level of technology generally decline over the processing technology life cycle."

source: sec.gov

QTL margins held at 72% in FY2025 and 73% in 9M FY2026, though Q3 FY2026 alone slipped to 69% from 71%, and the $111M revenue gain there is attributed to revenues per unit "primarily driven by favorable mix" rather than to price. At QCT, the fall to 26% from 30% is explained by "lower gross margin, primarily driven by higher product cost, partially offset by higher average selling prices" plus lower revenues, so the pressure is cost rather than price; FY2025 handsets rose $2,930M, of which $2.5B came from higher revenue per chipset. Against that, "declining average selling prices" is a standing risk-factor title, "particularly pronounced in emerging regions and China".

source: sec.gov

The FY2025 10-K shows prices being raised and sticking, and in the same breath shows what caps them. The results table puts gross margin at 36% of net sales in 2025 against 33% in 2024, and MD&A attributes the three-point gain to 'higher volume and the impact of actions taken by management to improve profitability, including raising prices, reducing costs and increasing productivity.' Display is the cleanest case: after resetting its core rate from 107 to 120 Japanese yen to the dollar, 'we implemented pricing actions in the second half of 2024', and 'The effects of the price increases on slightly higher volumes in 2025, compared to the prior period, substantially offset the impact of resetting the core rate.' The ceiling is disclosed in the same document: Optical Communications and Display are 'subject to pricing pressure', concentrated customers 'may possess substantial leverage in negotiating contractual obligations', and a risk factor warns that 'Increasing our prices to our customers may cause certain of our customers to push out, cancel or refrain from purchasing our products'. Price that holds on the back of rising volume, against customers that concentrated, is moderate rather than strong.

source: sec.gov

Mature- and specialty-node wafer supplier: 2025 wafer sales were 41.4% communication, 30.6% consumer and 11.6% computer, with the AI tie indirect — 2.5D silicon interposers with deep-trench capacitors shipped to major customers for HPC, cloud computing and LLM applications.

Every figure and quotation is drawn from the FY2025 10-K and the Q3 FY2026 10-Q. Where the filings state no market share, the share band is left unknown rather than inferred, and barrier bands follow the filings' own language, which states a barrier to entry only for automotive.

Corning sits a layer beneath the AI build-out, supplying the glass and fiber rather than the compute. The FY2025 10-K describes 'optical fiber, cable and connectivity solutions for advanced communications networks, such as fiber to the home and data centers, enabling artificial intelligence', and says 'the rapid acceleration of artificial intelligence ("AI") is driving strong demand for fiber and connectivity products inside and between data centers', citing purpose-built parts such as the SMF-28e Contour fiber, 'a 40% smaller fiber', and the Contour Flow Cable 'which can fit double the fiber into the same cable diameter'. It also sells into chipmaking, through HPFS Fused Silica, ULE Ultra-Low Expansion Glass and the EXTREME ULE Glass introduced in 2024 to 'support chip manufacturers in meeting the rapidly growing demand for advanced and intelligent technologies'. The exposure is already in the numbers: Optical Communications net sales rose 35% to $6,274 million in 2025, which the filing attributes first to 'continued growth in our Enterprise business driven by strong demand for our Generative AI products'.

• 12-inch 28nm/22nm logic and specialty foundry Challenger · Moderate source: sec.gov
• 12-inch silicon photonics Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov
• 2.5D silicon interposer and 3D hybrid bonding Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov
• 8-inch and legacy-node foundry (0.11 micron and above) Challenger · Moderate source: sec.gov
• Embedded non-volatile memory platforms (eFlash, RRAM, MRAM) Unknown · Deep source: sec.gov
• Specialty mixed-signal platforms (eHV, BCD, BSI-CSI, RF-SOI) Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov

• Data Center (Alphawave) Niche · Low source: sec.gov
• Dragonwing and Snapdragon IoT platforms Challenger · Low source: sec.gov
• QTL cellular patent licensing program Leader · Deep source: sec.gov
• Qualcomm RFFE Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov
• Snapdragon Digital Chassis (Automotive) Challenger · Deep source: sec.gov
• Snapdragon mobile platforms (QCT Handsets) Unknown · Low source: sec.gov

• Automotive ceramic substrates and particulate filters Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov
• Corning Gorilla Glass cover materials Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov
• Display glass substrates Leader · Deep source: sec.gov
• Hemlock hyper-pure polysilicon and solar products Unknown · Low source: sec.gov
• Life Sciences labware and consumables Unknown · Low source: sec.gov
• Optical fiber, cable and connectivity solutions Leader · Moderate source: sec.gov
• Semiconductor and precision optics Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →