Skip to content

Compare moats

Up to three covered companies, band by band. Every call is a curated editorial judgment, never a disclosed figure — and every band carries its cited basis.

comparing Vertiv×Cloudflare×Quanta Computer× maximum of 3 — remove one to swap
Vertiv VRT ai moat: latest change 2026-02-13 Cloudflare NET ai moat: latest change 2026-02-26 Quanta Computer 2382.TW ai moat: latest change 2026-05-08
Moat rating narrow

The FY2025 10-K splits its competition into niche players (Delta, Stulz, Johnson Controls, Socomec) and large-scale globals (Schneider, Eaton, Legrand, Huawei) — real differentiation inside a field that contains several larger diversified rivals.

source: sec.gov

wide

The band is earned by a measured share gap on a hard-to-rebuild asset, not asserted. W3Techs' 17 September 2026 survey (w3techs.com/technologies/overview/proxy) puts Cloudflare in front of 25.8% of all websites, an 85.0% share of the reverse-proxy market, against Amazon CloudFront at 5.5%, Fastly at 3.0% and Akamai at 2.1% - roughly fifteen times the nearest rival. The FY2025 10-K filed 2026-02-26 describes what a challenger would have to reproduce to contest that: a network that 'spans more than 330 cities in over 125 countries worldwide and interconnects with over 13,000 networks globally', architected to 'run every service on every server in every city' - capacity and peering accumulated city by city over a decade, not bought in a quarter. The position has been monetised without margin decay: SEC XBRL fundamentals on this site show GAAP gross margin inside a 74.5-78.7% band in every fiscal year from FY2017 to FY2025 while revenue grew from $134.9M to $2,167.9M, and Cloudflare's Q4/FY2025 results release of 2026-02-10 (cloudflare.com/press/press-releases/2026/cloudflare-announces-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2025-financial-results/) reports remaining performance obligations up 48% and new annual contract value up nearly 50% year over year. What stops this being a certainty rather than a judgement: the dominant share sits in application services, while SASE and developer compute are contested by vendors the 10-K itself concedes hold 'substantially greater financial, technical, and other resources.'

source: sec.gov

narrow

The 2025 annual report (English version filed with TWSE on 2026-05-08) shows a seat in a concentrated supply chain but no protected margin. Citing Omdia, it says Taiwanese manufacturers as a group, not Quanta alone, "command over 80% of market share in global server shipment, and a dominant 90% share of the AI server market", which it reads as "high entry barriers and extreme supply chain concentration", and revenue from AI servers doubled to lift consolidated revenue to NT$2.12 trillion, up 50.5%. Against that, gross profit rose 33.92% while net sales rose 50.54%, the FY2025 gross profit margin was 6.98%, three coded customers took 29.40%, 20.41% and 14.86% of FY2025 sales, and the report lists "Intense Market Competition" among its unfavorable factors. The Taipei Times (2026-05-15) reports 1Q26 gross margin fell to 4.78% from 7.92% a year earlier. An entrenched incumbent position, not one that commands price.

source: doc.twse.com.tw

Moat type switching costs

The filing pairs installed critical infrastructure with a lifecycle service estate — preventative maintenance, project management, acceptance testing, remote monitoring, spares — across more than 40 countries; ripping out the vendor means ripping out the service relationship too.

source: sec.gov

cost scale

The FY2025 10-K states the mechanism outright, and it is a unit-cost curve rather than a user-to-user network: 'We have chosen to utilize this idle capacity to create a free tier of service which has generated substantial global scale for us. In turn, this scale makes us attractive partners for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) globally, which reduces our co-location and bandwidth costs. As our network grows, these dynamics become even more powerful.' The same section explains why the curve applies to every line rather than one: the architecture lets Cloudflare 'deploy standard, commodity hardware' and run 'every service on every server in every city', so a new product reaches 330+ cities at near-zero incremental capital. That is what lets the filing claim Workers is offered 'at prices that are highly competitive with public cloud vendors' while FY2025 GAAP gross margin still printed 74.5%. Switching costs (traffic routed through Cloudflare, DNS delegated to it) and threat-intelligence feedback from aggregate traffic sit on top, but the filing-stated primary source is cost falling as the network grows.

source: sec.gov

switching costs

The report's evidence points to the customer program more than to IP, though it also cites scale. It credits "long-term partnerships with major CSPs and international brand customers" for "a pivotal position in the AI infrastructure supply chain", states there is "no major change in the Company's major customers over the last two years" (the same three coded customers exceeded 10% of sales in FY2024 and FY2025), and describes "pre-validated rack level solutions" and liquid-cooling development; for notebooks it cites "advantages in scale manufacturing and supply chain management". A US brokerage channel check reported by TechNews on 2026-05-12 independently says Quanta has long cultivated the four big North American cloud service providers and is favoured by them for the high stability of its liquid-cooling and system-integration work. The same report describes order allocation across three assemblers, with Foxconn's vertical integration winning it the lead, so the seat is shared, not exclusive. The IP route is thin by comparison: R&D was 1.75% of FY2025 revenue.

source: doc.twse.com.tw

Leadership co leader

Named against Schneider Electric and Eaton among global competitors; the filing claims differentiation through application expertise and the most comprehensive portfolio — attributed, not independently measured.

source: sec.gov

clear leader

Leadership is measured, not inferred. W3Techs on 2026-09-17 records an 85.0% reverse-proxy market share against 5.5% for Amazon CloudFront and 2.1% for Akamai, and makes Cloudflare the largest authoritative-DNS provider at 18.5% of all websites versus 9.9% for the next-placed GoDaddy Group. The FY2025 10-K reports the enterprise side moving the same way - 4,298 large customers at 2025 year-end against 3,497 a year earlier and 2,756 in 2023 - and the Q4/FY2025 results release (cloudflare.com/press/press-releases/2026/cloudflare-announces-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2025-financial-results/) cites the largest annual contract value deal in company history at about $42.5M per year. The band is for the application-services core the share data covers; in SASE and in serverless compute Cloudflare is a challenger to larger incumbents, and no independent placement naming Cloudflare in those markets was obtained for this profile.

source: sec.gov

co leader

Independent sources place Quanta behind Hon Hai/Foxconn in the business that now drives it. A US brokerage channel check reported by TechNews (2026-05-12) counts about 2,100 of roughly 8,300 GB200/GB300 AI racks produced worldwide in April 2026 as Quanta's, second to Foxconn's about 3,700 (over 44% share) and ahead of Wistron's 1,300-1,400, and calls the field "one strong, two leading". DigiTimes' 2025 full-year ranking of the top 20 EMS/ODM vendors by revenue (published 2026-02-02, as reported by cnyes) puts Quanta third at US$68.2 billion, behind Foxconn at US$261 billion and Wistron at US$70.6 billion; DigiTimes' 1H25 ranking had it second, the spot it took from Pegatron in 1H24. A leading co-supplier, not the leader.

source: doc.twse.com.tw

Pricing power moderate

The filing lists price as one of five competitive bases but leads with reliability and quality, and sells into customers 'in some of the world's most critical industries' — where downtime, not price, is the binding constraint.

source: sec.gov

moderate

Evidence cuts both ways, which is why this is not the top band. For it: GAAP gross margin has never left a 74.5-78.7% band across FY2017-FY2025 (SEC XBRL fundamentals on this site) even as revenue compounded 16x, and the Q4/FY2025 results release (cloudflare.com/press/press-releases/2026/cloudflare-announces-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2025-financial-results/) shows customers committing more rather than less - RPO +48% year over year and new ACV up nearly 50%. Against it: FY2025's 74.5% is the lowest reading in that nine-year series, a large permanent free tier anchors the entry price, the 10-K positions Workers 'at prices that are highly competitive with public cloud vendors', and the competition risk factor warns that larger rivals can 'sell products and services with which we compete at zero or negative margins, offer fee waivers and reductions or other economic and non-economic concessions', with competitive pressure that 'may result in price reductions, fewer subscriptions, reduced revenue and gross margin'.

source: sec.gov

weak

The annual report gives FY2025 gross, operating and net profit margins of 6.98%, 4.12% and 3.53%, with gross profit up 33.92% on net sales up 50.54%. The Taipei Times (2026-05-15) reports 1Q26 gross margin fell to 4.78% from 7.92% a year earlier and 6.33% in the prior quarter; the CFO said high-priced AI server racks "weigh on margins under the buy-and-sell transactions" and that Quanta "has negotiated with customers to shift toward consignment deals to lift margins".

source: doc.twse.com.tw

Summary

Vertiv sells the power and cooling that AI compute physically cannot run without, and its filing leads with 'first-to-market designs engineered for next-gen rack-scale artificial intelligence compute.' Its customers are 'the world's most critical industries' — hyperscale, colocation, neocloud and enterprise data centers — where competition, by the filing's own account, runs on reliability, quality, price, service and customer relationships. The differentiation claims are the company's own; the breadth of the named competitor set is the check on them.

Cloudflare sells security, performance and connectivity as services delivered from one global anycast network rather than from boxes at a customer's edge. The FY2025 10-K frames the market as a consolidation away from enterprises that 'string together a diverse set of on-premises hardware boxes from different vendors' and away from 'stringing together multiple point-cloud solutions that only address specific network needs', toward one integrated provider it calls the Connectivity Cloud, and places Cloudflare as 'a leader in this Connectivity Cloud category'. The economics are unusual: idle capacity funds a free tier, the free tier buys global traffic scale, that scale makes Cloudflare a peering partner ISPs want, and peering cuts colocation and bandwidth cost - a loop the filing says 'become[s] even more powerful' as the network grows. Independent measurement confirms where that loop has already settled the market: W3Techs on 2026-09-17 shows an 85.0% reverse-proxy share and the largest authoritative-DNS footprint at 18.5% of all websites. Commercially the company ended 2025 with roughly 332,000 paying customers in more than 190 countries and 4,298 large customers, up from 2,756 two years earlier, with no customer above 10% of revenue. The contested half of the story is the growth half: the SASE platform competes with established cloud-security, email-security and SD-WAN vendors, and the developer platform competes for storage and compute against hyperscalers, markets where the 10-K's own risk factors concede rivals have greater name recognition, larger customer bases and 'more mature products and services developed for large customers'. The core is defended; the adjacencies are being fought for, and FY2025 gross margin at a nine-year low of 74.5% is the first visible cost of building GPU capacity for that fight.

Quanta Computer is a Taiwanese ODM whose 2025 annual report describes it as one of the world's leading manufacturers of notebooks, AI servers and cloud infrastructure products. AI server revenue doubled in FY2025, taking consolidated revenue to NT$2.12 trillion, while notebook shipments rose 1.3% to 46.5 million units; by 1Q26 servers were 80% of revenue and notebooks less than 15% (Taipei Times, 2026-05-15). Independent data put it second to Foxconn in NVIDIA GB200/GB300 rack output in April 2026 and third, behind Foxconn and Wistron, in DigiTimes' 2025 full-year EMS/ODM revenue ranking. The durable element is the qualified seat: long-standing programs with the large North American cloud providers, whose orders the CFO says now have clear visibility through 2028. What it lacks is pricing power. The FY2025 gross margin was 6.98% and 1Q26's 4.78%, three coded customers took 29.40%, 20.41% and 14.86% of FY2025 sales, and margin relief comes from negotiating consignment terms with customers, not from raising prices.

Chain position

Layer-7 power and cooling under every AI rack.

Cloudflare sits between end users and whatever hosts the application - origin data centre, public cloud or SaaS - so it is a control layer in front of infrastructure rather than infrastructure a workload runs on, which the 10-K argues is the point: customers 'concerned about being locked in to any one public cloud provider' want policy enforced by 'an independent and integrated services provider'. Two AI-era roles follow from that position. As a supplier, the filing describes 'ongoing deployment of graphics processing units (GPUs) across our global network of servers' behind Workers AI, Vectorize and AI Gateway, putting inference next to the user instead of in a region. As a gatekeeper, the application-services suite now exists in part to 'easily identify, block and control access from AI crawlers and AI agents and operators' and underpins announced efforts to let content creators monetise how those crawlers reach their work - which makes Cloudflare a toll point between AI model builders and the open web.

Contract designer-manufacturer: builds notebooks for international brands and servers and AI racks for cloud service providers. The U.S. took 72.68% of FY2025 sales, and the report lists NVIDIA, Intel, AMD, Qualcomm and MediaTek as its CPU/GPU suppliers.

Products (share / barrier)
Long-horizon vote +0.13 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →

+0.38 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →

+0.05 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →