Skip to content

How the signal is computed — Fabrinet

FabrinetShort · ~2 weeksas of 2026-10-09Neutral

Structural set the tone, but the swarm won’t commit — a negative tilt with weak agreement, so the call is Neutral.

Coverage
3/7
Agreement
0.03
.00
Conviction
How the swarm reasoned
✓Question›✓Coverage›✓Driver›✓Consensus›5Gate›6Verdict
🧭
Structural Driver
Industry Index 12.2 (falling -8.0 over window) — structural headwind.
−0.293
Industry Index falling -8.0 [no link]−0.22135%
Industry Index level 12.2 [no link]−0.07211%
2 item(s) · sums to -0.293
MACD histogram (medium) [no link]+0.06811%
Momentum (short) [no link]+0.0599%
MACD histogram (short) [no link]+0.0559%
ADX / DMI (medium) [no link]+0.0264%
Moving-average trend (short) [no link]+0.0264%
Bollinger %B (short) [no link]+0.0224%
Moving-average trend (medium) [no link]−0.0213%
Stochastic (short) [no link]+0.0163%
OBV (short) [no link]+0.0152%
Momentum (medium) [no link]−0.0142%
RSI trend (short) [no link]+0.0122%
ADX 22 (trend strength 0.55) [no link]0.0000%
Bollinger %B 0.88 (extreme 0.00) [no link]0.0000%
RSI 63 (overextension penalty 0.00) [no link]0.0000%
14 item(s) · sums to +0.264
Unusual-activity net skew [src]+0.0051%
1 item(s) · sums to +0.005
📰
News Abstained
no recent news
—
📈
Growth Abstained
Fundamentals inform the ~3-month call, not a 2-week move.
—
🏦
Smart money Abstained
13F filings move too slowly for a 2-week call.
—
🏰
Moat Abstained
The moat prior is a ~6-month structural view, not a 2-week move.
—
Consensus · did they agree?

Most voters leaned one way; structural dissented. Directional agreement 0.03.

The gate · score → conviction → verdict
Raw score
−0.024
×
Agree·cover·strength
0.03
→
Conviction
0.00

A mildly-negative score, but weak agreement — so the engine returns a no-conviction Neutral rather than overclaim. This is the system refusing to force a call it doesn’t have.

as of 2026-10-09 · config sig-v4-2026-07-26

Signal history

☆← Back to fabrinet · Methodology