Ciena (CIEN) ☆
networking & interconnect · Industry Index 11 (rank #104) ·
ⓘ Data freshness
price: as of 2026-10-30 index: as of 2026-10-30 fundamentals: latest filing 2026-09-03 Reports quarterly (10-Q XBRL)
Ciena supplies coherent optical transport systems and WaveLogic modems for data-center interconnect and telecom networks.
Industry exposure 0.4 (Ciena's coherent optics and data-center-interconnect systems are increasingly driven by hyperscaler AI buildouts, though its base remains telecom transport.)
Signal
signal: as of 2026-10-13Short (~2 weeks)
- ▼Options positioning— Delayed per-contract options — call premium 22% / put 78% (net skew -0.55), unusualness 28/100. Context: Consumer Price Index in 1 day.[options]
- ▲Price momentum— Technical uptrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote 0.25, confidence 0.35 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · derived internally
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 11.4 (falling -6.7 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Medium (~3 months)
- ▲Growth trend— Revenue 37% YoY (decelerating), net margin expanding.[filing]
- ▲Price momentum— Technical uptrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote 0.25, confidence 0.35 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · derived internally
- ▲Smart money— 1 filer(s) accumulating, 1 trimming in 2026Q2 (value-weighted net 0.29).[holding][holding]
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 11.4 (falling -6.7 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Long (~6 months)
- ▲Growth trend— Revenue 37% YoY (decelerating), net margin expanding.[filing]
- ▲moat— Editorial prior (subjective, NOT backtested): narrow moat / co_leader / moderate pricing ⇒ wider/leading long-horizon tilt 0.13. Bounded, low-confidence input.[moat: Editorial moat profile — ciena — narrow moat, co_leader, moderate pricing (as of 2025-12-12)]
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 11.4 (falling -6.7 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Relationship network
- Meta Platforms — customer
- Nokia — competitor
Key relationships
- Meta Platforms — customer · Ciena supplies WaveLogic coherent optical transport and data-center-interconnect systems to Meta and a set of neocloud AI providers. source: ainvest.com
- Nokia — competitor · Ciena competes with Nokia — enlarged by its Infinera acquisition — in coherent optical transport and data-center interconnect for hyperscalers. source: fierce-network.com
Options positioning
delayed · aggregate: as of 2026-10-30- Call vs put volume: 7,409 calls · 4,319 puts — tilt +26.3% toward calls
- Vol/OI turnover: 0.33×
- Premium ($ notional proxy): $5.5M calls · $6.0M puts — tilt -4.3% toward puts
- OTM tilt: +44.6% toward OTM calls
- IV skew (put − call): -33.7%
Delayed, end-of-day, aggregate per contract — not a live tape or trade-level flow. Buy/sell side is INFERRED from where each contract's last print sat in the bid/ask spread, not observed order flow. The company-wide side is withheld unless quoted contracts cover at least a quarter of the day's premium, so it can be blank while individual contracts below show a side. Call/put premium is measured across the chain we capture — the 6 nearest expiries within 45 days, not the full option chain — while the table below lists at most 20 flagged contracts, so summing those rows will not reproduce the percentage.
Recent flags
Why flagged:FOMC Rate Decision in 5 days
| Date | Contract | Score | Side (inferred)? | OI Δ? | Volume | Vol/OI | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-30 | $350 CALL | 80 | mid-market · no side | +2 | 1,704 | 27.5× | |
| 2026-10-30 | $327.5 CALL | 79 | mid-market · no side | +2 | 440 | 48.9× | |
| 2026-10-30 | $330 CALL | 62 | mid-market · no side | +1 | 127 | 7.1× | |
| 2026-10-30 | $270 CALL | 39 | sell-side | 0 | 138 | 138.0× | |
| 2026-10-30 | $325 CALL | 38 | mid-market · no side | 0 | 91 | 45.5× | |
| 2026-10-30 | $322.5 PUT | 34 | mid-market · no side | 0 | 145 | 14.5× | |
| 2026-10-30 | $230 PUT | 32 | mid-market · no side | 0 | 826 | 19.2× |
13 smaller flags (under $100000 premium) hidden.
Daily options volume vs baseline
latest session: 1.0× its 13-day baseline
Call/put premium
48% calls / 52% puts (by premium)
Structural set the tone, but the swarm won’t commit — a negative tilt with weak agreement, so the call is Neutral.
Most voters leaned one way; structural dissented. Directional agreement 0.28.
A clear neutral score; conviction 0.02 reflects how strongly the agents agree. Conviction is confidence, not a probability of the move.
Signal history
Moat
moat: latest change 2025-12-12Ciena is the optical-transport specialist among networking vendors - its fiscal Q3 2026 earnings presentation calls it "the only pure-play optical systems provider operating at scale today" - and its FY2025 10-K builds the business on one proprietary technology, the WaveLogic coherent modem, carried into the 6500 Packet-Optical Platform, Waveserver data center interconnect systems, the 6500 RLS photonic line system and coherent pluggable transceivers sold for Ciena's own systems and third-party equipment. Analyst rankings the company cites in that presentation, which it says it "has not independently verified", put Ciena first in data center interconnect globally, in total optical networking in North America and in submarine networks globally (Q2 2026, excluding China). The AI build-out has turned it into more of a cloud supplier than a telecom one: cloud providers were 53% of fiscal Q3 2026 revenue, revenue rose 37% year over year, and GAAP gross margin reached 45.4%. The 10-K is equally clear about why the position is narrow rather than wide. Competition is "dominated by a small number of very large, multi-national companies", many with greater resources; rivals use pricing to displace incumbents; contracts carry no minimum or guaranteed purchases; the five largest customers were about half of fiscal 2025 revenue; and disaggregation lets an operator buy the line system from one vendor and the modem from another, while the push into data-center interconnects brings Ciena up against Marvell, Credo and Broadcom.
Rating: narrow
Ciena's FY2025 10-K describes a technology position that has held but does not lock customers in. On the durable side, the strategy is to "build on and expand our global leadership in optical networking", resting on "our proprietary WaveLogic™ coherent modem technology" and approximately 2,400 issued patents with 800 more pending as of December 2, 2025. On the limiting side, the same filing says competition "remains intense" and features "aggressive selling efforts, including using significant pricing pressure to displace incumbent vendors", that "our customer contracts generally do not include minimum or guaranteed purchases", and that "there is no assurance that we will maintain our incumbency". Concentration cuts the same way: the five largest customers contributed approximately 50% of fiscal 2025 revenue, one cloud provider approximately 18%. Its income statement reports gross profit of $1,878.9M on $4,386.5M of revenue in FY2023, $1,719.6M on $4,015.0M in FY2024 and $2,004.9M on $4,769.5M in FY2025. Self-described leadership in its segments, with customers that are re-won deal by deal, is a narrow moat.
Type: intangibles ip
The FY2025 10-K locates the advantage in owned technology rather than in customer lock-in: "The success of our business and technology leadership depends significantly on our proprietary and internally developed technology." That technology is centred on WaveLogic, which Ciena's fiscal Q3 2026 earnings presentation (the source of the first two product rows below) defines as "Ciena's proprietary family of coherent optical chips — the core technology inside most of our networking products", and it reaches beyond Ciena's own systems: the 10-K's coherent pluggable transceivers use WaveLogic "for use within our systems and third-party equipment". Switching costs are the weaker candidate, because the same filing describes operators disaggregating line systems from modems and competitors using price to displace incumbents.
Leadership: co leader
Slide 6 of Ciena's fiscal Q3 2026 earnings presentation of 2026-09-03 (https://s25.q4cdn.com/550667411/files/content_files/Ex-99-2-2026-Q3-Earnings-Presentation_FINAL-1.pdf) lists "#1 in Data Center Interconnect Globally" (Dell'Oro Group), "#1 in Total Optical Networking in N. America" (Cignal AI, Dell'Oro Group, Omdia) and "#1 in Submarine Networks Globally" (Omdia), with market share measured as of Q2 2026 excluding China, and a caveat that Ciena "has not independently verified" the analyst data. On the company's own presentation of that data, that is the front rank in its core segments, but the presentation does not claim the global lead in total optical networking, and the FY2025 10-K says competition is "dominated by a small number of very large, multi-national companies" - Nokia, Huawei, Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and ZTE - many of which have "substantially greater financial, operational and marketing resources, and broader product offerings". A shared front rank, led by Ciena where the company-reported rankings measure it, rather than an uncontested one.
Pricing power: moderate
Moderate, and improving. The FY2025 10-K's income statement reports gross profit of $1,878.9M on $4,386.5M, $1,719.6M on $4,015.0M and $2,004.9M on $4,769.5M of revenue for FY2023-FY2025, in a market where, the filing says, rivals use "significant pricing pressure to displace incumbent vendors" and "price and total cost of ownership" heads the list of competitive factors. Since then the AI build-out has lifted gross margin: Ciena's fiscal Q3 2026 earnings presentation (https://s25.q4cdn.com/550667411/files/content_files/Ex-99-2-2026-Q3-Earnings-Presentation_FINAL-1.pdf) reports GAAP gross margin of 45.4% against 41.3% a year earlier, on revenue up 37% year over year, and guides fiscal 2027 adjusted gross margin to 45% to 46%. The presentation does not say how much of that is price rather than mix or volume, and the 10-K warns that AI-related demand has led to "a constrained supply environment" that can raise component costs.
Curated moat judgment grounded in the cited source. source: sec.gov
Value-chain position
Layer: networking & interconnect
- Upstream (suppliers): —
- Downstream (customers): Meta Platforms
- Competitors: Nokia
Ciena sits between optical-component suppliers and the operators building AI-era networks. Upstream, its FY2025 10-K says its products include "optical and electronic components for which reliable, high-volume supply is often available only from sole or limited sources", built by contract manufacturers with facilities in Canada, Mexico, Thailand, Vietnam and the United States; at November 1, 2025 it carried $826.2 million of inventory and $2.1 billion of purchase commitments. Downstream, the fiscal Q3 2026 earnings presentation puts direct cloud providers at 53% of the quarter's revenue against 37% for service providers, and describes its products as the links between data centers (data center interconnect) and between distributed AI training clusters ("scale-across").
Derived from this company's mapped supply-chain edges and its industry layer.
Signal contribution editorial prior
The moat prior voted +0.13 on the long (~6-month) horizon at weight 0.20 — the swarm call there is neutral (score 0.19, conviction 3).
Editorial prior — subjective, not backtested. It is bounded (±0.6), low-confidence, and never votes on short/medium. See exactly how it voted →
Product lineup
Products & services with an editorial market-share band and technical barrier band — qualitative judgments tied to a cited basis, never invented figures.
| Product | Market share | Technical barrier |
|---|---|---|
| 6500 Packet-Optical Platform and Reconfigurable Line System · Long-haul, metro and submarine optical transport The 6500 multi-layer transport platform for core, regional, metro and submarine networks, paired with the 6500 RLS disaggregated photonic line system, including the multi-rail line systems Ciena sells for AI infrastructure. | Top 3 Slide 6 of Ciena's fiscal Q3 2026 earnings presentation lists "#1 in Total Optical Networking in N. America" (attributed to Cignal AI, Dell'Oro Group and Omdia) and "#1 in Submarine Networks Globally" (Omdia), both as of Q2 2026 and excluding China. These are company-reported, vendor-level rankings that the slide says Ciena "has not independently verified", and the presentation does not claim the global total-optical lead, so the band is held below leader. | Moderate The line systems carry Ciena's photonic engineering - slide 10 reports "a second multi-rail win, further validating Ciena's technology leadership in high-density photonic architectures for AI infrastructure". Against that, Ciena's FY2025 10-K says customer contracts "generally do not include minimum or guaranteed purchases", that "there is no assurance that we will maintain our incumbency", and that competition is "dominated by a small number of very large, multi-national companies" - Nokia, Huawei, Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and ZTE. |
| Coherent pluggables and interconnect modules · Pluggable optics and data center interconnect components WaveLogic-based coherent pluggable transceivers (including WaveLogic 6 Nano 800ZR) for access, metro, regional and data center interconnect links, sold for Ciena's own systems and third-party equipment, plus electrical and optical interconnect pluggables and components that include technology from the Nubis acquisition in fiscal Q4 2025. | Challenger Ciena's FY2025 10-K presents this as new ground: as it advances interconnects "to address needs inside and around the data center, we will begin to compete with additional competitors, including Marvell Technology Group, Credo Technology Group, and Broadcom", and the risk factors add "we have a more limited history in commercializing and selling solutions into these markets". Growth from that base is fast - Ciena's fiscal Q3 2026 earnings presentation (https://s25.q4cdn.com/550667411/files/content_files/Ex-99-2-2026-Q3-Earnings-Presentation_FINAL-1.pdf) says "Pluggables revenue more than doubled YoY as WaveLogic 6 Nano (WL6n) ramped meaningfully" - but no share ranking is given. | Moderate The modules carry Ciena's proprietary WaveLogic modem, but the form factor itself enables substitution: the 10-K notes that with pluggable modems "a network operator can purchase the switch or routing platform from one vendor and modem technology from a different vendor", and expects Ciena to "compete with component vendors, including those in our supply chain, who develop pluggable modem technology". |
| Waveserver data center interconnect systems · Data center interconnect (DCI) Compact, modular interconnect platforms in Ciena's WaveLogic-based Optical Networking portfolio, for high-bandwidth links between data centers including encrypted data transfer, designed for a small footprint and low power. | Top 3 Slide 6 of Ciena's fiscal Q3 2026 earnings presentation lists "#1 in Data Center Interconnect Globally", attributed to Dell'Oro Group, with a footnote that market share measures are as of Q2 2026 and exclude China; slide 10 reports that "RLS and Waveserver revenue each grew more than 55% YoY". The ranking is the company's presentation of analyst data, which the slide says Ciena "has not independently verified", so the band is held below leader. | Moderate The presentation's glossary describes WaveLogic as "Ciena's proprietary family of coherent optical chips — the core technology inside most of our networking products", which is what a rival has to match. But Ciena's FY2025 10-K says operators can now disaggregate - "a network operator may use a line system from one vendor and modem technology from a different vendor" - and that competitors use "significant pricing pressure to displace incumbent vendors", so the DCI lead is defended deal by deal. |
What you're looking at
These charts plot Ciena's reported income statement, cash flow, and balance sheet from its SEC filings through 2026-09-03. Every figure is as-filed XBRL — none of it is an estimate.
Over the reported window, net income at $123.3M in FY2025.
Analyst consensus — third-party estimates from Yahoo Finance, as of 2026-10-26. Not SEC filings and not a TradingPilot forecast. source: finance.yahoo.com
| Period | EPS (est.) | Revenue (est.) | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q/E Oct 2026 | USD 1.62 (USD 1.49–USD 1.86) · 5 | USD 1.8B (USD 1.8B–USD 1.8B) · 15 | +30% |
| FY 2026 | USD 7.17 (USD 6.99–USD 7.33) · 19 | USD 6.4B (USD 6.4B–USD 6.4B) · 15 | +35% |
Each figure shows the consensus mean, its (low–high) range where available, and · the number of analysts behind that estimate.
Our model leans Low-confidence · Neutral on the stock over the medium horizon — a market-direction call, not an earnings forecast. See the Signal tab.
Income statement
Cash flow & liquidity
Balance sheet
Filings
- 2025Q4 · filed 2026-09-03 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q3 · filed 2026-09-03 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q3 · filed 2026-09-03 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q2 · filed 2026-06-04 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q2 · filed 2026-06-04 source: sec.gov
Show 163 older filings
- 2026Q1 · filed 2026-03-05 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q1 · filed 2026-03-05 source: sec.gov
- FY2024 · filed 2025-12-12 source: sec.gov
- FY2025 · filed 2025-12-12 source: sec.gov
- FY2023 · filed 2025-12-12 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q4 · filed 2025-09-04 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q3 · filed 2025-09-04 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q3 · filed 2025-09-04 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q2 · filed 2025-06-05 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · filed 2025-06-05 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q1 · filed 2025-03-12 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · filed 2025-03-12 source: sec.gov
- FY2023 · filed 2024-12-20 source: sec.gov
- FY2022 · filed 2024-12-20 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q4 · filed 2024-09-04 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q3 · filed 2024-09-04 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · filed 2024-09-04 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · filed 2024-06-06 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · filed 2024-06-06 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · filed 2024-03-07 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · filed 2024-03-07 source: sec.gov
- FY2022 · filed 2023-12-15 source: sec.gov
- FY2021 · filed 2023-12-15 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q4 · filed 2023-09-06 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · filed 2023-09-06 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · filed 2023-09-06 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · filed 2023-06-07 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · filed 2023-06-07 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · filed 2023-03-08 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q1 · filed 2023-03-08 source: sec.gov
- FY2021 · filed 2022-12-16 source: sec.gov
- FY2020 · filed 2022-12-16 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q4 · filed 2022-09-07 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · filed 2022-09-07 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · filed 2022-09-07 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · filed 2022-06-08 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · filed 2022-06-08 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q1 · filed 2022-03-09 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · filed 2022-03-09 source: sec.gov
- FY2020 · filed 2021-12-17 source: sec.gov
- FY2019 · filed 2021-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q4 · filed 2021-09-08 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · filed 2021-09-08 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · filed 2021-09-08 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · filed 2021-06-09 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · filed 2021-06-09 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · filed 2021-03-10 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · filed 2021-03-10 source: sec.gov
- FY2019 · filed 2020-12-18 source: sec.gov
- FY2018 · filed 2020-12-18 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q4 · filed 2020-09-09 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · filed 2020-09-09 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2020-09-09 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · filed 2020-06-10 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2020-06-10 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · filed 2020-03-11 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2020-03-11 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2020-03-11 source: sec.gov
- FY2018 · filed 2019-12-20 source: sec.gov
- FY2017 · filed 2019-12-20 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · filed 2019-09-11 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2019-09-11 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2019-09-11 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2019-06-12 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2019-06-12 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2019-03-11 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2019-03-11 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2019-03-11 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2018-12-21 source: sec.gov
- FY2016 · filed 2018-12-21 source: sec.gov
- FY2017 · filed 2018-12-21 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2018-09-05 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2018-09-05 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2018-09-05 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2018-09-05 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2018-06-06 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2018-06-06 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2018-03-07 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2018-03-07 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2017-12-22 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2017-12-22 source: sec.gov
- FY2016 · filed 2017-12-22 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2017-09-07 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2017-09-07 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2017-09-07 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2017-09-07 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2017-06-07 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2017-06-07 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2017-03-08 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2017-03-08 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2016-12-21 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2016-12-21 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2016-12-21 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2016-09-07 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2016-09-07 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2016-09-07 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2016-09-07 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2016-06-08 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2016-06-08 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2016-03-09 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2016-03-09 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2015-12-21 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2015-12-21 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2015-12-21 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2015-09-09 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2015-09-09 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2015-09-09 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2015-09-09 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2015-06-10 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2015-06-10 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2015-03-12 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2015-03-12 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2014-12-19 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2014-12-19 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2014-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2014-09-09 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2014-09-09 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2014-09-09 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2014-09-09 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2014-06-11 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2014-06-11 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2014-03-07 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2014-03-07 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2013-12-20 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2013-12-20 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2013-12-20 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2013-09-11 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2013-09-11 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2013-09-11 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2013-09-11 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2013-06-12 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2013-06-12 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2013-03-13 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2013-03-13 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2012-12-21 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2012-12-21 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2012-12-21 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2012-09-05 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2012-09-05 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2012-09-05 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2012-09-05 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2012-06-06 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2012-06-06 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q1 · filed 2012-03-08 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2012-03-08 source: sec.gov
- FY2008 · filed 2011-12-22 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2011-12-22 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2011-12-22 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q4 · filed 2011-09-08 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q3 · filed 2011-09-08 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2011-09-08 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2011-09-08 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q2 · filed 2011-06-09 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2011-06-09 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q1 · filed 2011-03-10 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q1 · filed 2011-03-10 source: sec.gov
- FY2007 · filed 2010-12-22 source: sec.gov
- FY2008 · filed 2010-12-22 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2010-12-22 source: sec.gov
- 2008Q4 · filed 2010-09-08 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q3 · filed 2010-09-08 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q4 · filed 2010-09-08 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q3 · filed 2010-09-08 source: sec.gov
Key ratios vs peers
Comparing against peers…
Institutional holders (13F, 2026Q2)
| Institution | Shares | Value | Δ shares QoQ | % of 13F | % shares out |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMR (Fidelity) Passive / index | 19,113,538 | $9.4B | -2,096,218 | 0.4% | 13.48% |
| BlackRock Passive / index | 12,718,494 | $6.2B | -655,293 | 0.1% | 8.97% |
| State Street Passive / index | 6,680,578 | $3.3B | 371,528 | 0.1% | 4.71% |
| Renaissance Technologies Guru | 184,774 | $90.6M | 86,974 | 0.1% | 0.13% |
| Bridgewater Associates (Ray Dalio (founder)) Guru | 101,038 | $49.6M | -42,808 | 0.2% | 0.07% |
TradingPilot-computed columns (% of 13F, % shares out) are derived from as-filed 13F values; only name, shares and value are as-filed.
What a 13F can’t show you
- Delayed 45+ days. Positions are as-of the quarter-end shown, filed up to 45 days later.
- Long-only, US-listed. No shorts, cash, bonds, FX, foreign, or private holdings; listed options are reported at notional and excluded from per-position equity value.
- $100M threshold. Smaller managers never file.
- “% of 13F” is not “% of AUM”. A 13F is a partial book.
- “Sold out” means “no longer reported” — not necessarily sold.
- One CIK can aggregate multiple sub-entities. Confidential treatment can omit positions.
- Passive index filers are not gurus. Their 13F changes are index flows, and they are excluded from TradingPilot’s smart-money signal.
- Quant caveat. A quant filer’s 13F (e.g. Renaissance) is a long-only quarter-end snapshot and does NOT reflect its actual high-turnover, short-horizon strategy.
- Guru pages and holdings never feed a signal (weightless).
No tagged news yet.
Headlines
2026-10-22 Yahoo Finance: CIEN · Is Ciena Stock Really Expensive?
2026-10-21 Yahoo Finance: CIEN · Ciena (CIEN) Has $8.5 Billion in Backlog, but Can It Justify Its Premium?
2026-10-21 Yahoo Finance: CIEN · CIEN Wins Space Norway Cable Deal: Can Subsea Networking Drive Growth?
2026-10-21 Yahoo Finance: CIEN · Did Analyst Upgrade Just Shift Ciena (CIEN) Investment Narrative?
2026-10-13 Yahoo Finance: COHR · Coherent Stock Falls Nearly 8% as Ciena and Lumentum Drop About 10%. Here’s Where the Stock Could Go by 2031
2026-10-12 MarketWatch Top Stories · Why Ciena, Lumentum and other optical stocks were among the market’s biggest losers on Monday
2026-10-12 Business Wire AI · Ciena Appoints Monika Fahlbusch as Chief People Officer
2026-10-12 Yahoo Finance: NOK · Can Ciena Sustain Margin Gains Despite Rising Component Demand?
2026-10-10 Yahoo Finance: CIEN · Ciena (CIEN) Jumped, But What Is The Market Weighing Now?
2026-10-10 Yahoo Finance: CIEN · Is Ciena (CIEN) Still Undervalued After Its 2029 Targets?
2026-10-09 Yahoo Finance: GLW · Jim Cramer Likes Ciena (CIEN) but Another Optical Stock Holds His Attention
2026-10-09 Yahoo Finance: NOK · Ciena's Openreach Deal: Can 1.6Tb/s Technology Drive Its Growth?
2026-10-07 Yahoo Finance: ANET · What Just Happened To Ciena Stock?
2026-10-07 Yahoo Finance: CIEN · Ciena Surges 178% in a Year: Should Investors Buy the Stock Now?
2026-10-07 Yahoo Finance: CIEN · Zacks Industry Outlook Ciena, Viavi and Ooma
2026-10-06 Yahoo Finance: CIEN · Ciena (CIEN) Gets Boost From 60-70% Optical Growth Outlook, Shares Jump 14%
2026-10-02 Yahoo Finance: CIEN · Wall Street Analysts Think Ciena (CIEN) Could Surge 36.82%: Read This Before Placing a Bet
2026-10-01 Yahoo Finance: CIEN · Coherent, Lumentum, and Ciena stocks surge on bullish Wall Street call
Impact = company-prominence tier (High/Medium auto-assigned by graph centrality/size; Low only on curated minor events), not a magnitude forecast.
Upcoming
| Date | Type | Event | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-12-03 | earnings | Ciena earnings (estimated) — Date not yet announced — estimated from EDGAR filing cadence (last periodic filing + 91/365 days); confirm via IR. estimated | Medium |
Past
| Date | Event | Impact | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-03 | Ciena earnings confirmed | Medium | EPS beat · +1.1% |
| 2026-06-04 | Ciena earnings confirmed | Medium | EPS beat · -8.9% |