Iron Mountain (IRM) ☆
datacenters, power & cooling · Industry Index 9 (rank #144) ·
ⓘ Data freshness
price: as of 2026-10-29 index: as of 2026-10-29 fundamentals: latest filing 2026-08-05 Reports quarterly (10-Q XBRL)
Iron Mountain provides records storage, information management, and a growing portfolio of colocation and hyperscale data centers.
Industry exposure 0.2 (Core business is records and information management; the data center segment (with cloud/AI tenants) is a small but growing part of revenue.)
Signal
signal: as of 2026-10-13Short (~2 weeks)
- ▲Options positioning— Delayed per-contract options — call premium 83% / put 17% (net skew 0.65), unusualness 28/100. Context: Consumer Price Index in 1 day.[options]
- ▬Price momentum— Technical flat across short+medium horizon(s) — vote -0.01, confidence 0.21 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · derived internally
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 8.5 (falling -7.8 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Medium (~3 months)
- ▲Growth trend— Revenue 19% YoY (decelerating), net margin expanding.[filing]
- ▬Price momentum— Technical flat across short+medium horizon(s) — vote -0.01, confidence 0.21 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · derived internally
- ▲Smart money— 1 filer(s) accumulating, 0 trimming in 2026Q2 (value-weighted net 1.00).[holding]
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 8.5 (falling -7.8 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Long (~6 months)
- ▲Growth trend— Revenue 19% YoY (decelerating), net margin expanding.[filing]
- ▲moat— Editorial prior (subjective, NOT backtested): narrow moat / clear_leader / strong pricing ⇒ wider/leading long-horizon tilt 0.24. Bounded, low-confidence input.[moat: Editorial moat profile — irm — narrow moat, clear_leader, strong pricing (as of 2026-02-12)]
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 8.5 (falling -7.8 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Relationship network
- Digital Realty Trust — competitor
- Equinix — competitor
Key relationships
- Digital Realty Trust — competitor · Iron Mountain competes with Digital Realty in the data center colocation market. source: datacenterdynamics.com
- Equinix — competitor · Iron Mountain competes with Equinix in the data center colocation market. source: datacenterdynamics.com
Options positioning
delayed · aggregate: as of 2026-10-29- Call vs put volume: 452 calls · 1,089 puts — tilt -41.3% toward puts
- Vol/OI turnover: 0.18×
- Premium ($ notional proxy): $127952 calls · $84137 puts — tilt +20.7% toward calls
- OTM tilt: -54.4% toward OTM puts
- IV skew (put − call): +1.3%
Delayed, end-of-day, aggregate per contract — not a live tape or trade-level flow. Buy/sell side is INFERRED from where each contract's last print sat in the bid/ask spread, not observed order flow. The company-wide side is withheld unless quoted contracts cover at least a quarter of the day's premium, so it can be blank while individual contracts below show a side. Call/put premium is measured across the chain we capture — the 6 nearest expiries within 45 days, not the full option chain — while the table below lists at most 20 flagged contracts, so summing those rows will not reproduce the percentage.
Recent flags
Why flagged:earnings in 9 days
20 small flags (under $100000 premium) — none large enough to highlight.
Daily options volume vs baseline
latest session: 1.4× its 13-day baseline
Call/put premium
66% calls / 34% puts (by premium)
Structural set the tone, but the swarm won’t commit — a negative tilt with weak agreement, so the call is Neutral.
Most voters leaned one way; structural dissented. Directional agreement 0.48.
A clear neutral score; conviction 0.19 reflects how strongly the agents agree. Conviction is confidence, not a probability of the move.
Signal history
Moat
moat: latest change 2026-02-12Iron Mountain stores and manages physical records for, per its FY2025 10-K, more than 240,000 customers in 61 countries, "including approximately 95% of the Fortune 1000", with "no single customer accounting for more than approximately 3% of revenue". Revenue was $6,901,737 thousand in 2025, of which the Global RIM segment contributed $5,291,481 thousand and the Global Data Center segment $803,429 thousand. The records business is the moat. Storage rental agreements "generally range from one to five years in length", the company says it has "consistently experienced strong customer retention levels", and a 2016 Department of Justice complaint described Iron Mountain as "the largest RMS company in the United States" and permanent withdrawal fees as a barrier to rivals winning customers. That lock-in shows up as pricing: MD&A attributes Global RIM storage growth to "revenue management" while Item 1A says volumes "were relatively steady in 2025". The threat is substitution: activity is declining as records become "less active and more archival", and a shift to non-paper storage "could adversely affect our businesses". The growth arms sit outside that moat. The company operated 31 data centers across 21 markets with 488 MW of capacity approximately 97% leased and a weighted average lease expiration of 10.3 years, counts "five of the largest global hyperscalers among our customers", and on 2026-08-05 reported data center leasing of 110 megawatts year to date and second-quarter revenue of $2.0 billion, up 18.5%. But in data centres it competes with operators owning "properties comparable to ours", and in asset lifecycle management with hyperscalers' own programmes. A durable switching-cost franchise in a market expected only to hold steady, funding growth businesses that compete on power, location and price, is a narrow moat.
Rating: narrow
Iron Mountain's physical-records franchise shows a real switching-cost advantage, but the FY2025 Form 10-K also describes a slowly shrinking need for it, and the growth businesses compete in open markets. On the advantage side, an independent record: the Department of Justice complaint published in the Federal Register on 2016-04-11 (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/04/11/2016-08210/united-states-v-iron-mountain-inc-and-recall-holdings-ltd-proposed-final-judgment-and-competitive) stated that "Iron Mountain is the largest RMS company in the United States" and that "Taken together, permanent withdrawal fees and other withdrawal restrictions make it difficult for a new RMS entrant to win customers away from existing RMS vendors." The 2025 10-K reports more than 740 million cubic feet stored, says "we have consistently experienced strong customer retention levels", and shows the Global RIM segment's Adjusted EBITDA margin at 44.7% in 2025 against 44.6% in 2024. On the limiting side, Item 1A says "Our Records Management and Data Management service revenue growth is being negatively impacted by declining activity rates as stored records and tapes are becoming less active and more archival" and "A significant shift by our customers to storage of data through non-paper or non-tape-based technologies, whether now existing or developed in the future, could adversely affect our businesses." In data centres the 10-K says it competes with "numerous data center developers, owners and operators, many of whom own properties comparable to ours". A strong, regulator-documented lock-in on a physical market the company itself expects only to hold steady, plus growth arms without that lock-in, is a narrow moat rather than a wide one.
Type: switching costs
The advantage is the cost and friction of moving stored records. The 10-K's Item 1A says that "if we are successful in winning record storage customers from competitors, the process of moving their stored records into our facilities is often costly and time consuming", and its notes record payments made "to a customer in order to terminate the customer's storage of records with its current records management vendor" as customer inducements. The DOJ complaint (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/04/11/2016-08210/united-states-v-iron-mountain-inc-and-recall-holdings-ltd-proposed-final-judgment-and-competitive) describes the mechanism: "Customer contracts also often impose a cap on the number of boxes per month that a customer may permanently remove from a RMS vendor's facility, such that a switch to a new RMS vendor may take several months to complete", and a new vendor "will have to offer to pay the fees to induce the customer to switch". Scale helps, since the 10-K says "the majority of our competitors operate in only one market or region", but the filing's own account of what keeps customers is retention and the cost of leaving, which makes switching costs the primary source.
Leadership: clear leader
The band applies to records management, the Global RIM segment that produced $5,291,481 thousand of 2025's $6,901,737 thousand revenue. Independent evidence: the DOJ complaint published in the Federal Register on 2016-04-11 (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/04/11/2016-08210/united-states-v-iron-mountain-inc-and-recall-holdings-ltd-proposed-final-judgment-and-competitive) stated "Iron Mountain is the largest RMS company in the United States", with fiscal 2014 worldwide revenues of "approximately $3.1 billion", and called Recall, with 2014 revenues of "approximately $836.1 million", "the second-largest RMS company in the United States"; the FY2025 10-K lists property "acquired in connection with our acquisition of Recall Holdings Limited". The 2025 10-K adds, in the company's own words, that "the majority of our competitors operate in only one market or region". The independent source is from 2016 and covers the United States only. Iron Mountain did go on to acquire Recall, but the proposed final judgment in the same notice required it to divest "Recall RMS assets in all fifteen geographic markets identified in the Complaint", thirteen of them to Access CIG, which the notice called "currently the third-largest RMS provider in the United States", so Recall's business was not absorbed whole. This leadership does not extend to data centres, where the Global Data Center segment's $803,429 thousand of 2025 revenue compares with total revenue of $9,217,000,000 at Equinix (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1101239/000110123926000032/0001101239-26-000032-index.htm) and $6,112,692,000 at Digital Realty (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1297996/000110465926015365/0001104659-26-015365-index.htm) in stored fundamentals from their FY2025 10-Ks.
Pricing power: strong
In records, growth comes from price on steady volume. MD&A attributes Global RIM "organic storage rental revenue growth driven by revenue management" (organic storage rental growth of 5.4% in 2025), while Item 1A says volumes "were relatively steady in 2025" and "Our organic revenue growth has been positively impacted by our ability to effectively introduce, expand and monitor revenue management. If we are not able to continue and effectively manage pricing, our results of operations could be adversely affected". The segment's Adjusted EBITDA margin was 44.7% in 2025 against 44.6% in 2024. In data centres MD&A cites "improved pricing" and "a 620 basis point increase in Adjusted EBITDA Margin reflecting recent lease commencements, improved pricing and cost containment", to 51.8% from 45.6%. The limits: Item 1A says that on power costs "we may be limited in our ability to, or may not always choose to, pass these increased costs on to our customers", and the 2016 DOJ complaint (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/04/11/2016-08210/united-states-v-iron-mountain-inc-and-recall-holdings-ltd-proposed-final-judgment-and-competitive) found that where Iron Mountain and Recall met, they "competed aggressively against one another for customers, resulting in lower prices for RMS". Adjusted EBITDA margin is a non-GAAP measure, and the Q2 2026 release (https://s204.q4cdn.com/148941814/files/doc_financials/2026/q2/FINAL-Q2-2026-Earnings-Press-Release.pdf) shows it at 35.8% for the company against 36.7% a year earlier.
Curated moat judgment grounded in the cited source. source: s204.q4cdn.com
Value-chain position
Layer: datacenters, power & cooling
- Upstream (suppliers): —
- Downstream (customers): —
- Competitors: Digital Realty Trust, Equinix
In the AI build-out Iron Mountain is a landlord and a recycler. It leases data center capacity to hyperscale customers, with "five of the largest global hyperscalers among our customers", and its ALM business "provides hyperscale and corporate IT infrastructure managers with services and solutions that enable the decommissioning, data erasure, processing and disposition, and recycling or sale of IT hardware and component assets". Upstream, Item 1A says "We rely on third parties to provide power to our data centers" and that construction depends on "one or more design firms, general contractors, and associated subcontractors".
Derived from this company's mapped supply-chain edges and its industry layer.
Signal contribution editorial prior
The moat prior voted +0.24 on the long (~6-month) horizon at weight 0.20 — the swarm call there is neutral (score 0.01, conviction 0).
Editorial prior — subjective, not backtested. It is bounded (±0.6), low-confidence, and never votes on short/medium. See exactly how it voted →
Product lineup
Products & services with an editorial market-share band and technical barrier band — qualitative judgments tied to a cited basis, never invented figures.
| Product | Market share | Technical barrier |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Lifecycle Management (ALM) · IT asset disposition Decommissioning, data erasure, disposition, recycling and resale of hyperscale and corporate IT hardware and components; reported within Corporate and Other (34 facilities across 8 markets at the end of 2025). | Unknown The 10-K gives no share figure. It reports that "Our ALM business received the ITAD Company of the Year award at the ITAD Summit in July 2025", an industry award rather than a share ranking, so the band is unknown. | Low The 10-K says "we compete with both hyperscalers and individual corporate clients who manage their own asset recycling, disposition and management, in addition to external competitors", and Item 1A that "A significant portion of the revenue from our ALM business is derived from a limited number of clients and tied to cyclical projects". |
| Global Data Center Business · Colocation and hyperscale data centres Enterprise colocation and hyperscale-ready capacity: 31 data centers across 21 markets at the end of 2025, 488 MW of leasable capacity approximately 97% leased, and 1,340 MW of total potential capacity; segment revenue was $803,429 thousand in 2025. | Challenger The 10-K says "we are among the largest global data center operators" by potential capacity, which is the company's own account. On revenue it is a smaller player: the segment's $803,429 thousand in 2025 compares with total revenue of $9,217,000,000 at Equinix (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1101239/000110123926000032/0001101239-26-000032-index.htm) and $6,112,692,000 at Digital Realty (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1297996/000110465926015365/0001104659-26-015365-index.htm) in stored fundamentals from their FY2025 10-Ks. No independent share ranking was found. | Moderate Entry takes capital and power: Item 1A says expansion "requires significant capital" and cites "constrained supplies of new power", and leases are long, with a weighted average lease expiration of 10.3 years. But the 10-K also says it competes with "numerous data center developers, owners and operators, many of whom own properties comparable to ours in several of the same metropolitan areas", on "availability of power, security measures, location, connectivity and rental rates". |
| Records Management (physical records storage and information services) · Records and information management Storage of physical records, vital records services, courier operations and secure handling and disposal of documents for customers in 61 countries; the Global RIM segment, which also includes data management, digital solutions, shredding, media archives and consumer storage, had 2025 revenue of $5,291,481 thousand. | Leader Independent: the DOJ complaint in the Federal Register of 2016-04-11 (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/04/11/2016-08210/united-states-v-iron-mountain-inc-and-recall-holdings-ltd-proposed-final-judgment-and-competitive) stated "Iron Mountain is the largest RMS company in the United States" and named Recall as "the second-largest"; the FY2025 10-K shows Iron Mountain later acquired Recall Holdings Limited, though the proposed final judgment in the same notice required divestiture of "Recall RMS assets in all fifteen geographic markets identified in the Complaint", thirteen of them to Access CIG, "currently the third-largest RMS provider in the United States". The 10-K's own claims ("a leading global provider of physical records management services", more than 740 million cubic feet stored) are consistent but are not relied on alone. | Deep The DOJ complaint said entry "generally requires a secure facility, racking equipment, delivery trucks, tracking software, and employees", that "a new entrant would have to expend substantial effort to build a reputation for dependable service", and that withdrawal fees and caps "make it difficult for a new RMS entrant to win customers away from existing RMS vendors". The 2025 10-K says moving a won customer's records "is often costly and time consuming". |
What you're looking at
These charts plot Iron Mountain's reported income statement, cash flow, and balance sheet from its SEC filings through 2026-08-05. Every figure is as-filed XBRL — none of it is an estimate.
Over the reported window, net income at $152.3M in FY2025.
Analyst consensus — third-party estimates from Yahoo Finance, as of 2026-10-26. Not SEC filings and not a TradingPilot forecast. source: finance.yahoo.com
| Period | EPS (est.) | Revenue (est.) | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q/E Sep 2026 | USD 0.61 (USD 0.51–USD 0.66) · 6 | USD 2.0B (USD 2.0B–USD 2.0B) · 9 | +14% |
| FY 2026 | USD 2.48 (USD 2.31–USD 2.60) · 7 | USD 8.0B (USD 8.0B–USD 8.2B) · 11 | +16% |
Each figure shows the consensus mean, its (low–high) range where available, and · the number of analysts behind that estimate.
Next report ~2026-11-05.
Our model leans Low-confidence · Neutral on the stock over the medium horizon — a market-direction call, not an earnings forecast. See the Signal tab.
Income statement
Cash flow & liquidity
Balance sheet
Filings
- 2025Q2 · filed 2026-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q2 · filed 2026-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q3 · filed 2026-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q4 · filed 2026-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q4 · filed 2026-04-30 source: sec.gov
Show 180 older filings
- 2026Q1 · filed 2026-04-30 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q1 · filed 2026-04-30 source: sec.gov
- FY2024 · filed 2026-02-12 source: sec.gov
- FY2025 · filed 2026-02-12 source: sec.gov
- FY2023 · filed 2026-02-12 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q3 · filed 2025-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q3 · filed 2025-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q4 · filed 2025-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · filed 2025-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · filed 2025-05-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2023 · filed 2025-02-14 source: sec.gov
- FY2022 · filed 2025-02-14 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · filed 2024-11-06 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q4 · filed 2024-11-06 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · filed 2024-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · filed 2024-05-02 source: sec.gov
- FY2022 · filed 2024-02-22 source: sec.gov
- FY2021 · filed 2024-02-22 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · filed 2023-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q4 · filed 2023-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · filed 2023-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · filed 2023-08-03 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · filed 2023-08-03 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q4 · filed 2023-05-04 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · filed 2023-05-04 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q1 · filed 2023-05-04 source: sec.gov
- FY2021 · filed 2023-02-23 source: sec.gov
- FY2020 · filed 2023-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q4 · filed 2022-11-03 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · filed 2022-11-03 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · filed 2022-11-03 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · filed 2022-08-04 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · filed 2022-08-04 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · filed 2022-08-04 source: sec.gov
- FY2019 · filed 2022-08-04 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q1 · filed 2022-04-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2020 · filed 2022-02-24 source: sec.gov
- FY2019 · filed 2022-02-24 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q4 · filed 2021-11-04 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · filed 2021-11-04 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · filed 2021-11-04 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · filed 2021-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · filed 2021-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · filed 2021-05-06 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · filed 2021-05-06 source: sec.gov
- FY2019 · filed 2021-02-24 source: sec.gov
- FY2018 · filed 2021-02-24 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q4 · filed 2020-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · filed 2020-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2020-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · filed 2020-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2020-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · filed 2020-05-07 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2020-05-07 source: sec.gov
- FY2018 · filed 2020-02-13 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2020-02-13 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2020-02-13 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2020-02-13 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · filed 2020-02-13 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q4 · filed 2020-02-13 source: sec.gov
- FY2017 · filed 2020-02-13 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · filed 2019-10-31 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2019-10-31 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2019-10-31 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2019-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2019-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2019-04-25 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2019-04-25 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2019-04-25 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2019-02-14 source: sec.gov
- FY2016 · filed 2019-02-14 source: sec.gov
- FY2017 · filed 2019-02-14 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2019-02-14 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2019-02-14 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2019-02-14 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2019-02-14 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2018-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2018-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2018-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2018-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2018-07-27 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2018-07-27 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2018-04-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2018-02-16 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2018-02-16 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2018-02-16 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2018-02-16 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2018-02-16 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2018-02-16 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2017-10-26 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2017-10-26 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2017-10-26 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2017-07-28 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2017-04-27 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2017-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2017-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2017-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2017-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2017-02-23 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2017-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2016-11-01 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2016-11-01 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2016-11-01 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2016-11-01 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2016-08-04 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2016-08-04 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2016-04-28 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2016-04-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2016-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2016-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2016-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2016-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2016-02-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2016-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2015-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2015-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2015-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2015-07-30 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2015-05-07 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2015-05-07 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2015-05-07 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2015-05-07 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2015-05-07 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2015-04-30 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2015-02-27 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2015-02-27 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2014-10-31 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2014-10-31 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2014-10-31 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2014-07-31 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2014-05-05 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2014-05-05 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2014-05-05 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2014-05-05 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2014-05-05 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2014-05-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2014-02-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2014-02-28 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2013-10-31 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2013-10-31 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2013-10-31 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2013-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2013-05-02 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2013-03-01 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2013-03-01 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2013-03-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2013-03-01 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q1 · filed 2013-03-01 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2013-03-01 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2012-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2012-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2012-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2012-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q1 · filed 2012-05-10 source: sec.gov
- FY2008 · filed 2012-02-28 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2012-02-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2012-02-28 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q1 · filed 2012-02-28 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q2 · filed 2012-02-28 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q3 · filed 2012-02-28 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q4 · filed 2011-11-08 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q3 · filed 2011-11-08 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2011-11-08 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q1 · filed 2011-09-19 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q1 · filed 2011-09-19 source: sec.gov
- FY2008 · filed 2011-09-19 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2011-09-19 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2011-09-19 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q2 · filed 2011-09-19 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q2 · filed 2011-08-08 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2011-08-08 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q1 · filed 2011-05-05 source: sec.gov
- FY2007 · filed 2011-03-01 source: sec.gov
- 2008Q4 · filed 2010-11-08 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q3 · filed 2010-11-08 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q3 · filed 2010-11-08 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q4 · filed 2010-11-08 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q2 · filed 2010-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q1 · filed 2010-05-10 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q1 · filed 2010-05-10 source: sec.gov
Key ratios vs peers
Comparing against peers…
Institutional holders (13F, 2026Q2)
| Institution | Shares | Value | Δ shares QoQ | % of 13F | % shares out |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock Passive / index | 33,570,910 | $4.2B | 549,556 | 0.1% | 11.28% |
| State Street Passive / index | 17,634,044 | $2.2B | 82,411 | 0.1% | 5.92% |
| FMR (Fidelity) Passive / index | 7,872,365 | $994.4M | 387,967 | 0.0% | 2.64% |
| Renaissance Technologies Guru | 7,700 | $972587 | 5,300 | 0.0% | 0.00% |
TradingPilot-computed columns (% of 13F, % shares out) are derived from as-filed 13F values; only name, shares and value are as-filed.
What a 13F can’t show you
- Delayed 45+ days. Positions are as-of the quarter-end shown, filed up to 45 days later.
- Long-only, US-listed. No shorts, cash, bonds, FX, foreign, or private holdings; listed options are reported at notional and excluded from per-position equity value.
- $100M threshold. Smaller managers never file.
- “% of 13F” is not “% of AUM”. A 13F is a partial book.
- “Sold out” means “no longer reported” — not necessarily sold.
- One CIK can aggregate multiple sub-entities. Confidential treatment can omit positions.
- Passive index filers are not gurus. Their 13F changes are index flows, and they are excluded from TradingPilot’s smart-money signal.
- Quant caveat. A quant filer’s 13F (e.g. Renaissance) is a long-only quarter-end snapshot and does NOT reflect its actual high-turnover, short-horizon strategy.
- Guru pages and holdings never feed a signal (weightless).
No tagged news yet.
Headlines
2026-10-22 Yahoo Finance: IRM · Iron Mountain’s Quarterly Earnings Preview: What You Need to Know
2026-10-15 Yahoo Finance: IRM · Iron Mountain Schedules Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Release and Conference Call
2026-10-01 Business Wire Health · L’imagerie IRM de pointe révèle des modifications de la composition musculaire et de l’infiltration graisseuse au cours du traitement contre l’obésité
Impact = company-prominence tier (High/Medium auto-assigned by graph centrality/size; Low only on curated minor events), not a magnitude forecast.
Upcoming
| Date | Type | Event | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-04 | earnings | Iron Mountain earnings (estimated) — Date not yet announced — estimated from EDGAR filing cadence (last periodic filing + 91/365 days); confirm via IR. estimated | Medium |
Past
| Date | Event | Impact | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-05 | Iron Mountain earnings confirmed | Medium | EPS beat · Rev beat · -4.1% |
| 2026-04-30 | Iron Mountain earnings confirmed | Medium | EPS beat · +1.0% |