Compare moats

Ambarella earns a solid gross margin on its vision chips but has not turned it into GAAP operating profit, and its own filing describes larger rivals and falling prices. The 10-K and 10-Q financial data (as carried in TradingPilot fundamentals) report gross profit of $231,266 thousand on revenue of $390,702 thousand in fiscal 2026 (year ended 2026-01-31), against an operating loss of $82,527 thousand. GAAP operating income was negative in every fiscal year from fiscal 2019 (a loss of $40,420 thousand) through fiscal 2026, including a loss of $154,560 thousand in fiscal 2024. The quarter ended 2026-07-31 still shows an operating loss of $8,143 thousand on revenue of $108,125 thousand (10-Q filed 2026-09-04). The 10-Q's risk factors say 'Many of our competitors are substantially larger'. They say third parties 'have licensed their technology, including image signal processing and computer vision IP, which potentially enables a greater number of competitors to offer competitive solutions', and that average selling prices 'have typically decreased over time and will likely do so in the future'. None rather than narrow, because in no fiscal year since 2019 has the design-win position produced a GAAP operating profit.

source: sec.gov

The one durable mechanism the 10-Q (2026-09-04) describes is the design socket, and it cuts both ways. 'Once an OEM designs a competitor's device into its product, it becomes significantly more difficult for us to sell our SoC solutions to that OEM because changing suppliers involves significant cost, time, effort and risk for the OEM.' In OEM automotive and robotics, the filing says Ambarella faces 'certain competitive disadvantages in these markets relative to larger competitors that have significantly more resources and a longer history working with OEMs and ODMs'. The risk factors present socket stickiness as protecting whichever supplier wins, say rivals can license image-signal-processing and computer-vision IP, and name no lock specific to Ambarella.

source: sec.gov

No independent ranking was found. The 10-Q (2026-09-04) names HiSilicon, Novatek, NVIDIA, Qualcomm and SigmaStar as primary IoT competitors. In the automotive camera market it names Horizon Robotics, Mobileye, Novatek, NVIDIA, Qualcomm, Renesas and Texas Instruments. It says many competitors have 'significantly better brand recognition and broader product offerings than us'. It does win sockets at named customers: its largest end customer in fiscal 2027 to date was Insta360 (Arashi Vision), and its top 10 end customers were 'approximately 67%' of fiscal 2026 revenue. It is one supplier among several, conceding scale and, in automotive and robotics, 'competitive disadvantages', so the band is at parity, not leading.

source: sec.gov

Gross profit has held at a steady share of revenue. The filed financial data (as carried in TradingPilot fundamentals) show $231,266 thousand on $390,702 thousand in fiscal 2026, $172,330 thousand on $284,865 thousand in fiscal 2025, and $62,416 thousand on $108,125 thousand in the quarter ended 2026-07-31. The 10-Q expects that average selling prices 'will likely' keep decreasing, 'which could harm our revenue and gross margins'.

source: sec.gov

Edge-device silicon: vision and AI SoCs designed into cameras and vehicles by ODMs and OEMs, sold mostly through the distributor WT Microelectronics.

• AI vision SoCs for IoT cameras Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov
• Automotive camera SoCs Challenger · Moderate source: sec.gov

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →