Skip to content

Compare moats

Up to three covered companies, band by band. Every call is a curated editorial judgment, never a disclosed figure — and every band carries its cited basis.

comparing IBM×KLA Corporation×Seagate Technology× maximum of 3 — remove one to swap
IBM IBM ai moat: latest change 2026-02-24 KLA Corporation KLAC ai moat: latest change 2026-08-06 Seagate Technology STX ai moat: latest change 2026-08-04
Moat rating narrow

IBM's FY2025 10-K describes "a highly competitive environment" with "hundreds of competitors" and says IBM is "regularly exposed to new competitors" as it executes its hybrid-cloud/AI strategy, while differentiating through "incumbency with enterprises" and "client relationships and trust" — a real but narrow moat, not a wide one.

source: sec.gov

wide

The fiscal 2026 10-K states 'The strength of our competitive positions in many of our existing markets is primarily due to our leading technology', and frames process control as 'an essential enabler' of the yield ramp in fabs the filing says now cost 'well above $10 billion'.

source: sec.gov

narrow

The FY2026 10-K names Western Digital and Toshiba as the HDD competitors plus 'NAND flash suppliers that provide and enable alternative storage technologies' — a two-and-a-half-player market with a substitute technology pressing on it, defended by scale rather than lock-in.

source: sec.gov

Moat type switching costs

The 10-K roots IBM's differentiation in "incumbency with enterprises" and "client relationships and trust" — installed-base lock-in across its hybrid-cloud platform (Red Hat) and enterprise software and infrastructure raises switching costs.

source: sec.gov

intangibles ip

The 10-K reports over 9,100 active patents and over 3,600 pending applications with terms running through 2045, alongside proprietary process-control software (Klarity, I-PAT, aiSIGHT) that turns inspection and metrology data into yield learning.

source: sec.gov

cost scale

The filing grounds its position in 'our areal density-driven technology roadmap' and 'vertically integrated engineering and manufacturing capabilities' — cost per terabyte at scale is the moat.

source: sec.gov

Leadership fast follower

An enterprise incumbent that differentiates via "incumbency with enterprises" but is "regularly exposed to new competitors" in its hybrid-cloud/AI push (FY2025 10-K) — a follower in the current AI cycle rather than its leader.

source: sec.gov

clear leader

The 10-K opens by describing KLA as a supplier of 'industry-leading equipment and services' and attributes its competitive positions 'in many of our existing markets' primarily to leading technology; named competitors are Applied Materials, ASML, Hitachi High-Tech, Lasertec and Onto Innovation.

source: sec.gov

co leader

The competition section names exactly two HDD rivals — Western Digital and Toshiba — making this one of three global suppliers of the technology.

source: sec.gov

Pricing power moderate

Gross margin is high and rising (54.9% FY2021 to 58.2% FY2025) on a software-mix shift, but "price" is a principal method of competition per the 10-K and consulting/infrastructure remain price-competitive.

source: sec.gov

strong

Services were approximately 23% of fiscal 2026 total revenues on an installed base that recurs, backlog nearly doubled to $12.57 billion, and SEC-reported net income was 35.6% of revenue in fiscal 2026 with operating income at 41.2% of revenue in fiscal 2025.

source: sec.gov

weak

The filing's own list of competitive factors leads with capacity, performance and 'total cost of ownership' — buyers evaluate on delivered cost, and hyperscale customers purchase under master agreements with demand forecasts, which is buyer leverage.

source: sec.gov

Summary

IBM's moat rests on deep enterprise incumbency — sticky installed-base relationships across hybrid cloud (Red Hat), enterprise software, and mission-critical infrastructure, plus brand and a large patent base. But its own FY2025 10-K frames "a highly competitive environment" with "hundreds of competitors" and says IBM is "regularly exposed to new competitors" as it pursues hybrid cloud and AI, so the moat is durable but narrow and contested in the AI/cloud growth arena.

KLA sells the inspection, metrology and yield-management layer a fab must run to reach volume production: the 10-K says accelerating the yield ramp ahead of competitors is critical to chipmakers' profitability, and backlog nearly doubled from $7.86 billion to $12.57 billion in the year to June 30, 2026 'due to strong demand driven by the AI infrastructure buildout'.

Seagate sells mass-capacity storage economics: HDDs to 44TB and systems to 3.5PB for hyperscalers, CSPs and OEMs, with the filing calling HDDs 'a foundational technology for delivering scalable, energy-efficient, mass-capacity storage with favorable storage economics.' The counterweight the same section names is NAND: flash suppliers 'enable alternative storage technologies,' so the moat is a cost race, not a fortress.

Chain position

A hybrid-cloud platform, enterprise-AI (watsonx), and consulting provider to large enterprises — a software/cloud layer of the AI stack.

Sits beside the process steps rather than in them — it measures and inspects what deposition, etch and lithography produce, and TSMC alone exceeded 10% of revenue in each of the last three fiscal years.

Layer-3 mass-capacity storage under every AI data lake.

Products (share / barrier)
  • Metrology (Archer overlay, SpectraFilm, SpectraShape, Therma-Probe) Top 3 · Deep source: sec.gov
  • PCB and Component Inspection (Orbotech direct imaging, ICOS) Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov
  • Reticle and mask inspection (Teron, TeraScan, LMS IPRO) Top 3 · Deep source: sec.gov
  • Semiconductor process-control software (Klarity, I-PAT, aiSIGHT, 5D Analyzer) Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov
  • Specialty Semiconductor Process (SPTS etch, deposition and plasma dicing) Niche · Moderate source: sec.gov
  • Wafer defect inspection and review (Surfscan, Puma, eSixx, eDR7xxx, Voyager) Leader · Deep source: sec.gov
Long-horizon vote +0.06 at weight 0.20 · swarm bearish

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →

+0.42 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →

+0.05 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →