Compare moats

MACOM’s FY2025 10-K describes advantages that are real but contested. On the durable side: a catalog of “thousands of standard and custom devices” serving “over 6,000 end customers”; its own compound-semiconductor fabs (GaAs, GaN and InP) in Lowell, Research Triangle Park, Ann Arbor and Limeil-Brévannes; a Lowell fab accredited by the U.S. Department of Defense with “Trusted Foundry” status, in markets where “a domestic fabrication facility may be a requirement to be a strategic supplier”; and product life cycles of five to ten years, “with some of our products generating revenue for over 20 years”. On the limiting side, the same filing calls its markets “highly competitive”, names ADI, Broadcom, Credo, Marvell, MaxLinear, Microchip, NXP, Qorvo, Semtech, Skyworks and Sumitomo among its significant competitors, “some of whom have greater financial resources and scale than us”, adds “increased competition from Chinese companies”, sells “primarily on a purchase order basis” with no minimum purchase commitments, and warns that “the ASPs of our products may decrease over time”. Its income statement reports gross profit of $385,797 thousand on revenue of $648,407 thousand in fiscal 2023, $393,773 thousand on $729,578 thousand in fiscal 2024 and $529,002 thousand on $967,258 thousand in fiscal 2025. Process know-how and defense accreditation that larger rivals can contest, product generation by product generation, is a narrow moat rather than a wide one.

source: sec.gov

The FY2025 10-K's own Competition section undercuts any claim of insulation: 'The industries in which we operate are highly competitive, and we compete with thousands of companies that range from large multinational corporations to local manufacturers', competition is 'generally based on breadth of product offering, product innovation, price, quality, delivery, and service', and TE has 'experienced, and expect[s] to continue to experience, downward pressure on prices'. The same filing explicitly disclaims IP as the basis of its position: 'we do not believe that our competitive position or our operations are dependent upon or would be materially impacted by any single patent or group of related patents.' What TE does hold is durable rather than absolute — it calls itself 'one of the leading providers of advanced automobile connectivity solutions', its Industrial segment 'a leading supplier', and it converted that position into rising profitability across the same filing's three income statements (gross margin 31.5% of net sales in FY2023, 34.4% in FY2024, 35.2% in FY2025). A position that earns expanding margins into admitted price pressure is an advantage; one held against thousands of competitors and no decisive patent is not a wide one.

source: sec.gov

Customers can leave easily, and the FY2025 10-K (filed 2026-02-24) says so: 'The majority of our contracts with our customers are based on our terms of service, which do not require our customers to commit to a specific contractual period, and which permit the customer to terminate their contracts or decrease usage of our products and services without advance notice.' The 10-K also reports that net dollar retention, the measure of revenue kept and grown from existing customers, 'increased from 98% in 2024 to 100% in 2025'. It says larger competitors 'have substantial competitive advantages as compared to us', among them 'the ability to bundle products together' and 'larger and more mature intellectual property portfolios'. DigitalOcean itself owned six issued patents at December 31, 2025. The developer community, free support and simple pricing described in the 10-K attract customers but do not lock them in, so the rating is none. Longer AI contracts are new. The Q2 2026 results release (2026-08-04, https://investors.digitalocean.com/news/news-details/2026/DigitalOcean-Announces-Second-Quarter-2026-Financial-Results/default.aspx) reports the 'first nine-figure annual customer commitments with leading AI-Natives, extending weighted average contract life from 1.6 years to over 3 years'. These are too recent to change the call. No independent market-share figure was found.

source: sec.gov

The FY2025 10-K places the advantage in process and design know-how: “We continue to invest in proprietary processes, circuit design and packaging technologies”, “we utilize a broad array of internal, proprietary process technologies and commercially available foundry technologies”, and U.S.-based wafer fabrication “enables us to offer proprietary processes” and provides “a domestic source for U.S. I&D customers”. The filing itself says patents matter less than people: MACOM held 729 U.S. and 497 foreign issued patents as of October 3, 2025, but “we believe that our future success will be determined by the innovation, technical expertise and management abilities of our engineers and management more than by patent ownership”. Switching costs are the weaker candidate: long product life cycles help in Industrial & Defense, but sales are made on purchase orders and new business must be won through “a competitive selection process to develop semiconductors for use in our customers' systems, known in the industry as a ‘design win.’”

source: sec.gov

The FY2025 10-K locates the advantage at the customer, not in patents. It describes 'close working relationships with many of our customers' whose 'relationships with them typically date back many years', and co-development as the mechanism: 'By working with our customers in developing new products and technologies, we believe we can identify and act on trends and leverage knowledge about next-generation technology across our products.' Roughly 75% of fiscal 2025 net sales were direct to manufacturers rather than through distribution, and the Transportation segment's products 'must withstand harsh conditions' — parts engineered in with the customer and built to survive the application, so the position sits inside the customer's design rather than in a purchase order. The filing rules the alternative out in its own words on intellectual property, so intangibles_ip is not the source; the 'thousands of companies' in Competition rules out efficient_scale.

source: sec.gov

The 10-K shows no durable source of advantage. Contracts give low switching costs, since customers can end or cut usage 'without advance notice'. Scale favours rivals: 'We compete primarily with large, diversified technology companies that focus on large enterprise customers', which the 10-K names as AWS, Azure, GCP, IBM Cloud, Alibaba Cloud and Oracle Cloud. In AI it competes with the same large companies and 'smaller more infrastructure-focused companies such as Coreweave and Lambda Labs'. It also faces 'competition with larger cloud computing companies and other consumers with respect to high demand equipment, such as GPUs'. Its intellectual property is thin: six issued patents, and 'We use open source software in our services.' The nearest thing to an intangible asset is the developer community. Hacktoberfest drew 'over 56,000 developers completing over 87,000 contributions in 2025', and the 10-K presents the community as a way to win customers rather than a barrier that keeps them.

source: sec.gov

The only independent ranking found is for the optical analog line. Deep Fundamental’s “Deep Dive: Optical Module Market” of September 27, 2024 (https://deepfundamental.substack.com/p/deep-dive-optical-module-market) states “In the driver/TIA market, Marvell ($MRVL) and Macom ($MTSI) are the dominant players, especially in the high-end 400G+ segment” and “in the LPO market, Macom holds a significant advantage, largely because Marvell, strong in DSP, tends to promote solutions that include DSP”. That is a shared front rank, from an equity-research newsletter rather than a market tracker, and now two years old. MACOM’s own FY2025 10-K claims no rank - it says “We believe that we compete favorably” - and names significant competitors from ADI and Broadcom to Marvell and Sumitomo, “some of whom have greater financial resources and scale than us”. No third-party ranking was found for the Industrial & Defense or Telecom lines. A two-year-old newsletter covering one of three segments cannot carry a company-wide co-leader call, so the band is fast follower.

source: sec.gov

The FY2025 10-K claims leadership in qualified form and then names the peers who contest it. Transportation Solutions 'is a leader in connectivity and sensor technologies' and TE is 'one of the leading providers of advanced automobile connectivity solutions' — one of, not the — while the segment's 'major competitors include Yazaki, Aptiv, Sumitomo, Sensata, Honeywell, Molex, and Amphenol'. Industrial Solutions 'is a leading supplier of products that connect and distribute power, data, and signals' and 'competes primarily against Amphenol, Hubbell, Carlisle Companies, Integer Holdings, Molex, Omron, JST, and Korea Electric Terminal (KET)'. Amphenol and Molex appear on both lists, so TE shares the top of the interconnect market rather than owning it.

source: sec.gov

By its own account DigitalOcean is not a leader. The 10-K names AWS, Azure, GCP, IBM Cloud, Alibaba Cloud and Oracle Cloud as its primary competitors. It says larger competitors have 'greater name recognition and longer operating histories, larger sales and marketing and customer support budgets and resources'. Among 'smaller and/or niche cloud service providers' it names 'OVHcloud, Akamai (Linode), Hetzner, Vultr, and Contabo'. Its products cover the same categories as the larger clouds (virtual machines, managed Kubernetes and databases, serverless functions, GPUs and inference), packaged for smaller customers: 'Our goal is to address the core needs of our customer base instead of offering thousands of complex products and services that are more suited to large enterprise companies.' Growth is speeding up: the 2026-08-04 presentation says Q2 2026 revenue grew 29%, 'more than double a year ago'. No third-party share figure was found, and nothing cited places DigitalOcean ahead of the smaller providers or close behind the large ones, so the band is at parity rather than fast follower.

source: sec.gov

The FY2025 10-K says “the ASPs of our products may decrease over time, and we must introduce new products that can be manufactured at lower costs or that command higher prices based on superior performance to offset price erosion”. On inflation it says MACOM has “generally been able to offset increases in these costs through various productivity and cost reduction initiatives, as well as adjusting our selling prices to pass through some of these higher costs to our customers; however, our ability to raise or maintain our selling prices depends on market conditions and competitive dynamics.” Margins have risen with the Data Center mix: the fiscal Q3 2026 earnings release (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001493594/000149359426000036/ex99_1earningsreleaseq3fy26.htm) reports GAAP gross margin of 58.3%, compared to 55.3% a year earlier, and guides fiscal Q4 adjusted gross margin to between 60.0% and 61.0%. The release does not say how much of that is price rather than mix or fab utilisation.

source: sec.gov

The FY2025 10-K states both halves plainly: TE has 'experienced, and expect[s] to continue to experience, downward pressure on prices. However, as a result of increased costs and tariffs, certain of our businesses implemented price increases in recent years.' Pass-through, not price-setting. The realised result is margin expansion rather than erosion — gross margin of 31.5% of net sales in FY2023, 34.4% in FY2024 and 35.2% in FY2025 per the same filing's income statements, and 36.5% ($5,319M on $14,573M) for the nine months to 26 June 2026 versus 35.3% a year earlier, with Q3 FY2026 GAAP operating margin of 19%, per the 22 July 2026 results release (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1385157/000110465926085589/tel-20260722xex99d1.htm). Strong would require pricing that leads rather than follows cost; weak is contradicted by three years of expanding gross margin.

source: sec.gov

Gross profit kept pace with revenue from 2023 to 2025 but fell behind in Q2 2026; the 10-Q says 'The decline in gross margin resulted from incurrence of costs for data center expansions in advance of the ramp in revenue from new data centers.' SEC XBRL data carried in TradingPilot fundamentals show gross profit of $397,497 thousand on revenue of $692,884 thousand in 2023, $465,943 thousand on $780,615 thousand in 2024, and $539,592 thousand on $901,427 thousand in 2025. The 10-Q filed 2026-08-04 shows $154,662 thousand on $281,184 thousand for Q2 2026, against $130,945 thousand on $218,700 thousand in Q2 2025. The 10-K warns that 'certain customers may demand substantial price concessions', that 'in the future we may be required to reduce our prices or develop new pricing models', and that customers 'may reduce their usage to lower-cost pricing tiers'.

source: sec.gov

MACOM sells components that customers build into larger systems - the FY2025 10-K lists wireless basestations, high-capacity optical networks, data center networks, radar, medical systems, satellite networks and test and measurement. In the AI chain it sits upstream of optical-module makers, supplying TIAs, drivers, lasers and photodetectors for 800G and 1.6T transceivers. Sales to distributors were 32.3% of fiscal 2025 revenue, two resellers took 12.4% and 11.2%, and no direct customer reached 10%.

TE is an upstream component supplier to the AI build-out, not a participant in compute. It sells 'connectivity and sensor solutions [that] enable the distribution of power, signal, and data to advance next-generation transportation, energy networks, automated factories, data centers enabling artificial intelligence', about 75% of it direct to manufacturers across roughly 130 countries. AI exposure runs through one end market: digital data networks was 28% of Industrial Solutions, and Industrial Solutions was 46% of fiscal 2025 net sales — so the datacenter line is a minority of a company still 54% transportation. That minority is where the growth now is: digital data networks net sales rose 34.2% in Q3 FY2026 and 48.8% over the nine months, and energy rose 34.4% in the quarter, the CEO tying both to AI momentum 'in both the data center and across the broader energy infrastructure' (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1385157/000110465926085589/tel-20260722xex99d1.htm).

Downstream cloud provider: rents CPU and NVIDIA and AMD GPU capacity (H100, H200, HGX B300; MI300X, MI350X, MI355X per the Q2 2026 presentation) from leased data centers to developers, smaller technology companies and AI-native companies.

• Optical TIAs and modulator/laser drivers Top 3 · Moderate source: deepfundamental.substack.com
• Photodetectors and lasers for optical transceivers Unknown · Moderate source: marketbeat.com
• RF, microwave and GaN products for Industrial & Defense Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov
• Telecom optical and RF components Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov

• Aerospace, defense, and marine interconnect Challenger · Deep source: sec.gov
• Automotive terminals and connector systems Top 3 · Deep source: sec.gov
• Digital data networks connectivity Top 3 · Moderate source: sec.gov
• Energy connection and protection products Challenger · Moderate source: sec.gov
• Sensors Challenger · Moderate source: sec.gov

• Droplets and core cloud (compute, storage, networking) Unknown · Low source: sec.gov
• GPU Droplets and Bare Metal GPUs Unknown · Low source: sec.gov
• Inference Engine and Gradient AI Platform Unknown · Low source: s206.q4cdn.com
• Managed Hosting (Cloudways) Unknown · Low source: sec.gov

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →