MACOM Technology Solutions (MTSI) ☆
networking & interconnect · Industry Index 9 (rank #141) ·
ⓘ Data freshness
price: as of 2026-10-30 index: as of 2026-10-30 fundamentals: latest filing 2026-08-06 Reports quarterly (10-Q XBRL)
MACOM makes RF, microwave, analog, and optical semiconductors, including laser drivers and TIAs for datacenter optical modules.
Industry exposure 0.3 (MACOM's datacenter optical drivers and TIAs are AI-exposed, but defense, telecom, and industrial remain core end markets.)
Signal
signal: as of 2026-10-13Short (~2 weeks)
- ▲Options positioning— Delayed per-contract options — call premium 59% / put 41% (net skew 0.18), unusualness 25/100. Context: Consumer Price Index in 1 day.[options]
- ▲Price momentum— Technical uptrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote 0.37, confidence 0.35 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · derived internally
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 9.2 (falling -7.6 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Medium (~3 months)
- ▲Growth trend— Revenue 36% YoY (accelerating), net margin expanding.[filing]
- ▲Price momentum— Technical uptrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote 0.37, confidence 0.35 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · derived internally
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 9.2 (falling -7.6 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Long (~6 months)
- ▲Growth trend— Revenue 36% YoY (accelerating), net margin expanding.[filing]
- ▲moat— Editorial prior (subjective, NOT backtested): narrow moat / fast_follower / moderate pricing ⇒ wider/leading long-horizon tilt 0.06. Bounded, low-confidence input.[moat: Editorial moat profile — macom — narrow moat, fast_follower, moderate pricing (as of 2025-11-14)]
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 9.2 (falling -7.6 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Relationship network
- Broadcom — partner
- Semtech — competitor
- MaxLinear — competitor
Key relationships
- Broadcom — partner · MACOM demonstrated interoperability of its laser drivers and TIAs with Broadcom's VCSEL, photodetector, and PAM-4 DSP for up to 1.6Tbps optical links. source: businesswire.com
- Semtech — competitor · MACOM and Semtech compete in optical interconnect component silicon such as TIAs and laser/redriver ICs for AI datacenters. source: industrialanalyst.substack.com
- MaxLinear — competitor · MaxLinear and MACOM compete in optical interconnect component silicon such as PAM4 DSPs, TIAs, and drivers for datacenter modules. source: industrialanalyst.substack.com
Options positioning
delayed · aggregate: as of 2026-10-30- Call vs put volume: 962 calls · 178 puts — tilt +68.8% toward calls
- Vol/OI turnover: 0.17×
- Premium ($ notional proxy): $934757 calls · $846277 puts — tilt +5.0% toward calls
- OTM tilt: +85.4% toward OTM calls
- IV skew (put − call): -4.7%
Delayed, end-of-day, aggregate per contract — not a live tape or trade-level flow. Buy/sell side is INFERRED from where each contract's last print sat in the bid/ask spread, not observed order flow. The company-wide side is withheld unless quoted contracts cover at least a quarter of the day's premium, so it can be blank while individual contracts below show a side. Call/put premium is measured across the chain we capture — the 6 nearest expiries within 45 days, not the full option chain — while the table below lists at most 20 flagged contracts, so summing those rows will not reproduce the percentage.
Recent flags
Why flagged:earnings in 14 days
| Date | Contract | Score | Side (inferred)? | OI Δ? | Volume | Vol/OI | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-30 | $280 CALL | 25 | mid-market · no side | 0 | 802 | 0.9× | |
| 2026-10-26 | $300 CALL | 24 | mid-market · no side | +25 | 627 | 0.9× | |
| 2026-10-23 | $210 PUT | 24 | mid-market · no side | +65 | 103 | 0.3× | |
| 2026-10-22 | $220 PUT | 23 | mid-market · no side | 0 | 74 | 1.1× | |
| 2026-10-16 | $340 PUT | 28 | — | -67 | 100 | 100.0× | |
| 2026-10-16 | $350 PUT | 25 | — | -20 | 29 | 29.0× | |
| 2026-10-15 | $320 PUT | 24 | buy-side | -1 | 150 | 1.5× | |
| 2026-10-15 | $330 CALL | 24 | mid-market · no side | -1 | 211 | 11.1× | |
| 2026-10-15 | $290 CALL | 23 | sell-side | +10 | 112 | 1.0× | |
| 2026-10-15 | $310 PUT | 21 | buy-side | 0 | 50 | 1.5× |
10 smaller flags (under $100000 premium) hidden.
Daily options volume vs baseline
latest session: 1.8× its 13-day baseline
Call/put premium
53% calls / 47% puts (by premium)
Structural set the tone, but the swarm won’t commit — a negative tilt with weak agreement, so the call is Neutral.
Most voters leaned one way; structural dissented. Directional agreement 0.12.
A mildly-negative score, but weak agreement — so the engine returns a no-conviction Neutral rather than overclaim. This is the system refusing to force a call it doesn’t have.
Signal history
Moat
moat: latest change 2025-11-14MACOM is a broad-line analog, RF, microwave and optical semiconductor maker that, unusually for its size, runs its own compound-semiconductor fabs, including a Lowell, Massachusetts fab with Department of Defense “Trusted Foundry” accreditation. Its FY2025 10-K splits the business into Industrial & Defense (radar, electronic warfare, data links, SATCOM, medical and test and measurement), Data Center (TIAs, modulator drivers, lasers and photodetectors for 800G, 1.6T and 3.2T optical transceivers) and Telecom (long-haul and metro optics, 5G, SATCOM and FTTx/PON). The AI build-out has made Data Center the fastest-growing piece: the fiscal Q3 2026 10-Q (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1493594/000149359426000038/mtsi-20260703.htm) reports Data Center revenue of $137,584 thousand for the quarter against $75,822 thousand a year earlier, out of total revenue of $342,237 thousand, and the accompanying release reports GAAP gross margin of 58.3%. An independent 2024 newsletter places MACOM with Marvell at the front of the optical driver/TIA market and ahead in linear-drive (LPO) optics. The moat stays narrow because each speed generation is re-won through design wins against larger rivals - the 10-K names ADI, Broadcom, Credo, Marvell, MaxLinear, Microchip, NXP, Qorvo, Semtech, Skyworks and Sumitomo, plus Chinese competitors - on purchase orders without minimum commitments, and the filing expects average selling prices to fall over time.
Rating: narrow
MACOM’s FY2025 10-K describes advantages that are real but contested. On the durable side: a catalog of “thousands of standard and custom devices” serving “over 6,000 end customers”; its own compound-semiconductor fabs (GaAs, GaN and InP) in Lowell, Research Triangle Park, Ann Arbor and Limeil-Brévannes; a Lowell fab accredited by the U.S. Department of Defense with “Trusted Foundry” status, in markets where “a domestic fabrication facility may be a requirement to be a strategic supplier”; and product life cycles of five to ten years, “with some of our products generating revenue for over 20 years”. On the limiting side, the same filing calls its markets “highly competitive”, names ADI, Broadcom, Credo, Marvell, MaxLinear, Microchip, NXP, Qorvo, Semtech, Skyworks and Sumitomo among its significant competitors, “some of whom have greater financial resources and scale than us”, adds “increased competition from Chinese companies”, sells “primarily on a purchase order basis” with no minimum purchase commitments, and warns that “the ASPs of our products may decrease over time”. Its income statement reports gross profit of $385,797 thousand on revenue of $648,407 thousand in fiscal 2023, $393,773 thousand on $729,578 thousand in fiscal 2024 and $529,002 thousand on $967,258 thousand in fiscal 2025. Process know-how and defense accreditation that larger rivals can contest, product generation by product generation, is a narrow moat rather than a wide one.
Type: intangibles ip
The FY2025 10-K places the advantage in process and design know-how: “We continue to invest in proprietary processes, circuit design and packaging technologies”, “we utilize a broad array of internal, proprietary process technologies and commercially available foundry technologies”, and U.S.-based wafer fabrication “enables us to offer proprietary processes” and provides “a domestic source for U.S. I&D customers”. The filing itself says patents matter less than people: MACOM held 729 U.S. and 497 foreign issued patents as of October 3, 2025, but “we believe that our future success will be determined by the innovation, technical expertise and management abilities of our engineers and management more than by patent ownership”. Switching costs are the weaker candidate: long product life cycles help in Industrial & Defense, but sales are made on purchase orders and new business must be won through “a competitive selection process to develop semiconductors for use in our customers' systems, known in the industry as a ‘design win.’”
Leadership: fast follower
The only independent ranking found is for the optical analog line. Deep Fundamental’s “Deep Dive: Optical Module Market” of September 27, 2024 (https://deepfundamental.substack.com/p/deep-dive-optical-module-market) states “In the driver/TIA market, Marvell ($MRVL) and Macom ($MTSI) are the dominant players, especially in the high-end 400G+ segment” and “in the LPO market, Macom holds a significant advantage, largely because Marvell, strong in DSP, tends to promote solutions that include DSP”. That is a shared front rank, from an equity-research newsletter rather than a market tracker, and now two years old. MACOM’s own FY2025 10-K claims no rank - it says “We believe that we compete favorably” - and names significant competitors from ADI and Broadcom to Marvell and Sumitomo, “some of whom have greater financial resources and scale than us”. No third-party ranking was found for the Industrial & Defense or Telecom lines. A two-year-old newsletter covering one of three segments cannot carry a company-wide co-leader call, so the band is fast follower.
Pricing power: moderate
The FY2025 10-K says “the ASPs of our products may decrease over time, and we must introduce new products that can be manufactured at lower costs or that command higher prices based on superior performance to offset price erosion”. On inflation it says MACOM has “generally been able to offset increases in these costs through various productivity and cost reduction initiatives, as well as adjusting our selling prices to pass through some of these higher costs to our customers; however, our ability to raise or maintain our selling prices depends on market conditions and competitive dynamics.” Margins have risen with the Data Center mix: the fiscal Q3 2026 earnings release (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001493594/000149359426000036/ex99_1earningsreleaseq3fy26.htm) reports GAAP gross margin of 58.3%, compared to 55.3% a year earlier, and guides fiscal Q4 adjusted gross margin to between 60.0% and 61.0%. The release does not say how much of that is price rather than mix or fab utilisation.
Curated moat judgment grounded in the cited source. source: sec.gov
Value-chain position
Layer: networking & interconnect
MACOM sells components that customers build into larger systems - the FY2025 10-K lists wireless basestations, high-capacity optical networks, data center networks, radar, medical systems, satellite networks and test and measurement. In the AI chain it sits upstream of optical-module makers, supplying TIAs, drivers, lasers and photodetectors for 800G and 1.6T transceivers. Sales to distributors were 32.3% of fiscal 2025 revenue, two resellers took 12.4% and 11.2%, and no direct customer reached 10%.
Derived from this company's mapped supply-chain edges and its industry layer.
Signal contribution editorial prior
The moat prior voted +0.06 on the long (~6-month) horizon at weight 0.20 — the swarm call there is neutral (score 0.27, conviction 9).
Editorial prior — subjective, not backtested. It is bounded (±0.6), low-confidence, and never votes on short/medium. See exactly how it voted →
Product lineup
Products & services with an editorial market-share band and technical barrier band — qualitative judgments tied to a cited basis, never invented figures.
| Product | Market share | Technical barrier |
|---|---|---|
| Optical TIAs and modulator/laser drivers · Data center optical analog ICs Transimpedance amplifiers and modulator and laser drivers for single-mode, multi-mode and silicon-photonics transceivers at 800G, 1.6T and above, for DSP-based modules and for linear (LPO/LRO) designs that drop the DSP. | Top 3 Deep Fundamental’s September 27, 2024 deep dive states “In the driver/TIA market, Marvell ($MRVL) and Macom ($MTSI) are the dominant players, especially in the high-end 400G+ segment” and that “in the LPO market, Macom holds a significant advantage”. It is an independent equity-research newsletter, not a market tracker, and it is two years old, so the band is held at top_3 rather than leader. | Moderate The same deep dive says Broadcom “has a weak presence in the driver/TIA market – analog chips have never been a core focus for the digital chip giant”, which leaves the field to analog specialists. But it also says “There is limited brand loyalty in this market, as it's relatively easy for clients to switch vendors of driver/TIA”, and that “Marvell's higher pricing reflects the greater ability of product differentiation in the DSP market compared to the driver/TIA market”, and MACOM’s FY2025 10-K says new business must be won through a competitive “design win” process, so each speed generation is re-contested. |
| Photodetectors and lasers for optical transceivers · Data center photonic components Photodetectors (including 200G parts now in volume production) and lasers, offered alongside MACOM’s TIAs and drivers so that, per the 10-K, components can be optimised for use together as a chipset. | Unknown On the fiscal Q3 2026 earnings call of August 6, 2026 (transcript published by MarketBeat), management said “Our team is having strong results with our 200G photodetectors, which are ramping in volume production and becoming a meaningful contributor to our overall data center growth.” Neither the call nor the 10-K gives a share or rank for these parts, and no third-party figure was found. | Moderate The parts come out of MACOM’s own compound-semiconductor process capability - the FY2025 10-K says “We manufacture compound semiconductors including GaAs, GaN and InP” - which a fabless rival lacks. The laser line is not yet proven: on the same call management said its laser team is working to lock down a production process and “while we cannot declare success yet, we are gaining confidence.” |
| RF, microwave and GaN products for Industrial & Defense · Defense and industrial RF semiconductors Standard and custom amplifiers including GaN power amplifiers, MMICs, switch limiters, phase shifters, diodes and integrated modules for military and commercial radar, electronic warfare, data links, tactical radios, SATCOM, MRI and test and measurement. | Unknown The FY2025 10-K describes MACOM as “a valued resource for our I&D customers” but gives no market share, and no reliable third-party ranking for its defense RF or GaN lines was found; its list of significant competitors includes RF incumbents such as ADI, NXP, Qorvo and Skyworks. | Moderate The 10-K cites barriers specific to this market: Trusted Foundry status, “which we believe differentiates us as a trusted manufacturer of ICs for U.S. military and aerospace applications”, the point that “a domestic fabrication facility may be a requirement to be a strategic supplier”, and long product life cycles. Against that, rivals include suppliers “some of whom have greater financial resources and scale than us”, and the filing warns that silicon keeps closing the gap on compound semiconductors: “the performance of silicon ICs continues to improve.” |
| Telecom optical and RF components · Carrier infrastructure semiconductors Clock and data recovery, laser and modulator drivers, TIAs and photodetectors for long-haul, metro and FTTx/PON optics, plus amplifiers, switches and frequency-conversion parts for 5G, SATCOM and wired broadband equipment. | Unknown The FY2025 10-K gives no share or rank for the Telecom lines, and no third-party source covering them was found. | Moderate For optical communications the 10-K says MACOM uses a “proprietary combination” of GaAs, InP and SiGe technologies “to obtain advantages in performance and size”. It also expects “increased competition from companies utilizing alternative technologies, including high-volume manufacturers using low-cost silicon process technology”, and notes that “Some of our competitors are also our customers”. |
What you're looking at
These charts plot MACOM Technology Solutions's reported income statement, cash flow, and balance sheet from its SEC filings through 2026-08-06. Every figure is as-filed XBRL — none of it is an estimate.
Over the reported window, net income at a loss of $54.2M in FY2025.
Analyst consensus — third-party estimates from Yahoo Finance, as of 2026-10-26. Not SEC filings and not a TradingPilot forecast. source: finance.yahoo.com
| Period | EPS (est.) | Revenue (est.) | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q/E Sep 2026 | USD 2.00 (USD 1.97–USD 2.02) · 16 | USD 420376360.00 (USD 419200000.00–USD 423335000.00) · 15 | +61% |
| FY 2026 | USD 5.51 (USD 5.44–USD 5.54) · 16 | USD 1.3B (USD 1.3B–USD 1.3B) · 15 | +37% |
Each figure shows the consensus mean, its (low–high) range where available, and · the number of analysts behind that estimate.
Next report ~2026-11-05.
Our model leans Low-confidence · Neutral on the stock over the medium horizon — a market-direction call, not an earnings forecast. See the Signal tab.
Income statement
Cash flow & liquidity
Balance sheet
Filings
- 2025Q4 · filed 2026-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q3 · filed 2026-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q3 · filed 2026-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q2 · filed 2026-05-07 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q2 · filed 2026-05-07 source: sec.gov
Show 177 older filings
- 2026Q1 · filed 2026-02-05 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q1 · filed 2026-02-05 source: sec.gov
- FY2024 · filed 2025-11-14 source: sec.gov
- FY2025 · filed 2025-11-14 source: sec.gov
- FY2023 · filed 2025-11-14 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q3 · filed 2025-08-07 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q3 · filed 2025-08-07 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · filed 2025-08-07 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q2 · filed 2025-05-08 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · filed 2025-05-08 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q1 · filed 2025-02-06 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q4 · filed 2025-02-06 source: sec.gov
- FY2023 · filed 2024-11-12 source: sec.gov
- FY2022 · filed 2024-11-12 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · filed 2024-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · filed 2024-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · filed 2024-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · filed 2024-05-02 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · filed 2024-05-02 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q4 · filed 2024-02-01 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q4 · filed 2024-02-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2022 · filed 2023-11-13 source: sec.gov
- FY2021 · filed 2023-11-13 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · filed 2023-08-03 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · filed 2023-08-03 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · filed 2023-05-04 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · filed 2023-05-04 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q4 · filed 2023-02-02 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q4 · filed 2023-02-02 source: sec.gov
- FY2021 · filed 2022-11-14 source: sec.gov
- FY2020 · filed 2022-11-14 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q4 · filed 2022-07-28 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · filed 2022-07-28 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · filed 2022-04-28 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · filed 2022-04-28 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · filed 2022-01-27 source: sec.gov
- FY2020 · filed 2021-11-15 source: sec.gov
- FY2019 · filed 2021-11-15 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q4 · filed 2021-07-29 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · filed 2021-07-29 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · filed 2021-07-29 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · filed 2021-04-29 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · filed 2021-04-29 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · filed 2021-01-28 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · filed 2021-01-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2019 · filed 2020-11-18 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · filed 2020-11-18 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2020-11-18 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2020-11-18 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2020-11-18 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q4 · filed 2020-11-18 source: sec.gov
- FY2018 · filed 2020-11-18 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2020-07-30 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2020-07-30 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2020-07-30 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · filed 2020-07-30 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2020-04-30 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · filed 2020-04-30 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · filed 2020-01-29 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · filed 2020-01-29 source: sec.gov
- FY2016 · filed 2019-11-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2017 · filed 2019-11-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2018 · filed 2019-11-26 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2019-11-26 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2019-11-26 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2019-11-26 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2019-11-26 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2019-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2019-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2019-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2019-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2019-05-08 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2019-05-08 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2019-02-06 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2019-02-06 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · filed 2019-02-06 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2018-11-16 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2018-11-16 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2018-11-16 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2018-11-16 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2018-11-16 source: sec.gov
- FY2016 · filed 2018-11-16 source: sec.gov
- FY2017 · filed 2018-11-16 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2018-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2018-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2018-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2018-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2018-05-03 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2018-05-03 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2018-02-07 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2018-02-07 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2017-11-15 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2017-11-15 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2017-11-15 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2017-11-15 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2017-11-15 source: sec.gov
- FY2016 · filed 2017-11-15 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2017-08-02 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2017-08-02 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2017-08-02 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2017-04-26 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2017-04-26 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2017-02-01 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2017-02-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2016-11-17 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2016-11-17 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2016-11-17 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2016-11-17 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2016-11-17 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2016-11-17 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2016-11-17 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2016-07-27 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2016-07-27 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2016-07-27 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2016-04-27 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2016-04-27 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2016-01-27 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2016-01-27 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2015-11-24 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2015-11-24 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2015-11-24 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2015-11-24 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2015-11-24 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2015-11-24 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2015-11-24 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2015-08-12 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2015-08-12 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2015-08-12 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2015-08-12 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2015-05-13 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2015-05-13 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2015-02-02 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2015-02-02 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2014-12-09 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2014-12-09 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2014-12-09 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2014-12-09 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2014-12-09 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2014-12-09 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2014-12-09 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2014-12-09 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2014-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2014-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2014-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2014-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2014-07-03 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2014-07-03 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2014-07-03 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2014-07-03 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2014-07-03 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2014-05-12 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2014-05-12 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2014-02-12 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2014-02-12 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2013-12-05 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2013-12-05 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2013-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2013-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2013-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2013-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2013-05-03 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2013-05-03 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2013-02-01 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2013-02-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2012-11-28 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2012-11-28 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2012-11-28 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2012-11-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2012-11-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2012-11-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2012-11-28 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q3 · filed 2012-08-07 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2012-08-07 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2012-08-07 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2012-05-10 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2012-05-10 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2012-05-10 source: sec.gov
Key ratios vs peers
Comparing against peers…
Institutional holders (13F, 2026Q2)
| Institution | Shares | Value | Δ shares QoQ | % of 13F | % shares out |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMR (Fidelity) Passive / index | 10,527,144 | $4.0B | -83,296 | 0.2% | 13.78% |
| BlackRock Passive / index | 9,512,899 | $3.6B | 946,616 | 0.1% | 12.46% |
| State Street Passive / index | 2,262,242 | $860.5M | 109,491 | 0.0% | 2.96% |
TradingPilot-computed columns (% of 13F, % shares out) are derived from as-filed 13F values; only name, shares and value are as-filed.
What a 13F can’t show you
- Delayed 45+ days. Positions are as-of the quarter-end shown, filed up to 45 days later.
- Long-only, US-listed. No shorts, cash, bonds, FX, foreign, or private holdings; listed options are reported at notional and excluded from per-position equity value.
- $100M threshold. Smaller managers never file.
- “% of 13F” is not “% of AUM”. A 13F is a partial book.
- “Sold out” means “no longer reported” — not necessarily sold.
- One CIK can aggregate multiple sub-entities. Confidential treatment can omit positions.
- Passive index filers are not gurus. Their 13F changes are index flows, and they are excluded from TradingPilot’s smart-money signal.
- Quant caveat. A quant filer’s 13F (e.g. Renaissance) is a long-only quarter-end snapshot and does NOT reflect its actual high-turnover, short-horizon strategy.
- Guru pages and holdings never feed a signal (weightless).
No tagged news yet.
Headlines
2026-10-09 Yahoo Finance: MTSI · M/A-Com (MTSI) Is Up 12.62% in One Week: What You Should Know
2026-10-06 Yahoo Finance: MTSI · MACOM (MTSI) Shares Skyrocket, What You Need To Know
2026-10-01 Yahoo Finance: MTSI · Why Are MACOM (MTSI) Shares Soaring Today
Impact = company-prominence tier (High/Medium auto-assigned by graph centrality/size; Low only on curated minor events), not a magnitude forecast.
Upcoming
| Date | Type | Event | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-05 | earnings | MACOM Technology Solutions earnings — Company-confirmed date. confirmed | Medium |
Past
| Date | Event | Impact | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-06 | MACOM Technology Solutions earnings confirmed | Medium | EPS beat · +3.0% |
| 2026-05-07 | MACOM Technology Solutions earnings confirmed | Medium | EPS beat · +4.5% |