Skip to content

How the signal is computed — MiTAC Holdings

MiTAC HoldingsShort · ~2 weeksas of 2026-10-05Neutral

Structural set the tone, but the swarm won’t commit — a negative tilt with weak agreement, so the call is Neutral.

Coverage
2/7
Agreement
0.34
.15
Conviction
How the swarm reasoned
✓Question›✓Coverage›3Driver›4Consensus›5Gate›6Verdict
🧭
Structural Driver
Industry Index 8.3 (falling -9.1 over window) — structural headwind.
−0.516
Industry Index falling -9.1 [no link]−0.38060%
Industry Index level 8.3 [no link]−0.13621%
2 item(s) · sums to -0.516
Moving-average trend (medium) [no link]+0.0528%
Momentum (medium) [no link]+0.0173%
OBV (short) [no link]−0.0112%
Moving-average trend (short) [no link]+0.0102%
MACD histogram (medium) [no link]+0.0091%
MACD histogram (short) [no link]+0.0071%
ADX / DMI (medium) [no link]+0.0071%
Bollinger %B (short) [no link]+0.0031%
Stochastic (short) [no link]+0.0031%
RSI trend (short) [no link]+0.0010%
Momentum (short) [no link]−0.0010%
ADX 10 (trend strength 0.25) [no link]0.0000%
Bollinger %B 0.57 (extreme 0.00) [no link]0.0000%
RSI 51 (overextension penalty 0.00) [no link]0.0000%
14 item(s) · sums to +0.097
📰
News Abstained
no recent news
—
⚖️
Options positioning Abstained
no liquid options snapshot
—
📈
Growth Abstained
Fundamentals inform the ~3-month call, not a 2-week move.
—
🏦
Smart money Abstained
13F filings move too slowly for a 2-week call.
—
🏰
Moat Abstained
The moat prior is a ~6-month structural view, not a 2-week move.
—
Consensus · did they agree?

Most voters leaned one way; structural dissented. Directional agreement 0.34.

The gate · score → conviction → verdict
Raw score
−0.419
×
Agree·cover·strength
0.34
→
Conviction
0.15

A clear neutral score; conviction 0.15 reflects how strongly the agents agree. Conviction is confidence, not a probability of the move.

as of 2026-10-05 · config sig-v4-2026-07-26

Signal history

☆← Back to mitac · Methodology