Axcelis Technologies (ACLS) ☆
equipment & EDA · Industry Index 5 (rank #190) ·
ⓘ Data freshness
price: as of 2026-10-30 index: as of 2026-10-30 fundamentals: latest filing 2026-08-06 Reports quarterly (10-Q XBRL)
US supplier of ion implantation systems, with strong exposure to silicon-carbide power devices, image sensors, memory and mature-node logic.
Industry exposure 0.2 (Ion implant demand is dominated by SiC power, automotive and mature-node markets, with only modest direct AI-compute exposure via memory.)
Signal
signal: as of 2026-10-13Short (~2 weeks)
- ▲Options positioning— Delayed per-contract options — call premium 60% / put 40% (net skew 0.19), unusualness 30/100. Context: Consumer Price Index in 1 day.[options]
- ▼Price momentum— Technical downtrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote -0.08, confidence 0.45 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · derived internally
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 5.2 (falling -10.2 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Medium (~3 months)
- ▬Growth trend— Revenue 11% YoY (accelerating), net margin contracting.[filing]
- ▼Price momentum— Technical downtrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote -0.08, confidence 0.45 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · derived internally
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 5.2 (falling -10.2 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Long (~6 months)
- ▬Growth trend— Revenue 11% YoY (accelerating), net margin contracting.[filing]
- ▲moat— Editorial prior (subjective, NOT backtested): narrow moat / fast_follower / moderate pricing ⇒ wider/leading long-horizon tilt 0.06. Bounded, low-confidence input.[moat: Editorial moat profile — axcelis — narrow moat, fast_follower, moderate pricing (as of 2026-02-26)]
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 5.2 (falling -10.2 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Relationship network
- Applied Materials — competitor
- Micron — customer
Key relationships
- Applied Materials — competitor · Axcelis identifies Applied Materials as its principal competitor in ion-implantation equipment. source: sec.gov
- Micron — customer · Axcelis supplies Purion ion-implantation systems to logic and memory chipmakers, including DRAM producers whose HBM output feeds AI accelerators. source: moatmind.com
Options positioning
delayed · aggregate: as of 2026-10-30- Call vs put volume: 162 calls · 179 puts — tilt -5.0% toward puts
- Vol/OI turnover: 0.14×
- Premium ($ notional proxy): $365491 calls · $370241 puts — tilt -0.6% toward puts
- OTM tilt: +30.2% toward OTM calls
- IV skew (put − call): -2.7%
Delayed, end-of-day, aggregate per contract — not a live tape or trade-level flow. Buy/sell side is INFERRED from where each contract's last print sat in the bid/ask spread, not observed order flow. The company-wide side is withheld unless quoted contracts cover at least a quarter of the day's premium, so it can be blank while individual contracts below show a side. Call/put premium is measured across the chain we capture — the 6 nearest expiries within 45 days, not the full option chain — while the table below lists at most 20 flagged contracts, so summing those rows will not reproduce the percentage.
Recent flags
Why flagged:earnings in 14 days
| Date | Contract | Score | Side (inferred)? | OI Δ? | Volume | Vol/OI | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-22 | $110 PUT | 22 | sell-side | +20 | 102 | 2.8× |
19 smaller flags (under $100000 premium) hidden.
Daily options volume vs baseline
latest session: 0.8× its 13-day baseline
Call/put premium
50% calls / 50% puts (by premium)
Structural carried this call — it supplied almost the entire lean; the other voters nearly net out.
Most voters leaned one way; structural dissented. Directional agreement 0.61.
A clear bearish score; conviction 0.20 reflects how strongly the agents agree. Conviction is confidence, not a probability of the move.
Signal history
Moat
moat: latest change 2026-02-26Axcelis is an ion-implant specialist. The FY2025 10-K says implantation was 98.2% of 2025 revenue, sold as the Purion family of high energy, high current and medium current single-wafer implanters, the Ovation batch implanters, and aftermarket parts, upgrades and services. Its strongest ground is power devices. Axcelis calls itself 'a technology leader and supplier of choice in the implant-intensive power device segment', which made up 55% of the value of 2025 system shipments, and its Purion Power Series covers silicon carbide wafers. 2025 was a down year: revenue fell to $839.0 million from $1,017.9 million, systems backlog to $457.0 million from $645.8 million, and operating profit to $119.3 million from $210.8 million, while gross margin held at 44.9%. The 10-K names Applied Materials as the main rival and the only other full-range implant maker; other competitors include Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ion Technology, Nissin Ion Equipment, Advanced Ion Beam Technology and two Chinese developers. Among its 2026 goals the company lists 'Achieve market share leadership across all served markets', which it has not yet reached. On the Q2 2026 call (https://www.marketbeat.com/earnings/reports/2026-8-5-axcelis-technologies-inc-stock/), management said electric vehicles remain the number one driver of silicon carbide demand. It also said it expects its merger with Veeco, under which each Veeco share converts into 0.3575 Axcelis shares according to the 10-K, to close in the second half of 2026, pending approval in China.
Rating: narrow
Axcelis's FY2025 10-K describes a protected but contested position. On the durable side, it says 'Axcelis and Applied Materials are the only ion implant system manufacturers with a full range of implant products'. About 3,400 Axcelis products are in use in 27 countries, and they feed an aftermarket business (CS&I) that earned $268.0 million, or 31.9% of 2025 revenue. The company holds 169 active U.S. patents and 356 active patents granted in other countries. On the limiting side, the risk factors say the ion implant segment 'includes one company with substantially greater financial, engineering, manufacturing, marketing and customer service and support resources', as well as 'several smaller companies that could provide innovative systems'. U.S. export controls 'exacerbate the risk that Chinese customers will change suppliers to non-U.S. vendors', while Kingstone Semiconductor and CETC 'continue to develop ion implanters for the Chinese domestic market'. 'None of our customers have entered into a long-term agreement requiring it to purchase our products.' Revenue fell to $839.0 million in 2025 from $1,017.9 million in 2024. A full-line position with a large installed base, against a better-resourced rival and new Chinese entrants, is a narrow moat.
Type: intangibles ip
The FY2025 10-K grounds the advantage in owned implant technology rather than contractual lock-in. Its Purion implanters share 'a common platform which enables a unique combination of implant purity, precision, and productivity', and its high energy systems use 'production-proven RF Linac high energy, spot beam technology'. System assembly and testing stays in-house 'due to the high degree of expertise and intellectual property associated with the process and design'. The company holds 169 active U.S. and 356 foreign patents, though it says it is not 'substantially dependent on any single patent or any group of patents'. The installed base supports aftermarket revenue but does not lock customers in: the risk factors say customers often train 'their own staff to maintain and service' equipment and buy parts that are not patent-protected from third parties. Switching costs are therefore the weaker candidate.
Leadership: fast follower
The FY2025 10-K says 'In the market for ion implantation systems, we mainly compete against Applied Materials' and that the two 'are the only ion implant system manufacturers with a full range of implant products'. It claims Axcelis 'has been a market leader in high energy ion implanters for many years' and is 'a technology leader and supplier of choice' in power devices. But its risk factors say the implant segment includes 'one company with substantially greater' resources (unnamed there; Applied Materials is the main rival it names), and it lists 'Achieve market share leadership across all served markets' as a 2026 goal rather than a current fact. No third-party market-share source was fetched, so these are the company's own claims. Which of the two full-line suppliers has the larger overall share is not established by the sources read. Because the only basis for a shared lead is the company's own description, and that description treats share leadership as a goal not yet met, the band is held at fast_follower rather than co_leader.
Pricing power: moderate
The FY2025 10-K reports gross margin of 44.9% in 2025 against 44.7% in 2024. That held steady while revenue fell from $1,017.9 million to $839.0 million, but its risk factors warn that 'if we must lower prices to remain competitive without commensurate cost of goods savings, our gross margin and profitability will be adversely affected'. They also say that if suppliers raise component costs, Axcelis 'may not be able to raise the price of our products to cover all or part of the increased cost'. On the Q2 2026 call (https://www.marketbeat.com/earnings/reports/2026-8-5-axcelis-technologies-inc-stock/), management reported a non-GAAP gross margin of 42.7% (the call states its income-statement measures are non-GAAP unless noted, so it is not directly comparable with the 10-K's GAAP figures), 'slightly below our outlook of 43%', citing CS&I mix and higher than anticipated services costs.
Curated moat judgment grounded in the cited source. source: sec.gov
Value-chain position
Layer: equipment & EDA
- Upstream (suppliers): —
- Downstream (customers): Micron
- Competitors: Applied Materials
A front-end wafer-fab equipment supplier to chipmakers, concentrated in Asia and in power devices. The FY2025 10-K says implanter shipments to Asian customers were 76.0% of 2025 system revenue, international sales 83.7% of total revenue, and the top ten customers 55.2% of net sales. It also says sales to Chinese customers are expected to remain significant under U.S. export-control licensing.
Derived from this company's mapped supply-chain edges and its industry layer.
Signal contribution editorial prior
The moat prior voted +0.06 on the long (~6-month) horizon at weight 0.20 — the swarm call there is bearish (score -0.26, conviction 21).
Editorial prior — subjective, not backtested. It is bounded (±0.6), low-confidence, and never votes on short/medium. See exactly how it voted →
Product lineup
Products & services with an editorial market-share band and technical barrier band — qualitative judgments tied to a cited basis, never invented figures.
| Product | Market share | Technical barrier |
|---|---|---|
| CS&I aftermarket (spares, upgrades, used tools, services) · Equipment aftermarket and services Spare parts, equipment upgrades, used tools, maintenance services, training and managed spare-parts inventory for an installed base of about 3,400 Axcelis products in 27 countries. | Unknown No share figure for servicing implanters was found. The 10-K reports CS&I revenue of $268.0 million, $235.3 million and $247.0 million, or 31.9%, 23.1% and 21.8% of total revenue in 2025, 2024 and 2023. It says 'there are many competitors, often based in the customer's location, offering alternatives to Axcelis services and certified products'. | Moderate The installed base ties demand for parts and upgrades to Axcelis tools. On the Q2 2026 call (https://www.marketbeat.com/earnings/reports/2026-8-5-axcelis-technologies-inc-stock/) management said upgrades were selling, with CS&I growth driven by higher utilization. But the 10-K's risk factors say customers often train 'their own staff to maintain and service semiconductor capital equipment', and that Axcelis competes 'against third-party parts suppliers for the sale of parts and consumables that are not protected by patents or otherwise proprietary'. |
| High current and medium current implanters (Purion H, Dragon, H200, Purion M) · High current and medium current ion implantation Spot-beam high current systems and the Purion M medium current system, for silicon and silicon carbide. | Unknown No source fetched gives a share for these categories. The 10-K claims the Purion M offers 'higher productivity and lower electrical energy consumption compared to competitive offerings'. It lists 'growth opportunities in Japan and advanced logic' among 2026 goals, and has 'four Purion evaluation systems in the field at strategic customer sites'. | Moderate Only Axcelis and Applied Materials offer a full range of implant products, per the 10-K. But the risk factors say the segment includes 'one company with substantially greater' resources, and 'several smaller companies that could provide innovative systems with technology that may have performance advantages'. |
| High energy implanters (Purion XE/EXE, GSD Ovation batch) · High energy ion implantation Single-wafer Purion high energy systems built on RF Linac spot-beam technology, plus GSD/HE and GSD/VHE Ovation batch implanters with energies up to 3 MeV and 4.9 MeV. | Top 3 The FY2025 10-K says 'Axcelis has been a market leader in high energy ion implanters for many years'. That is the company's own claim, and no third-party share was fetched, so the band is held at top_3 rather than leader. | Moderate The 10-K describes the RF Linac beamline as 'production-proven' and keeps system assembly and testing in-house because of the 'expertise and intellectual property' involved. Its risk factors add that competitors 'may be able to challenge, design around or legitimately use the proprietary technology embedded in our systems', and that market share 'could be negatively impacted by the invalidation or expiration of a patent which had created a barrier for our competitors'. |
| Power device implanters (Purion Power Series) · Ion implantation for power semiconductors High current, medium current and high energy Purion implanters configured for power devices on silicon carbide wafers; the Purion XE and EXE high energy models are available with 150mm SiC or 200mm thin silicon wafer handling. | Top 3 The FY2025 10-K says Axcelis 'remained a technology leader and supplier of choice in the implant-intensive power device segment, which accounted for 55% of the value of our 2025 system shipments'. That is the company's own claim, and no third-party share was fetched, so the band is held at top_3 rather than leader. | Moderate The Purion Power Series 'provides full recipe coverage for power device applications'. But the 10-K's risk factors say export controls raise the risk that Chinese customers switch to non-U.S. vendors such as Advanced Ion Beam Technology, Nissin and Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ion Technology, and that Kingstone Semiconductor and CETC are developing implanters for the Chinese domestic market. |
What you're looking at
These charts plot Axcelis Technologies's reported income statement, cash flow, and balance sheet from its SEC filings through 2026-08-06. Every figure is as-filed XBRL — none of it is an estimate.
Over the reported window, net income at $120.2M in FY2025.
Analyst consensus — third-party estimates from Yahoo Finance, as of 2026-10-26. Not SEC filings and not a TradingPilot forecast. source: finance.yahoo.com
| Period | EPS (est.) | Revenue (est.) | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q/E Sep 2026 | USD 1.11 (USD 1.09–USD 1.11) · 5 | USD 230080760.00 (USD 229987800.00–USD 230415000.00) · 5 | +8% |
| FY 2026 | USD 4.11 (USD 4.08–USD 4.13) · 5 | USD 883522640.00 (USD 881032000.00–USD 885600000.00) · 5 | +5% |
Each figure shows the consensus mean, its (low–high) range where available, and · the number of analysts behind that estimate.
Next report ~2026-11-05.
Our model leans Low-confidence · Neutral on the stock over the medium horizon — a market-direction call, not an earnings forecast. See the Signal tab.
Income statement
Cash flow & liquidity
Balance sheet
Some recent figures are from Yahoo Finance where the latest SEC filing hasn’t posted yet — FX-converted to USD and reconciled against SEC-filed periods.
Filings
- 2025Q4 · filed 2026-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q2 · filed 2026-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q2 · filed 2026-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q1 · filed 2026-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q1 · filed 2026-08-06 source: sec.gov
Show 187 older filings
- 2025Q3 · filed 2026-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q1 · filed 2026-05-08 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q1 · filed 2026-05-08 source: sec.gov
- FY2024 · filed 2026-02-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2025 · filed 2026-02-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2023 · filed 2026-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q4 · filed 2025-12-31 source: finance.yahoo.com
- 2024Q4 · filed 2025-11-06 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q3 · filed 2025-11-06 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q3 · filed 2025-11-06 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · filed 2025-11-06 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · filed 2025-11-06 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q2 · filed 2025-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · filed 2025-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q1 · filed 2025-05-06 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · filed 2025-05-06 source: sec.gov
- FY2023 · filed 2025-02-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2022 · filed 2025-02-28 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q4 · filed 2024-11-07 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q3 · filed 2024-11-07 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · filed 2024-11-07 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · filed 2024-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · filed 2024-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · filed 2024-05-02 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · filed 2024-05-02 source: sec.gov
- FY2022 · filed 2024-02-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2021 · filed 2024-02-28 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q4 · filed 2023-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · filed 2023-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · filed 2023-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · filed 2023-08-03 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · filed 2023-08-03 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · filed 2023-05-05 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q1 · filed 2023-05-05 source: sec.gov
- FY2021 · filed 2023-02-24 source: sec.gov
- FY2020 · filed 2023-02-24 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q4 · filed 2022-11-03 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · filed 2022-11-03 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · filed 2022-11-03 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · filed 2022-08-04 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · filed 2022-08-04 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q1 · filed 2022-05-05 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · filed 2022-05-05 source: sec.gov
- FY2020 · filed 2022-02-25 source: sec.gov
- FY2019 · filed 2022-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q4 · filed 2021-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · filed 2021-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · filed 2021-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · filed 2021-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · filed 2021-08-06 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · filed 2021-05-06 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · filed 2021-05-06 source: sec.gov
- FY2019 · filed 2021-02-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2018 · filed 2021-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q4 · filed 2020-11-06 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · filed 2020-11-06 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2020-11-06 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · filed 2020-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2020-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · filed 2020-05-06 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2020-05-06 source: sec.gov
- FY2018 · filed 2020-03-02 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2020-03-02 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2020-03-02 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2020-03-02 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · filed 2020-03-02 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q4 · filed 2020-03-02 source: sec.gov
- FY2017 · filed 2020-03-02 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · filed 2019-11-07 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2019-11-07 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2019-11-07 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2019-08-07 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2019-08-07 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2019-05-08 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2019-05-08 source: sec.gov
- FY2017 · filed 2019-03-11 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2019-03-11 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2019-03-11 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2019-03-11 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2019-03-11 source: sec.gov
- FY2016 · filed 2019-03-11 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2019-03-11 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2018-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2018-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2018-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2018-08-03 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2018-08-03 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2018-05-04 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2018-05-04 source: sec.gov
- FY2016 · filed 2018-03-14 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2018-03-14 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2018-03-14 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2018-03-14 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2018-03-14 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2018-03-14 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2017-11-03 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2017-11-03 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2017-11-03 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2017-08-04 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2017-08-04 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2017-05-05 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2017-05-05 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2017-05-05 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2017-03-14 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2017-03-14 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2017-03-14 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2017-03-14 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2017-03-14 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2017-03-14 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2017-03-14 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2016-11-03 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2016-11-03 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2016-11-03 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2016-11-03 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2016-08-08 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2016-08-08 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2016-05-05 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2016-05-05 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2016-03-04 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2016-03-04 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2016-03-04 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2016-03-04 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2016-03-04 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2016-03-04 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2016-03-04 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2015-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2015-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2015-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2015-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2015-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2015-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2015-05-06 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2015-05-06 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2015-03-12 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2015-03-12 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2015-03-12 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2015-03-12 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2015-03-12 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2015-03-12 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2015-03-12 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2014-11-06 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2014-11-06 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2014-11-06 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2014-11-06 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2014-08-08 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2014-08-08 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2014-05-08 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2014-05-08 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2014-03-03 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2014-03-03 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2014-03-03 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2014-03-03 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2014-03-03 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2014-03-03 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2014-03-03 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2013-11-08 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2013-11-08 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2013-11-08 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2013-11-08 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2013-08-02 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2013-08-02 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2013-05-06 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2013-05-06 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2013-03-01 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q1 · filed 2013-03-01 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2013-03-01 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2013-03-01 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2013-03-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2013-03-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2013-03-01 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2012-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2012-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2012-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2012-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2012-08-07 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2012-08-07 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q1 · filed 2012-05-04 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2012-05-04 source: sec.gov
- FY2008 · filed 2012-02-29 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2012-02-29 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2012-02-29 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q4 · filed 2011-11-04 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q3 · filed 2011-11-04 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2011-11-04 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2011-11-04 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q2 · filed 2011-08-05 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2011-08-05 source: sec.gov
Key ratios vs peers
Comparing against peers…
Institutional holders (13F, 2026Q2)
| Institution | Shares | Value | Δ shares QoQ | % of 13F | % shares out |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock Passive / index | 5,029,462 | $952.8M | 92,688 | 0.0% | 16.29% |
| FMR (Fidelity) Passive / index | 4,125,902 | $781.7M | 1,694,781 | 0.0% | 13.36% |
| State Street Passive / index | 1,231,109 | $233.2M | 42,064 | 0.0% | 3.99% |
TradingPilot-computed columns (% of 13F, % shares out) are derived from as-filed 13F values; only name, shares and value are as-filed.
What a 13F can’t show you
- Delayed 45+ days. Positions are as-of the quarter-end shown, filed up to 45 days later.
- Long-only, US-listed. No shorts, cash, bonds, FX, foreign, or private holdings; listed options are reported at notional and excluded from per-position equity value.
- $100M threshold. Smaller managers never file.
- “% of 13F” is not “% of AUM”. A 13F is a partial book.
- “Sold out” means “no longer reported” — not necessarily sold.
- One CIK can aggregate multiple sub-entities. Confidential treatment can omit positions.
- Passive index filers are not gurus. Their 13F changes are index flows, and they are excluded from TradingPilot’s smart-money signal.
- Quant caveat. A quant filer’s 13F (e.g. Renaissance) is a long-only quarter-end snapshot and does NOT reflect its actual high-turnover, short-horizon strategy.
- Guru pages and holdings never feed a signal (weightless).
No tagged news yet.
Headlines
2026-10-27 EDGAR current 8-K filings · 8-K - AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES INC (0001113232) (Filer)
2026-10-27 Yahoo Finance: ACLS · Axcelis Technologies Names Jeroen Delsman as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
2026-10-25 Yahoo Finance: ACLS · Can Axcelis Technologies (ACLS) Support Its Price With Earnings?
2026-10-25 Yahoo Finance: ACLS · Axcelis Technologies (ACLS) Expands In Korea, Is The Stock A Bargain?
2026-10-25 Yahoo Finance: ACLS · Should Korea Factory Plans Require Action From Axcelis Technologies Stock Investors?
2026-10-23 Yahoo Finance: ACLS · Axcelis Technologies (ACLS) Rises As Market Takes a Dip: Key Facts
2026-10-19 PR Newswire Aerospace/Defense · 2026 Luce/ACLS Dissertation Fellowships in American Art
Impact = company-prominence tier (High/Medium auto-assigned by graph centrality/size; Low only on curated minor events), not a magnitude forecast.
Upcoming
| Date | Type | Event | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-05 | earnings | Axcelis Technologies earnings — Company-confirmed date. confirmed | Medium |
Past
| Date | Event | Impact | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-06 | Axcelis Technologies earnings confirmed | Medium | EPS beat · +2.6% |
| 2026-05-07 | Axcelis Technologies earnings confirmed | Medium | EPS beat · +2.8% |