Deere & Company (DE) ☆
AI-adopting incumbents · Industry Index 10 (rank #117) ·
ⓘ Data freshness
price: as of 2026-10-30 index: as of 2026-10-30 fundamentals: latest filing 2026-08-27 Reports quarterly (10-Q XBRL)
Maker of agricultural, turf, and construction and forestry equipment - tractors, harvesters, and precision-agriculture systems - run through four segments including a captive John Deere Financial lending arm.
Industry exposure 0.1 (AI-adopting incumbent, not an AI vendor. Its FY2025 10-K (fiscal year ended 2025-11-02, filed 2025-12-18) describes a Technology Stack that "leverages these core technologies across the enterprise, including digital capabilities, automation and machine learning, and autonomy", and states that in December 2025 it refined its Ambitions to emphasize "automation, autonomy, digitalization, lifecycle solutions, and Solutions as a Service". In the risk factor "Technical or regulatory limitations may impact our ability to effectively implement automation, autonomy, and artificial intelligence solutions" it says it uses "automation software, digital tools, applications, and analytics on the S7 Series Combines and our See & Spray targeted spraying solution" and "leverage[s] generative artificial intelligence in our business processes". Held at 0.1 rather than 0.2: the same filing reports FY2025 net sales and revenues of $45,684M, comprising $38,917M of equipment net sales and $5,748M of finance and interest income, and discloses no AI or precision-agriculture revenue line, so AI is a differentiating feature layer on part of the machine line rather than how the company builds its product overall. The 10-K names no AI counterparty anywhere - zero occurrences of "NVIDIA" and zero of "Blue River" across the full 10.7MB filing - so the graph edge comes from NVIDIA's own newsroom.)
Signal
signal: as of 2026-10-13Short (~2 weeks)
- ▼Options positioning— Delayed per-contract options — call premium 43% / put 57% (net skew -0.15), unusualness 25/100. Context: Consumer Price Index in 1 day.[options]
- ▼Price momentum— Technical downtrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote -0.18, confidence 0.36 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · derived internally
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 10.1 (falling -0.6 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Medium (~3 months)
- ▲Growth trend— Revenue 5% YoY (accelerating), net margin expanding.[filing]
- ▼Price momentum— Technical downtrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote -0.18, confidence 0.36 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · derived internally
- ▼Smart money— 1 filer(s) accumulating, 1 trimming in 2026Q2 (value-weighted net -0.99).[holding][holding]
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 10.1 (falling -0.6 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Long (~6 months)
- ▲Growth trend— Revenue 5% YoY (accelerating), net margin expanding.[filing]
- ▲moat— Editorial prior (subjective, NOT backtested): narrow moat / clear_leader / moderate pricing ⇒ wider/leading long-horizon tilt 0.20. Bounded, low-confidence input.[moat: Editorial moat profile — deere — narrow moat, clear_leader, moderate pricing (as of 2025-12-18)]
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 10.1 (falling -0.6 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Relationship network
- NVIDIA — supplier
Key relationships
- NVIDIA — supplier · NVIDIA's newsroom names John Deere among the leading adopters deploying on NVIDIA Jetson, and quotes Deere chief technology officer Jahmy Hindman describing Deere's "fully autonomous tractor, featuring two NVIDIA Jetson GPUs for quick and accurate image classification at the edge". source: nvidianews.nvidia.com
Options positioning
delayed · aggregate: as of 2026-10-30- Call vs put volume: 2,032 calls · 1,610 puts — tilt +11.6% toward calls
- Vol/OI turnover: 0.30×
- Premium ($ notional proxy): $2.8M calls · $1.0M puts — tilt +46.7% toward calls
- OTM tilt: -4.1% toward OTM puts
- IV skew (put − call): -5.3%
Delayed, end-of-day, aggregate per contract — not a live tape or trade-level flow. Buy/sell side is INFERRED from where each contract's last print sat in the bid/ask spread, not observed order flow. The company-wide side is withheld unless quoted contracts cover at least a quarter of the day's premium, so it can be blank while individual contracts below show a side. Call/put premium is measured across the chain we capture — the 6 nearest expiries within 45 days, not the full option chain — while the table below lists at most 20 flagged contracts, so summing those rows will not reproduce the percentage.
Recent flags
Why flagged:earnings in 27 days
20 small flags (under $100000 premium) — none large enough to highlight.
Daily options volume vs baseline
latest session: 1.2× its 13-day baseline
Call/put premium
74% calls / 26% puts (by premium)
Price momentum set the tone, but the swarm won’t commit — a negative tilt with weak agreement, so the call is Neutral.
Most voters leaned one way; price momentum dissented. Directional agreement 0.67.
A clear neutral score; conviction 0.08 reflects how strongly the agents agree. Conviction is confidence, not a probability of the move.
Signal history
Moat
moat: latest change 2025-12-18Deere makes agricultural, turf, construction, forestry and roadbuilding equipment and finances it through John Deere Financial. Per its FY2025 Form 10-K, Production & Precision Agriculture generated $17,311 million of net sales (45% of equipment operations net sales), Small Agriculture & Turf $10,224 million (26%) and Construction & Forestry $11,382 million (29%), within net sales and revenues of $45,684 million. The core of the moat is large farm machinery. The FTC's January 2025 complaint calls Deere "the largest manufacturer of agricultural equipment in the United States" and alleges a dominant share of U.S. large tractor and combine sales, substantial barriers to entry, and significant costs to switch away from a Deere fleet, including losing machine data. The 10-K adds brand recognition, about 2,050 U.S. and Canadian dealer locations, proprietary parts and the Operations Center data platform. The same structure is under legal attack: the FTC with several states, and a separate multidistrict class action, allege that Deere unlawfully restrained the market for repairing its own farm equipment by limiting repair resources, including its fully functional Service ADVISOR tool, to its authorised dealers. On 2026-07-08 the FTC and Illinois, Arizona, Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin announced a settlement (https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/07/ftc-states-secure-settlement-deere-company-advancing-farmers-right-repair): a stipulated order, which has the force of law once the District Court approves it, requiring Deere for 10 years to make available to farmers and independent repair providers "repair resources equivalent to those Deere now makes available to Deere dealers". Item 1A also reports "slower than expected customer adoption of some of our precision technology solutions, and SaaS subscription services". Earnings are cyclical: the third-party data site stockanalysis.com shows gross margin falling from 30.63% in fiscal 2023 to 26.96% in fiscal 2025, and the 10-K reports PPA backlog down to about $4.0 billion from $5.2 billion as "demand has declined". An alleged dominant, high-barrier large-ag franchise, with repair-access litigation as the main threat to its aftermarket profits, supports a narrow moat. The dominance rests on a plaintiff's unproven allegations and covers one segment, and construction and forestry is a contested second leg.
Rating: narrow
The independent evidence is a regulator's complaint, not a finding. The FTC, Illinois and Minnesota complaint filed 2025-01-15 (https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/DeereCoREDACTEDComplaintCaseNo325-cv-50017.pdf) alleges that "Deere is the world's leading manufacturer of agricultural equipment like large tractors and combine harvesters, and Deere enjoys a dominant share of large tractor and combine sales in the United States", that Deere "possessed monopoly and market power in the sale of Large Tractors and Combines in the United States", and that "There are substantial barriers to entry into the Large Tractor and Combine markets." The share figures behind those claims are redacted in the public version. Deere's FY2025 Form 10-K (fiscal year ended 2025-11-02, filed 2025-12-18) adds the company's own side of the edge: "John Deere's brand recognition is a competitive factor in North America and many other parts of the world", about 2,050 independent dealer locations in the U.S. and Canada, and parts "many of which are proprietary". The limits are in the same 10-K: "The agricultural equipment industry continues to change and is becoming even more competitive through the emergence and global expansion of many competitors", the industry "is also attracting non-traditional competitors, including technology-focused companies and start-up ventures", and construction and forestry (29% of fiscal 2025 equipment net sales) faces Caterpillar, Komatsu, Volvo and others. That supports a narrow rating, not a wide one. The dominance and entry barriers are a plaintiff's allegations, not findings, and the share figures are redacted. They cover U.S. large tractors and combines, inside a segment that was 45% of fiscal 2025 equipment net sales. Deere's own filing describes agriculture as becoming more competitive and construction and forestry as a contested market.
Type: switching costs
The FTC complaint (2025-01-15) places the advantage in the cost of leaving the installed fleet: "Equipment owners cannot switch from Deere agricultural equipment to other manufacturers' equipment without incurring significant costs", including "the cost of acquiring replacement equipment (often hundreds of thousands of dollars per machine), the cost of learning how to operate new equipment, and the cost of losing data generated by existing Deere equipment", plus the cost of making "mixed fleets" interoperable. The FY2025 10-K describes the assets that create this lock-in: a dealer network of about 2,050 U.S. and Canadian locations, proprietary parts for current and past products, and the John Deere Operations Center, which Item 1A says "stores substantial volumes of data with respect to our customers' operations". Patents are not the main source: the 10-K says it does "not regard any of our businesses as being dependent upon any single patent or family of patents."
Leadership: clear leader
The independent evidence covers U.S. large farm equipment. The FTC complaint (2025-01-15) states "Deere is the largest manufacturer of agricultural equipment in the United States" and alleges that for each fiscal year from at least 2012 to 2021 Deere's share of large tractors sold in the United States exceeded a figure that is redacted in the public version; the FTC press release of the same day (https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/01/ftc-states-sue-deere-company-protect-farmers-unfair-corporate-tactics-high-repair-costs) says Deere "maintains a dominant market share position across the large agricultural equipment market". These are a plaintiff's allegations. The band does not extend to construction and forestry, where the FY2025 10-K lists Caterpillar, CNH Industrial, Doosan Bobcat, Hitachi, Komatsu, Kubota, Liugong, SANY, Volvo and XCMG among global competitors and no independent share source was found.
Pricing power: moderate
The FTC complaint alleges pricing power in large tractors and combines, "shown directly through Deere's ability to raise prices, reduce output, and degrade quality in those markets", and says Deere's dealers "charge supracompetitive prices for restricted repairs". The reported numbers show a cyclical business: the third-party data site stockanalysis.com (https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/de/financials/) shows gross margin of 30.63% in fiscal 2023, 29.50% in fiscal 2024, 26.96% in fiscal 2025 and 25.18% for the twelve months to August 2026, and stored fundamentals from the 10-K show net income of $10,166 million (fiscal 2023), $7,100 million (fiscal 2024) and $5,027 million (fiscal 2025). Item 1A of the FY2025 10-K says Deere competes on "product performance, innovation, quality, distribution, sustainability, customer service, and price", that "Aggressive pricing or other strategies of competitors" or a failure "to price products competitively" hurt results, and that results suffer "if our customers are unwilling to accept price increases for our products". Alleged pricing power that still leaves margins falling with farm demand is moderate, not strong.
Curated moat judgment grounded in the cited source. source: sec.gov
Value-chain position
Layer: AI-adopting incumbents
- Upstream (suppliers): NVIDIA
- Downstream (customers): —
- Competitors: —
An AI adopter, not an AI vendor: Item 1A of the FY2025 10-K says Deere uses "automation software, digital tools, applications, and analytics on the S7 Series Combines and our See & Spray targeted spraying solution", maintains the Operations Center data platform, and leverages generative AI in its business processes, and warns that falling behind competitors' AI advances could hurt its competitive position.
Derived from this company's mapped supply-chain edges and its industry layer.
Signal contribution editorial prior
The moat prior voted +0.20 on the long (~6-month) horizon at weight 0.20 — the swarm call there is neutral (score 0.10, conviction 0).
Editorial prior — subjective, not backtested. It is bounded (±0.6), low-confidence, and never votes on short/medium. See exactly how it voted →
Product lineup
Products & services with an editorial market-share band and technical barrier band — qualitative judgments tied to a cited basis, never invented figures.
| Product | Market share | Technical barrier |
|---|---|---|
| Construction, forestry and Wirtgen roadbuilding equipment · Construction and roadbuilding machinery Excavators, loaders, dozers, motor graders, articulated dump trucks, compact construction equipment, forestry machines, and Wirtgen, Vögele, Hamm and Kleemann roadbuilding equipment; CF net sales were $11,382 million in fiscal 2025. | Unknown The FY2025 10-K lists a long roster of global competitors for the segment, including Caterpillar, CNH Industrial, Doosan Bobcat, Fayat, Hitachi Construction Machinery, Komatsu, Kubota, Liugong, Ponsse, SANY, Terex, Tigercat, Volvo Construction Equipment and XCMG, and gives no share figure. No independent share source was found, so the band is left unknown. | Moderate The 10-K describes about 450 U.S. and Canadian dealer locations for construction and forestry equipment, company-owned Wirtgen sales and service subsidiaries in many countries, and technology such as Smart Grade and SmartDetect. Against that, the construction business "operates in competitive markets" with many large global rivals, so the barrier is moderate. |
| Large tractors and combines (Production & Precision Agriculture) · Large agricultural machinery 4WD, track and row-crop tractors, combines, cotton and sugarcane harvesters, and the seeding and application equipment sold to production-scale grain, cotton and sugarcane growers; PPA net sales were $17,311 million in fiscal 2025. | Leader The FTC complaint (2025-01-15) alleges that "Deere enjoys a dominant share of large tractor and combine sales in the United States" and that its U.S. large tractor share exceeded a redacted figure in every fiscal year from at least 2012 to 2021, with its combine share in a redacted range. The FY2025 10-K names AGCO, CLAAS, CNH Industrial and Kubota as global agricultural competitors. The band rests on a plaintiff's allegations and covers U.S. sales. | Deep The complaint alleges "There are substantial barriers to entry into the Large Tractor and Combine markets", listing capital, technical, logistical and regulatory hurdles, the need to build distribution networks, "the lack of an established reputation" and mixed-fleet interoperability, and says switching away from a Deere fleet means the cost of replacement machines, retraining and "losing data generated by existing Deere equipment". |
| Precision agriculture technology and John Deere Operations Center · Precision ag hardware, software and data Guidance, telematics, on-board sensing and automation (including See & Spray targeted spraying), and the Operations Center digital management system that connects owners, managers and dealers to machines in the field. | Unknown The FY2025 10-K gives no share figure for precision technology and says the industry is "attracting non-traditional competitors, including technology-focused companies and start-up ventures". No independent share source was found, so the band is left unknown. | Moderate The technology is built into Deere machines and the FTC complaint counts "the cost of losing data generated by existing Deere equipment" among switching costs. But Item 1A reports "slower than expected customer adoption of some of our precision technology solutions, and SaaS subscription services" and lists among execution risks "customers not seeing the value proposition of the technologies and deciding not to adopt them" and "inability to fully monetize technology-based solutions", so the barrier is moderate rather than deep. |
| Small agriculture and turf equipment · Utility tractors, hay and forage, turf and lawn equipment Specialty, utility and compact tractors, hay and forage equipment, riding and commercial mowers, golf course equipment and utility vehicles; SAT net sales were $10,224 million in fiscal 2025. | Unknown The FY2025 10-K gives no share figure and names Kubota and The Toro Company among the global competitors for agriculture and turf, plus "a variety of short-line and specialty manufacturers, as well as local or regional competitors". No independent share source was found, so the band is left unknown. | Moderate Distribution helps: the 10-K says turf equipment is sold at most John Deere agricultural dealer locations plus about 260 turf-only locations. But some lawn and garden products are also sold through The Home Depot and Lowe's, and demand is tied to housing, weather and consumer spending, so the barrier is moderate. |
What you're looking at
These charts plot Deere & Company's reported income statement, cash flow, and balance sheet from its SEC filings through 2026-08-27. Every figure is as-filed XBRL — none of it is an estimate.
Over the reported window, net income at $5.0B in FY2025.
Analyst consensus — third-party estimates from Yahoo Finance, as of 2026-10-26. Not SEC filings and not a TradingPilot forecast. source: finance.yahoo.com
| Period | EPS (est.) | Revenue (est.) | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q/E Oct 2026 | USD 4.06 (USD 3.84–USD 4.47) · 16 | USD 10.4B (USD 10.2B–USD 10.9B) · 12 | -2% |
| FY 2026 | USD 18.11 (USD 17.90–USD 18.54) · 21 | USD 41.1B (USD 41.0B–USD 41.7B) · 13 | +6% |
Each figure shows the consensus mean, its (low–high) range where available, and · the number of analysts behind that estimate.
Next report ~2026-11-25.
Our model leans Low-confidence · Neutral on the stock over the medium horizon — a market-direction call, not an earnings forecast. See the Signal tab.
Income statement
Cash flow & liquidity
Balance sheet
Filings
- 2025Q3 · filed 2026-08-27 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q4 · filed 2026-08-27 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q3 · filed 2026-08-27 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q2 · filed 2026-05-28 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q2 · filed 2026-05-28 source: sec.gov
Show 180 older filings
- 2025Q1 · filed 2026-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q1 · filed 2026-02-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2023 · filed 2025-12-18 source: sec.gov
- FY2024 · filed 2025-12-18 source: sec.gov
- FY2025 · filed 2025-12-18 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q3 · filed 2025-08-28 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q4 · filed 2025-08-28 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · filed 2025-05-29 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · filed 2025-02-27 source: sec.gov
- FY2022 · filed 2024-12-12 source: sec.gov
- FY2023 · filed 2024-12-12 source: sec.gov
- FY2024 · filed 2024-12-12 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · filed 2024-08-29 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q4 · filed 2024-08-29 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · filed 2024-05-30 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · filed 2024-02-29 source: sec.gov
- FY2021 · filed 2023-12-15 source: sec.gov
- FY2022 · filed 2023-12-15 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · filed 2023-08-31 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q4 · filed 2023-08-31 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · filed 2023-08-31 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · filed 2023-06-01 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · filed 2023-06-01 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q1 · filed 2023-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · filed 2023-02-23 source: sec.gov
- FY2020 · filed 2022-12-15 source: sec.gov
- FY2021 · filed 2022-12-15 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · filed 2022-09-01 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q4 · filed 2022-09-01 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · filed 2022-05-26 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · filed 2022-02-24 source: sec.gov
- FY2019 · filed 2021-12-16 source: sec.gov
- FY2020 · filed 2021-12-16 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · filed 2021-08-26 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q4 · filed 2021-08-26 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · filed 2021-05-27 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · filed 2021-02-25 source: sec.gov
- FY2019 · filed 2020-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2020-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2020-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2020-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q4 · filed 2020-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · filed 2020-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · filed 2020-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · filed 2020-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q4 · filed 2020-12-17 source: sec.gov
- FY2018 · filed 2020-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2020-08-27 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q4 · filed 2020-08-27 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2020-05-28 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2020-02-27 source: sec.gov
- FY2018 · filed 2019-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2019-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2019-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2019-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · filed 2019-12-19 source: sec.gov
- FY2017 · filed 2019-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2019-08-29 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · filed 2019-08-29 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2019-05-30 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2019-02-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2018-12-17 source: sec.gov
- FY2016 · filed 2018-12-17 source: sec.gov
- FY2017 · filed 2018-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2018-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2018-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2018-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2018-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2018-08-30 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2018-08-30 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2018-08-30 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2018-05-31 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2018-03-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2017-12-18 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2017-12-18 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2017-12-18 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2017-12-18 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2017-12-18 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2017-12-18 source: sec.gov
- FY2016 · filed 2017-12-18 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2017-08-31 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2017-08-31 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2017-08-31 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2017-06-02 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2017-02-24 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2016-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2016-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2016-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2016-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2016-12-19 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2016-12-19 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2016-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2016-09-01 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2016-09-01 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2016-09-01 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2016-09-01 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2016-05-26 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2016-02-25 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2016-02-01 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2016-02-01 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2016-02-01 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2016-02-01 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2016-02-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2016-02-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2016-02-01 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2015-08-27 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2015-08-27 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2015-08-27 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2015-05-28 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2015-02-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2014-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2014-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2014-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2014-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2014-12-19 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2014-12-19 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2014-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2014-08-28 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2014-08-28 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2014-08-28 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2014-05-29 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2014-02-27 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2013-12-16 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2013-12-16 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2013-12-16 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2013-12-16 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2013-12-16 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2013-12-16 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2013-12-16 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2013-08-29 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2013-08-29 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2013-08-29 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2013-05-30 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2013-02-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2012-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q1 · filed 2012-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2012-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2012-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2012-12-17 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2012-12-17 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2012-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2012-08-30 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2012-08-30 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2012-08-30 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2012-05-31 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2012-05-31 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2012-05-31 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q1 · filed 2012-03-01 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2012-03-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2008 · filed 2011-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q1 · filed 2011-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q2 · filed 2011-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q3 · filed 2011-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2011-12-19 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2011-12-19 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2011-12-19 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2011-12-19 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q4 · filed 2011-09-01 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q3 · filed 2011-09-01 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2011-09-01 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q2 · filed 2011-05-27 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q1 · filed 2011-02-25 source: sec.gov
- FY2007 · filed 2010-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q1 · filed 2010-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q2 · filed 2010-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q3 · filed 2010-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q4 · filed 2010-12-17 source: sec.gov
- FY2008 · filed 2010-12-17 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2010-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2008Q4 · filed 2010-08-27 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q3 · filed 2010-08-27 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q4 · filed 2010-08-27 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q2 · filed 2010-05-28 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q1 · filed 2010-03-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2006 · filed 2009-12-17 source: sec.gov
- FY2007 · filed 2009-12-17 source: sec.gov
- FY2008 · filed 2009-12-17 source: sec.gov
- 2007Q4 · filed 2009-08-28 source: sec.gov
- 2008Q3 · filed 2009-08-28 source: sec.gov
- 2008Q4 · filed 2009-08-28 source: sec.gov
Key ratios vs peers
Comparing against peers…
Institutional holders (13F, 2026Q2)
| Institution | Shares | Value | Δ shares QoQ | % of 13F | % shares out |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock Passive / index | 18,544,770 | $11.8B | 228,947 | 0.2% | 6.88% |
| State Street Passive / index | 10,867,942 | $6.9B | 256,561 | 0.2% | 4.03% |
| FMR (Fidelity) Passive / index | 7,488,674 | $4.8B | 958,880 | 0.2% | 2.78% |
| ARK Investment Management (Cathie Wood) Guru | 393,025 | $249.3M | -6,049 | 1.6% | 0.15% |
| Bridgewater Associates (Ray Dalio (founder)) Guru | 1,433 | $908995 | 1,433 | 0.0% | 0.00% |
TradingPilot-computed columns (% of 13F, % shares out) are derived from as-filed 13F values; only name, shares and value are as-filed.
What a 13F can’t show you
- Delayed 45+ days. Positions are as-of the quarter-end shown, filed up to 45 days later.
- Long-only, US-listed. No shorts, cash, bonds, FX, foreign, or private holdings; listed options are reported at notional and excluded from per-position equity value.
- $100M threshold. Smaller managers never file.
- “% of 13F” is not “% of AUM”. A 13F is a partial book.
- “Sold out” means “no longer reported” — not necessarily sold.
- One CIK can aggregate multiple sub-entities. Confidential treatment can omit positions.
- Passive index filers are not gurus. Their 13F changes are index flows, and they are excluded from TradingPilot’s smart-money signal.
- Quant caveat. A quant filer’s 13F (e.g. Renaissance) is a long-only quarter-end snapshot and does NOT reflect its actual high-turnover, short-horizon strategy.
- Guru pages and holdings never feed a signal (weightless).
No tagged news yet.
Headlines
2026-10-27 Yahoo Finance: DE · Deere & Company (DE) Is a Trending Stock: Facts to Know Before Betting on It
Impact = company-prominence tier (High/Medium auto-assigned by graph centrality/size; Low only on curated minor events), not a magnitude forecast.
Upcoming
| Date | Type | Event | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-25 | earnings | Deere & Company earnings — Company-confirmed date. confirmed | Medium |
Past
| Date | Event | Impact | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-20 | Deere & Company earnings confirmed | Medium | EPS beat · +4.3% |