MaxLinear (MXL) ☆
networking & interconnect · Industry Index 7 (rank #178) ·
ⓘ Data freshness
price: as of 2026-10-30 index: as of 2026-10-30 fundamentals: latest filing 2026-07-23 Reports quarterly (10-Q XBRL)
MaxLinear designs mixed-signal semiconductors including PAM4 DSPs and TIAs for datacenter optical modules and broadband infrastructure.
Industry exposure 0.3 (MaxLinear's Keystone PAM4 DSPs address datacenter optics, but broadband access and infrastructure connectivity remain a large part of revenue.)
Signal
signal: as of 2026-10-13Short (~2 weeks)
- ▲Options positioning— Delayed per-contract options — call premium 95% / put 5% (net skew 0.89), unusualness 20/100. Context: earnings in 9 days.[options]
- ▲Price momentum— Technical uptrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote 0.09, confidence 0.23 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · derived internally
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 6.9 (falling -8.9 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Medium (~3 months)
- ▲Growth trend— Revenue 55% YoY (accelerating), net margin expanding.[filing]
- ▲Price momentum— Technical uptrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote 0.09, confidence 0.23 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · derived internally
- ▼Smart money— 1 filer(s) accumulating, 1 trimming in 2026Q2 (value-weighted net -0.98).[holding][holding]
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 6.9 (falling -8.9 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Long (~6 months)
- ▲Growth trend— Revenue 55% YoY (accelerating), net margin expanding.[filing]
- ▬moat— Editorial prior (subjective, NOT backtested): none moat / fast_follower / moderate pricing ⇒ wider/leading long-horizon tilt 0.01. Bounded, low-confidence input.[moat: Editorial moat profile — maxlinear — none moat, fast_follower, moderate pricing (as of 2026-01-29)]
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 6.9 (falling -8.9 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Relationship network
- MACOM Technology Solutions — competitor
- Marvell Technology — competitor
Key relationships
- MACOM Technology Solutions — competitor · MaxLinear and MACOM compete in optical interconnect component silicon such as PAM4 DSPs, TIAs, and drivers for datacenter modules. source: industrialanalyst.substack.com
- Marvell Technology — competitor · MaxLinear competes with Marvell in merchant PAM4 DSPs used in datacenter optical transceiver modules. source: industrialanalyst.substack.com
Options positioning
delayed · aggregate: as of 2026-10-30- Call vs put volume: 554 calls · 415 puts — tilt +14.3% toward calls
- Vol/OI turnover: 0.06×
- Premium ($ notional proxy): $108909 calls · $348099 puts — tilt -52.3% toward puts
- OTM tilt: +38.4% toward OTM calls
- IV skew (put − call): -1.0%
Delayed, end-of-day, aggregate per contract — not a live tape or trade-level flow. Buy/sell side is INFERRED from where each contract's last print sat in the bid/ask spread, not observed order flow. The company-wide side is withheld unless quoted contracts cover at least a quarter of the day's premium, so it can be blank while individual contracts below show a side. Call/put premium is measured across the chain we capture — the 6 nearest expiries within 45 days, not the full option chain — while the table below lists at most 20 flagged contracts, so summing those rows will not reproduce the percentage.
Recent flags
Why flagged:earnings in 1 day
| Date | Contract | Score | Side (inferred)? | OI Δ? | Volume | Vol/OI | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-27 | $90 CALL | 30 | sell-side | +11 | 1,458 | 2.6× | |
| 2026-10-26 | $60 PUT | 20 | mid-market · no side | +143 | 340 | 0.3× | |
| 2026-10-23 | $70 CALL | 35 | mid-market · no side | +254 | 954 | 1.6× | |
| 2026-10-23 | $80 CALL | 21 | mid-market · no side | +34 | 510 | 0.9× | |
| 2026-10-23 | $60 PUT | 21 | mid-market · no side | +13 | 231 | 0.3× | |
| 2026-10-22 | $70 CALL | 36 | sell-side | +2 | 613 | 1.8× | |
| 2026-10-22 | $50 PUT | 33 | mid-market · no side | +12 | 859 | 5.1× | |
| 2026-10-22 | $65 CALL | 23 | mid-market · no side | 0 | 187 | 9.3× | |
| 2026-10-21 | $80 CALL | 36 | buy-side | +31 | 447 | 2.0× | |
| 2026-10-21 | $90 CALL | 24 | buy-side | +5 | 224 | 0.9× | |
| 2026-10-19 | $75 PUT | 32 | mid-market · no side | +18 | 1,044 | 3.0× | |
| 2026-10-19 | $90 CALL | 23 | mid-market · no side | +13 | 232 | 1.3× |
8 smaller flags (under $100000 premium) hidden.
Daily options volume vs baseline
latest session: 0.4× its 13-day baseline
Call/put premium
71% calls / 29% puts (by premium)
Structural set the tone, but the swarm won’t commit — a negative tilt with weak agreement, so the call is Neutral.
Most voters leaned one way; structural dissented. Directional agreement 0.44.
A clear neutral score; conviction 0.18 reflects how strongly the agents agree. Conviction is confidence, not a probability of the move.
Signal history
Moat
moat: latest change 2026-01-29MaxLinear is a fabless designer of RF, analog and mixed-signal communications SoCs whose core skill, per its FY2025 10-K, is combining broadband RF and analog front ends with digital signal processing in standard CMOS. It sells into broadband access (cable, fiber PON and DSL gateways - approximately 44% of 2025 net revenue), home connectivity (Wi-Fi, MoCA, G.hn and Ethernet), wired and wireless infrastructure including optical data-center DSPs, and industrial and multi-market interface and power products. After a downturn that took revenue from $693,263 thousand in 2023 to $360,528 thousand in 2024, the AI optical ramp is turning it around: the Q2 2026 release reports revenue of $168,847 thousand, up 55% year over year, with the infrastructure business up 145% on the Keystone PAM4 DSP ramp for 800G, and management raised its 2026 optical data-center revenue outlook to $210 million-$230 million on the call. The moat question is whether that growth rests on anything durable. In optical DSPs MaxLinear entered as a lower-priced second source to Marvell; elsewhere it competes with Broadcom, Qualcomm, Realtek and MediaTek, which can integrate the functions it sells; customers are concentrated; and the 10-K still carries the Silicon Motion arbitration over its terminated merger, whose outcome it says it cannot predict. On this record MaxLinear is a technically capable challenger without a moat.
Rating: none
MaxLinear’s FY2025 10-K does not show a durable advantage. Its income statement reports revenue of $693,263 thousand in 2023, $360,528 thousand in 2024 and $467,641 thousand in 2025, with operating losses of $38,221 thousand, $223,352 thousand and $126,890 thousand. The risk factors say “Increased competition has resulted in price pressure, decreased demand, reduced revenue and profitability, and loss of market share”; the business section says competitors include “companies with much longer operating histories, greater name recognition, and substantially greater financial, technical and operational resources”; and because its products “often are building block semiconductors” it also faces integrated-circuit makers, “some of which may be existing customers or platform partners”. Two customers were 28% of 2025 net revenue and the ten largest 65%, and “substantially all of our sales to date have been made on a purchase order basis”. Gross profit held up - $385,663 thousand, $194,782 thousand and $265,814 thousand for 2023 to 2025 - and the AI optical ramp has lifted 2026 results, but a revenue base that nearly halved in one year and three straight years of operating losses do not evidence a moat.
Type: none
No single source of advantage in the 10-K is strong enough to name. MaxLinear has “over one thousand issued patents” and says consideration under intellectual property sale agreements “has previously been and is currently expected in the future be material”, but the same filing describes its products as building blocks that larger vendors can integrate, says some optical-interconnect customers are “module makers who are vertically integrated, where we compete with internally supplied components”, and claims only that “We believe that we compete favorably” on factors from product performance to price. Its RF-CMOS integration know-how is real, but nothing in the filing shows customers locked in or rivals unable to match it.
Leadership: fast follower
In its fastest-growing line MaxLinear is a second source. Deep Fundamental’s September 27, 2024 deep dive (https://deepfundamental.substack.com/p/deep-dive-optical-module-market) says “Marvell ($MRVL) and Broadcom ($AVGO) are two major suppliers of DSPs, with Marvell holding the top position in the market”, that “Coherent also sources heavily from Marvell, with Broadcom/ Maxlinear potentially serving as second supplier with 20-30% share”, and that MaxLinear offers “DSPs at about half the price of Marvell's if it can achieve a meaningful mass production volume of at least 100K units per month”. Keystone has since reached volume - management said on the Q2 2026 call that it “continues to ramp into high volume production at major hyperscale customers across U.S. and Asia” - but the 10-K names Broadcom, Qualcomm, Realtek, Skyworks, Credo, MediaTek, Marvell, MACOM, Texas Instruments, Analog Devices, Renesas, Microchip and Semtech as primary merchant competitors, and no third-party source found ranks MaxLinear first in any of its markets.
Pricing power: moderate
Mixed. Gross profit has stayed in proportion through the cycle - the 10-K’s income statement shows $265,814 thousand on revenue of $467,641 thousand in 2025 - and the Q2 2026 release (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001288469/000128846926000050/a06302026exhibit991.htm) reports GAAP gross margin of 57.8% against 56.5% a year earlier, guiding Q3 to 57.0%-60.0%. But the 10-K says “From time to time, we have reduced the average unit price of our products due to competitive pricing pressures, new product introductions by us or our competitors, and for other reasons, and we expect that we will have to do so again in the future”, that under some distributor agreements “we provide protection for reductions in selling prices of the distributors' inventory”, and in optical DSPs it entered as the lower-priced challenger.
Curated moat judgment grounded in the cited source. source: sec.gov
Value-chain position
Layer: networking & interconnect
- Upstream (suppliers): —
- Downstream (customers): —
- Competitors: MACOM Technology Solutions, Marvell Technology
MaxLinear sells chips, much of it through Asian distributors, ODMs and module makers - products shipped to Asia were 82% of 2025 net revenue, including 49% to Hong Kong - that build cable modems, PON terminals, Wi-Fi gateways, base-station radios and optical transceivers for operators and hyperscale data centers. In the AI chain it sits beside the optical-module makers as a DSP supplier, competing with Marvell and Broadcom and, at vertically integrated module makers, with internally supplied components.
Derived from this company's mapped supply-chain edges and its industry layer.
Signal contribution editorial prior
The moat prior voted +0.01 on the long (~6-month) horizon at weight 0.20 — the swarm call there is neutral (score 0.28, conviction 10).
Editorial prior — subjective, not backtested. It is bounded (±0.6), low-confidence, and never votes on short/medium. See exactly how it voted →
Product lineup
Products & services with an editorial market-share band and technical barrier band — qualitative judgments tied to a cited basis, never invented figures.
| Product | Market share | Technical barrier |
|---|---|---|
| Broadband access SoCs (cable, fiber PON, DSL) · Broadband modem and gateway chips DOCSIS cable, passive optical network and DSL modem and gateway SoCs sold to the OEMs and ODMs that build operators’ customer-premises equipment. | Unknown The FY2025 10-K says revenue directly attributable to broadband applications was “approximately 44% and 32% of our net revenue” in 2025 and 2024, and that the North American and European Pay-TV market is “dominated by a few OEMs”, but it gives no market share, and no third-party share figure was found. | Moderate Business is won through operator programs and qualification - the 10-K says customers require “a lengthy and expensive qualification process which does not assure product sales”, which favours a supplier once designed in. But the same filing warns that operator consolidation “could delay or lead to cancellations of major spending programs”, and its listed primary competitors include Broadcom, Realtek and MediaTek. |
| Home connectivity SoCs (Wi-Fi 7, MoCA, G.hn, Ethernet) · In-home networking chips Wi-Fi and Ethernet gateway SoCs and MoCA and G.hn transceivers that distribute broadband inside the home. | Unknown On the Q2 2026 call management said broadband and connectivity grew on “large scale deployments of our single chip fiber PON and Wi-Fi 7 gateway platforms at major Tier 1 service providers in North America and Europe”, but neither the call nor the 10-K gives a share for Wi-Fi, MoCA or G.hn, and no third-party figure was found. | Low The FY2025 10-K describes its products as “building block semiconductors which provide functions that in some cases can be integrated into more complex integrated circuits” and warns “If we cannot offer an attractive solution for applications where our competitors offer more fully integrated products, we may lose significant market share to our competitors” - a live risk against the integrated Wi-Fi and gateway suppliers it names as primary competitors, including Broadcom, Qualcomm, MediaTek and Realtek. |
| Industrial and multi-market interface and power ICs · Catalog analog and interface chips Serial interfaces, USB, UARTs, PCIe devices, data converters and power-management ICs for industrial automation, process control and manufacturing IT. | Niche The FY2025 10-K says “we compete with much larger analog and mixed-signal catalog competitors in the multi-market high-performance analog markets”, naming Texas Instruments, Analog Devices, Renesas and Microchip among its primary competitors. It gives no share; the language places MaxLinear as a smaller catalog supplier. | Low The filing calls power management and interface technologies “ubiquitous functions in new and existing markets” and cites no proprietary barrier specific to this line against its much larger catalog rivals. |
| Keystone and Rushmore optical PAM4 DSPs · Data center optical DSPs Keystone is a 5nm CMOS, 100Gb-per-lane PAM4 DSP for 400G and 800G optical modules; Rushmore, a 200Gb-per-lane DSP for 1.6T, is sampling, with management expecting it to drive growth beginning in 2027. | Challenger Deep Fundamental’s September 27, 2024 deep dive says Marvell holds “the top position in the market” for DSPs, with Broadcom the other major supplier, and that at Coherent “Broadcom/ Maxlinear potentially serving as second supplier with 20-30% share”. MaxLinear has since won volume - on the Q2 2026 call (https://www.marketbeat.com/earnings/reports/2026-7-23-maxlinear-inc-stock/) management said Keystone “continues to ramp into high volume production at major hyperscale customers across U.S. and Asia for 400 Gb and 800 Gb deployments” - but no independent source found ranks it above Marvell or Broadcom. | Moderate The deep dive says “Marvell's higher pricing reflects the greater ability of product differentiation in the DSP market compared to the driver/TIA market”, and management claims Keystone delivers “almost 40% lower consumption in power than competition” (Q2 2026 call; a company claim). But MaxLinear entered on price - the newsletter says it offers “DSPs at about half the price of Marvell's if it can achieve a meaningful mass production volume” - and its 10-K says some optical customers are “module makers who are vertically integrated, where we compete with internally supplied components”. |
What you're looking at
These charts plot MaxLinear's reported income statement, cash flow, and balance sheet from its SEC filings through 2026-07-23. Every figure is as-filed XBRL — none of it is an estimate.
Over the reported window, net income at a loss of $136.7M in FY2025.
Analyst consensus — third-party estimates from Yahoo Finance, as of 2026-10-26. Not SEC filings and not a TradingPilot forecast. source: finance.yahoo.com
| Period | EPS (est.) | Revenue (est.) | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q/E Dec 2026 | USD 0.79 (USD 0.78–USD 0.79) · 10 | USD 250242800.00 (USD 249000000.00–USD 252900000.00) · 10 | +83% |
| FY 2026 | USD 1.99 (USD 1.97–USD 2.01) · 10 | USD 774322000.00 (USD 773100000.00–USD 777000000.00) · 10 | +66% |
Each figure shows the consensus mean, its (low–high) range where available, and · the number of analysts behind that estimate.
Our model leans Low-confidence · Neutral on the stock over the medium horizon — a market-direction call, not an earnings forecast. See the Signal tab.
Income statement
Cash flow & liquidity
Balance sheet
Filings
- 2025Q4 · filed 2026-07-23 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q2 · filed 2026-07-23 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q2 · filed 2026-07-23 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q1 · filed 2026-07-23 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q1 · filed 2026-07-23 source: sec.gov
Show 197 older filings
- 2025Q3 · filed 2026-07-23 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q1 · filed 2026-04-23 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q1 · filed 2026-04-23 source: sec.gov
- FY2024 · filed 2026-01-29 source: sec.gov
- FY2025 · filed 2026-01-29 source: sec.gov
- FY2023 · filed 2026-01-29 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q4 · filed 2025-10-23 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q3 · filed 2025-10-23 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q3 · filed 2025-10-23 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · filed 2025-10-23 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · filed 2025-10-23 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q2 · filed 2025-07-23 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · filed 2025-07-23 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q1 · filed 2025-04-23 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · filed 2025-04-23 source: sec.gov
- FY2023 · filed 2025-01-29 source: sec.gov
- FY2022 · filed 2025-01-29 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q4 · filed 2024-10-23 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q3 · filed 2024-10-23 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · filed 2024-10-23 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · filed 2024-10-23 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · filed 2024-10-23 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · filed 2024-07-24 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · filed 2024-07-24 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · filed 2024-04-24 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · filed 2024-04-24 source: sec.gov
- FY2022 · filed 2024-01-31 source: sec.gov
- FY2021 · filed 2024-01-31 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q4 · filed 2023-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · filed 2023-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · filed 2023-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q1 · filed 2023-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · filed 2023-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · filed 2023-07-27 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · filed 2023-07-27 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · filed 2023-04-26 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q1 · filed 2023-04-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2021 · filed 2023-02-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2020 · filed 2023-02-01 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q4 · filed 2022-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · filed 2022-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · filed 2022-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · filed 2022-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · filed 2022-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · filed 2022-07-27 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · filed 2022-07-27 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q1 · filed 2022-04-27 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · filed 2022-04-27 source: sec.gov
- FY2020 · filed 2022-02-02 source: sec.gov
- FY2019 · filed 2022-02-02 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q4 · filed 2021-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · filed 2021-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · filed 2021-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · filed 2021-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · filed 2021-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · filed 2021-07-28 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · filed 2021-07-28 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · filed 2021-04-28 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · filed 2021-04-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2019 · filed 2021-02-11 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2021-02-11 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2021-02-11 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2021-02-11 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q4 · filed 2021-02-11 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q4 · filed 2021-02-11 source: sec.gov
- FY2018 · filed 2021-02-11 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q4 · filed 2020-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · filed 2020-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2020-11-05 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · filed 2020-07-23 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2020-07-23 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · filed 2020-04-29 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2020-04-29 source: sec.gov
- FY2018 · filed 2020-02-05 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2020-02-05 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2020-02-05 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2020-02-05 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · filed 2020-02-05 source: sec.gov
- FY2017 · filed 2020-02-05 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · filed 2019-10-24 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2019-10-24 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2019-10-24 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2019-07-25 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2019-07-25 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2019-05-01 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2019-05-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2017 · filed 2019-02-05 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2019-02-05 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2019-02-05 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2019-02-05 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2019-02-05 source: sec.gov
- FY2016 · filed 2019-02-05 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2018-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2018-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2018-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2018-08-07 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2018-08-07 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2018-05-09 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2018-05-09 source: sec.gov
- FY2016 · filed 2018-02-20 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2018-02-20 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2018-02-20 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2018-02-20 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2018-02-20 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2018-02-20 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2017-11-07 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2017-11-07 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2017-11-07 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2017-08-08 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2017-08-08 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2017-08-08 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2017-05-09 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2017-05-09 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2017-02-09 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2017-02-09 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2017-02-09 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2017-02-09 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2017-02-09 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2017-02-09 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2017-02-09 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2016-11-07 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2016-11-07 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2016-11-07 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2016-11-07 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2016-08-08 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2016-08-08 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2016-05-09 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2016-05-09 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2016-02-17 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2016-02-17 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2016-02-17 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2016-02-17 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2016-02-17 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2016-02-17 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2016-02-17 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2015-11-04 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2015-11-04 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2015-11-04 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2015-11-04 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2015-08-10 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2015-08-10 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2015-05-06 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2015-05-06 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2015-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2015-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2015-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2015-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2015-02-23 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2015-02-23 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2015-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2014-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2014-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2014-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2014-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2014-07-31 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2014-07-31 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2014-04-30 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2014-04-30 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2014-02-07 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2014-02-07 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2014-02-07 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2014-02-07 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2014-02-07 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2014-02-07 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2014-02-07 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2013-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2013-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2013-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2013-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2013-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2013-08-01 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2013-05-01 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2013-05-01 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2013-02-06 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q1 · filed 2013-02-06 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2013-02-06 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2013-02-06 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2013-02-06 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2013-02-06 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2013-02-06 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2012-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2012-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2012-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2012-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2012-08-03 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2012-08-03 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q1 · filed 2012-05-02 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2012-05-02 source: sec.gov
- FY2008 · filed 2012-03-14 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2012-03-14 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2012-03-14 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q4 · filed 2011-11-01 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q3 · filed 2011-11-01 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2011-11-01 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2011-11-01 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q2 · filed 2011-07-28 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2011-07-28 source: sec.gov
Key ratios vs peers
Comparing against peers…
Institutional holders (13F, 2026Q2)
| Institution | Shares | Value | Δ shares QoQ | % of 13F | % shares out |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock Passive / index | 13,700,399 | $1.8B | 295,662 | 0.0% | 15.11% |
| State Street Passive / index | 4,325,471 | $553.8M | -742,126 | 0.0% | 4.77% |
| FMR (Fidelity) Passive / index | 1,650,824 | $211.4M | -3,611,846 | 0.0% | 1.82% |
| Renaissance Technologies Guru | 436,513 | $55.9M | -9,400 | 0.1% | 0.48% |
| Bridgewater Associates (Ray Dalio (founder)) Guru | 4,879 | $624658 | 4,879 | 0.0% | 0.01% |
TradingPilot-computed columns (% of 13F, % shares out) are derived from as-filed 13F values; only name, shares and value are as-filed.
What a 13F can’t show you
- Delayed 45+ days. Positions are as-of the quarter-end shown, filed up to 45 days later.
- Long-only, US-listed. No shorts, cash, bonds, FX, foreign, or private holdings; listed options are reported at notional and excluded from per-position equity value.
- $100M threshold. Smaller managers never file.
- “% of 13F” is not “% of AUM”. A 13F is a partial book.
- “Sold out” means “no longer reported” — not necessarily sold.
- One CIK can aggregate multiple sub-entities. Confidential treatment can omit positions.
- Passive index filers are not gurus. Their 13F changes are index flows, and they are excluded from TradingPilot’s smart-money signal.
- Quant caveat. A quant filer’s 13F (e.g. Renaissance) is a long-only quarter-end snapshot and does NOT reflect its actual high-turnover, short-horizon strategy.
- Guru pages and holdings never feed a signal (weightless).
No tagged news yet.
Headlines
2026-10-28 Yahoo Finance: CRDO · Credo Sinks 13% in a Week as MaxLinear Says “The Market Is Diversifying”
2026-10-24 Yahoo Finance: ALAB · Credo Stock Fell Nearly 10% in a Day as MaxLinear Targeted Its Cable Market. Here’s What Credo’s CEO Called Its Biggest Moat
2026-10-24 Yahoo Finance: MXL · MaxLinear (MXL) Stock Slips As Q3 Earnings Fuel AI Rebound Questions
2026-10-23 Yahoo Finance: MXL · How Investors Are Reacting To MaxLinear (MXL) Earnings Beat
2026-10-23 Yahoo Finance: MXL · MaxLinear: 3 Key Takeaways for Long-Term Investors
2026-10-23 Yahoo Finance: MXL · MaxLinear's Q3 Earnings Top Estimates, Revenues Increase Y/Y
2026-10-23 Yahoo Finance: MXL · MXL Q3 Earnings Call Highlights AI Growth and Optical Demand
2026-10-23 Yahoo Finance: MXL · MaxLinear (MXL) Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
2026-10-23 Yahoo Finance: MXL · MaxLinear, Inc. Q3 2026 Earnings Call Summary
2026-10-23 Yahoo Finance: MXL · What MaxLinear (MXL) Said on Its Q3 Earnings Call
2026-10-22 Yahoo Finance: MXL · MaxLinear beats estimates but stock dips after-hours
2026-10-22 Yahoo Finance: MTSI · MaxLinear (MXL) Q3 Earnings and Revenues Top Estimates
2026-10-22 Yahoo Finance: MXL · Chipmaker MaxLinear Delivers Beat-And-Raise Report With Data Center Surge
2026-10-22 Yahoo Finance: MXL · MaxLinear: Q3 Earnings Snapshot
2026-10-13 Yahoo Finance: MXL · MaxLinear (MXL) Could Be 6% Below Fair Value After Topaz AI Gateway Debut
2026-10-13 Yahoo Finance: MXL · MaxLinear Accelerates AI-Powered Broadband with Topaz™ and Intelligent Network Innovations at Network X 2026
2026-10-06 Business Wire AI · MaxLinear Introduces Topaz™, One of the Industry's Most Advanced AI-Ready PON HGU Chips for 10G and Beyond
Impact = company-prominence tier (High/Medium auto-assigned by graph centrality/size; Low only on curated minor events), not a magnitude forecast.
Upcoming
| Date | Type | Event | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027-01-21 | earnings | MaxLinear earnings (estimated) — Date not yet announced — estimated from EDGAR filing cadence (last periodic filing + 91/365 days); confirm via IR. estimated | Medium |
Past
| Date | Event | Impact | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-22 | MaxLinear earnings confirmed | Medium | EPS beat · Rev beat · -2.8% |
| 2026-07-23 | MaxLinear earnings confirmed | Medium | EPS beat · -21.5% |
| 2026-04-23 | MaxLinear earnings confirmed | Medium | EPS beat · +76.1% |