memory & storage · Industry Index 15 (rank #51) · $532.00 (+3.50%) · mkt cap $57.5B
ⓘ Data freshness
price: as of 2026-10-08 index: as of 2026-10-08 fundamentals: latest filing 2026-06-30 Reports quarterly (financials via Yahoo Finance; not SEC-registered)
Taiwanese DRAM manufacturer producing commodity and specialty DRAM for PC, consumer and networking markets.
Industry exposure 0.2 (Nanya makes commodity/specialty DRAM and no HBM, so its AI exposure is mostly the indirect lift of the AI-driven DRAM price cycle.)
Signal
signal: as of 2026-10-05
Short (~2 weeks)
0%
Low-confidence · Neutral
Conviction 0
▲Price momentum— Technical uptrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote 0.54, confidence 0.24 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · derived internally
▼Structural— Industry Index 8.7 (falling -7.1 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Micron — partner · Following the Inotera DRAM joint venture, Micron licenses DRAM process technology to Nanya and holds an equity stake, receiving royalties in return. source: globenewswire.com
Winbond Electronics — competitor · Nanya and Winbond are peer Taiwanese DRAM/memory makers competing in the DRAM and specialty-memory markets. source: heqingele.com
Unusual options activity needs a US-listed instrument; this company has none.
Nanya TechnologyShort · ~2 weeksas of 2026-10-05Neutral
Structural set the tone, but the swarm won’t commit — a negative tilt with weak agreement, so the call is Neutral.
Fundamentals inform the ~3-month call, not a 2-week move.
—
no vote
🏦
Smart money Abstained
13F filings move too slowly for a 2-week call.
—
no vote
🏰
Moat Abstained
The moat prior is a ~6-month structural view, not a 2-week move.
—
no vote
Consensus · did they agree?
Most voters leaned one way; structural dissented. Directional agreement 0.10.
The gate · score → conviction → verdict
Raw score
−0.142
×
Agree·cover·strength
0.10
→
Conviction
0.00
A mildly-negative score, but weak agreement — so the engine returns a no-conviction Neutral rather than overclaim. This is the system refusing to force a call it doesn’t have.
as of 2026-10-05 · config sig-v4-2026-07-26
Signal history
No moat profile yet. The durable competitive advantage — moat, leadership, and pricing power — is curated for flagship names first; Nanya Technology isn't covered yet. Nothing here is fabricated in its absence.
Signal contribution
The moat prior — a subjective, non-backtested editorial input — only nudges the long (~6-month) horizon, and it isn't scoring Nanya Technology yet (no long-horizon signal has been computed for this name). Nothing here is fabricated in its absence.
What you're looking at
These charts plot Nanya Technology's reported income statement, cash flow, and balance sheet from its SEC filings through 2026-06-30. Every figure is as-filed XBRL — none of it is an estimate.
Over the reported window, revenue grew 15% to $2.1B (FY2022→FY2025); gross margin moved 37% → 23%; net income at $211.7M in FY2025.
Analyst consensus — third-party estimates from Yahoo Finance, as of 2026-10-06. Not SEC filings and not a TradingPilot forecast. source: finance.yahoo.com
Period
EPS (est.)
Revenue (est.)
YoY
Q/E Sep 2026
TWD 24.02 (TWD 18.34–TWD 26.44) · 6
TWD 116.1B (TWD 94.4B–TWD 132.8B) · 7
+518%
FY 2026
TWD 69.46 (TWD 58.52–TWD 77.50) · 8
TWD 368.2B (TWD 313.2B–TWD 422.5B) · 10
+453%
Each figure shows the consensus mean, its (low–high) range where available, and · the number of analysts behind that estimate.
Next report ~2026-10-12.
Our model leans Bullish on the stock over the medium horizon — a market-direction call, not an earnings forecast. See the Signal tab.
Income statement
Cash flow & liquidity
Balance sheet
Some recent figures are from Yahoo Finance where the latest SEC filing hasn’t posted yet — FX-converted to USD and reconciled against SEC-filed periods.
Passive index filers are not gurus. Their 13F changes are index flows, and they are excluded from TradingPilot’s smart-money signal.
Quant caveat. A quant filer’s 13F (e.g. Renaissance) is a long-only quarter-end snapshot and does NOT reflect its actual high-turnover, short-horizon strategy.
Guru pages and holdings never feed a signal (weightless).
