Compare moats
Up to three covered companies, band by band. Every call is a curated editorial judgment, never a disclosed figure — and every band carries its cited basis.
| AMD | Trane Technologies | Deere & Company | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moat rating | narrow AMD's FY2025 10-K documents real but bounded advantages: approximately 7,200 U.S. patents and roughly 18,900 patent matters worldwide, an outright claim that 'We are the market share leader in semi-custom game console products,' and gross margin of 50% on revenue up 34% to $34.6 billion. The same filing sets the ceiling: 'Some of our competitors may possess stronger market positions, larger customer bases, more design wins, and greater financial, sales, marketing, and distribution resources than us'; Nvidia is named 'the discrete GPU market share leader'; and AMD relies on TSMC 'for the production of all wafers for microprocessor and GPU products at 7 nanometer (nm) or smaller nodes.' Advantages that are genuine, contested, and dependent on a shared foundry are narrow, not wide. | narrow Trane's FY2025 Form 10-K (filed 5 February 2026) makes exactly one rank claim about itself and it is hedged: 'We are one of the leading manufacturers in the world of HVAC systems and services and transport temperature control products and services'. It sits inside a Competitive Conditions section that opens 'Our products and services are sold in highly competitive markets throughout the world', describes 'a wide variety of competitors that vary by product line and services' including 'well-established regional or specialized competitors, as well as larger U.S. and non-U.S. corporations or divisions of larger companies', and names price first among 'the principal methods of competition in these markets', ahead of quality, delivery, service and support, technology and innovation. The risk factors push the same way: 'The markets that we serve are highly competitive', 'consolidation and new entrants (including non-traditional competitors) within our industries' 'could result in increased competition and pricing pressures', Trane competes 'with large companies and with smaller, local operators who may have customer, regulatory or economic advantages in the geographies in which they are located', and 'some of our competitors may employ pricing and other strategies that are not traditional'. What the filing does evidence is an advantage that gets paid for: 2025 net revenues of $21,321.9 million, up 7.5% from $19,838.2 million, of which the company's own bridge assigns 3.0 points to pricing; gross margin up 50 basis points to 36.2%; operating income of $3,967.4 million, 18.6% of revenues; and firm backlog up to $7,769.4 million from $6,747.7 million. But that advantage is not uniform in the same document: the EMEA pricing component was (0.3)% and its segment adjusted EBITDA margin fell 150 basis points to 18.3%, and Asia Pacific organic revenue fell 2.5% on 'lower volumes in China'. A position the company itself will only call 'one of the leading', defended in markets it calls highly competitive and priced unevenly across its three segments, is protection that is real but bounded. | narrow The independent evidence is a regulator's complaint, not a finding. The FTC, Illinois and Minnesota complaint filed 2025-01-15 (https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/DeereCoREDACTEDComplaintCaseNo325-cv-50017.pdf) alleges that "Deere is the world's leading manufacturer of agricultural equipment like large tractors and combine harvesters, and Deere enjoys a dominant share of large tractor and combine sales in the United States", that Deere "possessed monopoly and market power in the sale of Large Tractors and Combines in the United States", and that "There are substantial barriers to entry into the Large Tractor and Combine markets." The share figures behind those claims are redacted in the public version. Deere's FY2025 Form 10-K (fiscal year ended 2025-11-02, filed 2025-12-18) adds the company's own side of the edge: "John Deere's brand recognition is a competitive factor in North America and many other parts of the world", about 2,050 independent dealer locations in the U.S. and Canada, and parts "many of which are proprietary". The limits are in the same 10-K: "The agricultural equipment industry continues to change and is becoming even more competitive through the emergence and global expansion of many competitors", the industry "is also attracting non-traditional competitors, including technology-focused companies and start-up ventures", and construction and forestry (29% of fiscal 2025 equipment net sales) faces Caterpillar, Komatsu, Volvo and others. That supports a narrow rating, not a wide one. The dominance and entry barriers are a plaintiff's allegations, not findings, and the share figures are redacted. They cover U.S. large tractors and combines, inside a segment that was 45% of fiscal 2025 equipment net sales. Deere's own filing describes agriculture as becoming more competitive and construction and forestry as a contested market. |
| Moat type | intangibles ip The FY2025 10-K locates the durable asset in design IP rather than manufacturing: 'We rely on contracts and intellectual property rights to protect our products and technologies from unauthorized third-party copying and use,' with approximately 7,200 U.S. patents and about 18,900 patent matters worldwide spanning x86 EPYC/Ryzen CPUs, CDNA/RDNA graphics and the Versal/Zynq adaptive-SoC families, and it credits customer wins to 'our broad IP portfolio and leadership in design, integration and advanced packaging.' It is explicitly not cost_scale: AMD is fabless and 'utilize[s] Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC) for the production of wafers' — the same leading-edge foundry its merchant competitors use, so no manufacturing-scale advantage accrues to it. | switching costs The filing rules out the obvious alternative in its own words. Item 1's Patents and Licenses paragraph says the Company 'does not consider any single patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret, proprietary technology, technical data, business process or any other confidential information (or any related group of any such items) to be of material importance to any segment or to the business as a whole', and the matching risk factor is blunter: 'we do not believe that our business is materially dependent on a single intellectual property right or any group of them. In our opinion, engineering, production skills and experience are more responsible for our market position than our patents and/or licenses.' That is a company disclaiming an IP moat. Where the 10-K does locate durability is the installed equipment and the channel wrapped around it. The overview frames the entire growth plan that way - 'As an industry leader with an extensive global install base, our growth strategy includes expanding recurring revenue through services and rental options' - the principal products and services table carries 'Service agreements', 'Repair and maintenance services', 'Parts and supplies (aftermarket and OEM)' and 'Rental services' alongside the equipment itself, the Distribution paragraph puts U.S. sales through Trane's own 'branch sales offices, distributors and dealers across the country' and non-U.S. sales through 'numerous subsidiary sales and service companies with a supporting chain of distributors throughout the world', and the accounting policy confirms the contracts are multi-period: 'For extended warranties and long-term service agreements, revenue for these distinct performance obligations are recognized over time on a straight-line basis over the respective contract term.' Long-lived equipment serviced under term agreements by the manufacturer's own branches is the asset this filing keeps pointing at, which is why the moat is read as an installed-base tie rather than a patent estate. | switching costs The FTC complaint (2025-01-15) places the advantage in the cost of leaving the installed fleet: "Equipment owners cannot switch from Deere agricultural equipment to other manufacturers' equipment without incurring significant costs", including "the cost of acquiring replacement equipment (often hundreds of thousands of dollars per machine), the cost of learning how to operate new equipment, and the cost of losing data generated by existing Deere equipment", plus the cost of making "mixed fleets" interoperable. The FY2025 10-K describes the assets that create this lock-in: a dealer network of about 2,050 U.S. and Canadian locations, proprietary parts for current and past products, and the John Deere Operations Center, which Item 1A says "stores substantial volumes of data with respect to our customers' operations". Patents are not the main source: the 10-K says it does "not regard any of our businesses as being dependent upon any single patent or family of patents." |
| Leadership | fast follower The FY2025 10-K itself places AMD behind the pace-setter in its two most important markets: 'Our principal competitor in the supply of discrete graphics is Nvidia, who is the discrete GPU market share leader,' and the risk factors state Nvidia 'leverages its market position in data center GPU, financial resources, and proprietary software ecosystem to promote its systems and influences customers who do business with us.' AMD is nonetheless executing 'an annual cadence of leadership for AMD Instinct solutions' and has won gigawatt-scale commitments (OpenAI, 6 GW) — following fast and closely, not setting the pace. | co leader The company's own claim is comparative but never exclusive: 'We are one of the leading manufacturers in the world of HVAC systems and services and transport temperature control products and services' - one of, with no rank, no share figure and no competitor named anywhere in the filing. Competitive Conditions sets that against 'well-established regional or specialized competitors, as well as larger U.S. and non-U.S. corporations or divisions of larger companies', and the risk factors add that Trane competes 'with large companies and with smaller, local operators who may have customer, regulatory or economic advantages in the geographies in which they are located'. The scale behind the claim is substantial and disclosed - $21,321.9 million of 2025 net revenues, products sold in approximately 100 countries, backlog of $7,769.4 million - but the 10-K never asserts the top position in any market it serves. | clear leader The independent evidence covers U.S. large farm equipment. The FTC complaint (2025-01-15) states "Deere is the largest manufacturer of agricultural equipment in the United States" and alleges that for each fiscal year from at least 2012 to 2021 Deere's share of large tractors sold in the United States exceeded a figure that is redacted in the public version; the FTC press release of the same day (https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/01/ftc-states-sue-deere-company-protect-farmers-unfair-corporate-tactics-high-repair-costs) says Deere "maintains a dominant market share position across the large agricultural equipment market". These are a plaintiff's allegations. The band does not extend to construction and forestry, where the FY2025 10-K lists Caterpillar, CNH Industrial, Doosan Bobcat, Hitachi, Komatsu, Kubota, Liugong, SANY, Volvo and XCMG among global competitors and no independent share source was found. |
| Pricing power | moderate FY2025 gross margin was 50%, up from 49% in 2024 per the 10-K — healthy and improving — but the same filing attributes average-selling-price pressure to competitors: Intel 'uses its microprocessor market position to price its products aggressively and target our customers and channel partners with special incentives. These aggressive activities have reduced and may reduce our unit sales and average selling prices for many of our products'. Pricing power is real but contested. | moderate Price is a separately disclosed component of growth in this filing and it is positive: of the 7.5% increase in 2025 net revenues, the company's bridge assigns 3.0% to pricing against 3.2% volume, 0.8% acquisitions and 0.5% currency, and gross margin rose 50 basis points to 36.2% 'primarily due to gross productivity and price realization, partially offset by inflation'. In the Americas the price component was 3.8% of an 8.0% revenue increase, and that segment's adjusted EBITDA margin rose 70 basis points to 21.6% 'primarily due to price realization and gross productivity, partially offset by inflation and continued business reinvestment'. What holds the band below strong is in the same bridge and the same risk factors: EMEA pricing was (0.3)% and its segment margin fell 150 basis points to 18.3%; Asia Pacific pricing was 0.4% on organic revenue down 2.5%; consolidation and new entrants 'could result in increased competition and pricing pressures'; and 'in the event there is deflation, we may experience pressure from our customers to reduce prices.' Price that sticks in the Americas, disappears in EMEA and is disclaimed as durable in the risk factors is moderate rather than strong. | moderate The FTC complaint alleges pricing power in large tractors and combines, "shown directly through Deere's ability to raise prices, reduce output, and degrade quality in those markets", and says Deere's dealers "charge supracompetitive prices for restricted repairs". The reported numbers show a cyclical business: the third-party data site stockanalysis.com (https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/de/financials/) shows gross margin of 30.63% in fiscal 2023, 29.50% in fiscal 2024, 26.96% in fiscal 2025 and 25.18% for the twelve months to August 2026, and stored fundamentals from the 10-K show net income of $10,166 million (fiscal 2023), $7,100 million (fiscal 2024) and $5,027 million (fiscal 2025). Item 1A of the FY2025 10-K says Deere competes on "product performance, innovation, quality, distribution, sustainability, customer service, and price", that "Aggressive pricing or other strategies of competitors" or a failure "to price products competitively" hurt results, and that results suffer "if our customers are unwilling to accept price increases for our products". Alleged pricing power that still leaves margins falling with farm demand is moderate, not strong. |
| Summary | AMD's edge is architectural design IP executed on someone else's fabs. The FY2025 10-K describes a full-stack portfolio — EPYC server CPUs, Instinct AI accelerators, Ryzen client parts where 'AMD was the first company to integrate a dedicated neural processing unit (NPU) on the same SoC as an x86 CPU for AI PCs,' Radeon graphics, Pensando networking and Versal adaptive SoCs — backed by roughly 18,900 patent matters worldwide, and it discloses gigawatt-scale customer commitments (an October 2025 agreement with OpenAI 'to deploy 6 gigawatts of AMD GPUs,' first gigawatt on Instinct MI450). The same filing bounds that moat: Nvidia is 'the discrete GPU market share leader' and 'leverages its market position in data center GPU, financial resources, and proprietary software ecosystem'; Intel 'uses its microprocessor market position to price its products aggressively'; Arm architectures and customers who 'internally develop products to support similar AI workloads' are named as encroaching; and every wafer at 7 nm or below comes from TSMC. Revenue grew 34% in FY2025 with Data Center up 32%, but the filing's own competitive framing places AMD in the challenger seat rather than the entrenched one. | Trane Technologies is the Trane and Thermo King equipment maker - the FY2025 10-K opens by calling it 'a global climate innovator' selling HVAC, transport refrigeration and custom refrigeration through 'our strategic brands, Trane® and Thermo King®' - organised in three regional segments that produced 2025 net revenues of $17,168.8 million (Americas), $2,802.1 million (EMEA) and $1,351.0 million (Asia Pacific), with 'Approximately 25% of our net revenues in 2025 ... derived outside the U.S.' across 'approximately 100 countries' and 'no single external customer that accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated net revenues in 2025, 2024 or 2023'. The filing is candid that the markets are contested and equally candid that its position does not rest on intellectual property: 'engineering, production skills and experience are more responsible for our market position than our patents and/or licenses.' The durable asset it does describe is the installed base and the aftermarket attached to it - an 'extensive global install base' whose monetisation through 'services and rental options' is the stated growth strategy, reached through branch sales offices, dealers and distributors, with service agreements, repair and maintenance, aftermarket and OEM parts and rental all listed among the principal products. The 2025 financials carry that signature: revenues up 7.5% to $21,321.9 million split 3.2 points volume, 3.0 points price, 0.8 points acquisitions and 0.5 points currency; gross margin up 50 basis points to 36.2% 'primarily due to gross productivity and price realization, partially offset by inflation'; and backlog of $7,769.4 million on equipment where 'orders for specialized equipment or specific customer applications are submitted with extended lead times'. The limits are in the same filing. Price contributed 3.8% in the Americas but (0.3)% in EMEA and 0.4% in Asia Pacific; EMEA's segment adjusted EBITDA margin fell 150 basis points to 18.3%; Asia Pacific organic revenue fell 2.5% on 'lower volumes in China'; the Americas' otherwise strong year was 'partially offset by weaker volume in our Residential business'; and the risk factors warn that refrigerant regulation 'could make some of our existing HVAC and refrigeration products non-compliant or obsolete', with the company 'developing and selling our next generation products that utilize lower global warming potential solutions' against $347.6 million of 2025 research and development spending. For the AI build-out specifically, the link exists in the filing but is unsized: 'Data center HVAC systems', 'Data center liquid cooling solutions', 'Data center facility controls' and 'Data center services' appear in the principal products and services table, and those four entries are the only places the phrase occurs anywhere in the 10-K - no revenue, no ranking, no share, and no mention at all in the MD&A discussion of 2025 growth. | Deere makes agricultural, turf, construction, forestry and roadbuilding equipment and finances it through John Deere Financial. Per its FY2025 Form 10-K, Production & Precision Agriculture generated $17,311 million of net sales (45% of equipment operations net sales), Small Agriculture & Turf $10,224 million (26%) and Construction & Forestry $11,382 million (29%), within net sales and revenues of $45,684 million. The core of the moat is large farm machinery. The FTC's January 2025 complaint calls Deere "the largest manufacturer of agricultural equipment in the United States" and alleges a dominant share of U.S. large tractor and combine sales, substantial barriers to entry, and significant costs to switch away from a Deere fleet, including losing machine data. The 10-K adds brand recognition, about 2,050 U.S. and Canadian dealer locations, proprietary parts and the Operations Center data platform. The same structure is under legal attack: the FTC with several states, and a separate multidistrict class action, allege that Deere unlawfully restrained the market for repairing its own farm equipment by limiting repair resources, including its fully functional Service ADVISOR tool, to its authorised dealers. On 2026-07-08 the FTC and Illinois, Arizona, Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin announced a settlement (https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/07/ftc-states-secure-settlement-deere-company-advancing-farmers-right-repair): a stipulated order, which has the force of law once the District Court approves it, requiring Deere for 10 years to make available to farmers and independent repair providers "repair resources equivalent to those Deere now makes available to Deere dealers". Item 1A also reports "slower than expected customer adoption of some of our precision technology solutions, and SaaS subscription services". Earnings are cyclical: the third-party data site stockanalysis.com shows gross margin falling from 30.63% in fiscal 2023 to 26.96% in fiscal 2025, and the 10-K reports PPA backlog down to about $4.0 billion from $5.2 billion as "demand has declined". An alleged dominant, high-barrier large-ag franchise, with repair-access litigation as the main threat to its aftermarket profits, supports a narrow moat. The dominance rests on a plaintiff's unproven allegations and covers one segment, and construction and forestry is a contested second leg. |
| Chain position | A fabless merchant-silicon designer sitting one layer above the foundries: the FY2025 10-K states AMD relies on TSMC 'for the production of all wafers for microprocessor and GPU products at 7 nanometer (nm) or smaller nodes' and primarily on GLOBALFOUNDRIES above 7 nm, with packaging and test performed by Asia-Pacific ATMP partners — so its cost, supply and cadence are inherited from partners it does not control. | Trane sits on the facility side of the AI build-out rather than in the compute stack. Its FY2025 10-K lists 'Data center HVAC systems', 'Data center liquid cooling solutions', 'Data center facility controls' and 'Data center services' among its principal products and services, alongside 'Thermal energy storage' and 'Smart and AI-enabled services'. Those four entries are the only occurrences of the phrase in the entire filing: there is no data center revenue figure, no ranking, no named competitor and no separate reporting - segment disclosure stops at Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific, and the MD&A attributes the Americas' 7.4% organic growth to 'realization of price increases and higher volumes led by strong demand within our Commercial HVAC business' without naming an end market. | An AI adopter, not an AI vendor: Item 1A of the FY2025 10-K says Deere uses "automation software, digital tools, applications, and analytics on the S7 Series Combines and our See & Spray targeted spraying solution", maintains the Operations Center data platform, and leverages generative AI in its business processes, and warns that falling behind competitors' AI advances could hurt its competitive position. |
| Products (share / barrier) |
|
|
|
| Long-horizon vote | +0.06 at weight 0.20 · swarm bullish Editorial prior, not backtested. | +0.13 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral Editorial prior, not backtested. | +0.20 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral Editorial prior, not backtested. |