Compare moats

Cipher (renamed Cipher Digital Inc. on 20 February 2026) holds signed, credit-supported leases but has not yet shown that they amount to a durable advantage. Its 2025 Form 10-K (filed 2026-02-24) says "Through the end of 2025, our revenue has been derived from mining bitcoin". Its Q2 2026 business update (2026-08-04, Exhibit 99.1, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819989/000181998926000038/q226_earningsxprxdraftxvf.htm) reported "Q2 2026 Revenue of $25 million", and its first HPC rent began only in August 2026 at Black Pearl. The 10-K's own risk factors describe a contested market. They say "There has been an increasing number of businesses constructing HPC data centers, which has resulted in increasing competition and pricing pressure that may cause us to reduce our pricing in order to remain competitive", that "our data centers are single-tenant properties", and that lessees "will have the right to terminate the lease if there are significant delays in the completion of construction". At Barber Lake, where the 10-K targeted Phase I delivery "by September 30, 2026", a September 2026 amendment, made "In connection with change orders and the continued evolution of tenant requirements", moved data-hall deliveries to the fourth quarter of 2026 through the first quarter of 2027. Under it, Cipher "will bear the first $359.3 million of costs in excess of the initial budgeted amount" (2026-09-25). There is real counter-evidence: a 15-year Amazon lease, a Google-backstopped Fluidstack lease whose contracted life a "leading AI lab" extended to 20 years, and a third lease with an investment-grade hyperscale tenant. Until that capacity is delivered and paying rent, though, a moat is not shown, so the band is none.

source: sec.gov

The FY2026 10-K (filed 2026-08-27) shows IREN holds an input the industry competes on: it names 'access to secured and energized power' first among what it believes are the principal competitive factors in its industry, and reports 'executed grid connection agreements, letters of agreement or equivalents representing approximately 5GW of total power capacity' in the United States, Canada, Spain and Australia as of June 30, 2026. It does not claim an advantage over rivals in that input. It says 'Certain competitors may have access to more competitively priced power, a greater access to power and a better capacity to timely secure grid connections,' and 'Many of our competitors have greater financial, technical or commercial resources, longer cloud operating histories or larger customer bases, compared to us.' Operating AI Cloud Services capacity was approximately 40MW at June 30, 2026, and the stored XBRL fundamentals from this 10-K show an FY2026 operating loss of about $1,046.7M on revenue of about $707.0M, so no durable advantage is yet demonstrated.

source: sec.gov

FY2025 10-K (filed 2025-08-19) grounds a narrow rating: on one side ~1,020 U.S. and ~1,100 foreign patents with expirations through 2045 plus vertically integrated wafer fabs (US, UK, Japan, Thailand) behind its laser chips and photonic ICs; on the other, Item 1A states optical communications products 'have increasingly become subject to commoditization' with 'predominantly Asia-based competitors' intensifying pricing pressure and a historical 'continued decline of average selling prices' expected to continue.

source: sec.gov

No moat source is demonstrated yet. Switching costs are the most likely candidate, since the leases are long (15 years at Black Pearl; Barber Lake now a 20-year contracted life) and each site has a single tenant. But the 10-K says tenant guarantees "will only be effective after rent commencement under such leases and are subject to certain limitations", and by August 2026 rent had begun at only one site. The advantages the 10-K claims are the company's own. It speaks of "industry-leading expertise in originating and securing industrial-scale, greenfield data center sites" and of securing West Texas land "on more favorable terms than in more established data center markets". The same document says "there is significant competition for power capacity and energized facilities". Intellectual property is modest: "four granted United States patents and one issued patent in Taiwan". With 66 full-time employees, Cipher has no scale advantage over the competitors it names: CoreWeave, Digital Realty, Equinix, Vantage Data Centers and Aligned Data Centers.

source: sec.gov

The FY2026 10-K's asserted advantage is control from owning its data centers, 'including the associated land, grid connections and substations', which it believes allows it 'to benefit from more sustainable cash flows and operational flexibility relative to operators that rely upon third-party colocation services or short-term land leases'. Its only scale language is a belief that its 'procurement scale, deployment experience and direct control over the data center layer' lets it bring new compute into service 'rapidly and at scale', a deployment-speed claim, and it 'generally target[s]' regions with 'low-cost and attractive renewable energy sources', a siting target rather than a demonstrated cost position. It does not claim a cost or scale lead: it says 'Many of our competitors are larger, have longer operating histories and significantly greater resources than we do' and that certain competitors 'may have access to more competitively priced power, a greater access to power and a better capacity to timely secure grid connections.' There is no network effect or lock-in either, since existing contracts have 'terms ranging from month to month up to five years'. No enumerated moat source is grounded.

source: sec.gov

Per the FY2025 10-K, the moat rests on intangibles/IP and process know-how: patent portfolio (~1,020 U.S. / ~1,100 foreign, ~780 pending), InP laser and photonic-integrated-circuit technology (Oclaro, NeoPhotonics acquisitions), coherent DSP/ASIC lines (IPG telecom transmission acquisition), and its own wafer fabrication, assembly and test facilities — the company states it does not broadly license its IP absent adequate consideration or cross-licenses.

source: sec.gov

No independent share or rank was found. The 10-K names CoreWeave, Digital Realty, Equinix, Vantage Data Centers and Aligned Data Centers as competitors, along with miners that have "signed leases with hyperscalers and HPC tenants": Hut 8, IREN, TeraWulf, Core Scientific and Applied Digital. Cipher has signed hyperscale-grade tenants (Amazon; Fluidstack with a Google backstop; a third investment-grade hyperscaler) but delivered its first HPC capacity only in August 2026 (Q2 2026 update). That makes it a fast follower. Its self-description as "a leading developer, owner, and operator of industrial-scale data centers" is the company's own claim and is not counted.

source: sec.gov

The 10-K lists IREN's competitors as hyperscalers (Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud) and specialized AI Cloud Services providers (CoreWeave, Nebius, Crusoe, Lambda, Nscale, SpaceX and others). It says IREN began providing AI Cloud Services in 2024 and cites its 'shorter operating history in AI Cloud Services relative to some competitors', and states 'Some of our competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, more comprehensive IP portfolios and patent protections, more design wins, and greater financial, sales, marketing and distribution resources than we do.' Operating AI Cloud Services capacity was approximately 40MW at June 30, 2026. The filing describes a smaller, later entrant that trails some competitors on operating history, customer base and resources, with its progress so far resting on two anchor contracts (a ~$9.7B five-year Microsoft agreement and a ~$3.4B five-year NVIDIA contract) rather than any claimed category position.

source: sec.gov

Mixed by layer: the FY2025 10-K self-describes Lumentum as 'a leading provider of optical and photonic products... recognized as an industry leader based on revenue and market share' (company's own characterization), while LightCounting's May 2026 optical vendor landscape places Lumentum near the bottom of its transceiver-only Top 10 — noting the list 'accounts for sales of optical transceivers only, excluding all other products, which explains lower rankings of Coherent and Lumentum' and that 'Neither CIG nor Lumentum plan to stay at the bottom of the list for much longer.' Co-leader in optical components/chips; follower in merchant transceiver modules behind Innolight and Eoptolink.

source: sec.gov

The 10-K says competition "has resulted in increasing competition and pricing pressure that may cause us to reduce our pricing in order to remain competitive". It adds that if customers cut usage "we may be compelled to lower our prices or risk losing a significant customer". At Barber Lake, Cipher agreed to absorb "the first $359.3 million of costs in excess of the initial budgeted amount", with the tenant reimbursing "50% of any such costs above that amount" (2026-09-25, Exhibit 99.1, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819989/000181998926000043/barberlakeleaseamendmentpr.htm). Its one input-cost edge is specific to mining: Odessa's power costs about 2.8 c/kWh under the Luminant contract, available "until at least July 2027". A landlord that concedes cost overruns to its tenants has weak pricing power.

source: sec.gov

The 10-K's risk factors state 'Our competitors' products, services and technologies may be cheaper or provide better functionality or features than ours, which has resulted and may in the future result in lower-than-expected selling prices or demand for our products.' They also say long-term contract pricing 'is generally fixed or agreed at the time of contracting', so if market pricing for comparable capacity rises during a contract's term 'we will not benefit from those increases with respect to capacity already committed under our existing long-term contracts', and that if customers suffer a downturn or discontinue its services it 'may be compelled to offer more flexible terms, lower our prices or risk losing a significant customer.' The stored XBRL fundamentals from this 10-K show FY2026 revenue of about $707.0M against an operating loss of about $1,046.7M, so there is no margin record yet that evidences pricing power.

source: sec.gov

The May 5, 2026 Q3 FY2026 earnings release shows current pricing traction — CEO cites 'operational rigor, pricing discipline, and product mix' behind a 540 bps sequential non-GAAP gross-margin gain to 47.9% — but the FY2025 10-K states pricing pressures 'have led to a continued decline of average selling prices across our business and we expect that these historical trends will continue,' so power is cyclical/mix-driven rather than structural.

source: sec.gov

Cipher develops single-tenant, powered data-centre campuses for hyperscale and AI tenants: Amazon at Black Pearl, Fluidstack (backstopped by Google) at Barber Lake, and an unnamed investment-grade hyperscaler at a third campus. Meanwhile it winds down bitcoin mining.

Downstream AI-cloud operator: owns grid-connected data centers and deploys NVIDIA/AMD GPU systems it rents to hyperscalers, frontier labs, AI developers and enterprises (anchor customers Microsoft and NVIDIA).

Upstream photonics supplier into AI/cloud datacenter and telecom infrastructure: sells transceivers, laser chips, CPO components and OCS to cloud operators, AI infrastructure providers and NEMs, and also supplies components to transceiver makers who compete with it ('Some of these competitors are also our customers' — FY2025 10-K). Concentrated demand: Customer A 16.0% and Customer B 15.4% of FY2025 net revenue; manufacturing concentrated in Thailand, China, UK, Slovenia, Japan and US with sole/limited-source component exposure.

• Bitcoin mining (Odessa) Unknown · Low source: sec.gov
• HPC data center leasing (Black Pearl, Barber Lake, Stingray) Challenger · Moderate source: sec.gov

• AI Cloud Services (bare metal and managed GPU compute) Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov
• AI infrastructure software (Mirantis k0rdent AI) Unknown · Low source: sec.gov
• Bitcoin mining (in wind-down) Unknown · Low source: sec.gov
• Owned data centers and grid-connected power portfolio Unknown · Moderate source: sec.gov

• Datacom optical transceivers & data interconnects Challenger · Moderate source: lightcounting.com
• High-speed laser chips & optical components Leader · Deep source: sec.gov
• Industrial & consumer lasers (incl. 3D-sensing VCSELs) Challenger · Moderate source: sec.gov
• Optical circuit switches (OCS) Niche · Moderate source: sec.gov
• Telecom transmission & transport Top 3 · Deep source: sec.gov

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →

Editorial prior, not backtested.

see exactly how it voted →