Compare moats
Up to three covered companies, band by band. Every call is a curated editorial judgment, never a disclosed figure — and every band carries its cited basis.
| CrowdStrike | Applied Digital | X-FAB Silicon Foundries | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moat rating | narrow Narrow rather than wide because the FY2026 10-K argues both ways and its own risk factors are the harder side: it describes a self-reinforcing data advantage and says "we do not believe any of our competitors currently have a true platform offering equivalent to the Falcon platform", but the same filing calls the market for security and IT operations solutions "intensely competitive, fragmented", warns that "Competitive pricing pressure may reduce our gross profits", and still carries the July 19 Incident as having "had, and is expected to continue to have, an adverse effect on our business, sales, customer and partner relations, reputation" more than two years after it occurred. | none The FY2026 10-K (filed 2026-07-29) shows contracted revenue, not a demonstrated competitive edge. About 1,410 MW is leased under 15-year take-or-pay, non-cancellable base terms worth about $36.2 billion, but only about 100 MW of the roughly 1.5 GW that is contracted and either operating or under construction was operating and earning revenue at May 31, 2026, and Item 1A says "lessees may have the right to terminate applicable leases if there are significant delays in construction." Item 1A also concedes "We do not have the resources to compete with larger providers of similar products or services at this time," and the Competition section names 13 power-advantaged developers the company competes with. Signed leases give revenue visibility, but the filing does not show a durable advantage. | narrow X-FAB's own 2025 annual report (published 2026-03-31) describes real lock-in. It says 'X-FAB is the sole source for most of the products it manufactures' and that 'A large portion of these products have long product lifecycles of ten or more years'. Its first medical MEMS product 'has been in production for more than 25 years'. No independent tracker confirms this, so the rating stays modest, and the same report qualifies it. Its risk section says 'None of X-FAB's customers are prohibited by contract from purchasing from other semiconductor suppliers' and that 'customers have switched to other semiconductor suppliers with little or no notice'. Melexis alone accounted for 43% of 2025 revenue. Returns are thin. Net profit fell to USD 30,128 thousand in 2025 from USD 61,526 thousand in 2024, and the Q2 2026 results (2026-07-30) report EBIT of USD 2.1 million. |
| Moat type | network effects The 10-K states the mechanism directly: "The more data that is fed into our Falcon platform, the more intelligent the AI Security Cloud becomes, the stronger our ability to anticipate and counter evolving adversary tradecraft, and the more our customers benefit, creating a powerful network effect that increases the overall value we provide." | none The 10-K claims three advantages: power-advantaged sites (it believes securing power and interconnection ahead of demand is 'the principal constraint on new HPC capacity and a core differentiator for us from many of our competitors'), a standardized 'franchise-style' design, and hyperscaler master service and master telecom service agreements 'that are difficult to obtain.' The filing does not show any of them to be durable. Its Competition section says competition 'centers on securing and developing sites with access to large-scale, reliable, and cost-competitive power and interconnection' and names 13 power-advantaged developers going after the same leases, and Item 1A concedes it lacks the resources to compete with larger providers. Signed leases are take-or-pay and non-cancellable, so a tenant leaving for convenience owes 'the full remaining contractual value,' but that is contractual lock-in on each lease rather than a moat source, so no moat type is assigned. | switching costs The 2025 annual report describes the lock-in mechanism. Customers design on X-FAB's own process platforms with design IP that 'X-FAB, as opposed to its competitors, does not rely on third-party providers to develop', because it is 'done and supported in-house'. Most of its open-platform technologies 'are qualified for automotive use'. 'Microsystems devices are highly specific and require the development of customer-specific technologies.' The report says this customization makes X-FAB 'less vulnerable to the extreme price and demand volatility experienced by many competitors in the broader foundry market'. Every element here is the company's own account. |
| Leadership | co leader Co-leader rather than clear leader because the only claim of platform primacy available is the company's own ("we do not believe any of our competitors currently have a true platform offering equivalent"), while the same 10-K describes a fragmented market and lists seven distinct categories of competitor, from legacy antivirus to network security, cloud security, identity and legacy SIEM vendors. | behind The 10-K makes no leadership claim and gives no ranking or share figure. Item 1A concedes "We do not have the resources to compete with larger providers of similar products or services at this time" and that some rivals have "substantially greater liquidity and financial resources than we do." Its Competition section places APLD against established operators (Digital Realty, Equinix), hyperscalers that build their own capacity, independent developers and 13 named power-advantaged developers (IREN, Cipher Digital, TeraWulf, Hut 8, Riot, CleanSpark, HIVE, Core Scientific, Bitdeer, Galaxy Digital, Fermi, Keel Infrastructure, MARA). | at parity No current independent ranking of X-FAB among specialty or analog foundries was found. It is absent from TrendForce's 2Q26 top 10 (2026-09-09), where tenth-placed PSMC had revenue of $432 million; X-FAB's Q2 2026 revenue was USD 199.8 million. Yole Group's 2021 MEMS foundry ranking, reported by eeNews Europe on 2022-09-06, put X-Fab fourth behind Silex Microsystems, Teledyne MEMS and TSMC. The annual report concedes that it faces competition from producers, 'some of which have greater manufacturing, financial, research and development, and marketing resources than X-FAB does'. |
| Pricing power | moderate The 10-K's risk factors state that "Competitive pricing pressure may reduce our gross profits" and that competing successfully may require "aggressive pricing", which is the company's own case against strong pricing power; the offsetting factor it cites is module consolidation on one sensor. | weak Item 1A says "Due to the limited number of hyperscalers, we expect that a limited number of customers will continue to account for a high percentage of our revenue for the foreseeable future," and that if customers' equipment usage declines or they discontinue use of its facilities, APLD "may be compelled to lower our lease prices in some instances or risk losing a significant customer." One customer was 59% of FY2026 revenue from continuing operations. Take-or-pay, non-cancellable terms protect contracted revenue over the base term, and Note 19 reports a $39.1M HPC Hosting segment profit on $385.3M of segment revenue in FY2026, but those terms are agreed with a small group of concentrated buyers. | weak Prices have held by the company's own account, but costs have not been passed on. The annual report's risk section says 'X-FAB has not experienced significant pricing pressure in the past'. Yet gross profit rose only from USD 182,949 thousand in 2024 to USD 184,403 thousand in 2025, while revenue grew 6.6% to USD 870,255 thousand, because cost of sales rose 8.3% on lower inventories and higher depreciation. Profit depends on utilization: 'The profitability of X-FAB's operations is closely tied to its level of utilization.' The Q2 2026 results put the EBITDA margin at 16.8%, mainly reflecting automotive softness 'which limited capacity utilization'. |
| Summary | A single lightweight sensor collects enterprise data once and reuses it across 33 cloud modules, and the pooled telemetry trains the models every customer is then defended by — the 10-K calls this crowdsourced, high-fidelity data "cloud-scale AI" and treats it as the fundamental differentiator from competitors. | Applied Digital designs, builds and operates purpose-built, liquid-cooled HPC data centers, which it calls 'AI factories', and leases the capacity to CoreWeave and investment-grade hyperscalers. At May 31, 2026 its 10-K lists five campuses (Polaris Forge 1-3 and Delta Forge 1-2) with about 1,410 MW contracted under roughly 15-year take-or-pay, non-cancellable leases worth about $36.2 billion over the base terms. The filing claims three sources of advantage: it controls power-advantaged sites, it uses a standardized 'franchise-style' design built to deliver about 150 MW in about 14 to 18 months, and it holds hyperscaler master agreements that are 'difficult to obtain.' The same document shows how early the company is. About 100 MW was operating and earning revenue. One customer was 59% of FY2026 revenue from continuing operations. It competes with Digital Realty, Equinix, hyperscalers that build their own capacity and 13 named power-advantaged developers, and it concedes that it lacks the resources to compete with larger providers. Signed leases give long-dated revenue visibility, but the filing does not show a durable competitive advantage. | X-FAB is a specialty foundry with six fabs in Malaysia, Germany, France and the United States. It makes analog/mixed-signal ICs, microsystems (MEMS), photonics and wide-bandgap (SiC and GaN) devices, mainly for automotive, industrial and medical customers. It runs mature nodes, from 1.0μm on 150 mm wafers to 350nm, 180nm, 130nm and 110nm on 200 mm wafers. 2025 revenue was USD 870.3 million, up 7%, with an EBITDA margin of 22.6%. CMOS technologies contributed USD 732.7 million, and microsystems crossed USD 100 million for the first time. 2026 has been weaker. Q2 revenue was USD 199.8 million, down 7% YoY, as automotive fell 19% to USD 116.0 million on customer inventory adjustments, and the EBITDA margin was 16.8%. Bookings are improving, with an automotive book-to-bill at its highest in two years. The company also cites 'the reallocation of 8-inch CMOS fabs in Asia to AI applications' as an opening 'supported by available capacity'. The verdict is a narrow switching-cost moat. Sole sourcing and long product lives keep customers, but it rests on the company's own account and a concentrated customer base, and recent profits are too thin to show pricing power. |
| Chain position | AI-native security platform — an adopter and reseller of AI rather than a supplier of AI infrastructure. | Developer and landlord of power-advantaged, liquid-cooled AI data-center capacity, leased long-term to CoreWeave and investment-grade hyperscalers. | Upstream specialty foundry for fabless analog/mixed-signal, sensor and power-device designers. Automotive, industrial and medical markets were 93% of Q2 2026 revenue. |
| Products (share / barrier) |
|
|
|
| Long-horizon vote | +0.13 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral Editorial prior, not backtested. | -0.20 at weight 0.20 · swarm neutral Editorial prior, not backtested. | -0.01 at weight 0.20 · swarm bearish Editorial prior, not backtested. |