Skip to content

How the signal is computed — TeraWulf

TeraWulfShort · ~2 weeksas of 2026-10-05Bearish

Structural led a bearish call; the other agents split, so conviction reflects the disagreement.

Coverage
3/7
Agreement
0.61
.38
Conviction
How the swarm reasoned
✓Question›✓Coverage›3Driver›4Consensus›5Gate›6Verdict
🧭
Structural Driver
Industry Index 8.2 (falling -8.4 over window) — structural headwind.
−0.352
Industry Index falling -8.4 [no link]−0.25940%
Industry Index level 8.2 [no link]−0.09314%
2 item(s) · sums to -0.352
Moving-average trend (medium) [no link]−0.08413%
Momentum (medium) [no link]−0.0487%
Moving-average trend (short) [no link]−0.0366%
Momentum (short) [no link]−0.0325%
Stochastic (short) [no link]−0.0183%
Bollinger %B (short) [no link]−0.0152%
OBV (short) [no link]−0.0122%
MACD histogram (medium) [no link]−0.0101%
MACD histogram (short) [no link]−0.0081%
RSI trend (short) [no link]−0.0061%
ADX / DMI (medium) [no link]−0.0051%
ADX 13 (trend strength 0.32) [no link]0.0000%
Bollinger %B 0.19 (extreme 0.00) [no link]0.0000%
RSI 42 (overextension penalty 0.00) [no link]0.0000%
14 item(s) · sums to -0.272
Unusual-activity net skew [src]+0.0274%
1 item(s) · sums to +0.027
📰
News Abstained
no recent news
—
📈
Growth Abstained
Fundamentals inform the ~3-month call, not a 2-week move.
—
🏦
Smart money Abstained
13F filings move too slowly for a 2-week call.
—
🏰
Moat Abstained
The moat prior is a ~6-month structural view, not a 2-week move.
—
Consensus · did they agree?

Most voters leaned one way; structural dissented. Directional agreement 0.61.

The gate · score → conviction → verdict
Raw score
−0.597
×
Agree·cover·strength
0.61
→
Conviction
0.38

A clear bearish score; conviction 0.38 reflects how strongly the agents agree. Conviction is confidence, not a probability of the move.

as of 2026-10-05 · config sig-v4-2026-07-26

Signal history

☆← Back to terawulf · Methodology