EMCOR Group (EME) ☆
datacenters, power & cooling · Industry Index 9 (rank #135) ·
ⓘ Data freshness
price: as of 2026-10-29 index: as of 2026-10-29 fundamentals: latest filing 2026-10-29 Reports quarterly (10-Q XBRL)
EMCOR Group provides mechanical and electrical construction and facilities services, including for data center projects.
Industry exposure 0.3 (Diversified MEP and facilities-services contractor where data center construction is a growing driver alongside other end markets.)
Signal
signal: as of 2026-10-13Short (~2 weeks)
- ▲Options positioning— Delayed per-contract options — call premium 75% / put 25% (net skew 0.50), unusualness 22/100. Context: Consumer Price Index in 1 day.[options]
- ▬Price momentum— Technical flat across short+medium horizon(s) — vote -0.03, confidence 0.14 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · derived internally
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 9.3 (falling -6.6 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Medium (~3 months)
- ▲Growth trend— Revenue 20% YoY (accelerating), net margin expanding.[filing]
- ▬Price momentum— Technical flat across short+medium horizon(s) — vote -0.03, confidence 0.14 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · derived internally
- ▲Smart money— 1 filer(s) accumulating, 1 trimming in 2026Q2 (value-weighted net 0.34).[holding][holding]
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 9.3 (falling -6.6 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Long (~6 months)
- ▲Growth trend— Revenue 20% YoY (accelerating), net margin expanding.[filing]
- ▲moat— Editorial prior (subjective, NOT backtested): narrow moat / co_leader / moderate pricing ⇒ wider/leading long-horizon tilt 0.13. Bounded, low-confidence input.[moat: Editorial moat profile — emcor — narrow moat, co_leader, moderate pricing (as of 2026-02-26)]
- ▼Structural— Industry Index 9.3 (falling -6.6 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · derived internally
Relationship network
- Comfort Systems USA — competitor
Key relationships
- Comfort Systems USA — competitor · Comfort Systems USA and EMCOR Group are competing mechanical and electrical contractors both driven by surging data center construction demand. source: ainvest.com
Options positioning
delayed · aggregate: as of 2026-10-29- Call vs put volume: 325 calls · 115 puts — tilt +47.7% toward calls
- Vol/OI turnover: 0.37×
- Premium ($ notional proxy): $674614 calls · $254766 puts — tilt +45.2% toward calls
- OTM tilt: +47.5% toward OTM calls
- IV skew (put − call): +2.0%
Delayed, end-of-day, aggregate per contract — not a live tape or trade-level flow. Buy/sell side is INFERRED from where each contract's last print sat in the bid/ask spread, not observed order flow. The company-wide side is withheld unless quoted contracts cover at least a quarter of the day's premium, so it can be blank while individual contracts below show a side. Call/put premium is measured across the chain we capture — the 6 nearest expiries within 45 days, not the full option chain — while the table below lists at most 20 flagged contracts, so summing those rows will not reproduce the percentage.
Recent flags
Why flagged:earnings in 8 days
| Date | Contract | Score | Side (inferred)? | OI Δ? | Volume | Vol/OI | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-22 | $560 CALL | 29 | buy-side | — | 52 | 52.0× | |
| 2026-10-22 | $720 CALL | 22 | — | 0 | 36 | 0.9× | |
| 2026-10-21 | $680 PUT | 39 | buy-side | 0 | 48 | 16.0× | |
| 2026-10-21 | $660 PUT | 35 | mid-market · no side | +1 | 50 | 2.3× | |
| 2026-10-21 | $720 CALL | 22 | — | 0 | 36 | 0.9× | |
| 2026-10-16 | $840 PUT | 42 | sell-side | -55 | 141 | 141.0× | |
| 2026-10-16 | $830 PUT | 36 | sell-side | -16 | 44 | 44.0× | |
| 2026-10-16 | $820 PUT | 33 | mid-market · no side | -15 | 37 | 37.0× | |
| 2026-10-16 | $850 PUT | 33 | mid-market · no side | -14 | 21 | 21.0× | |
| 2026-10-16 | $810 PUT | 25 | mid-market · no side | -5 | 82 | 1.6× |
10 smaller flags (under $100000 premium) hidden.
Daily options volume vs baseline
latest session: 1.4× its 13-day baseline
Call/put premium
37% calls / 63% puts (by premium)
Structural carried this call — it supplied almost the entire lean; the other voters nearly net out.
Most voters leaned one way; structural dissented. Directional agreement 0.53.
A clear bearish score; conviction 0.26 reflects how strongly the agents agree. Conviction is confidence, not a probability of the move.
Signal history
Moat
moat: latest change 2026-02-26EMCOR Group installs and services electrical and mechanical systems in non-residential buildings and plants. Its FY2025 10-K reports revenues of $16.99 billion, approximately 72% from construction operations, approximately 21% from building services and approximately 7% from industrial services, through "approximately 100 operating subsidiaries"; the United Kingdom operations were sold on December 1, 2025. Data centres now drive the construction book: the network and communications market sector was $2,461,883 thousand, or 48%, of electrical construction segment revenue in 2025, against 34% in 2023, and $1,670,355 thousand, or 23%, of mechanical construction segment revenue, against 8% in 2023. Remaining performance obligations were $13.25 billion at the end of 2025, and the Q2 2026 results release (2026-07-30) put them at "a record $17.14 billion, compared to $11.91 billion as of June 30, 2025", with revenue guidance for 2026 raised to $20.00 billion - $20.50 billion. The 10-K's case for an edge is that bids for large work are "often conditioned upon prior experience, technical capability, and financial strength" and require performance bonds, and that EMCOR's balance sheet, bonding, prefabrication and VDC capabilities and safety record "give us an advantage over many of our competitors". The same filing sets the limits: the industry is "highly fragmented and our competition includes thousands of small companies across the United States", "relatively few barriers exist to prevent entry", most revenue comes from "projects requiring competitive bids", some rivals can price "at lower rates than we are currently able to provide", customers' in-house staff compete for building services, and the 10-K warns that if data centre spending "were to decrease, demand for our services could decline as we transition our resources to other sectors". Gross margin rose to 19.3% in 2025 from 19.0% in 2024, which MD&A attributes to "improved revenue mix and excellent project execution". A scale and execution edge on large, bonded projects, re-tested at every bid in an industry with low entry barriers, is a narrow moat.
Rating: narrow
The FY2025 Form 10-K describes an edge that holds on large, complex work but not across the trade. On the advantage side, it says an invitation to bid "is often conditioned upon prior experience, technical capability, and financial strength", that its largest projects "typically require significant technical and management skills and the financial strength to obtain performance bonds, which are often a condition to bidding for and winning these projects", and that those projects "represented approximately 58% of our electrical and mechanical construction services revenues in 2025". It adds: "We believe our financial position, operating results, access to bank credit and surety bonding, technical expertise including prefabrication, VDC, and BIM capabilities, and safety record, among other factors, give us an advantage over many of our competitors." Operating margin was 10.1% in 2025 against 9.2% in 2024, and the filing notes the 2025 figure includes a $144.9 million gain on the sale of the United Kingdom operations that "positively impacted operating margin by 85 basis points". On the limiting side, the same Competition section says "relatively few barriers exist to prevent entry into the electrical and mechanical construction services industry" and "there are relatively few barriers to entry into the building services industry". Item 1A adds that "Certain of our competitors have lower overhead cost structures and, therefore, are able to provide their services at lower rates than we are currently able to provide" and that work "is frequently awarded through a competitive bidding process". An advantage confined to bonded, technically demanding projects, in a trade the company itself calls easy to enter, is a narrow moat, not a wide one.
Type: cost scale
The 10-K places the advantage in capabilities that come with size rather than in customer lock-in or protected technology. The edge it names is "financial position, operating results, access to bank credit and surety bonding, technical expertise including prefabrication, VDC, and BIM capabilities, and safety record", delivered through "approximately 100 operating subsidiaries" and approximately 44,000 employees. MD&A credits the mechanical construction segment's 2025 result to "a more favorable mix of work and better project execution, including enhanced productivity, due in part to investments in virtual design and construction, prefabrication, and automation". Item 1A makes bonding a scale matter: "if we were to experience an interruption or reduction in the availability of bonding, we may be unable to compete for or work on certain projects." The filing cites no patents as a source of advantage, and switching costs are thin by its own account: "Many of our contracts, especially our building and industrial services contracts, may be canceled or delayed on short notice".
Leadership: co leader
The 10-K gives no market share. It calls the field "highly fragmented" with "thousands of small companies across the United States", adds that "there are a number of larger companies focused on providing electrical and/or mechanical construction services, such as APi Group Corporation, Comfort Systems USA, Inc., Dycom Industries, Inc., Everus Construction Group, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc., MasTec, Inc., MYR Group Inc., Quanta Services, Inc., and Tutor Perini Corporation", and describes EMCOR as "one of the largest specialty contractors in the United States", which is the company's own account. Outside the filing: Wikipedia's EMCOR article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emcor) states that "In 2025, the company was ranked 2nd by Engineering News-Record on its list of the largest 600 specialty contractors by revenue"; its footnote links ENR's 2025 Top 600 preview page, which refused this fetch with HTTP 403, so the rank was not read at ENR itself (the footnote's title also reads 2024 while its link is the 2025 page). Statista's summary of the ENR survey for 2018 (https://www.statista.com/statistics/467307/leading-us-firms-in-mechanical-based-on-revenue, published Oct 21, 2019) says "EMCOR Group was ranked as the leading mechanical contractor based in the United States in 2018" and that the overall survey was "topped by electrical contractor Quanta Services and closely followed by EMCOR Group". A filing-based check agrees on scale against one named rival: stored fundamentals from the FY2025 10-Ks show EMCOR revenue of $16,986,422 thousand against $9,101,641 thousand for Comfort Systems USA (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1035983/000110465926017530/0001104659-26-017530-index.htm). Second place on a revenue ranking of 600 specialty contractors, in a field the 10-K says has thousands of firms, is co-leadership rather than clear leadership; the ranking evidence is second-hand or dated, so the band is held at co-leader and no higher.
Pricing power: moderate
Margins have widened, but the filing says most work is bid. The 2025 Annual Report's five-year highlights show gross profit of $1,501,737 thousand on revenues of $9,903,580 thousand in 2021, $2,089,339 thousand on $12,582,873 thousand in 2023 and $3,282,988 thousand on $16,986,422 thousand in 2025; MD&A gives gross profit margin of 19.3% in 2025 against 19.0% in 2024. The Q2 2026 release (https://emcorgroup.com/application/files/3517/8535/6062/2Q26_Earnings_Release_Final.pdf) reports operating margin of 10.6% against 9.6% a year earlier, and the chief executive said "We remain focused on maintaining pricing discipline, carefully selecting project opportunities, and executing at a high level across our operations." The limits are in the 10-K: "Competition can place downward pressure on our contract prices and profit margins"; on commodities, "While we believe we can increase our prices to adjust for some price increases in commodities, there can be no assurance that price increases of commodities, if they were to occur, would be recoverable", and "certain of our contracts do not allow us to adjust our prices"; and Note 3 shows projects whose profitability was revised down by more than $1.0 million each reduced operating results by $85,941 thousand in 2025, against $66,319 thousand in 2024.
Curated moat judgment grounded in the cited source. source: emcorgroup.com
Value-chain position
Layer: datacenters, power & cooling
- Upstream (suppliers): —
- Downstream (customers): —
- Competitors: Comfort Systems USA
EMCOR builds the electrical and mechanical plant inside facilities, increasingly data centres: the 10-K says capital spending on data center infrastructure "is rapidly expanding, which has increased demand for our services in recent years". It works directly for owners and "indirectly by acting as a subcontractor to general contractors, systems suppliers, construction managers, developers, property managers, and other subcontractors". Upstream, "we rely on third-party vendors and manufacturers to supply much of the materials and equipment necessary for our operations", with commodity exposure to "copper and steel" and fuel for a fleet of approximately 14,400 vehicles.
Derived from this company's mapped supply-chain edges and its industry layer.
Signal contribution editorial prior
The moat prior voted +0.13 on the long (~6-month) horizon at weight 0.20 — the swarm call there is neutral (score 0.06, conviction 0).
Editorial prior — subjective, not backtested. It is bounded (±0.6), low-confidence, and never votes on short/medium. See exactly how it voted →
Product lineup
Products & services with an editorial market-share band and technical barrier band — qualitative judgments tied to a cited basis, never invented figures.
| Product | Market share | Technical barrier |
|---|---|---|
| Building services (United States) · Facilities maintenance and services Maintenance, retrofit, building automation and site-based facilities services; segment revenue was $3,122,242 thousand (18% of the total) in 2025, 77% of it from the mechanical services division. | Unknown The 10-K gives no share figure; it says "we believe our building services operations are in a strong competitive position", which is the company's own view, and lists rivals including Carrier Global, Trane Technologies, CBRE, Jones Lang LaSalle and ABM Industries. No independent ranking was found, so the band is unknown. | Low The 10-K says "there are relatively few barriers to entry into the building services industry", Item 1A says "Many of our customers employ personnel who perform some of the same types of building services that we do", and MD&A reports revenue declines "due to the loss of certain facilities maintenance contracts that were not renewed upon rebid in a prior period". |
| Electrical construction and facilities services (United States) · Electrical contracting Design, installation and servicing of power distribution, generation, low-voltage, lighting and communications systems; segment revenue was $5,074,252 thousand (30% of the total) in 2025, including the Miller Electric Company acquisition completed on February 3, 2025 for approximately $876.8 million; the network and communications sector was 48% of segment revenue. | Unknown The 10-K gives no share figure for electrical work and names MYR Group, IES Holdings, MasTec and Quanta Services among larger electrical or mechanical competitors. No independent electrical-contracting ranking was opened (ENR's pages refused the fetch), so the band is left unknown. | Moderate For large work the 10-K says projects "typically require significant technical and management skills and the financial strength to obtain performance bonds, which are often a condition to bidding for and winning these projects". Across the trade, though, "relatively few barriers exist to prevent entry into the electrical and mechanical construction services industry", and MD&A reports "lower profitability on certain projects in new geographies where we encountered reduced labor productivity or availability". A barrier that bites only on bonded, complex projects is moderate, not deep. |
| Industrial services (United States) · Refinery and petrochemical maintenance Refinery turnarounds, specialty welding, and design, manufacture and repair of shell and tube heat exchangers; segment revenue was $1,268,099 thousand (7% of the total) in 2025. | Unknown The 10-K calls the business "a recognized leader in the refinery turnaround market", but that is the company's own description and no independent share source was found, so the band is unknown. | Low The 10-K: "Although the technical expertise and capital investment that is required in manufacturing heat exchangers may be considered a barrier to entry in this field, there are significantly fewer barriers to entry as it pertains to turnaround projects and services." |
| Mechanical construction and facilities services (United States) · Mechanical contracting HVAC, plumbing, process and high-purity piping, fire protection and central plant systems; segment revenue was $7,050,481 thousand (42% of the total) in 2025, with the network and communications sector at 23% and high-tech manufacturing at 14% of segment revenue. | Top 3 The only third-party ranking found is dated: Statista's summary of ENR's survey (https://www.statista.com/statistics/467307/leading-us-firms-in-mechanical-based-on-revenue, published Oct 21, 2019) says "EMCOR Group was ranked as the leading mechanical contractor based in the United States in 2018", with "Comfort Systems USA and ACCO Engineered Systems" second and third. No current ranking could be opened, and Comfort Systems has grown since, so the band is held at top 3 rather than leader. | Moderate The 10-K's competitive factors include "the ability to obtain surety bonding", "adequate working capital or access to bank credit" and "the use of technology such as virtual design construction", and MD&A credits segment productivity partly to "investments in virtual design and construction, prefabrication, and automation". The same section still says "relatively few barriers exist to prevent entry into the electrical and mechanical construction services industry", so the barrier is moderate. |
What you're looking at
These charts plot EMCOR Group's reported income statement, cash flow, and balance sheet from its SEC filings through 2026-10-29. Every figure is as-filed XBRL — none of it is an estimate.
Over the reported window, net income at $1.3B in FY2025.
Analyst consensus — third-party estimates from Yahoo Finance, as of 2026-10-26. Not SEC filings and not a TradingPilot forecast. source: finance.yahoo.com
| Period | EPS (est.) | Revenue (est.) | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q/E Sep 2026 | USD 8.35 (USD 7.97–USD 8.82) · 9 | USD 5.2B (USD 5.0B–USD 5.3B) · 9 | +21% |
| FY 2026 | USD 33.48 (USD 32.29–USD 37.59) · 11 | USD 20.4B (USD 20.2B–USD 20.5B) · 10 | +20% |
Each figure shows the consensus mean, its (low–high) range where available, and · the number of analysts behind that estimate.
Next report ~2026-10-29.
Our model leans Low-confidence · Neutral on the stock over the medium horizon — a market-direction call, not an earnings forecast. See the Signal tab.
Income statement
Cash flow & liquidity
Balance sheet
Some recent figures are from Yahoo Finance where the latest SEC filing hasn’t posted yet — FX-converted to USD and reconciled against SEC-filed periods.
Filings
- 2025Q4 · filed 2026-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q3 · filed 2026-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q3 · filed 2026-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2026Q2 · filed 2026-07-30 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q2 · filed 2026-07-30 source: sec.gov
Show 209 older filings
- 2026Q1 · filed 2026-04-29 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q1 · filed 2026-04-29 source: sec.gov
- FY2021 · filed 2026-04-21 source: sec.gov
- FY2022 · filed 2026-04-21 source: sec.gov
- FY2023 · filed 2026-04-21 source: sec.gov
- FY2024 · filed 2026-04-21 source: sec.gov
- FY2025 · filed 2026-04-21 source: sec.gov
- FY2024 · filed 2026-02-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2025 · filed 2026-02-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2023 · filed 2026-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q4 · filed 2025-12-31 source: finance.yahoo.com
- 2024Q4 · filed 2025-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q3 · filed 2025-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q3 · filed 2025-10-30 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q2 · filed 2025-07-31 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · filed 2025-07-31 source: sec.gov
- 2025Q1 · filed 2025-04-30 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · filed 2025-04-30 source: sec.gov
- FY2023 · filed 2025-02-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2022 · filed 2025-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q4 · filed 2024-10-31 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q3 · filed 2024-10-31 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · filed 2024-10-31 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · filed 2024-07-25 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · filed 2024-07-25 source: sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · filed 2024-04-25 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · filed 2024-04-25 source: sec.gov
- FY2022 · filed 2024-02-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2021 · filed 2024-02-28 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q4 · filed 2023-10-26 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · filed 2023-10-26 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · filed 2023-10-26 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · filed 2023-07-27 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · filed 2023-07-27 source: sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · filed 2023-04-27 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q1 · filed 2023-04-27 source: sec.gov
- FY2021 · filed 2023-02-23 source: sec.gov
- FY2020 · filed 2023-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q4 · filed 2022-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · filed 2022-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · filed 2022-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · filed 2022-07-28 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · filed 2022-07-28 source: sec.gov
- 2022Q1 · filed 2022-04-28 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · filed 2022-04-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2020 · filed 2022-02-24 source: sec.gov
- FY2019 · filed 2022-02-24 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q4 · filed 2021-10-28 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · filed 2021-10-28 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · filed 2021-10-28 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · filed 2021-07-29 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · filed 2021-07-29 source: sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · filed 2021-04-29 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · filed 2021-04-29 source: sec.gov
- FY2019 · filed 2021-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2021-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2021-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2021-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q4 · filed 2021-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q4 · filed 2021-02-25 source: sec.gov
- FY2018 · filed 2021-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q4 · filed 2020-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · filed 2020-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2020-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · filed 2020-08-03 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2020-08-03 source: sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · filed 2020-04-30 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2020-04-30 source: sec.gov
- FY2018 · filed 2020-02-27 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2020-02-27 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2020-02-27 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2020-02-27 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · filed 2020-02-27 source: sec.gov
- FY2017 · filed 2020-02-27 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · filed 2019-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · filed 2019-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2019-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · filed 2019-07-30 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2019-07-30 source: sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · filed 2019-04-30 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2019-04-30 source: sec.gov
- FY2017 · filed 2019-02-21 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2019-02-21 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2019-02-21 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2019-02-21 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2019-02-21 source: sec.gov
- FY2016 · filed 2019-02-21 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2018-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · filed 2018-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2018-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · filed 2018-07-26 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2018-07-26 source: sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · filed 2018-04-26 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2018-04-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2018-02-22 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2018-02-22 source: sec.gov
- FY2016 · filed 2018-02-22 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2018-02-22 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2018-02-22 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2018-02-22 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2018-02-22 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · filed 2018-02-22 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2017-10-26 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2017-10-26 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · filed 2017-10-26 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · filed 2017-10-26 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2017-07-27 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · filed 2017-07-27 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2017-04-27 source: sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · filed 2017-04-27 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2017-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2017-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2017-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2017-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2017-02-23 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2017-02-23 source: sec.gov
- FY2015 · filed 2017-02-23 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2016-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2016-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · filed 2016-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · filed 2016-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2016-07-28 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · filed 2016-07-28 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2016-04-28 source: sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · filed 2016-04-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2016-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2016-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2016-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2016-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2016-02-25 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2016-02-25 source: sec.gov
- FY2014 · filed 2016-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2015-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2015-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · filed 2015-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · filed 2015-10-29 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2015-07-30 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · filed 2015-07-30 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2015-04-30 source: sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · filed 2015-04-30 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2015-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2015-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2015-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2015-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2015-02-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2015-02-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2013 · filed 2015-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2014-10-28 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2014-10-28 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q4 · filed 2014-10-28 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q3 · filed 2014-10-28 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2014-07-29 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q2 · filed 2014-07-29 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2014-04-29 source: sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · filed 2014-04-29 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2014-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2014-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2014-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2014-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2014-02-25 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2014-02-25 source: sec.gov
- FY2012 · filed 2014-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2013-10-24 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2013-10-24 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q4 · filed 2013-10-24 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q3 · filed 2013-10-24 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2013-07-25 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q2 · filed 2013-07-25 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2013-04-25 source: sec.gov
- 2013Q1 · filed 2013-04-25 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2013-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q1 · filed 2013-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2013-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2013-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2013-02-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2013-02-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2011 · filed 2013-02-26 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2012-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2012-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q4 · filed 2012-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q3 · filed 2012-10-25 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2012-07-26 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q2 · filed 2012-07-26 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q1 · filed 2012-04-26 source: sec.gov
- 2012Q1 · filed 2012-04-26 source: sec.gov
- FY2008 · filed 2012-02-27 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q1 · filed 2012-02-27 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q2 · filed 2012-02-27 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q3 · filed 2012-02-27 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2012-02-27 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2012-02-27 source: sec.gov
- FY2010 · filed 2012-02-27 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q4 · filed 2011-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q3 · filed 2011-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q4 · filed 2011-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q3 · filed 2011-10-27 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q2 · filed 2011-07-29 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q2 · filed 2011-07-29 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q1 · filed 2011-04-28 source: sec.gov
- 2011Q1 · filed 2011-04-28 source: sec.gov
- FY2007 · filed 2011-02-25 source: sec.gov
- FY2008 · filed 2011-02-25 source: sec.gov
- FY2009 · filed 2011-02-25 source: sec.gov
- 2008Q4 · filed 2010-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q3 · filed 2010-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q4 · filed 2010-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q3 · filed 2010-11-02 source: sec.gov
- 2009Q2 · filed 2010-07-29 source: sec.gov
- 2010Q2 · filed 2010-07-29 source: sec.gov
Key ratios vs peers
Comparing against peers…
Institutional holders (13F, 2026Q2)
| Institution | Shares | Value | Δ shares QoQ | % of 13F | % shares out |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock Passive / index | 4,116,754 | $3.4B | 8,569 | 0.1% | 9.33% |
| State Street Passive / index | 1,978,559 | $1.6B | 43,850 | 0.0% | 4.49% |
| FMR (Fidelity) Passive / index | 1,334,646 | $1.1B | -624,178 | 0.0% | 3.03% |
| Renaissance Technologies Guru | 65,640 | $54.5M | 65,040 | 0.1% | 0.15% |
| Bridgewater Associates (Ray Dalio (founder)) Guru | 32,248 | $26.8M | -40,560 | 0.1% | 0.07% |
TradingPilot-computed columns (% of 13F, % shares out) are derived from as-filed 13F values; only name, shares and value are as-filed.
What a 13F can’t show you
- Delayed 45+ days. Positions are as-of the quarter-end shown, filed up to 45 days later.
- Long-only, US-listed. No shorts, cash, bonds, FX, foreign, or private holdings; listed options are reported at notional and excluded from per-position equity value.
- $100M threshold. Smaller managers never file.
- “% of 13F” is not “% of AUM”. A 13F is a partial book.
- “Sold out” means “no longer reported” — not necessarily sold.
- One CIK can aggregate multiple sub-entities. Confidential treatment can omit positions.
- Passive index filers are not gurus. Their 13F changes are index flows, and they are excluded from TradingPilot’s smart-money signal.
- Quant caveat. A quant filer’s 13F (e.g. Renaissance) is a long-only quarter-end snapshot and does NOT reflect its actual high-turnover, short-horizon strategy.
- Guru pages and holdings never feed a signal (weightless).
No tagged news yet.
Headlines
2026-10-29 EDGAR current 8-K filings · 8-K - EMCOR Group, Inc. (0000105634) (Filer)
2026-10-29 Business Wire Energy · EMCOR Group, Inc. Reports Record Third Quarter 2026 Results
2026-10-28 Yahoo Finance: EME · EMCOR (EME) Q3 earnings: what to expect
2026-10-26 Yahoo Finance: EME · Unlocking Q3 Potential of Emcor Group (EME): Exploring Wall Street Estimates for Key Metrics
2026-10-24 Yahoo Finance: EME · Why EMCOR Group (EME) Is Back In The Spotlight
2026-10-23 Yahoo Finance: EME · Emcor Group (EME) Dips More Than Broader Market: What You Should Know
2026-10-23 Yahoo Finance: EME · Polen Focus Growth Strategy Increases EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) Position on Stronger Business Momentum
2026-10-23 Yahoo Finance: EME · EMCOR Group (EME) Stock May Look Reasonable Given Its Earnings Power
2026-10-22 Yahoo Finance: EME · Here's Why Emcor Group (EME) Fell More Than Broader Market
2026-10-21 Yahoo Finance: EME · Q2 Earnings Recap: EMCOR (NYSE:EME) Tops Engineering and Design Services Stocks
2026-10-15 Business Wire Energy · EMCOR Group, Inc. Sets Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Release Date and Webcast
2026-10-14 Yahoo Finance: EME · Emcor Group (EME) Dips More Than Broader Market: What You Should Know
2026-10-14 PR Newswire Financial Services · YeePay obtient une licence d'établissement de monnaie électronique (EME) auprès de la Banque des Pays-Bas, renforçant ainsi son réseau de paiement européen.
2026-10-13 Yahoo Finance: EME · Earnings Preview: What To Expect From EMCOR Group’s Report
2026-10-08 Yahoo Finance: EME · EMCOR Group (EME) Stock May Be 41% Undervalued On Cash Flow
2026-10-02 Business Wire Energy · EMCOR Group, Inc. Declares Regular Quarterly Dividend
Impact = company-prominence tier (High/Medium auto-assigned by graph centrality/size; Low only on curated minor events), not a magnitude forecast.
Upcoming
| Date | Type | Event | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027-01-28 | earnings | EMCOR Group earnings (estimated) — Date not yet announced — estimated from EDGAR filing cadence (last periodic filing + 91/365 days); confirm via IR. estimated | Medium |
Past
| Date | Event | Impact | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-29 | EMCOR Group earnings confirmed | Medium | outcome pending |
| 2026-07-30 | EMCOR Group earnings confirmed | Medium | EPS beat · -0.6% |
| 2026-04-29 | EMCOR Group earnings confirmed | Medium | EPS beat · +7.0% |