GitLab (GTLB) ☆
AI applications & software · 产业指数 7 (排名 #172) ·
ⓘ 数据时效
价格: 截至 2026-11-02 指数: 截至 2026-11-02 基本面: 最新申报文件 2026-09-02 按季披露（10-Q XBRL）
GitLab provides an integrated DevSecOps software-development platform, with AI code assistance and agents delivered through GitLab Duo.
产业敞口 0.3 (GitLab Duo AI features are a strategic add-on to a broad DevSecOps subscription business.)
信号
信号: 截至 2026-10-13短期（约 2 周）
- ▼期权持仓结构— Delayed per-contract options — call premium 18% / put 82% (net skew -0.64), unusualness 39/100. Context: Consumer Price Index in 1 day.[options]
- ▲价格动量— Technical uptrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote 0.53, confidence 0.84 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · 内部推导
- ▼结构性— Industry Index 6.8 (falling -8.5 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · 内部推导
中期（约 3 个月）
- ▲增长趋势— Revenue 21% YoY (decelerating), net margin contracting.[filing]
- ▲价格动量— Technical uptrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote 0.53, confidence 0.84 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · 内部推导
- ▼聪明钱— 0 filer(s) accumulating, 2 trimming in 2026Q2 (value-weighted net -1.00).[holding][holding]
- ▼结构性— Industry Index 6.8 (falling -8.5 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · 内部推导
长期（约 6 个月）
- ▲增长趋势— Revenue 21% YoY (decelerating), net margin contracting.[filing]
- ▲moat— Editorial prior (subjective, NOT backtested): narrow moat / fast_follower / moderate pricing ⇒ wider/leading long-horizon tilt 0.06. Bounded, low-confidence input.[moat: Editorial moat profile — gitlab — narrow moat, fast_follower, moderate pricing (as of 2026-08-05)]
- ▼结构性— Industry Index 6.8 (falling -8.5 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · 内部推导
关系网络
- Anthropic — 供应商
- Alphabet — 供应商
主要关系
- Anthropic — 供应商 · GitLab integrates Anthropic's Claude models to power AI features in GitLab Duo and the Duo Agent Platform. 来源：ir.gitlab.com
- Alphabet — 供应商 · GitLab runs its SaaS platform on Google Cloud Platform and discloses reliance on GCP as its infrastructure provider. 来源：sec.gov
期权持仓结构
延迟 · 汇总: 截至 2026-11-02- 看涨与看跌成交量：5,380 张看涨 · 801 张看跌 — 偏向 +74.1%，偏向看涨
- 成交量／未平仓量周转： 0.40×
- 权利金（名义金额代理）：$483088 看涨 · $169817 看跌 — 偏向 +48.0%，偏向看涨
- 价外偏斜：+80.9%，偏向价外看涨
- 隐含波动率偏斜（看跌 − 看涨）： -4.5%
延迟的日终逐合约汇总数据——不是实时盘口，也不是逐笔资金流。买卖方向是根据每个合约最后一笔成交在买卖价差中的位置推断出来的，并非观测到的委托流。除非有报价的合约占当日权利金的四分之一以上，否则公司层面的方向会被隐去，因此下方个别合约有方向时这里也可能为空。看跌/看涨权利金是在我们采集的合约范围内计算的——最近的 6 个到期日、45 天以内，并非完整期权链——而下表最多列出 20 个被标记的合约，所以把这些行加总不会还原出上面的百分比。
近期标记
标记原因：earnings in 29 days
20 个小额标记（权利金低于 $100000）——没有一个大到值得突出显示。
每日期权成交量与基准对比
最近交易日：为 13 日基准的 1.4 倍
看涨／看跌权利金
看涨 74% / 看跌 26%（按权利金）
价格动量 定下了基调，但群体不愿下结论——正向倾斜叠加薄弱的一致度，因此结论为中性。
多数投票者倾向一致；结构性 投了反对票。方向一致度 0.18。
一个明确的中性分数；置信度 0.00 反映的是智能体之间的一致强度。置信度是信心，不是价格变动的概率。
信号历史
护城河
护城河: 最新变动 2026-08-05GitLab sells a single-platform DevSecOps toolchain defended by workflow lock-in rather than intellectual property: a unified data model plus deployment flexibility, including single-tenant "Dedicated for Government with FedRAMP compliance," makes it hard to remove where data residency is contractual. The installed base expands: 118% Dollar-Based Net Retention, 10,682 Base Customers, 1,456 above $100,000 of ARR, 155 above $1.0 million (up 26%), over 70% of ARR from public sector and enterprise. The filing supplies the counterweight: "limited barriers to entry," Microsoft/GitHub as principal competitor, 16 issued patents. Retention (130 to 123 to 118, the 130 a cap), gross margin (89% to 87%) and a January 2026 AI launch point to compression at the commodity end. No source measures market share, so every share band is "unknown".
评级: 窄
The FY2026 10-K (year ended 2026-01-31) shows real expansion inside the installed base: 118% Dollar-Based Net Retention, Base Customers up to 10,682 from 9,893, customers above $100,000 of ARR up to 1,456 from 1,229, and $1.0 million ARR customers "to 155 from 123, an increase of 26%". But the filing concedes "limited barriers to entry" and names "Microsoft Corporation, which owns GitHub" as principal competitor. Retention decelerates (130% FY2024, 123% FY2025, 118% FY2026), and since DBNR is reported "on a threshold basis of 130%," the FY2024 figure is a cap and the slide is steeper than it looks. Narrow, not wide: expansion must be re-won against a bundled hyperscaler.
类型: 转换成本
Stickiness comes from platform embedding, not IP. The 10-K rests differentiation on "our single platform with a unified data model," on "Consolidation of multiple tools into a single platform," and on deployment inside the customer's own perimeter for regulated buyers. Replacement means re-integrating a toolchain and re-certifying compliance. IP is the wrong label: only "16 issued patents and 25 pending patent applications," plus open-source licenses granting "broad permissions to use, copy, modify, and redistribute." The no-lock-in claim is the filing's own characterisation, footnoted to a Forrester study "commissioned by GitLab."
领先地位: 快速追随者
The 10-K positions GitLab against a leader rather than as one: "Our principal competitor is Microsoft Corporation, which owns GitHub." Competition reads from the challenger side, differentiating "from GitHub through flexible deployment options that work within enterprise security and compliance requirements, LLM neutrality with self-hosted gateway support" and an open core model. On AI it follows: Duo Agent Platform went "Generally available in January 2026," the last month of the fiscal year. What keeps it a follower rather than behind is cadence, "a new version of our software every month for 172 months in a row," plus a regulated-deployment franchise a SaaS-first rival does not cover.
定价权: 中等
FY2026 gross margin was 87% against 89%, with cost of revenue up $35.6 million "primarily due to an increase of $18.4 million in third party hosting costs for SaaS and cloud usage," and management expects SaaS and Duo mix to bring costs that "may adversely impact our gross margins." Strain is explicit: GitLab "may be required to reduce our prices," competitors "may offer their products and services at a lower price or for free," and it "implemented user limits on our free SaaS product." Power retained: Premium lists at $29 per user/month billed annually, and seats bundle $12 and $24 of GitLab Credits. But "A majority of our subscriptions are on a one-year period."
基于所引来源做出的人工整理护城河判断。 来源：sec.gov
产业链位置
层级: AI applications & software
GitLab sits at the software-tooling layer, not compute or models. It consumes third-party LLM capacity — marketing "LLM neutrality and support for self-hosted AI gateways, including air-gapped environments" — so it captures no model-layer economics and bears inference as COGS, visible in the $18.4 million rise in hosting costs. Its distinctive position is the regulated perimeter.
由这家公司已映射的供应链关系及其所属产业层级推导而来。
信号贡献 编辑先验
护城河先验在长周期（约 6 个月）上投出 +0.06 票，权重为 0.20——该周期上的群体判断是 neutral（得分 -0.24，信念度 14）。
编辑先验——主观、未经回测。它有界（±0.6）、低置信度，且从不对短周期与中周期投票。 查看它究竟如何投票 →
产品线
产品与服务，附编辑判定的市场份额区间与技术壁垒区间——这些是与所引依据绑定的定性判断，绝非杜撰的数字。
| 产品 | 市场份额 | 技术壁垒 |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise Agile Planning add-on · Agile portfolio and project planning Upsell module. The 10-K states: "Enterprise Agile Planning Add-On available to Ultimate customers." The live pricing page lists "Enterprise Agile Planning Seats" as a paid add-on under Ultimate only. The filing also identifies Enterprise Agile Planning as one of the core use cases absorbing the majority of development spend. | 未知 No source discloses any share, revenue, or attach rate for this add-on. The only sourceable facts are that the add-on exists and is gated to Ultimate. | 低 A planning module competing directly against entrenched incumbents in a category the filing explicitly flags as contested, with Atlassian named among competitors. Its pull is bundle convenience for existing Ultimate customers rather than any disclosed structural advantage; no patent, data, or certification barrier is claimed for it. |
| GitLab Dedicated (including Dedicated for Government) · Single-tenant managed SaaS for regulated industries Verbatim from the 10-K: "Dedicated: Fully managed by GitLab with data isolation, residency, and protection. Includes Dedicated for Government with FedRAMP compliance. Ideal for enterprises and organizations in highly regulated industries requiring data isolation, specific geographic requirements, or government compliance." | 未知 No share data is disclosed. The filing gives no revenue split, customer count, or share figure for Dedicated specifically. | 深 The barrier is regulatory rather than technical. FedRAMP authorization and contractual data-residency and isolation commitments are certification assets a customer cannot casually re-procure, and the filing markets Dedicated squarely at customers whose "compliance, security, or infrastructure requirements" foreclose multi-tenant SaaS. This is the narrowest but most defensible pocket of the moat. |
| GitLab DevSecOps Platform (Free, Premium, and Ultimate tiers) · DevSecOps platform / software delivery Core seat-based platform spanning source code management, CI/CD, security and compliance. The 10-K describes three tiers: Free, Premium for "scaling organizations," and Ultimate, which "includes all Premium capabilities, plus advanced application and supply chain security, centralized compliance reporting, and policy controls." | 未知 No market-share measurement exists in the 10-K: no reference to Gartner, IDC, any share percentage, or any "leader in" claim. The only positional statements are self-descriptive ("GitLab is the only intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps built on an open-core business model") alongside a competitor list naming Microsoft/GitHub as principal competitor plus "Atlassian, JFrog, and Harness." Being a named participant in a competitive set does not establish a rank. | 中等 Stickiness comes from "our single platform with a unified data model" and "Consolidation of multiple tools into a single platform," corroborated by 118% Dollar-Based Net Retention and $100,000+ ARR customers rising to 1,456. It stops short of deep because the filing itself admits that "The markets for our services are highly competitive, with limited barriers to entry," and because GitLab holds only 16 issued patents. |
| GitLab Duo Agent Platform (with GitLab Credits) · Agentic AI for the software lifecycle AI agent orchestration layer. "Generally available in January 2026, GitLab Duo Agent Platform combines conversational AI assistance, purpose-built agents for specialized tasks, workflow automation, and enterprise controls." Monetized on a usage axis: "Usage-based pricing (GitLab Credits) applies specifically to GitLab Duo Agent Platform capabilities." | 未知 No share data exists, and none could exist meaningfully — the product reached general availability in January 2026, the final month of the fiscal year, so the filing reports no Duo-specific revenue, customer count, or share. | 低 Newly general-available in a crowded AI coding-assistant field where the principal competitor bundles. The filing's own differentiator is neutrality rather than capability — "LLM neutrality and support for self-hosted AI gateways, including air-gapped environments" — which is a deployment advantage, not a model or data advantage. It is also margin-dilutive by the company's own forward guidance that "deploying AI systems involves high computing costs." |
| Self-Managed GitLab (on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment) · Self-hosted enterprise software Customer-operated GitLab instance. The 10-K describes it as "self-managed (on-premise or hybrid cloud)" giving customers "full control over their data, workflows, and security policies." Self-managed subscription plus license revenue is the larger revenue line: $568.5M self-managed subscription and $68.9M self-managed license against $296.2M SaaS in FY2026. | 未知 No share measurement exists in the filing or any consulted source. GitLab discloses revenue by delivery model but never a share of the self-hosted DevSecOps market. | 深 Running inside the customer's own perimeter means replacement requires re-platforming infrastructure the customer operates and re-certifying compliance. The filing ties this to regulated demand: organizations in highly regulated sectors "value our built-in security, compliance controls, and flexible deployment options that meet strict data residency and governance requirements," and more than 70% of ARR came from public sector and enterprise customers in FY2026. |
2 项完全具备 · 2 项部分具备 ，共 5 项 — 这是一种格局，不是分数
GitLab owns the delivery workflow and the customer relationship, rents the model, and is barred by its own policy from compounding the one data asset that would otherwise be its moat. It is the system of record for the software lifecycle, agents run inside it, and GitLab Credits meter that agent activity, while the models are entirely third-party and customer tenant data is walled off from training. Evaluation is genuinely first-party but leans on an external tracking platform and an industry benchmark for scoring.
| 客户关系 | 完全具备 | GitLab sells "through a direct sales organization, a self-service web purchasing experience, and a global partner ecosystem", with partners "designed to complement direct sales efforts." Free tiers and trials feed the funnel, and the installed base is named: 1,456 customers at $100k+ ARR, up from 1,229, net retention of 118%, and "no individual customers whose revenue represented more than 10% of total revenue" in FY2026, FY2025 or FY2024. Customer counts track each end customer separately even when sold through a channel. The counterweight is intermediation: at January 31, 2026 two channel partners held 17% and 13% of accounts receivable, in a book where over 70% of ARR is public sector and enterprise, and the filing carries a channel-partner risk factor. 来源：sec.gov |
|---|---|---|
| 专有数据 | 部分具备 | GitLab has privileged inference-time access to an unusually complete software-lifecycle corpus, but it is customer tenant data and GitLab has foreclosed compounding it: "GitLab does not train generative AI models" and "For GitLab Duo requests, GitLab has a zero data retention policy with Fireworks AI." Some exhaust is kept: Duo Chat and Duo Agent Platform "retain chat and workflow history", "GitLab retains trace data" under expanded logging, telemetry covers prompt lengths, model, editor and accept/reject counts, and since 18.9.1 an opt-in setting logs "Full prompt and response text" and "Tool calls and their results" — "not for training AI models." Prompt caching and "limited vendor-side data retention" apply to certain Anthropic and OpenAI models. 来源：docs.gitlab.com |
| 评测体系 | 部分具备 | GitLab runs a public, first-party evaluation harness. The Centralized Evaluation Framework "is a command-line interface (CLI) framework designed to provide a centralized solution for evaluating AI features at GitLab", maintained by its AI Model Validation and Research group and covering "GitLab AI features (such as Duo Chat, Code Suggestions, etc.)". Its outputs are performance metrics and comparison reports letting developers "test and validate prompt engineering changes"; that these set per-feature defaults is an inference, as the docs say only "GitLab might update default models to optimize performance." It stays below owns because "CEF relies on LangSmith for evaluation tracking and experiment management" and agentic scoring uses an external benchmark via "one-click SWE-bench evaluations." 来源：gitlab.com |
| 工作流 | 完全具备 | GitLab "is a technology company and its primary offering is 'GitLab', an intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps delivered as a single application", and the issue, merge request, pipeline and vulnerability record live in its system of record. The Duo Agent Platform, "Generally available in January 2026", puts agents inside that workflow: "teams orchestrate AI agents that execute tasks autonomously across planning, development, security, and deployment. This eliminates the need for manual handoffs between software lifecycle stages." Monetization meters the same surface: "Usage-based pricing (GitLab Credits) applies specifically to GitLab Duo Agent Platform capabilities." Authoring is the limit — code is written in "third-party code editors and integrated development environments, or IDEs." 来源：sec.gov |
| 领域专用模型 | 不具备 | Every model behind GitLab Duo is third-party: Anthropic (Claude Sonnet 4.5, Sonnet 4.6, Sonnet 3, Haiku 3, Haiku 4.5, several via Google Vertex), Google (Gemini 2.5 Flash Vertex), Mistral Codestral 25.01 and 25.08, and OpenAI — the guidance recommends starting with "Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5.4 Mini." Defaults are Claude Sonnet 4.6 Vertex for code generation and chat, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Vertex for Code Review, and Codestral 25.08 Fireworks for code completion. No GitLab-authored model appears and there is no fine-tuning claim: "GitLab does not train generative AI models." The 10-K books the dependency as a risk — "We rely on third-party vendors for the provision of the AI models which power many of our AI features." GitLab owns routing, per-feature model switching (GA in 18.5) and prompt engineering. 来源：docs.gitlab.com |
AI 落地深度
中GitLab's Duo Agent Platform, generally available since January 2026, finished its first full quarter of consumption at a paid consumption run rate of nearly $20 million, a figure that includes minimum usage commitments made before that launch plus on-demand credits. It attached to four of the quarter's top ten deals and added more net new ARR than Duo Pro and Duo Enterprise combined had in any prior quarter. One disclosed account shows the intensity: a top-ten US bank whose developers averaged 1.5 hours saved per task is in active rollout across hundreds of developers, and the customer's own plan points to an active user base nearly 20 times larger at full deployment. Management assumes no material revenue contribution in fiscal 2027 and frames the year as converting pilots to production. 来源：s204.q4cdn.com
这是并列的另一条轴，而不是第六项：它从不计入上方的格局，两者也从不平均成一个分数。
进展证据
- customer: Customers with $100,000+ ARR grew to 1,456 from 1,229; customers above $1.0M ARR grew to 155 from 123 (+26%); more than 70% of ARR came from public sector and enterprise customers (1,456) 2026-01-31 来源：sec.gov
- revenue: Dollar-Based Net Retention Rate of 118% for FY2026, down from 123% in FY2025 and 130% in FY2024 - expansion is decelerating even as Duo Agent Platform reached GA in January 2026 and usage-based GitLab Credits began monetizing agent activity (118%) 2026-01-31 来源：sec.gov
- revenue: FY2026 total revenue of $955.2M, up 26% from $759.2M in FY2025, with subscription (self-managed and SaaS) revenue up 28% to $864.7M ($955.2M) 2026-01-31 来源：sec.gov
依据以下条件侦察：a company that simultaneously owns the customer relationship, the data, the evals, the workflow, and a domain-specific model。无权重——这份档案从不影响信号，也不是对回报的预测。
你正在看的是什么
这些图表绘制的是 GitLab 在其 SEC 申报文件中已申报的利润表、现金流量表与资产负债表（截至 2026-09-02）。每一个数字都是申报原值 XBRL——没有任何一项是预估。
在已申报的区间内，营收增长 1076%，达到 $955.2M（FY2020→FY2026）; 毛利率从 88% 变为 87%; FY2026 净亏损 $58.6M。
分析师一致预期——来自 Yahoo Finance 的第三方预估，截至 2026-11-02。这不是 SEC 申报文件，也不是 TradingPilot 的预测。 来源：finance.yahoo.com
| 期间 | 每股收益（预估） | 营收（预估） | 同比 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q/E Oct 2026 | USD 0.20 (USD 0.19–USD 0.22) · 27 | USD 282741150.00 (USD 282000000.00–USD 294607000.00) · 25 | +16% |
| FY 2027 | USD 0.87 (USD 0.83–USD 0.93) · 27 | USD 1.1B (USD 1.1B–USD 1.2B) · 27 | +19% |
每个数字显示一致预期均值、可得时的（最低–最高）区间，以及 · 后面给出该预估背后的分析师人数。
下次财报约在 2026-12-01。
我们的模型在中周期上对这只股票偏向 Low-confidence · Neutral——这是对市场方向的判断，不是对盈利的预测。查看“信号”标签。
利润表
现金流与流动性
资产负债表
申报文件
- 2026Q1 · 申报于 2026-09-02 来源：sec.gov
- 2026Q3 · 申报于 2026-09-02 来源：sec.gov
- 2025Q3 · 申报于 2026-09-02 来源：sec.gov
- 2025Q4 · 申报于 2026-09-02 来源：sec.gov
- 2026Q2 · 申报于 2026-06-02 来源：sec.gov
显示另外 48 份较早的申报文件
- 2025Q2 · 申报于 2026-06-02 来源：sec.gov
- FY2022 · 申报于 2026-05-01 来源：sec.gov
- FY2023 · 申报于 2026-05-01 来源：sec.gov
- FY2024 · 申报于 2026-05-01 来源：sec.gov
- FY2025 · 申报于 2026-05-01 来源：sec.gov
- FY2026 · 申报于 2026-05-01 来源：sec.gov
- FY2025 · 申报于 2026-03-17 来源：sec.gov
- FY2026 · 申报于 2026-03-17 来源：sec.gov
- FY2024 · 申报于 2026-03-17 来源：sec.gov
- 2025Q1 · 申报于 2025-12-03 来源：sec.gov
- 2025Q4 · 申报于 2025-12-03 来源：sec.gov
- 2024Q4 · 申报于 2025-12-03 来源：sec.gov
- 2025Q3 · 申报于 2025-09-04 来源：sec.gov
- 2024Q3 · 申报于 2025-09-04 来源：sec.gov
- 2025Q2 · 申报于 2025-06-11 来源：sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · 申报于 2025-06-11 来源：sec.gov
- FY2023 · 申报于 2025-03-21 来源：sec.gov
- FY2024 · 申报于 2025-03-21 来源：sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · 申报于 2024-12-06 来源：sec.gov
- 2024Q4 · 申报于 2024-12-06 来源：sec.gov
- 2023Q4 · 申报于 2024-12-06 来源：sec.gov
- 2024Q3 · 申报于 2024-09-04 来源：sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · 申报于 2024-09-04 来源：sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · 申报于 2024-06-04 来源：sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · 申报于 2024-06-04 来源：sec.gov
- FY2022 · 申报于 2024-03-26 来源：sec.gov
- FY2023 · 申报于 2024-03-26 来源：sec.gov
- 2022Q4 · 申报于 2023-12-05 来源：sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · 申报于 2023-12-05 来源：sec.gov
- 2023Q4 · 申报于 2023-12-05 来源：sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · 申报于 2023-09-06 来源：sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · 申报于 2023-09-06 来源：sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · 申报于 2023-06-06 来源：sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · 申报于 2023-06-06 来源：sec.gov
- FY2021 · 申报于 2023-03-30 来源：sec.gov
- FY2022 · 申报于 2023-03-30 来源：sec.gov
- 2021Q4 · 申报于 2022-12-06 来源：sec.gov
- 2022Q1 · 申报于 2022-12-06 来源：sec.gov
- 2022Q4 · 申报于 2022-12-06 来源：sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · 申报于 2022-09-07 来源：sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · 申报于 2022-09-07 来源：sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · 申报于 2022-06-07 来源：sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · 申报于 2022-06-07 来源：sec.gov
- FY2020 · 申报于 2022-04-08 来源：sec.gov
- FY2021 · 申报于 2022-04-08 来源：sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · 申报于 2021-12-07 来源：sec.gov
- 2020Q4 · 申报于 2021-12-07 来源：sec.gov
- 2021Q4 · 申报于 2021-12-07 来源：sec.gov
关键比率与同业对比
正在与同业比较…
机构持有人（13F, 2026Q2）
| 机构 | 股数 | 金额 | 环比股数变动 | 占 13F 比例 | 占流通股比例 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock 被动 / 指数 | 8,847,331 | $270.1M | 210,271 | 0.0% | 5.35% |
| Alphabet 企业 | 2,724,712 | $83.2M | 0 | 0.1% | 1.65% |
| State Street 被动 / 指数 | 2,632,173 | $80.4M | 81,807 | 0.0% | 1.59% |
| ARK Investment Management (Cathie Wood) 大师 | 767,998 | $23.4M | -58,887 | 0.2% | 0.46% |
| FMR (Fidelity) 被动 / 指数 | 39,728 | $1.2M | 28,306 | 0.0% | 0.02% |
| Renaissance Technologies 大师 | 7,600 | $232028 | -735,200 | 0.0% | 0.00% |
TradingPilot 计算的列（占 13F 比例、占流通股比例）由申报原值推导而来；只有名称、股数与金额是申报原值。
13F 无法告诉你的事
- 延迟 45 天以上。持仓是所示季末的状态，最晚可在其后 45 天才申报。
- 只含多头、且限于美国上市品种。不含空头、现金、债券、外汇、境外或非上市持仓；上市期权按名义金额申报，并不计入单个持仓的股票价值。
- 1 亿美元门槛。规模更小的管理人根本不需申报。
- “占 13F 比例”不等于“占管理规模比例”。13F 只是一份不完整的持仓表。
- “已清仓”只表示“不再申报”——未必真的卖出了。
- 一个 CIK 可能汇总多个子实体。保密处理可以略去某些持仓。
- 被动指数申报人 不是投资大师。他们的 13F 变动是指数资金流，因此已被排除在 TradingPilot 的聪明钱信号之外。
- 量化机构须注意。量化机构（如 Renaissance）的 13F 是一份只含多头的季末快照，并不反映其真实的高换手、短周期策略。
- 投资大师页面与其持仓从不进入任何信号（无权重）。
尚无标记的新闻。
头条
2026-11-03 Business Wire Contracts/Agreements · RapidFort to Deliver Hardened Container Images for GitLab Regulated Self-Managed Deployments
2026-10-29 Business Wire AI · GitLab Orbit, Now Generally Available, Makes AI Agents More Accurate and Less Expensive to Run
2026-10-27 Yahoo Finance: GTLB · GitLab Inc. (GTLB) Eases AI Disruption Fears After Exceptional Q2 Results, Madison Small Cap Fund Says
2026-10-06 Business Wire AI · GitLab Announces the Foundation for the Governed Software Factory
影响 = 公司显著度层级（高/中由图谱中心度与规模自动判定；低仅用于人工整理的次要事件），不是对波动幅度的预测。
即将到来
| 日期 | 类型 | 事件 | 影响 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-12-01 | 财报 | GitLab earnings (estimated) — Date not yet announced — consensus estimate. 预估 | 中 |
已过去
| 日期 | 事件 | 影响 | 结果 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-01 | GitLab earnings 已确认 | 中 | 每股收益超预期 · +10.0% |
| 2026-06-02 | GitLab earnings 已确认 | 中 | 每股收益超预期 · -2.8% |
| 2026-05-11 | GitLab results release 已确认 | 中 | 结果待定 |