GitLab (GTLB) ☆

AI applications & software · 產業指數 7 (排名 #172) · $56.65 (-2.30%) · 市值 $9.4B

ⓘ 資料時效

價格: 截至 2026-10-29 指數: 截至 2026-10-29 基本面: 最新申報文件 2026-09-02 按季揭露（10-Q XBRL）

GitLab provides an integrated DevSecOps software-development platform, with AI code assistance and agents delivered through GitLab Duo.

產業曝險 0.3 (GitLab Duo AI features are a strategic add-on to a broad DevSecOps subscription business.)

訊號

訊號: 截至 2026-10-13

短期（約 2 週）

低信心度 · 中性

信心度 0

選擇權部位結構— Delayed per-contract options — call premium 18% / put 82% (net skew -0.64), unusualness 39/100. Context: Consumer Price Index in 1 day.[options]
價格動能— Technical uptrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote 0.53, confidence 0.84 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · 內部推導
結構性— Industry Index 6.8 (falling -8.5 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · 內部推導

中期（約 3 個月）

低信心度 · 中性

信心度 3

成長趨勢— Revenue 21% YoY (decelerating), net margin contracting.[filing]
價格動能— Technical uptrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote 0.53, confidence 0.84 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · 內部推導
聰明錢— 0 filer(s) accumulating, 2 trimming in 2026Q2 (value-weighted net -1.00).[holding][holding]
結構性— Industry Index 6.8 (falling -8.5 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · 內部推導

長期（約 6 個月）

14%

低信心度 · 中性

信心度 14

成長趨勢— Revenue 21% YoY (decelerating), net margin contracting.[filing]
moat— Editorial prior (subjective, NOT backtested): narrow moat / fast_follower / moderate pricing ⇒ wider/leading long-horizon tilt 0.06. Bounded, low-confidence input.[moat: Editorial moat profile — gitlab — narrow moat, fast_follower, moderate pricing (as of 2026-08-05)]
結構性— Industry Index 6.8 (falling -8.5 over window) — structural headwind.[index] · 內部推導

查看細節

關係網路

正在載入關係圖譜…

Anthropic — 供應商
Alphabet — 供應商

主要關係

Anthropic — 供應商 · GitLab integrates Anthropic's Claude models to power AI features in GitLab Duo and the Duo Agent Platform. 來源：ir.gitlab.com
Alphabet — 供應商 · GitLab runs its SaaS platform on Google Cloud Platform and discloses reliance on GCP as its infrastructure provider. 來源：sec.gov

選擇權部位結構

延遲 · 彙總: 截至 2026-10-29

買權與賣權成交量：1,283 口買權 · 584 口賣權 — 偏向 +37.4%，偏向買權
成交量／未平倉量週轉： 0.09×
權利金（名目金額代理）：$497456 買權 · $112754 賣權 — 偏向 +63.0%，偏向買權
價外偏斜：+16.8%，偏向價外買權
隱含波動率偏斜（賣權 − 買權）： -19.7%

護城河

護城河: 最新變動 2026-08-05

GitLab sells a single-platform DevSecOps toolchain defended by workflow lock-in rather than intellectual property: a unified data model plus deployment flexibility, including single-tenant "Dedicated for Government with FedRAMP compliance," makes it hard to remove where data residency is contractual. The installed base expands: 118% Dollar-Based Net Retention, 10,682 Base Customers, 1,456 above $100,000 of ARR, 155 above $1.0 million (up 26%), over 70% of ARR from public sector and enterprise. The filing supplies the counterweight: "limited barriers to entry," Microsoft/GitHub as principal competitor, 16 issued patents. Retention (130 to 123 to 118, the 130 a cap), gross margin (89% to 87%) and a January 2026 AI launch point to compression at the commodity end. No source measures market share, so every share band is "unknown".

評級: 窄

The FY2026 10-K (year ended 2026-01-31) shows real expansion inside the installed base: 118% Dollar-Based Net Retention, Base Customers up to 10,682 from 9,893, customers above $100,000 of ARR up to 1,456 from 1,229, and $1.0 million ARR customers "to 155 from 123, an increase of 26%". But the filing concedes "limited barriers to entry" and names "Microsoft Corporation, which owns GitHub" as principal competitor. Retention decelerates (130% FY2024, 123% FY2025, 118% FY2026), and since DBNR is reported "on a threshold basis of 130%," the FY2024 figure is a cap and the slide is steeper than it looks. Narrow, not wide: expansion must be re-won against a bundled hyperscaler.

類型: 轉換成本

Stickiness comes from platform embedding, not IP. The 10-K rests differentiation on "our single platform with a unified data model," on "Consolidation of multiple tools into a single platform," and on deployment inside the customer's own perimeter for regulated buyers. Replacement means re-integrating a toolchain and re-certifying compliance. IP is the wrong label: only "16 issued patents and 25 pending patent applications," plus open-source licenses granting "broad permissions to use, copy, modify, and redistribute." The no-lock-in claim is the filing's own characterisation, footnoted to a Forrester study "commissioned by GitLab."

領先地位: 快速追隨者

The 10-K positions GitLab against a leader rather than as one: "Our principal competitor is Microsoft Corporation, which owns GitHub." Competition reads from the challenger side, differentiating "from GitHub through flexible deployment options that work within enterprise security and compliance requirements, LLM neutrality with self-hosted gateway support" and an open core model. On AI it follows: Duo Agent Platform went "Generally available in January 2026," the last month of the fiscal year. What keeps it a follower rather than behind is cadence, "a new version of our software every month for 172 months in a row," plus a regulated-deployment franchise a SaaS-first rival does not cover.

定價權: 中等

FY2026 gross margin was 87% against 89%, with cost of revenue up $35.6 million "primarily due to an increase of $18.4 million in third party hosting costs for SaaS and cloud usage," and management expects SaaS and Duo mix to bring costs that "may adversely impact our gross margins." Strain is explicit: GitLab "may be required to reduce our prices," competitors "may offer their products and services at a lower price or for free," and it "implemented user limits on our free SaaS product." Power retained: Premium lists at $29 per user/month billed annually, and seats bundle $12 and $24 of GitLab Credits. But "A majority of our subscriptions are on a one-year period."

依所引來源做出的人工整理護城河判斷。來源：sec.gov

與其他公司比較…

產業鏈位置

層級: AI applications & software

上游（供應商）： Anthropic, Alphabet
下游（客戶）： —
競爭對手： —

GitLab sits at the software-tooling layer, not compute or models. It consumes third-party LLM capacity — marketing "LLM neutrality and support for self-hosted AI gateways, including air-gapped environments" — so it captures no model-layer economics and bears inference as COGS, visible in the $18.4 million rise in hosting costs. Its distinctive position is the regulated perimeter.

由這家公司已對應的供應鏈關係及其所屬產業層級推導而來。

訊號貢獻編輯先驗

護城河先驗在長週期（約 6 個月）投出 +0.06 票，權重為 0.20——該週期上的群體判斷是 neutral（分數 -0.24，信念度 14）。

編輯先驗——主觀、未經回測。它有界（±0.6）、低信賴度，且從不對短週期與中週期投票。檢視它究竟如何投票 →

產品線

產品與服務，附編輯判定的市佔區間與技術門檻區間——這些是與所引依據綁定的定性判斷，絕非杜撰的數字。

產品	市場佔有率	技術門檻
Enterprise Agile Planning add-on · Agile portfolio and project planning Upsell module. The 10-K states: "Enterprise Agile Planning Add-On available to Ultimate customers." The live pricing page lists "Enterprise Agile Planning Seats" as a paid add-on under Ultimate only. The filing also identifies Enterprise Agile Planning as one of the core use cases absorbing the majority of development spend.	未知 No source discloses any share, revenue, or attach rate for this add-on. The only sourceable facts are that the add-on exists and is gated to Ultimate.	低 A planning module competing directly against entrenched incumbents in a category the filing explicitly flags as contested, with Atlassian named among competitors. Its pull is bundle convenience for existing Ultimate customers rather than any disclosed structural advantage; no patent, data, or certification barrier is claimed for it.
GitLab Dedicated (including Dedicated for Government) · Single-tenant managed SaaS for regulated industries Verbatim from the 10-K: "Dedicated: Fully managed by GitLab with data isolation, residency, and protection. Includes Dedicated for Government with FedRAMP compliance. Ideal for enterprises and organizations in highly regulated industries requiring data isolation, specific geographic requirements, or government compliance."	未知 No share data is disclosed. The filing gives no revenue split, customer count, or share figure for Dedicated specifically.	深 The barrier is regulatory rather than technical. FedRAMP authorization and contractual data-residency and isolation commitments are certification assets a customer cannot casually re-procure, and the filing markets Dedicated squarely at customers whose "compliance, security, or infrastructure requirements" foreclose multi-tenant SaaS. This is the narrowest but most defensible pocket of the moat.
GitLab DevSecOps Platform (Free, Premium, and Ultimate tiers) · DevSecOps platform / software delivery Core seat-based platform spanning source code management, CI/CD, security and compliance. The 10-K describes three tiers: Free, Premium for "scaling organizations," and Ultimate, which "includes all Premium capabilities, plus advanced application and supply chain security, centralized compliance reporting, and policy controls."	未知 No market-share measurement exists in the 10-K: no reference to Gartner, IDC, any share percentage, or any "leader in" claim. The only positional statements are self-descriptive ("GitLab is the only intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps built on an open-core business model") alongside a competitor list naming Microsoft/GitHub as principal competitor plus "Atlassian, JFrog, and Harness." Being a named participant in a competitive set does not establish a rank.	中等 Stickiness comes from "our single platform with a unified data model" and "Consolidation of multiple tools into a single platform," corroborated by 118% Dollar-Based Net Retention and $100,000+ ARR customers rising to 1,456. It stops short of deep because the filing itself admits that "The markets for our services are highly competitive, with limited barriers to entry," and because GitLab holds only 16 issued patents.
GitLab Duo Agent Platform (with GitLab Credits) · Agentic AI for the software lifecycle AI agent orchestration layer. "Generally available in January 2026, GitLab Duo Agent Platform combines conversational AI assistance, purpose-built agents for specialized tasks, workflow automation, and enterprise controls." Monetized on a usage axis: "Usage-based pricing (GitLab Credits) applies specifically to GitLab Duo Agent Platform capabilities."	未知 No share data exists, and none could exist meaningfully — the product reached general availability in January 2026, the final month of the fiscal year, so the filing reports no Duo-specific revenue, customer count, or share.	低 Newly general-available in a crowded AI coding-assistant field where the principal competitor bundles. The filing's own differentiator is neutrality rather than capability — "LLM neutrality and support for self-hosted AI gateways, including air-gapped environments" — which is a deployment advantage, not a model or data advantage. It is also margin-dilutive by the company's own forward guidance that "deploying AI systems involves high computing costs."
Self-Managed GitLab (on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment) · Self-hosted enterprise software Customer-operated GitLab instance. The 10-K describes it as "self-managed (on-premise or hybrid cloud)" giving customers "full control over their data, workflows, and security policies." Self-managed subscription plus license revenue is the larger revenue line: $568.5M self-managed subscription and $68.9M self-managed license against $296.2M SaaS in FY2026.	未知 No share measurement exists in the filing or any consulted source. GitLab discloses revenue by delivery model but never a share of the self-hosted DevSecOps market.	深 Running inside the customer's own perimeter means replacement requires re-platforming infrastructure the customer operates and re-certifying compliance. The filing ties this to regulated demand: organizations in highly regulated sectors "value our built-in security, compliance controls, and flexible deployment options that meet strict data residency and governance requirements," and more than 70% of ARR came from public sector and enterprise customers in FY2026.

潛力新秀檔案

編輯估算截至 2026-08-05

2 項完全具備 · 2 項部分具備 ，共 5 項 — 這是一種格局，不是分數

GitLab owns the delivery workflow and the customer relationship, rents the model, and is barred by its own policy from compounding the one data asset that would otherwise be its moat. It is the system of record for the software lifecycle, agents run inside it, and GitLab Credits meter that agent activity, while the models are entirely third-party and customer tenant data is walled off from training. Evaluation is genuinely first-party but leans on an external tracking platform and an industry benchmark for scoring.

客戶關係	完全具備	GitLab sells "through a direct sales organization, a self-service web purchasing experience, and a global partner ecosystem", with partners "designed to complement direct sales efforts." Free tiers and trials feed the funnel, and the installed base is named: 1,456 customers at $100k+ ARR, up from 1,229, net retention of 118%, and "no individual customers whose revenue represented more than 10% of total revenue" in FY2026, FY2025 or FY2024. Customer counts track each end customer separately even when sold through a channel. The counterweight is intermediation: at January 31, 2026 two channel partners held 17% and 13% of accounts receivable, in a book where over 70% of ARR is public sector and enterprise, and the filing carries a channel-partner risk factor. 來源：sec.gov
專有資料	部分具備	GitLab has privileged inference-time access to an unusually complete software-lifecycle corpus, but it is customer tenant data and GitLab has foreclosed compounding it: "GitLab does not train generative AI models" and "For GitLab Duo requests, GitLab has a zero data retention policy with Fireworks AI." Some exhaust is kept: Duo Chat and Duo Agent Platform "retain chat and workflow history", "GitLab retains trace data" under expanded logging, telemetry covers prompt lengths, model, editor and accept/reject counts, and since 18.9.1 an opt-in setting logs "Full prompt and response text" and "Tool calls and their results" — "not for training AI models." Prompt caching and "limited vendor-side data retention" apply to certain Anthropic and OpenAI models. 來源：docs.gitlab.com
評測體系	部分具備	GitLab runs a public, first-party evaluation harness. The Centralized Evaluation Framework "is a command-line interface (CLI) framework designed to provide a centralized solution for evaluating AI features at GitLab", maintained by its AI Model Validation and Research group and covering "GitLab AI features (such as Duo Chat, Code Suggestions, etc.)". Its outputs are performance metrics and comparison reports letting developers "test and validate prompt engineering changes"; that these set per-feature defaults is an inference, as the docs say only "GitLab might update default models to optimize performance." It stays below owns because "CEF relies on LangSmith for evaluation tracking and experiment management" and agentic scoring uses an external benchmark via "one-click SWE-bench evaluations." 來源：gitlab.com
工作流程	完全具備	GitLab "is a technology company and its primary offering is 'GitLab', an intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps delivered as a single application", and the issue, merge request, pipeline and vulnerability record live in its system of record. The Duo Agent Platform, "Generally available in January 2026", puts agents inside that workflow: "teams orchestrate AI agents that execute tasks autonomously across planning, development, security, and deployment. This eliminates the need for manual handoffs between software lifecycle stages." Monetization meters the same surface: "Usage-based pricing (GitLab Credits) applies specifically to GitLab Duo Agent Platform capabilities." Authoring is the limit — code is written in "third-party code editors and integrated development environments, or IDEs." 來源：sec.gov
領域專用模型	不具備	Every model behind GitLab Duo is third-party: Anthropic (Claude Sonnet 4.5, Sonnet 4.6, Sonnet 3, Haiku 3, Haiku 4.5, several via Google Vertex), Google (Gemini 2.5 Flash Vertex), Mistral Codestral 25.01 and 25.08, and OpenAI — the guidance recommends starting with "Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5.4 Mini." Defaults are Claude Sonnet 4.6 Vertex for code generation and chat, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Vertex for Code Review, and Codestral 25.08 Fireworks for code completion. No GitLab-authored model appears and there is no fine-tuning claim: "GitLab does not train generative AI models." The 10-K books the dependency as a risk — "We rely on third-party vendors for the provision of the AI models which power many of our AI features." GitLab owns routing, per-feature model switching (GA in 18.5) and prompt engineering. 來源：docs.gitlab.com

AI 落地深度

中

GitLab's Duo Agent Platform, generally available since January 2026, finished its first full quarter of consumption at a paid consumption run rate of nearly $20 million, a figure that includes minimum usage commitments made before that launch plus on-demand credits. It attached to four of the quarter's top ten deals and added more net new ARR than Duo Pro and Duo Enterprise combined had in any prior quarter. One disclosed account shows the intensity: a top-ten US bank whose developers averaged 1.5 hours saved per task is in active rollout across hundreds of developers, and the customer's own plan points to an active user base nearly 20 times larger at full deployment. Management assumes no material revenue contribution in fiscal 2027 and frames the year as converting pilots to production. 來源：s204.q4cdn.com

這是並列的另一條軸，而不是第六項：它從不計入上方的格局，兩者也從不平均成一個分數。

進展證據

customer: Customers with $100,000+ ARR grew to 1,456 from 1,229; customers above $1.0M ARR grew to 155 from 123 (+26%); more than 70% of ARR came from public sector and enterprise customers (1,456) 2026-01-31 來源：sec.gov
revenue: Dollar-Based Net Retention Rate of 118% for FY2026, down from 123% in FY2025 and 130% in FY2024 - expansion is decelerating even as Duo Agent Platform reached GA in January 2026 and usage-based GitLab Credits began monetizing agent activity (118%) 2026-01-31 來源：sec.gov
revenue: FY2026 total revenue of $955.2M, up 26% from $759.2M in FY2025, with subscription (self-managed and SaaS) revenue up 28% to $864.7M ($955.2M) 2026-01-31 來源：sec.gov

依據以下條件偵查：a company that simultaneously owns the customer relationship, the data, the evals, the workflow, and a domain-specific model。無權重——這份檔案從不影響訊號，也不是對報酬的預測。

你正在看的是什麼

這些圖表繪製的是 GitLab 在其 SEC 申報文件中已申報的損益表、現金流量表與資產負債表（截至 2026-09-02）。每一個數字都是申報原值 XBRL——沒有任何一項是預估。

在已申報的區間內，營收成長 1076%，達到 $955.2M（FY2020→FY2026）; 毛利率從 88% 變為 87%; FY2026 淨損 $58.6M。

分析師一致預期——來自 Yahoo Finance 的第三方預估，截至 2026-10-26。這不是 SEC 申報文件，也不是 TradingPilot 的預測。來源：finance.yahoo.com

期間	每股盈餘（預估）	營收（預估）	年增率
Q/E Oct 2026	USD 0.20 (USD 0.19–USD 0.22) · 27	USD 282741150.00 (USD 282000000.00–USD 294607000.00) · 25	+16%
FY 2027	USD 0.87 (USD 0.83–USD 0.93) · 27	USD 1.1B (USD 1.1B–USD 1.2B) · 27	+19%

每個數字顯示一致預期平均值、可得時的（最低–最高）區間，以及 · 後面給出該預估背後的分析師人數。

下次財報約在 2026-12-01。

我們的模型在中週期上對這檔股票偏向 Low-confidence · Neutral——這是對市場方向的判斷，不是對獲利的預測。檢視「訊號」分頁。

損益表

現金流與流動性

資產負債表

申報文件

2026Q1 · 申報於 2026-09-02 來源：sec.gov
2026Q3 · 申報於 2026-09-02 來源：sec.gov
2025Q3 · 申報於 2026-09-02 來源：sec.gov
2025Q4 · 申報於 2026-09-02 來源：sec.gov
2026Q2 · 申報於 2026-06-02 來源：sec.gov

顯示另外 48 份較早的申報文件

2025Q2 · 申報於 2026-06-02 來源：sec.gov
FY2022 · 申報於 2026-05-01 來源：sec.gov
FY2023 · 申報於 2026-05-01 來源：sec.gov
FY2024 · 申報於 2026-05-01 來源：sec.gov
FY2025 · 申報於 2026-05-01 來源：sec.gov
FY2026 · 申報於 2026-05-01 來源：sec.gov
FY2025 · 申報於 2026-03-17 來源：sec.gov
FY2026 · 申報於 2026-03-17 來源：sec.gov
FY2024 · 申報於 2026-03-17 來源：sec.gov
2025Q1 · 申報於 2025-12-03 來源：sec.gov
2025Q4 · 申報於 2025-12-03 來源：sec.gov
2024Q4 · 申報於 2025-12-03 來源：sec.gov
2025Q3 · 申報於 2025-09-04 來源：sec.gov
2024Q3 · 申報於 2025-09-04 來源：sec.gov
2025Q2 · 申報於 2025-06-11 來源：sec.gov
2024Q2 · 申報於 2025-06-11 來源：sec.gov
FY2023 · 申報於 2025-03-21 來源：sec.gov
FY2024 · 申報於 2025-03-21 來源：sec.gov
2024Q1 · 申報於 2024-12-06 來源：sec.gov
2024Q4 · 申報於 2024-12-06 來源：sec.gov
2023Q4 · 申報於 2024-12-06 來源：sec.gov
2024Q3 · 申報於 2024-09-04 來源：sec.gov
2023Q3 · 申報於 2024-09-04 來源：sec.gov
2023Q2 · 申報於 2024-06-04 來源：sec.gov
2024Q2 · 申報於 2024-06-04 來源：sec.gov
FY2022 · 申報於 2024-03-26 來源：sec.gov
FY2023 · 申報於 2024-03-26 來源：sec.gov
2022Q4 · 申報於 2023-12-05 來源：sec.gov
2023Q1 · 申報於 2023-12-05 來源：sec.gov
2023Q4 · 申報於 2023-12-05 來源：sec.gov
2022Q3 · 申報於 2023-09-06 來源：sec.gov
2023Q3 · 申報於 2023-09-06 來源：sec.gov
2022Q2 · 申報於 2023-06-06 來源：sec.gov
2023Q2 · 申報於 2023-06-06 來源：sec.gov
FY2021 · 申報於 2023-03-30 來源：sec.gov
FY2022 · 申報於 2023-03-30 來源：sec.gov
2021Q4 · 申報於 2022-12-06 來源：sec.gov
2022Q1 · 申報於 2022-12-06 來源：sec.gov
2022Q4 · 申報於 2022-12-06 來源：sec.gov
2021Q3 · 申報於 2022-09-07 來源：sec.gov
2022Q3 · 申報於 2022-09-07 來源：sec.gov
2021Q2 · 申報於 2022-06-07 來源：sec.gov
2022Q2 · 申報於 2022-06-07 來源：sec.gov
FY2020 · 申報於 2022-04-08 來源：sec.gov
FY2021 · 申報於 2022-04-08 來源：sec.gov
2021Q1 · 申報於 2021-12-07 來源：sec.gov
2020Q4 · 申報於 2021-12-07 來源：sec.gov
2021Q4 · 申報於 2021-12-07 來源：sec.gov

關鍵比率與同業比較

正在與同業比較…

機構持有人（13F, 2026Q2）

有 2 位被追蹤的投資大師持有 GitLab：0 位加碼、2 位減碼——淨部位規模傾向 -1.00。被動指數申報人已排除在外。

機構	股數	金額	季增減股數	佔 13F 比例	佔流通股比例
BlackRock 被動 / 指數	8,847,331	$270.1M	210,271	0.0%	5.35%
Alphabet 企業	2,724,712	$83.2M	0	0.1%	1.65%
State Street 被動 / 指數	2,632,173	$80.4M	81,807	0.0%	1.59%
ARK Investment Management (Cathie Wood) 大師	767,998	$23.4M	-58,887	0.2%	0.46%
FMR (Fidelity) 被動 / 指數	39,728	$1.2M	28,306	0.0%	0.02%
Renaissance Technologies 大師	7,600	$232028	-735,200	0.0%	0.00%

TradingPilot 計算的欄位（佔 13F 比例、佔流通股比例）由申報原值推導而來；只有名稱、股數與金額是申報原值。

13F 無法告訴你的事

延遲 45 天以上。部位是所示季末的狀態，最晚可在其後 45 天才申報。
僅含多方，且限於美國掛牌商品。不含空方、現金、債券、外匯、境外或未上市部位；掛牌選擇權按名目金額申報，並不計入個別部位的股票價值。
1 億美元門檻。規模更小的經理人根本無須申報。
「佔 13F 比例」不等於「佔管理規模比例」。13F 只是一份不完整的部位表。
「已出清」只表示「不再申報」——未必真的賣掉了。
一個 CIK 可能彙總多個子實體。保密處理可以略去某些部位。
被動指數申報人不是投資大師。他們的 13F 變動是指數資金流，因此已被排除在 TradingPilot 的聰明錢訊號之外。
量化機構須注意。量化機構（如 Renaissance）的 13F 是一份僅含多方的季末快照，並不反映其真實的高週轉、短週期策略。
投資大師頁面與其持股從不進入任何訊號（無權重）。

影響 = 公司顯著度層級（高/中由圖譜中心度與規模自動判定；低僅用於人工整理的次要事件），並非對波動幅度的預測。

即將到來

日期	類型	事件	影響
2026-12-02	財報	GitLab earnings (estimated) — Date not yet announced — estimated from EDGAR filing cadence (last periodic filing + 91/365 days); confirm via IR. 預估	中

已過去

日期	事件	影響	結果
2026-09-01	GitLab earnings 已確認	中	每股盈餘優於預期 · +10.0%
2026-06-02	GitLab earnings 已確認	中	每股盈餘優於預期 · -2.8%
2026-05-11	GitLab results release 已確認	中	結果待定

檢視完整行事曆 →

GitLab (GTLB) ☆

訊號

短期（約 2 週）

中期（約 3 個月）

長期（約 6 個月）

關係網路

主要關係

選擇權部位結構

近期標記

每日選擇權成交量與基準對照

買權／賣權權利金

訊號歷史

護城河

產業鏈位置

訊號貢獻編輯先驗

產品線

潛力新秀檔案

AI 落地深度

進展證據

你正在看的是什麼

損益表

現金流與流動性

資產負債表

申報文件

關鍵比率與同業比較

機構持有人（13F, 2026Q2）

頭條

即將到來

已過去

訊號

短期（約 2 週）

中期（約 3 個月）

長期（約 6 個月）

關係網路

主要關係

選擇權部位結構

近期標記

每日選擇權成交量與基準對照

買權／賣權權利金

訊號歷史

護城河

產業鏈位置

訊號貢獻 編輯先驗

產品線

潛力新秀檔案

AI 落地深度

進展證據

你正在看的是什麼

損益表

現金流與流動性

資產負債表

申報文件

關鍵比率與同業比較

機構持有人（13F, 2026Q2）

頭條

即將到來

已過去

訊號貢獻編輯先驗