Everpure, Inc. (P) ☆
memory & storage · 产业指数 12 (排名 #97) ·
ⓘ 数据时效
价格: 截至 2026-10-29 指数: 截至 2026-10-29 基本面: 最新申报文件 2026-09-04 按季披露（10-Q XBRL）
U.S. enterprise storage vendor (NYSE: P, renamed from Pure Storage to Everpure, Inc.) selling all-flash arrays and, increasingly, DirectFlash Modules to hyperscalers.
产业敞口 0.5 (A landmark hyperscaler DirectFlash design win (Meta) and AI-data-pipeline demand tie a growing share of Everpure's business to AI datacenters.)
信号
信号: 截至 2026-10-13短期（约 2 周）
- ▲期权持仓结构— Delayed per-contract options — call premium 87% / put 13% (net skew 0.74), unusualness 39/100. Context: Consumer Price Index in 1 day.[options]
- ▲价格动量— Technical uptrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote 0.82, confidence 0.80 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · 内部推导
- ▲结构性— Industry Index 11.8 (rising 10.9 over window) — structural tailwind.[index] · 内部推导
中期（约 3 个月）
- ▲增长趋势— Revenue 38% YoY (accelerating), net margin expanding.[filing]
- ▲价格动量— Technical uptrend across short+medium horizon(s) — vote 0.82, confidence 0.80 from 11 indicator sub-signal(s).[price] · 内部推导
- ▲结构性— Industry Index 11.8 (rising 10.9 over window) — structural tailwind.[index] · 内部推导
长期（约 6 个月）
- ▲增长趋势— Revenue 38% YoY (accelerating), net margin expanding.[filing]
- ▲moat— Editorial prior (subjective, NOT backtested): narrow moat / fast_follower / moderate pricing ⇒ wider/leading long-horizon tilt 0.06. Bounded, low-confidence input.[moat: Editorial moat profile — pure-storage — narrow moat, fast_follower, moderate pricing (as of 2026-03-25)]
- ▲结构性— Industry Index 11.8 (rising 10.9 over window) — structural tailwind.[index] · 内部推导
关系网络
- Meta Platforms — 客户
- NetApp — 竞争对手
主要关系
- Meta Platforms — 客户 · Pure Storage won a design to supply its DirectFlash Module and DirectFlash software as hyperscale flash storage for Meta's data centers. 来源：blocksandfiles.com
- NetApp — 竞争对手 · Pure Storage and NetApp are direct competitors in the enterprise all-flash storage array market. 来源：datamation.com
期权持仓结构
延迟 · 汇总: 截至 2026-10-29- 看涨与看跌成交量：742 张看涨 · 489 张看跌 — 偏向 +20.6%，偏向看涨
- 成交量／未平仓量周转： 0.03×
- 权利金（名义金额代理）：$638859 看涨 · $393048 看跌 — 偏向 +23.8%，偏向看涨
- 价外偏斜：+26.0%，偏向价外看涨
- 隐含波动率偏斜（看跌 − 看涨）： +4.1%
延迟的日终逐合约汇总数据——不是实时盘口，也不是逐笔资金流。买卖方向是根据每个合约最后一笔成交在买卖价差中的位置推断出来的，并非观测到的委托流。除非有报价的合约占当日权利金的四分之一以上，否则公司层面的方向会被隐去，因此下方个别合约有方向时这里也可能为空。看跌/看涨权利金是在我们采集的合约范围内计算的——最近的 6 个到期日、45 天以内，并非完整期权链——而下表最多列出 20 个被标记的合约，所以把这些行加总不会还原出上面的百分比。
近期标记
标记原因：Consumer Price Index today
| 日期 | 合约 | 异常分 | 买卖方向（推断）? | 持仓量变动? | 成交量 | 成交量/持仓量 | 标记 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-26 | $125 PUT | 25 | 价差中段 · 无法判定方向 | +2 | 384 | 0.7× | |
| 2026-10-26 | $140 CALL | 24 | 价差中段 · 无法判定方向 | +125 | 349 | 0.5× | |
| 2026-10-26 | $135 CALL | 21 | 买方主动 | -2 | 270 | 0.9× | |
| 2026-10-23 | $120 PUT | 32 | 价差中段 · 无法判定方向 | +69 | 708 | 1.3× | |
| 2026-10-21 | $135 CALL | 22 | 价差中段 · 无法判定方向 | +27 | 117 | 0.5× | |
| 2026-10-16 | $180 PUT | 24 | — | -22 | 50 | 12.5× | |
| 2026-10-14 | $165 CALL | 34 | 价差中段 · 无法判定方向 | +20 | 1,741 | 4.3× | |
| 2026-10-14 | $140 PUT | 23 | 卖方主动 | -32 | 678 | 1.9× | |
| 2026-10-14 | $145 PUT | 23 | 价差中段 · 无法判定方向 | +1 | 429 | 0.9× | |
| 2026-10-14 | $170 CALL | 20 | 价差中段 · 无法判定方向 | +44 | 476 | 2.1× | |
| 2026-10-14 | $150 CALL | 20 | 价差中段 · 无法判定方向 | +7 | 417 | 0.7× |
9 smaller flags (under $100000 premium) hidden.
每日期权成交量与基准对比
最近交易日：为 13 日基准的 0.4 倍
看涨／看跌权利金
看涨 68% / 看跌 32%（按权利金）
价格动量 撑起了这次判断——几乎全部倾向都由它贡献，其余投票者基本相互抵消。
投票者大体一致。方向一致度 0.67。
一个明确的看多分数；置信度 0.42 反映的是智能体之间的一致强度。置信度是信心，不是价格变动的概率。
信号历史
护城河
护城河: 最新变动 2026-03-25Everpure（由 Pure Storage 更名而来）销售全闪存存储，建立在其自 FlashArray 以来一直坚持的一项设计选择之上——FY2026 10-K 称 FlashArray 为 "the industry's first all-flash array"：由自有软件直接管理原始 NAND，而不是通过通用 SSD。申报文件列出了基于这一选择的三项差异化优势，并称 Purity 操作环境在 FlashArray、FlashBlade 和 Everpure Cloud 服务之间共享。正是这一设计让 Everpure 能将高密度 QLC 闪存放入企业级阵列，并赢得 "the industry-first Flash design win with a major hyperscaler"；公司的 Q2 FY2027 业绩新闻稿（2026-08-26）又宣布基于同一 DirectFlash 架构拿下第二家前五大超大规模云厂商。硬件之外是 Evergreen——它在原位更换控制器和闪存模块，使阵列无需整体更换——以及 10-K 所称超过 14,500 家的客户群，其中包括约 64% 的 Fortune 500，经认证的 NPS 为 84。10-K 利润表显示，FY2024 毛利为 $2,021.2M，营收为 $2,830.6M；FY2025 分别为 $2,212.7M 和 $3,168.2M；FY2026 分别为 $2,578.0M 和 $3,662.8M。局限同样明确。IDC 的 1Q26 追踪报告将 Everpure 列为外部企业存储第三，位于 Dell 和 NetApp 之后。10-K 承认竞争对手拥有更大、更成熟的知识产权组合；大多数潜在客户已经在使用竞争对手的存储，而在位厂商部分依靠转换成本留住他们；且 "known for developing storage systems internally" 的公有云服务商会减少对 Everpure 这类系统的需求。零部件成本是另一项风险敞口：申报文件称零部件成本在 2026 财年 "increased significantly"，并称 2027 财年第一季度的提价旨在 "to help offset these rising expenses"，而波动性持续对利润率构成压力。这是一项真实的、以技术为基础的优势，由一家按营收排名第三的厂商持有：窄，而非宽。
评级: 窄
FY2026 10-K 显示了一种并未主导其市场的技术优势。在持久性一侧，申报文件称 "Our extended advantage stems from three technology differentiators"（direct-to-NAND 软件、集成式 DirectFlash 模块和闪存管理能力），披露超过 14,500 家客户，其中包括 "approximately 64% of Fortune 500 companies"，经认证的 Net Promoter Score 为 84；其利润表显示 FY2024 毛利为 $2,021.2M，营收为 $2,830.6M；FY2025 分别为 $2,212.7M 和 $3,168.2M；FY2026 分别为 $2,578.0M 和 $3,662.8M。在局限性一侧，同一份申报文件描述了 "the intensely competitive data storage market"，称许多竞争对手拥有 "substantially greater financial, technical and other resources" 和 "larger and more mature intellectual property portfolios"，并承认在位厂商之所以能部分留住客户，是因为客户担心 "actual or perceived costs of switching to a new vendor and technology"。IDC 的 1Q26 追踪报告（见下方阵列产品条目）将 Everpure 列为第三，位于 Dell 和 NetApp 之后。由排名第三的厂商持有的、真实且以技术为基础的优势，是一条窄护城河，而非宽护城河。
类型: 无形资产与知识产权
FY2026 10-K 将优势来源归于专有技术。它将差异化优势列为 "Direct-to-NAND Software Leadership"、"Integrated Hardware–Software DirectFlash Modules" 和 "Next-Generation Flash Management Capabilities"，解释说由于其闪存管理软件 "requires less NAND"，因而避免了 SSD 超额配置，并称 FlashArray//C 的 QLC 优势 "are only achievable through our DirectFlash integrated hardware and software approach"。公司拥有 "over 3,000 issued patents and patent applications"。Everpure 将其超大规模云厂商 design win 归功于这项技术，而非客户锁定效应。Evergreen 的无中断升级增加了一层客户留存，但 10-K 自身的风险因素显示，转换成本主要有利于 Everpure 正在取代的在位厂商，且竞争对手拥有 "larger and more mature intellectual property portfolios"——因此这一优势是一项特定的闪存管理技术，而非组合的广度。
领先地位: 快速追随者
IDC's 1Q26 Worldwide Quarterly Enterprise Storage Systems Tracker, as reported by Blocks & Files on 2026-06-16 (the source of the array row below), ranks Everpure third in external enterprise storage behind Dell and NetApp and ahead of Huawei and HPE, noting "Everpure moved into third position helped by subscription model adoption and AI-optimized platforms." By the company's own account it ranks higher on the qualitative axis: its Q2 FY2027 results release of 2026-08-26 (https://s21.q4cdn.com/687136699/files/doc_financials/2027/q2/Q2FY2027-Earnings-Press-Release.pdf) reports it was "Named a Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Enterprise Storage Platforms, positioned highest in execution and furthest in vision for the second consecutive year" - the company's own summary of Gartner's opinion. Third by IDC's independent revenue ranking, with the higher Gartner placement resting on the company's own account, reads as a close follower to Dell and NetApp rather than a shared lead.
定价权: 中等
It can pass costs through but not escape them. The 10-K's income statement reports gross profit of $2,021.2M, $2,212.7M and $2,578.0M on revenue of $2,830.6M, $3,168.2M and $3,662.8M for FY2024-FY2026. When component costs rose, the 10-K says "we raised our prices during the first quarter of fiscal year 2027", and the Q2 FY2027 results release (https://s21.q4cdn.com/687136699/files/doc_financials/2027/q2/Q2FY2027-Earnings-Press-Release.pdf) quotes the CFO: "Demand remains strong across our solutions portfolio despite historic industry price increases in the first half of FY'27." Those were industry-wide increases, though, and margin still slipped: GAAP gross margin was 68.4% in Q2 FY2027, against gross profit of $604.3M on $861.0M of revenue a year earlier. The 10-K adds that "ongoing component cost volatility has placed, and may continue to place, downward pressure on our gross margins" and that some competitors offer storage "at significant discounts or even for free".
基于所引来源做出的人工整理护城河判断。 来源：sec.gov
产业链位置
层级: memory & storage
- 上游（供应商）： —
- 下游（客户）： Meta Platforms
- 竞争对手： NetApp
Everpure sits between the flash-memory supply and enterprise and hyperscale data centres. Upstream, the FY2026 10-K names "the cost of components, including flash and DRAM" as a gross-margin driver, says it must ensure "a sufficient supply of flash to support our hyperscaler customer", develops DirectFlash "In close collaboration with key QLC flash partners", and relies on contract manufacturers to build its products. Downstream it sells through a direct sales force and channel partners to enterprises, managed service providers and hyperscalers, and lists Microsoft Azure, AWS, Google, IBM, Cisco and NVIDIA among its technology partners; large public cloud providers are at once partners and, through internally developed storage, substitutes.
由这家公司已映射的供应链关系及其所属产业层级推导而来。
信号贡献 编辑先验
护城河先验在长周期（约 6 个月）上投出 +0.06 票，权重为 0.20——该周期上的群体判断是 bullish（得分 0.62，信念度 67）。
编辑先验——主观、未经回测。它有界（±0.6）、低置信度，且从不对短周期与中周期投票。 查看它究竟如何投票 →
产品线
产品与服务，附编辑判定的市场份额区间与技术壁垒区间——这些是与所引依据绑定的定性判断，绝非杜撰的数字。
| 产品 | 市场份额 | 技术壁垒 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectFlash Modules for hyperscale data centers · Hyperscale flash storage Everpure's own high-density flash modules running its Purity flash-management software, supplied to hyperscalers in place of disk-based storage; the FY2026 10-K reports a 300TB DirectFlash Module released in 2025. | 挑战者 Everpure's Q2 FY2027 results release reports that on August 10 it announced "a landmark design win with a second top-five hyperscaler, leveraging Everpure's advanced DirectFlash® architecture to drastically lower operational costs and reclaim vital power and rack space for hyperscale workloads". Its FY2026 10-K describes the first as "the industry-first Flash design win with a major hyperscaler" and warns that "a design win does not guarantee sales". Two design wins at individual very large buyers, with the company's own caution attached, is a challenger's position rather than an established one. | 中等 The FY2026 10-K says the 300TB DirectFlash Module delivers "up to 18 times the capacity of standard hard drives and seven times the capacity of the largest SSDs", and the release credits the new win to the DirectFlash architecture - a product lead resting on Everpure's own flash-management software. But the buyers can walk away and can build: the 10-K notes that large public cloud providers are "known for developing storage systems internally", and that Everpure "may be obligated to fulfill NAND flash purchase commitments if our hyperscale customer reduces its demand". |
| Evergreen//One and Evergreen//Flex subscriptions · Storage-as-a-service Evergreen//One sells storage capacity and performance as an SLA-backed service, with Everpure shipping whatever infrastructure its guarantees require and paying for the power and rack space that infrastructure uses in the customer's data center; Evergreen//Flex keeps hardware ownership with a lower upfront cost and a pay-as-you-go subscription. | 未知 The FY2026 10-K asserts "We are a leader in the storage-as-a-service market" but cites no third-party share figure for it, and the IDC tracker cited on the array row ranks storage systems vendors, not subscription services (it does credit Everpure's move to third partly to subscription model adoption). No independent share basis was found, so the band is left unknown rather than inferred from the company's own claim. | 中等 The 10-K's argument is structural: Evergreen//One is "a hardware-independent storage subscription centered on defined service outcomes", under which Everpure stays "responsible for delivering contracted outcomes, including required hardware upgrades or expansions" - something its non-disruptive Evergreen architecture makes deliverable and which, the filing says, rivals' equipment-tied consumption models "may not provide". It is not uncontested: the risk factors say competitors "have introduced business programs designed, among other things, to compete with our innovative programs, such as our Evergreen Storage model". |
| FlashArray and FlashBlade all-flash storage systems · Enterprise all-flash storage arrays Purity-based arrays built on DirectFlash modules: FlashArray (//XL, //X, //C, //E, //ST and the smaller //RC20) for block, file and object workloads, and FlashBlade (//S, //E) for unstructured file and object data, sold outright or under Evergreen subscriptions. | 前三 IDC's 1Q26 Worldwide Quarterly Enterprise Storage Systems Tracker, as reported here, ranks Everpure third among external enterprise storage systems vendors, behind Dell and NetApp and ahead of Huawei and HPE, and says "Everpure moved into third position helped by subscription model adoption and AI-optimized platforms." The ranking is of vendors' external storage revenue rather than of a product line, but these arrays are the systems Everpure sells into that market. The same report says "All Flash Arrays (AFA) crossed the 50% revenue threshold for the first time", so the all-flash segment these arrays occupy is now the larger half of the market. | 中等 Five vendors are ranked in the same tracker, which put the market's growth at 22.7% year over year in the quarter - a market rivals are investing in, not a closed one. What sets these arrays apart is the DirectFlash integration: Everpure's FY2026 10-K says the QLC benefits of FlashArray//C "are only achievable through our DirectFlash integrated hardware and software approach". The same filing concedes the edge is contestable: competitors "have developed or acquired storage technologies with features or data reduction technologies that directly compete with our Everpure Platform", and most prospects already run an incumbent vendor's storage. |
| FlashBlade//EXA · AI and HPC storage Disaggregated, massively parallel storage introduced in March 2025 for specialty GPU clouds and HPC, scaling data and metadata independently and using off-the-shelf data nodes. | 挑战者 The FY2026 10-K frames this as expansion, not an established position: its sixth strategic pillar is to "Expand our AI portfolio into the most demanding specialty Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) clouds and High-Performance Computing (HPC) environments", and its risk factors concede "We may be unable to capture significant storage workloads for AI environments and hyperscalers." | 低 The 10-K says FlashBlade//EXA runs on "cost-efficient, off-the-shelf data nodes", so the hardware is not where any protection lies, and that Everpure's market "attracts new startups and more highly specialized vendors" alongside the established storage companies. A new product in a segment that is drawing entrants has little beyond its software design to hold rivals off. |
你正在看的是什么
这些图表绘制的是 Everpure, Inc. 在其 SEC 申报文件中已申报的利润表、现金流量表与资产负债表（截至 2026-09-04）。每一个数字都是申报原值 XBRL——没有任何一项是预估。
在已申报的区间内，FY2026 净利润为 $188.2M。
分析师一致预期——来自 Yahoo Finance 的第三方预估，截至 2026-10-26。这不是 SEC 申报文件，也不是 TradingPilot 的预测。 来源：finance.yahoo.com
| 期间 | 每股收益（预估） | 营收（预估） | 同比 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q/E Oct 2026 | USD 0.77 (USD 0.66–USD 0.84) · 19 | USD 1.3B (USD 1.3B–USD 1.3B) · 17 | +38% |
| FY 2027 | USD 2.78 (USD 2.54–USD 3.00) · 19 | USD 5.1B (USD 5.0B–USD 5.1B) · 18 | +38% |
每个数字显示一致预期均值、可得时的（最低–最高）区间，以及 · 后面给出该预估背后的分析师人数。
我们的模型在中周期上对这只股票偏向 Bullish——这是对市场方向的判断，不是对盈利的预测。查看“信号”标签。
利润表
现金流与流动性
资产负债表
申报文件
- 2025Q3 · 申报于 2026-09-04 来源：sec.gov
- 2026Q1 · 申报于 2026-09-04 来源：sec.gov
- 2026Q3 · 申报于 2026-09-04 来源：sec.gov
- 2025Q4 · 申报于 2026-09-04 来源：sec.gov
- 2025Q2 · 申报于 2026-06-05 来源：sec.gov
显示另外 108 份较早的申报文件
- 2026Q2 · 申报于 2026-06-05 来源：sec.gov
- FY2022 · 申报于 2026-05-01 来源：sec.gov
- FY2023 · 申报于 2026-05-01 来源：sec.gov
- FY2024 · 申报于 2026-05-01 来源：sec.gov
- FY2025 · 申报于 2026-05-01 来源：sec.gov
- FY2026 · 申报于 2026-05-01 来源：sec.gov
- FY2024 · 申报于 2026-03-25 来源：sec.gov
- FY2025 · 申报于 2026-03-25 来源：sec.gov
- FY2026 · 申报于 2026-03-25 来源：sec.gov
- 2024Q4 · 申报于 2025-12-10 来源：sec.gov
- 2025Q1 · 申报于 2025-12-10 来源：sec.gov
- 2025Q4 · 申报于 2025-12-10 来源：sec.gov
- 2024Q3 · 申报于 2025-09-10 来源：sec.gov
- 2025Q3 · 申报于 2025-09-10 来源：sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · 申报于 2025-06-11 来源：sec.gov
- 2025Q2 · 申报于 2025-06-11 来源：sec.gov
- FY2023 · 申报于 2025-03-27 来源：sec.gov
- FY2024 · 申报于 2025-03-27 来源：sec.gov
- 2023Q4 · 申报于 2024-12-12 来源：sec.gov
- 2024Q1 · 申报于 2024-12-12 来源：sec.gov
- 2024Q4 · 申报于 2024-12-12 来源：sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · 申报于 2024-09-11 来源：sec.gov
- 2024Q3 · 申报于 2024-09-11 来源：sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · 申报于 2024-06-13 来源：sec.gov
- 2024Q2 · 申报于 2024-06-13 来源：sec.gov
- FY2022 · 申报于 2024-04-01 来源：sec.gov
- FY2023 · 申报于 2024-04-01 来源：sec.gov
- 2022Q4 · 申报于 2023-12-15 来源：sec.gov
- 2023Q1 · 申报于 2023-12-15 来源：sec.gov
- 2023Q4 · 申报于 2023-12-15 来源：sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · 申报于 2023-09-14 来源：sec.gov
- 2023Q3 · 申报于 2023-09-14 来源：sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · 申报于 2023-06-16 来源：sec.gov
- 2023Q2 · 申报于 2023-06-16 来源：sec.gov
- FY2021 · 申报于 2023-04-03 来源：sec.gov
- FY2022 · 申报于 2023-04-03 来源：sec.gov
- 2021Q4 · 申报于 2022-12-15 来源：sec.gov
- 2022Q1 · 申报于 2022-12-15 来源：sec.gov
- 2022Q4 · 申报于 2022-12-15 来源：sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · 申报于 2022-09-15 来源：sec.gov
- 2022Q3 · 申报于 2022-09-15 来源：sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · 申报于 2022-06-16 来源：sec.gov
- 2022Q2 · 申报于 2022-06-16 来源：sec.gov
- FY2020 · 申报于 2022-04-07 来源：sec.gov
- FY2021 · 申报于 2022-04-07 来源：sec.gov
- 2020Q4 · 申报于 2021-12-07 来源：sec.gov
- 2021Q1 · 申报于 2021-12-07 来源：sec.gov
- 2021Q4 · 申报于 2021-12-07 来源：sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · 申报于 2021-09-08 来源：sec.gov
- 2021Q3 · 申报于 2021-09-08 来源：sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · 申报于 2021-06-08 来源：sec.gov
- 2021Q2 · 申报于 2021-06-08 来源：sec.gov
- FY2019 · 申报于 2021-03-25 来源：sec.gov
- FY2020 · 申报于 2021-03-25 来源：sec.gov
- 2019Q4 · 申报于 2020-12-09 来源：sec.gov
- 2020Q1 · 申报于 2020-12-09 来源：sec.gov
- 2020Q4 · 申报于 2020-12-09 来源：sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · 申报于 2020-09-11 来源：sec.gov
- 2020Q3 · 申报于 2020-09-11 来源：sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · 申报于 2020-06-11 来源：sec.gov
- 2020Q2 · 申报于 2020-06-11 来源：sec.gov
- FY2018 · 申报于 2020-03-27 来源：sec.gov
- FY2019 · 申报于 2020-03-27 来源：sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · 申报于 2019-12-09 来源：sec.gov
- 2019Q1 · 申报于 2019-12-09 来源：sec.gov
- 2019Q4 · 申报于 2019-12-09 来源：sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · 申报于 2019-08-30 来源：sec.gov
- 2019Q3 · 申报于 2019-08-30 来源：sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · 申报于 2019-06-07 来源：sec.gov
- 2019Q2 · 申报于 2019-06-07 来源：sec.gov
- FY2017 · 申报于 2019-03-26 来源：sec.gov
- FY2018 · 申报于 2019-03-26 来源：sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · 申报于 2018-12-06 来源：sec.gov
- 2018Q1 · 申报于 2018-12-06 来源：sec.gov
- 2018Q4 · 申报于 2018-12-06 来源：sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · 申报于 2018-09-04 来源：sec.gov
- 2018Q3 · 申报于 2018-09-04 来源：sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · 申报于 2018-06-08 来源：sec.gov
- 2018Q2 · 申报于 2018-06-08 来源：sec.gov
- FY2015 · 申报于 2018-03-26 来源：sec.gov
- FY2016 · 申报于 2018-03-26 来源：sec.gov
- FY2017 · 申报于 2018-03-26 来源：sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · 申报于 2017-12-08 来源：sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · 申报于 2017-12-08 来源：sec.gov
- 2017Q1 · 申报于 2017-12-08 来源：sec.gov
- 2017Q4 · 申报于 2017-12-08 来源：sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · 申报于 2017-09-05 来源：sec.gov
- 2017Q3 · 申报于 2017-09-05 来源：sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · 申报于 2017-06-07 来源：sec.gov
- 2017Q2 · 申报于 2017-06-07 来源：sec.gov
- FY2014 · 申报于 2017-03-29 来源：sec.gov
- FY2015 · 申报于 2017-03-29 来源：sec.gov
- FY2016 · 申报于 2017-03-29 来源：sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · 申报于 2016-12-13 来源：sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · 申报于 2016-12-13 来源：sec.gov
- 2016Q1 · 申报于 2016-12-13 来源：sec.gov
- 2016Q4 · 申报于 2016-12-13 来源：sec.gov
- 2015Q3 · 申报于 2016-09-06 来源：sec.gov
- 2016Q3 · 申报于 2016-09-06 来源：sec.gov
- 2015Q2 · 申报于 2016-06-03 来源：sec.gov
- 2016Q2 · 申报于 2016-06-03 来源：sec.gov
- FY2013 · 申报于 2016-03-25 来源：sec.gov
- FY2014 · 申报于 2016-03-25 来源：sec.gov
- FY2015 · 申报于 2016-03-25 来源：sec.gov
- 2014Q1 · 申报于 2015-12-11 来源：sec.gov
- 2014Q4 · 申报于 2015-12-11 来源：sec.gov
- 2015Q1 · 申报于 2015-12-11 来源：sec.gov
- 2015Q4 · 申报于 2015-12-11 来源：sec.gov
关键比率与同业对比
正在与同业比较…
13F 无法告诉你的事
- 延迟 45 天以上。持仓是所示季末的状态，最晚可在其后 45 天才申报。
- 只含多头、且限于美国上市品种。不含空头、现金、债券、外汇、境外或非上市持仓；上市期权按名义金额申报，并不计入单个持仓的股票价值。
- 1 亿美元门槛。规模更小的管理人根本不需申报。
- “占 13F 比例”不等于“占管理规模比例”。13F 只是一份不完整的持仓表。
- “已清仓”只表示“不再申报”——未必真的卖出了。
- 一个 CIK 可能汇总多个子实体。保密处理可以略去某些持仓。
- 被动指数申报人 不是投资大师。他们的 13F 变动是指数资金流，因此已被排除在 TradingPilot 的聪明钱信号之外。
- 量化机构须注意。量化机构（如 Renaissance）的 13F 是一份只含多头的季末快照，并不反映其真实的高换手、短周期策略。
- 投资大师页面与其持仓从不进入任何信号（无权重）。
尚无标记的新闻。
头条
2026-10-28 Yahoo Finance: P · Everpure Announces Date and Conference Call Information for Third Quarter Fiscal 2027 Financial Results
2026-10-23 Yahoo Finance: P · How Everpure Is Winning Over Hyperscalers In The AI Data Center Race
2026-10-22 Yahoo Finance: P · Everpure (P) Upgraded to Buy: Here's What You Should Know
2026-10-22 Yahoo Finance: P · Brown Advisory Sees Further Growth Potential in Everpure, Inc. (P)
2026-10-21 Yahoo Finance: P · Everpure (P) stock trades up, here is why
2026-10-15 Yahoo Finance: DELL · Everpure Revenues Surge 38% in Q2: Can Growth Momentum Last?
2026-10-14 Yahoo Finance: P · RUM Group, Everpure, WEBTOON, Magnite, and Kyndryl Shares Are Falling, What You Need To Know
2026-10-09 Yahoo Finance: P · Everpure Stock Surges 147% in Six Months: Is It Still a Buy?
2026-10-09 Yahoo Finance: P · What Are Everpure Investors Betting On?
2026-10-01 Yahoo Finance: P · Everpure Stock Is September’s Surprise S&P 500 Winner, Surging More Than 40% As Retail Piles In
2026-10-01 Yahoo Finance: P · Everpure (P), Why Is It Drawing Fresh Attention Today?
2026-09-30 Yahoo Finance: P · Is Everpure (P) Quietly Turning Its Data Platform Into an AI Cost and Risk Control Hub?
2026-09-30 Yahoo Finance: P · Everpure (P) Stock Looks Below Fair Value Despite Its 4x Run
2026-09-30 Yahoo Finance: P · Everpure (P) Unveils AI Data Platform Upgrades With Faster Inference And Privacy Controls
2026-09-30 PR Newswire Aerospace/Defense · Everpure Announces New Data Management Capabilities for Production AI at Scale
2026-09-30 Yahoo Finance: P · Everpure Announces New Data Management Capabilities for Production AI at Scale
影响 = 公司显著度层级（高/中由图谱中心度与规模自动判定；低仅用于人工整理的次要事件），不是对波动幅度的预测。
即将到来
| 日期 | 类型 | 事件 | 影响 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-12-04 | 财报 | Everpure, Inc. earnings (estimated) — Date not yet announced — estimated from EDGAR filing cadence (last periodic filing + 91/365 days); confirm via IR. 预估 | 中 |
已过去
| 日期 | 事件 | 影响 | 结果 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-26 | Everpure, Inc. earnings 已确认 | 中 | 每股收益超预期 · -8.9% |